Search FAA Documents

47 results found (894ms)

Sort by: Date AD Number

2013-16-10

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard Division and Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Propellers

Unsafe Condition: The amount of corrosion detected during major inspections (MI) could result in propeller failure and loss of airplane control.

Effective: Sep 19, 2013 Category: propeller Compliance: Within 45 days after the effective date of this AD for Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation propeller ...

Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard Division and Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

2004-12-10

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Formerly Hamilton Standard Division) Model 568F Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Reports of propeller blades found at inspection with random areas of missing adhesive under the compression wrap, which exposed the steel tulip part of the blade, leading to potential corrosion-ind...

Effective: Jul 19, 2004 Category: propeller Compliance: Within the compliance times specified in Table 1 of the AD, with some blades due by December 31, ...

Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Formerly Hamilton Standard Division) Model 568F Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

Amdt-39-10920

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard 54H60 Series Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Insufficient cold rolling of the beveled radius of the blade flange can lead to propeller blade cracks, potentially resulting in blade separation and damage to the aircraft.

Effective: Dec 18, 1998 Category: propeller Compliance: Before further flight
Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

98-24-34

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard 54H60 Series Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Propeller blade cracks due to incomplete cold rolling during manufacture in the beveled radius area of the blade flange, which can result in blade separation and damage to the aircraft.

Effective: Dec 18, 1998 Category: propeller Compliance: Within 100 hours time in service after the effective date or prior to September 30, 2002, whichev...

Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard 54H60 Series Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

97-13-07

final rule

Hamilton Standard 54H60 Series Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Propeller blade fracture due to a manufacturing defect in the beveled radius of the blade root, which could result in blade separation and loss of control of the aircraft.

Effective: Jul 14, 1997 Category: propeller Compliance: Within 50 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD

Why matched: Hamilton Standard 54H60 Series Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

Amdt-39-10054

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard 54H60 Series Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Propeller blade fracture due to manufacturing defect could result in blade separation and loss of control.

Effective: Jul 14, 1997 Category: propeller Compliance: Before further flight
Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

96-25-20

final rule

Hamilton Standard 14RF and 14SF Series, and Hamilton Standard/British Aerospace Model 6/5500/F Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Failure of critical control components, including transfer tube assemblies, actuator assemblies, and propeller control units (PCUs), could result in loss of propeller control and subsequent loss of...

Effective: Feb 7, 1997 Category: propeller Compliance: within 6,000 hours time in service (TIS), or 3 years, whichever occurs first, after the effective...

Why matched: Hamilton Standard 14RF and 14SF Series, and Hamilton Standard/British Aerospace Model 6/5500/F Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

96-08-01 R1

final rule

Hamilton Standard Model 14RF-9 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Propeller blade separation due to propeller blade shank cracking caused by mechanical damage induced from a localized interference condition between the blade spar and foam mold during manufacture.

Effective: Aug 2, 1996 Category: propeller Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

Why matched: Hamilton Standard Model 14RF-9 Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

Amdt-39-9705

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard Model 14RF-9 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: propeller blade separation due to propeller blade shank cracking that can result in loss of control of the aircraft

Effective: Aug 2, 1996 Category: propeller
Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

96-08-02

final rule

Hamilton Standard Models 14RF-9, 14RF-19, 14RF-21; and 14SF-5, 14SF-7, 14SF-11, 14SFL11, 14SF-15, 14SF-17, 14SF-19, and 14SF-23; and Hamilton Standard/British Aerospace 6/5500/F Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Separation of a propeller blade due to cracks initiating in the blade taper bore, which can result in aircraft damage and possible loss of aircraft control.

Effective: May 9, 1996 Category: propeller Compliance: No later than July 31, 1996 for Model 14RF-9 and February 28, 1997 for other affected propeller m...

Why matched: Hamilton Standard Models 14RF-9, 14RF-19, 14RF-21; and 14SF-5, 14SF-7, 14SF-11, 14SFL11, 14SF-15, 14SF-17, 14SF-19, and 14SF-23; and Hamilton Standard/British Aerospace 6/5500/F Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

95-22-12

final rule

Hamilton Standard 14RF, 247F, 14SF, and 6/5500/F Series Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Control Unit Servo Ballscrew Internal Spline Assembly

Effective: May 6, 1996 Category: propeller

Why matched: Hamilton Standard 14RF, 247F, 14SF, and 6/5500/F Series Propellers

Amdt-39-9567

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard Model 14RF-9 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Propeller blade shank cracking could lead to propeller blade separation, resulting in loss of control of the aircraft.

Effective: May 1, 1996 Category: propeller Compliance: Before further flight
Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

Amdt-39-9170 Recurring

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Standard 14RF Series, 14SF Series, and Hamilton Standard/British Aerospace Model 6/5500/F Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Cracks initiating in the blade taper bore can lead to loss of a propeller blade in flight.

Effective: Mar 23, 1995 Category: propeller Compliance: Before further flight
Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

94-06-05

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Model 14RF-9, 14RF-19, and 14RF-21 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Propeller hub cracking and loss of engine oil, and possible loss of a propeller blade or hub.

