AD 2017-18-17
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracking of the center section of the fuselage, which could result in a ruptured frame foot and reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect for cracking around certain attachment holes, install new fasteners, and perform follow-on corrective actions if necessary. Modify certain fuselage frames to improve fatigue life of upper frame feet fittings.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A300, A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R series airplanes; Model A300 F4-605R and A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes. Affected by changes in material used for upper frame feet manufacturing.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004-23-20, which applied to certain Airbus Model A300, A300 B4-600, and A300 B4- 600R series airplanes; and Model A300 F4-605R and A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes. AD 2004-23-20 required, for certain airplanes, repetitive inspections for cracking around certain attachment holes, installation of new fasteners for certain airplanes, and follow-on corrective actions if necessary. AD 2004-23-20 also required modifying certain fuselage frames, which terminated certain repetitive inspections. This new AD reduces certain compliance times, expands the applicability, and requires an additional repair on certain modified airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report indicating that the material used to manufacture the upper frame feet was changed and negatively affected the fatigue life of the frame feet. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-603, A300 B4-620, A300
B4-622, A300 B4-605R, A300 B4-622R, A300 F4-605R, A300 F4-622R, and
A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes; certificated in any category; all
manufacturer serial numbers.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43160-43163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19303]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-0451; Product Identifier 2013-NM-253-AD; Amendment
39-19026; AD 2017-18-17]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004-23-20,
which applied to certain Airbus Model A300, A300 B4-600, and A300 B4-
600R series airplanes; and Model A300 F4-605R and A300 C4-605R Variant
F airplanes. AD 2004-23-20 required, for certain airplanes, repetitive
inspections for cracking around certain attachment holes, installation
of new fasteners for certain airplanes, and follow-on corrective
actions if necessary. AD 2004-23-20 also required modifying certain
fuselage frames, which terminated certain repetitive inspections. This
new AD reduces certain compliance times, expands the applicability, and
requires an additional repair on certain modified airplanes. This AD
was prompted by a report indicating that the material used to
manufacture the upper frame feet was changed and negatively affected
the fatigue life of the frame feet. We are issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective October 19, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 19,
2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax
+33 5 61 93 44 51; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e4e6e6eaf0ebf1abe4ecf7f2eaf7f1eda8e0e4f6c5e4ecf7e7f0f6abe6eae8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3b2b0b0bca6bda7fdb2baa1a4bca1a7bbfeb6b2a093b2baa1b1a6a0fdb0bcbe">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet
<a href="http://www.airbus.com">http://www.airbus.com</a>. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
0451.
[[Page 43161]]
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
0451; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-
647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2125; fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2004-23-20, Amendment 39-13875 (69
FR 68779, November 26, 2004) (``AD 2004-23-20''). AD 2004-23-20 applied
to certain Airbus Model A300 B2, A300 B4, A300 B4-600, and A300 B4-600R
series airplanes; and Model A300 F4-605R and A300 C4-605R Variant F
airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on June 15, 2017
(82 FR 27444) (``the SNPRM''). We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on
February 1, 2016 (81 FR 5056) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by
a report indicating that the material used to manufacture the upper
frame feet was changed and negatively affected the fatigue life of the
frame feet. The NPRM proposed to reduce the compliance times for the
initial inspection and the inspection intervals. The NPRM also proposed
to expand the applicability and require an additional repair on certain
airplanes that have been modified. The SNPRM proposed to reduce the
compliance times, require an additional modification, and omit the
requirement for the repetitive inspections. We are issuing this AD to
prevent cracking of the center section of the fuselage, which could
result in a ruptured frame foot and reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2016-0249, dated December 14, 2016; corrected January 10, 2017
(referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ``the MCAI''); to correct an unsafe condition for all
Airbus Model A300 B4-603, A300 B4-620, A300 B4-622, A300 B4-605R, A300
B4-622R, A300 F4-605R, A300 F4-622R, and A300 C4-605R Variant F
airplanes. The MCAI states:
During an inspection in accordance with Airworthiness Limitation
Item (ALI) 53-15-54 on an A300-600 aeroplane, Frames (FR) 43, FR44,
FR45 and FR46 were found cracked between stringer (STGR) 24 and
STGR30 on the aeroplane right hand side. FR45 was also found cracked
on the aeroplane left hand side.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce the
structural integrity of the fuselage.
To address this potential unsafe condition and improve the
fatigue life of the upper frame feet fittings, Airbus issued Service
Bulletin (SB) A300-53-6125 to provide instructions for expansion of
the most sensitive fastener holes between FR41 and FR46. DGAC
[Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile] France
issued AD F-2004-002 (EASA approval 2003-2108) [which corresponds to
FAA AD 2004-23-20] to require the structural modification defined in
SB A300-53-6125 Revision 03 (Airbus modification 12168).
[French] AD F-2004-002 was subsequently superseded by EASA AD
2013-0295 to amend the inspection programme in this area as provided
in SB A300-53-6122 (which is now obsolete and replaced by ALI task
531558, published in the [Airworthiness Limitation Section] ALS Part
2 Revision 01 dated 07 August 2015).
Since EASA AD 2013-0295 was issued, a new investigation was
conducted in the frame of the Widespread Fatigue Damage study.
Airbus revised the thresholds for the accomplishment of the
instructions defined in SB A300-53-6125 and issued SB A300-53-6178
to provide modification instructions to improve the fatigue life of
upper frame feet fittings on aeroplane[s] on which Airbus
modification (mod) 12168 or Airbus SB A300-53-6125 was embodied.
