AD 96-12-02

final rule

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes

AD Number
96-12-02
Status
final_rule
Effective Date
Product Category
aircraft
Docket
95-NM-161-AD
FR Citation
This information is not available.

Applicability

TypeManufacturerModelDetails
aircraft Airbus A300 B2-1A Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A300 B2-1C Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A300 B2-203 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A300 B2K-3C Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A300 B4-103 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A300 B4-203 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
aircraft Airbus A300 B4-2C Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes

Unsafe Condition

Stress corrosion cracking in the skin at the longitudinal lap joint at certain stringers of the fuselage, caused by increased stress levels from rework beyond specified limits, could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Required Actions

Measure the thickness of the inner skin at specified fuselage stringers using ultrasonic methods, perform high frequency eddy current inspections for cracking, and repair if limits are exceeded or cracking is found.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Compliance Time

Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD for stringer 57 between frames 65 and 72, and within 6 months after the effective date for stringer 52 between frames 58 and 65. Compliance must be prior to further flight if limits are exceeded or cracking is detected.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Affected Aircraft

Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers 003 through 156 inclusive, excluding Model A300-600 series, where Airbus Modification 2611 has not been installed.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Federal Register Abstract

Inspect Longitudinal Lap Joints Of Fuselage

Applicability Source Text

Show captured applicability text from the source AD
AD Final Rules - DRS_96-12-02.html
Copy URL
Print/Save as PDF
Document Versions
 Feedback
Details
AD Number:
96-12-02
Document Type:
AD Final Rules
Docket Number:
95-NM-161-AD
Subject Heading:
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Ser...Show more
Subject:
Inspect Longitudinal Lap Joints Of Fuselage
Status:
Current
Citation:
This information is not available.
Citation Publish Date:
Effective Date:
07/10/1996
Make:
Airbus
Model:
A300 B2-1A | A300 B2-1C | A300 B2-203 | A300 B2K-3C | A300 B4-103 | A300 B4-203 | A300 B4-2C
Product Type:
Aircraft
Product Subtype:
Large Airplane
Affected AD:
Superseded AD:
Affected By:
Superseded By:
Service/Office:
Office of Primary Responsibility:
CFR Part Reference:
Part 39 [61 FR 28497 NO. 109 06/05/96]
Comments:
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES FINAL RULES: 96-12-02
CITATION:   This information is not available.

PAGE NUMBER:  

DOCKET NUMBER:   95-NM-161-AD

AMENDMENT:   39-9644

AD NUMBER:   96-12-02

SUBJECT HEADING:   Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes

ACTION:   Final rule.

SUMMARY:   This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes, that requires measurements of the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at certain stringers. This amendment also requires inspections to detect stress corrosion cracking in the subject area, and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports of stress corrosion cracking found in the skin at the longitudinal lap joint at certain stringers of the fuselage, which was caused by the increased stress level in the subject area when it was reworked beyond certain limits. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such stress corrosion cracking which, if not detected and corrected in a timely manner, could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane.

DATES:   Effective July 10, 1996. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 10, 1996.

ADDRESSES:   The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2797; fax (206) 227-1149

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on February 28, 1996 (61 FR 7444). That action proposed to require measurements of the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at certain stringers using the ultrasonic thickness measurement method. That action also proposed to require high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections to detect cracking in the subject area, and repair, if necessary.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the two comments received.

Support for the Proposal

Both commenters support the proposed rule.

Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 17 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 32 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $32,640, or $1,920 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13 - [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive

REGULATORY TEXT:  
96-12-02 AIRBUS INDUSTRIE: Amendment 39-9644. Docket 95-NM-161-AD.

Applicability: Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers 003 through 156 inclusive; on which Airbus Modification 2611 has not been installed; certificated in any category.

NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

NOTE 2: Model A300-600 series airplanes are not subject to the requirements of this AD.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent stress corrosion cracking in the longitudinal lap joints of the fuselage, which could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane, accomplish the following:

NOTE 3: Any of the inspections and measurements required by this AD that were performed before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 53-05 (original issue), dated August 16, 1995, are considered acceptable for compliance with the applicable requirements of this AD.

(a) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, accomplish paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 53-05, Revision 1, dated August 16, 1993.

(1) Measure the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at stringer 57 between frames 65 and 72 using the ultrasonic thickness measurement method, in accordance with the AOT. If the thickness is less than or equal to the limits specified in the AOT, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate.

(2) Perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracking of the longitudinal lap joint at stringer 57 between frames 65 and 72, in accordance with the AOT. If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(b) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, accomplish paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD in accordance with Airbus AOT 53-05, Revision 1, dated August 16, 1993.