Effective: Mar 29, 1994 Category: propeller Compliance: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Model 14RF-9, 14RF-19, and 14RF-21 Propellers

93-06-06

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Models 14RF-9, 14RF-19, and 14RF-21, and Models 14SF-5, 14SF-7, 14SF-11, 14SF-15, 14SF-17, 14SF-19, and 14SF-23 Propellers, and Hamilton Standard-British Aerospace Model 6/5500/F-1 propellers

Unsafe Condition: Loss of control of the propeller blade pitch due to propeller control unit (PCU) ballscrew quill wear.

Effective: Jul 6, 1993 Category: propeller Compliance: Within 10 hours time in service (TIS) after the effective date; within 30 hours TIS; within 60 da...

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Models 14RF-9, 14RF-19, and 14RF-21, and Models 14SF-5, 14SF-7, 14SF-11, 14SF-15, 14SF-17, 14SF-19, and 14SF-23 Propellers, and Hamilton Standard-British Aerospace Model 6/5500/F-1 propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

81-13-06 R2

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD: Hydromatic (noncounterweighted) propellers with aluminum blades

Unsafe Condition: Propeller blade failure due to corrosion and fatigue in the blade fillet and shank area, particularly under the teflon friction reduction strip and the resin corrosion barrier.

Effective: Sep 15, 1989 Category: propeller Compliance: Within 90 days after July 1, 1982, or within 18 months since last inspection, whichever occurs later

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD: Hydromatic (noncounterweighted) propellers with aluminum blades

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

88-20-08

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Models 14SF-5 and 14SF-7 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Loss of the plastic 'Rynite' blade retaining rings, P/N 785540, and severe damage to the blade retention system with resultant propeller unbalance.

Effective: Oct 31, 1988 Category: propeller Compliance: Within the next 50 hours time in service after May 21, 1987, and thereafter at intervals not to e...

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Models 14SF-5 and 14SF-7 Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

86-01-07

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Models 54H60-77, -81, -123, -125, -131, and -133 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Loss of aircraft control and possible loss of aircraft due to slippage of the valve housing cover input gear when less than 36 pounds of load is applied.

Effective: Jan 17, 1986 Category: propeller Compliance: within the next 30 days after the effective date of this AD

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Models 54H60-77, -81, -123, -125, -131, and -133 Propellers

84-25-06

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Model 23LF-335 and -371 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Cracks in the blades/counterweights could cause possible propeller failure.

Effective: Jan 3, 1985 Category: propeller Compliance: within the next 20 hours time in service or before the next propeller landing reversal, whichever...

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Model 23LF-335 and -371 Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

81-12-05

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Model 24PF Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Spalling in the bearing raceway surfaces of the barrel and blade split races can lead to propeller failure.

Effective: Jun 15, 1981 Category: propeller Compliance: Within the next 100 hours time in service after the effective date (June 15, 1981) for propellers...

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Model 24PF Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

79-25-09

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Model 24PF Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Fracture of P/N 738410-1 bell crank and P/N 738405-1 pivot due to cyclic loading.

Effective: Dec 24, 1979 Category: propeller Compliance: Prior to the accumulation of specified hours time in service as outlined in the schedule (3,000 h...

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Model 24PF Propellers

76-05-06

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Models 54H60-63, -81, -91, -111, -117 and -125 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Wear of pitchlock regulator extension sleeve threads resulting in looseness and possible separation of the extension sleeve from the pitchlock regulator.

Effective: Mar 17, 1976 Category: propeller Compliance: Within the next 200 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already acc...

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Models 54H60-63, -81, -91, -111, -117 and -125 Propellers

75-03-05

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Models 54H60-63, -81, -91, -111, -117, and -125 Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Inflight separation of the extension sleeve, P/N 541850, Change B or earlier revision, from the pitch lock regulator assembly resulting in propeller pitchlocking.

Effective: Feb 5, 1975 Category: propeller Compliance: Within the next 100 hours time in service for propellers with 2500 or more hours as of effective ...

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Models 54H60-63, -81, -91, -111, -117, and -125 Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

64-03-03

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD Models All Standard Aluminum-Alloy Propellers

Unsafe Condition: Propeller blades may have undetected damage from impact with solid objects, leading to bending, twisting, or other structural failures that could result in blade separation or loss of thrust.

Effective: Mar 1, 1964 Category: appliance Compliance: before further flight

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD Models All Standard Aluminum-Alloy Propellers

Technical illustration of an aircraft propeller assembly
Problem area Propeller

58-22-01

final rule

HAMILTON STANDARD 6800, 6900, and 7000 Series Externally Surface-Treated Aluminum Alloy Blades (Airfoil Shotpeened and/or Shank Rolled, Including Nickel-Plated Blades)

Unsafe Condition: Two surface-treated aluminum alloy blades fractured during operation due to blade bending which may have a serious detrimental effect on the fatigue strength of a blade.

Category: appliance Compliance: At first blade overhaul after January 1, 1959, and at every overhaul thereafter.

Why matched: HAMILTON STANDARD 6800, 6900, and 7000 Series Externally Surface-Treated Aluminum Alloy Blades (Airfoil Shotpeened and/or Shank Rolled, Including Nickel-Plated Blades)