AD 96-25-07

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes

AD Number
96-25-07
Status
final_rule
Effective Date
Product Category
aircraft
Docket
96-NM-164-AD
FR Citation
Federal Register: December 19, 1996
Technical illustration of an aircraft turbine engine assembly
Problem area Engine

Applicability

TypeManufacturerModelDetails
aircraft Airbus A320-111 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A320-211 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A320-212 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A320-214 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A320-231 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A320-232 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes

Unsafe Condition

The ram air turbine (RAT) could break away from its support leg, which could damage the airplane structure and systems, and could injure ground personnel.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Required Actions

Install a new modified RAT (Modification 24701) in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995. Before further flight, replace the RAT if discrepancies are detected during inspections, and repeat inspections after each functional ground check and in-flight deployment. Alternatively, install the modified RAT within 2 years after the AD's effective date to terminate inspections.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Compliance Time

Within 2 years after the effective date of this AD (January 27, 1997)

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Affected Aircraft

Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, and -232 series airplanes on which Modification 24701 has not been installed.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Federal Register Abstract

Ram Air Turbine

Applicability Source Text

Show captured applicability text from the source AD
AD Final Rules - DRS_96-25-07.html
Copy URL
Print/Save as PDF
Document Versions
 Feedback
Details
AD Number:
96-25-07
Document Type:
AD Final Rules
Docket Number:
96-NM-164-AD
Subject Heading:
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes
Subject:
Ram Air Turbine
Status:
Current
Citation:
Federal Register: December 19, 1996
Citation Publish Date:
12/19/1996
Effective Date:
01/27/1997
Make:
Airbus
Model:
A320-111 | A320-211 | A320-212 | A320-214 | A320-231 | A320-232
Product Type:
Aircraft
Product Subtype:
Large Airplane
Affected AD:
Superseded AD:
94-01-11
Affected By:
Superseded By:
Service/Office:
Office of Primary Responsibility:
CFR Part Reference:
Part 39 [61 FR 66887 NO. 245 12/19/96]
Comments:
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES FINAL RULES: 96-25-07
CITATION:   [Federal Register: December 19, 1996]

PAGE NUMBER:  

DOCKET NUMBER:   96-NM-164-AD

AMENDMENT:   39-9849

AD NUMBER:   96-25-07

SUBJECT HEADING:   Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes

ACTION:   Final rule.

SUMMARY:   This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks of the ram air turbine (RAT), and replacement of the RAT, if necessary. This amendment requires installation of a modified RAT, which constitutes terminating action for the currently required inspections. This amendment is prompted by the development of a modification of the RAT that positively addresses the unsafe condition. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the RAT from breaking away from its support leg, which could damage the airplane structure and systems, and could injure ground personnel.

DATES:   Effective January 27, 1997. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995, as listed in the regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 27, 1997. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, as listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of March 3, 1994 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994).

ADDRESSES:   The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   Charles Huber, Aerospace Engineer, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2589; fax (206) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:   A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 94-01-11, amendment 39-8793 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994), which is applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes, was published in the Federal Register on September 11, 1996 (61 FR 47829). The action proposes to continue to require repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks of the ram air turbine (RAT), and replacement of the RAT, if necessary. The action also proposed to require the installation of the new modified RAT (Modification 24701) as terminating action for the repetitive inspections. In addition, the action proposed to limit the applicability of the AD to only airplanes on which Modification 24701 has not been installed.

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the two comments received.

Both commenters support the proposed rule.

Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact
There are approximately 94 Airbus Model A320 series airplanes of U.S. registry that will be affected by this AD.

The inspections/checks that are currently required by AD 94-01-11 take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact on U.S. operators of the current inspection/check requirement is estimated to be $5,640, or $60 per airplane, per inspection/check.

The terminating modification that is required in this AD action will take approximately 74 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts will be provided by the manufacturer at no cost to operators. Based on these figures, the cost impact on U.S. operators of the modification requirement of this AD is estimated to be $417,360, or $4,440 per airplane.