(1) Measure the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at stringer 52 (left- and right-hand) between frames 58 and 65 using the ultrasonic thickness measurement method, in accordance with the AOT. If the thickness is less than or equal to the limits specified in the AOT, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(2) Perform a HFEC inspection to detect cracking of the longitudinal lap joint at stringer 52 (left- and right-hand) between frames 58 and 65, in accordance with the AOT. If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

NOTE 4: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(e) The measurements and inspections shall be done in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 53-05, Revision 1, dated August 16, 1993. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(f) This amendment becomes effective on July 10, 1996.

FOOTER:

Document Text

Show stored source text (verify against official source)
AD Final Rules - DRS_96-12-02.html
Copy URL
Print/Save as PDF
Document Versions
 Feedback
Details
AD Number:
96-12-02
Document Type:
AD Final Rules
Docket Number:
95-NM-161-AD
Subject Heading:
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Ser...Show more
Subject:
Inspect Longitudinal Lap Joints Of Fuselage
Status:
Current
Citation:
This information is not available.
Citation Publish Date:
Effective Date:
07/10/1996
Make:
Airbus
Model:
A300 B2-1A | A300 B2-1C | A300 B2-203 | A300 B2K-3C | A300 B4-103 | A300 B4-203 | A300 B4-2C
Product Type:
Aircraft
Product Subtype:
Large Airplane
Affected AD:
Superseded AD:
Affected By:
Superseded By:
Service/Office:
Office of Primary Responsibility:
CFR Part Reference:
Part 39 [61 FR 28497 NO. 109 06/05/96]
Comments:
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES FINAL RULES: 96-12-02
CITATION:   This information is not available.

PAGE NUMBER:  

DOCKET NUMBER:   95-NM-161-AD

AMENDMENT:   39-9644

AD NUMBER:   96-12-02

SUBJECT HEADING:   Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes, Excluding Model A300-600 Series Airplanes

ACTION:   Final rule.

SUMMARY:   This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes, that requires measurements of the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at certain stringers. This amendment also requires inspections to detect stress corrosion cracking in the subject area, and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports of stress corrosion cracking found in the skin at the longitudinal lap joint at certain stringers of the fuselage, which was caused by the increased stress level in the subject area when it was reworked beyond certain limits. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such stress corrosion cracking which, if not detected and corrected in a timely manner, could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane.

DATES:   Effective July 10, 1996. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 10, 1996.

ADDRESSES:   The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2797; fax (206) 227-1149

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on February 28, 1996 (61 FR 7444). That action proposed to require measurements of the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at certain stringers using the ultrasonic thickness measurement method. That action also proposed to require high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections to detect cracking in the subject area, and repair, if necessary.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the two comments received.

Support for the Proposal

Both commenters support the proposed rule.

Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 17 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 32 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $32,640, or $1,920 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13 - [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive

REGULATORY TEXT:  
96-12-02 AIRBUS INDUSTRIE: Amendment 39-9644. Docket 95-NM-161-AD.

Applicability: Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers 003 through 156 inclusive; on which Airbus Modification 2611 has not been installed; certificated in any category.

NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

NOTE 2: Model A300-600 series airplanes are not subject to the requirements of this AD.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent stress corrosion cracking in the longitudinal lap joints of the fuselage, which could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane, accomplish the following:

NOTE 3: Any of the inspections and measurements required by this AD that were performed before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 53-05 (original issue), dated August 16, 1995, are considered acceptable for compliance with the applicable requirements of this AD.

(a) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, accomplish paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 53-05, Revision 1, dated August 16, 1993.

(1) Measure the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at stringer 57 between frames 65 and 72 using the ultrasonic thickness measurement method, in accordance with the AOT. If the thickness is less than or equal to the limits specified in the AOT, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate.

(2) Perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracking of the longitudinal lap joint at stringer 57 between frames 65 and 72, in accordance with the AOT. If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(b) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, accomplish paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD in accordance with Airbus AOT 53-05, Revision 1, dated August 16, 1993.

(1) Measure the thickness of the inner skin of the longitudinal lap joint from the inside of the fuselage at stringer 52 (left- and right-hand) between frames 58 and 65 using the ultrasonic thickness measurement method, in accordance with the AOT. If the thickness is less than or equal to the limits specified in the AOT, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(2) Perform a HFEC inspection to detect cracking of the longitudinal lap joint at stringer 52 (left- and right-hand) between frames 58 and 65, in accordance with the AOT. If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair the longitudinal lap joint in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

NOTE 4: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(e) The measurements and inspections shall be done in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 53-05, Revision 1, dated August 16, 1993. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(f) This amendment becomes effective on July 10, 1996.

FOOTER:

Source: Official FAA Source ↗

Retrieved: Apr 8, 2026

Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain

This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.