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains some
requirements of EASA AD 2013-0295, which is superseded, and requires
modification of the upper frame feet fittings from FR41 to FR46
[repetitive inspections are not retained].
This [EASA] AD is republished to correct a typographical error
in the compliance time * * *.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
0451.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the SNPRM or on the determination
of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A300-53-6125, Revision 04, dated
March 17, 2015; and Service Bulletin A300-53-6178, dated March 17,
2015. The service information describes procedures for the modification
of certain upper frame feet fittings. These documents are distinct
since they apply to airplanes in different configurations. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 65 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
The actions that were required by AD 2004-23-20 and retained in
this AD take about 90 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate
of $85 per work-hour. Required parts cost about $4,000 per product.
Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that were
required by AD 2004-23-20 is $11,650 per product.
We also estimate that it will take up to 109 work-hours per product
to comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost up to $6,070 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on
U.S. operators to be up to $996,775, or up to $15,335 per product.
We have received no definitive data that will enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of
[[Page 43162]]
the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes
in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2004-23-20, Amendment 39-13875 (69 FR 68779, November 26, 2004), and
adding the following new AD:
2017-18-17 Airbus: Amendment 39-19026; Docket No. FAA-2016-0451;
Product Identifier 2013-NM-253-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective October 19, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2004-23-20, Amendment 39-13875 (69 FR 68779,
November 26, 2004) (``AD 2004-23-20'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-603, A300 B4-620, A300
B4-622, A300 B4-605R, A300 B4-622R, A300 F4-605R, A300 F4-622R, and
A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes; certificated in any category; all
manufacturer serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report indicating that the material
used to manufacture the upper frame feet was changed and negatively
affected the fatigue life of the frame feet. We are issuing this AD
to prevent cracking of the center section of the fuselage, which
could result in a ruptured frame foot and reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Modification of the Upper Frame Feet Fittings
(1) Except for airplanes identified in table 2 to paragraphs
(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: At the times specified in table 1 to
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, depending on the average flight time
(AFT), as defined in paragraph (i) of this AD, modify the upper
frame feet fittings, including doing all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6125,
Revision 04, dated March 17, 2015 (``SB A300-53-6125, Revision
04''). Do all applicable related investigative and corrective
actions before further flight. Where Airbus SB A300-53-6125,
Revision 04, specifies to contact Airbus for appropriate action, and
specifies that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance): Before
further flight, accomplish corrective actions in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.
Table 1 to Paragraph (g)(1) of This AD--Modification SB A300-53-6125,
Revision 04
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial compliance time (flight cycles or
Airplane usage flight hours, whichever occurs first
since first flight)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFT greater than 1.5......... Within 10,200 flight cycles or 22,100
flight hours.
AFT equal to or less than 1.5 Within 11,000 flight cycles or 16,600
flight hours.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2 to Paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of This AD--Modification SB A300-
53-6178
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane configuration Initial compliance time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post-modification 12168...... Within 27,100 flight cycles or 47,300
flight hours since the airplane's first
flight, whichever occurs first.
Post-SB A300-53-6125......... Within 27,100 flight cycles or 47,300
flight hours after embodiment of SB A300-
53-6125, whichever occurs first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) For airplanes identified in table 2 to paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(2) of this AD: At the applicable compliance time specified in
table 2 to paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, modify the upper
frame feet fittings, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6178, dated March
17, 2015. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6178, dated March
17, 2015, specifies to contact Airbus for appropriate action, and
specifies that action as ``RC'': Before further flight,
[[Page 43163]]
accomplish corrective actions in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.
(h) Additional Post-Modification Actions
Prior to exceeding 24,100 total flight cycles or 42,000 total
flight hours, whichever occurs first after doing the modification
required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD: Contact the Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA); for instructions to do additional
actions, and do those actions at the compliance times stated
therein.
(i) Definition of AFT
For the purpose of this AD, to establish the applicable AFT for
the actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, divide the
total accumulated flight hours counted from take-off to touch-down
by the total accumulated flight cycles as of the effective date of
this AD.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the modification required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if the modification was performed
before the effective date of this AD using the service information
specified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), (j)(3), or (j)(4) of this AD.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6125, dated November 8,
2000, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6125, Revision 01, dated
June 13, 2003, which was incorporated by reference in AD 2004-23-20.
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6125, Revision 02, dated
February 25, 2005, which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
(4) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6125, Revision 03, dated
September 13, 2011, which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
(k) Exempt Airplanes
For airplanes on which Airbus Modification 12168 has been
embodied in production: The modification required by paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD is not required by this AD.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a99084e8e7e48498989f84e8e4e6ea84fbecf8fcecfafdfae9cfc8c887cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4fde9858a89e9f5f5f2e985898b87e9968195918197909784a2a5a5eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0249, dated December 14,
2016; corrected January 10, 2017; for related information. This MCAI
may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2016-0451.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-
227-2125; fax 425- 227-1149.
(3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6125, Revision 04, dated
March 17, 2015.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6178, dated March 17, 2015.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6e6c6c607a617b216e667d78607d7b67226a6e7c4f6e667d6d7a7c216c6062"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dfbebcbcb0aab1abf1beb6ada8b0adabb7f2babeac9fbeb6adbdaaacf1bcb0b2">[email protected]</span></a>;
Internet <a href="http://www.airbus.com">http://www.airbus.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 29, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-19303 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.