The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13 - [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-8793 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), amendment 39-9849, to read as follows:

REGULATORY TEXT:  
96-25-07 AIRBUS INDUSTRIE: Amendment 39-9849. Docket 96-NM-164-AD. Supersedes AD 94-01-11, Amendment 39-8793.

Applicability: Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, and -232 series airplanes; on which Airbus Industrie Modification 24701 (as described in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29- 1065, dated February 28, 1995) has not been installed; certificated in any category.

NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent the ram air turbine (RAT) from breaking away from its support leg, which could damage the airplane structure and systems, and could injure ground personnel, accomplish the following:

(a) Perform a detailed visual inspection and an end-float check of the RAT between turbine and leg, in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, at the earliest of the times specified in paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this AD:

(1) Within the next 450 flight hours after March 3, 1994 (the effective date of AD 94-01-11, amendment 39-8793); or

(2) Before and after the first functional ground check of the RAT that is performed after March 3, 1994; or

(3) After the first in-flight deployment of the RAT that occurs after March 3, 1994.

(b) If no discrepancy is detected, repeat the detailed visual inspection and the end- float check after each functional ground check of the RAT, and after each in-flight deployment of the RAT.

NOTE 2: Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, references Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin 600-29-171, dated January 4, 1993, which provides specific descriptions of the discrepancies in paragraph 2 of that service bulletin.

NOTE 3: The discrepancies that are addressed in this AD can only occur during use of the RAT, and not during stowage of the RAT; therefore, it is not necessary to perform the repetitive inspections and end-float checks before each functional ground check of the RAT if the RAT has not been used since the preceding inspection.

(c) If any discrepancy is detected as a result of any detailed visual inspection required by this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the requirements of either paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this AD.

(1) Replace the RAT in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993; and after replacement, repeat the detailed visual inspection and the end-float check required by paragraph (a) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the detailed visual inspection and the end-float check after each functional ground check of the RAT, and after each in-flight deployment of the RAT. Or

(2) Install a new modified RAT (Modification 24701) in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995. Installation of this modification constitutes terminating action for the repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks required by this AD.

(d) Within 2 years after the effective date of this AD, install a new modified RAT (Modification 24701) in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995. Installation of this modification constitutes terminating action for the repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks required by this AD.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

NOTE 4: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(g) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 as of March 3, 1994 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994). Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(h) This amendment becomes effective on January 27, 1997.

FOOTER:

Document Text

Show stored source text (verify against official source)
AD Final Rules - DRS_96-25-07.html
Copy URL
Print/Save as PDF
Document Versions
 Feedback
Details
AD Number:
96-25-07
Document Type:
AD Final Rules
Docket Number:
96-NM-164-AD
Subject Heading:
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes
Subject:
Ram Air Turbine
Status:
Current
Citation:
Federal Register: December 19, 1996
Citation Publish Date:
12/19/1996
Effective Date:
01/27/1997
Make:
Airbus
Model:
A320-111 | A320-211 | A320-212 | A320-214 | A320-231 | A320-232
Product Type:
Aircraft
Product Subtype:
Large Airplane
Affected AD:
Superseded AD:
94-01-11
Affected By:
Superseded By:
Service/Office:
Office of Primary Responsibility:
CFR Part Reference:
Part 39 [61 FR 66887 NO. 245 12/19/96]
Comments:
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES FINAL RULES: 96-25-07
CITATION:   [Federal Register: December 19, 1996]

PAGE NUMBER:  

DOCKET NUMBER:   96-NM-164-AD

AMENDMENT:   39-9849

AD NUMBER:   96-25-07

SUBJECT HEADING:   Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplanes

ACTION:   Final rule.

SUMMARY:   This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks of the ram air turbine (RAT), and replacement of the RAT, if necessary. This amendment requires installation of a modified RAT, which constitutes terminating action for the currently required inspections. This amendment is prompted by the development of a modification of the RAT that positively addresses the unsafe condition. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the RAT from breaking away from its support leg, which could damage the airplane structure and systems, and could injure ground personnel.

DATES:   Effective January 27, 1997. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995, as listed in the regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 27, 1997. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, as listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of March 3, 1994 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994).

ADDRESSES:   The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   Charles Huber, Aerospace Engineer, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2589; fax (206) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:   A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 94-01-11, amendment 39-8793 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994), which is applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes, was published in the Federal Register on September 11, 1996 (61 FR 47829). The action proposes to continue to require repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks of the ram air turbine (RAT), and replacement of the RAT, if necessary. The action also proposed to require the installation of the new modified RAT (Modification 24701) as terminating action for the repetitive inspections. In addition, the action proposed to limit the applicability of the AD to only airplanes on which Modification 24701 has not been installed.

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the two comments received.

Both commenters support the proposed rule.

Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact
There are approximately 94 Airbus Model A320 series airplanes of U.S. registry that will be affected by this AD.

The inspections/checks that are currently required by AD 94-01-11 take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact on U.S. operators of the current inspection/check requirement is estimated to be $5,640, or $60 per airplane, per inspection/check.

The terminating modification that is required in this AD action will take approximately 74 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts will be provided by the manufacturer at no cost to operators. Based on these figures, the cost impact on U.S. operators of the modification requirement of this AD is estimated to be $417,360, or $4,440 per airplane.

The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13 - [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-8793 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), amendment 39-9849, to read as follows:

REGULATORY TEXT:  
96-25-07 AIRBUS INDUSTRIE: Amendment 39-9849. Docket 96-NM-164-AD. Supersedes AD 94-01-11, Amendment 39-8793.

Applicability: Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, and -232 series airplanes; on which Airbus Industrie Modification 24701 (as described in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29- 1065, dated February 28, 1995) has not been installed; certificated in any category.

NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent the ram air turbine (RAT) from breaking away from its support leg, which could damage the airplane structure and systems, and could injure ground personnel, accomplish the following:

(a) Perform a detailed visual inspection and an end-float check of the RAT between turbine and leg, in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, at the earliest of the times specified in paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this AD:

(1) Within the next 450 flight hours after March 3, 1994 (the effective date of AD 94-01-11, amendment 39-8793); or

(2) Before and after the first functional ground check of the RAT that is performed after March 3, 1994; or

(3) After the first in-flight deployment of the RAT that occurs after March 3, 1994.

(b) If no discrepancy is detected, repeat the detailed visual inspection and the end- float check after each functional ground check of the RAT, and after each in-flight deployment of the RAT.

NOTE 2: Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, references Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin 600-29-171, dated January 4, 1993, which provides specific descriptions of the discrepancies in paragraph 2 of that service bulletin.

NOTE 3: The discrepancies that are addressed in this AD can only occur during use of the RAT, and not during stowage of the RAT; therefore, it is not necessary to perform the repetitive inspections and end-float checks before each functional ground check of the RAT if the RAT has not been used since the preceding inspection.

(c) If any discrepancy is detected as a result of any detailed visual inspection required by this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the requirements of either paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this AD.

(1) Replace the RAT in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993; and after replacement, repeat the detailed visual inspection and the end-float check required by paragraph (a) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the detailed visual inspection and the end-float check after each functional ground check of the RAT, and after each in-flight deployment of the RAT. Or

(2) Install a new modified RAT (Modification 24701) in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995. Installation of this modification constitutes terminating action for the repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks required by this AD.

(d) Within 2 years after the effective date of this AD, install a new modified RAT (Modification 24701) in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995. Installation of this modification constitutes terminating action for the repetitive visual inspections and end-float checks required by this AD.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

NOTE 4: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(g) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1065, dated February 28, 1995, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. The incorporation by reference of Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-29-1061, dated April 13, 1993, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 as of March 3, 1994 (59 FR 4562, February 1, 1994). Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(h) This amendment becomes effective on January 27, 1997.

FOOTER:

Source: Official FAA Source ↗

Retrieved: Apr 8, 2026

Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain

This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.