AD 2014-13-12
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A318 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Silicon particles inside the oxygen generator manifolds, chafed from the mask hoses during installation, could reduce or block the oxygen supply, possibly resulting in injury to passengers when oxygen supply is needed.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Identify the part number and serial number of each passenger oxygen container. Replace the oxygen generator manifold of any affected oxygen container with a serviceable manifold. Perform an operational check of the manual mask release and perform corrective actions if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
All Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of silicon particles inside the oxygen generator manifolds, which had chafed from the mask hoses during installation onto the generator outlets. This AD requires identifying the part number and serial number of each passenger oxygen container, replacing the oxygen generator manifold of any affected oxygen container with a serviceable manifold, and performing an operational check of the manual mask release, and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct non-serviceable oxygen generator manifolds, which could reduce or block the oxygen supply and result in injury to passengers when oxygen supply is needed.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122
airplanes; A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes; A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes; A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer serial
numbers (MSN).
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45317-45322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16706]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 45317]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0807; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-191-AD;
Amendment 39-17888; AD 2014-13-12]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of silicon particles inside the oxygen generator
manifolds, which had chafed from the mask hoses during installation
onto the generator outlets. This AD requires identifying the part
number and serial number of each passenger oxygen container, replacing
the oxygen generator manifold of any affected oxygen container with a
serviceable manifold, and performing an operational check of the manual
mask release, and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct non-serviceable oxygen generator manifolds,
which could reduce or block the oxygen supply and result in injury to
passengers when oxygen supply is needed.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 9, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 9,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail">http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail</a>;D=FAA-2012-0807; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bddcdeded2c8d3c993dcd4cfcad2cfc9d590d8dccefddcd4cfdfc8ce93ded2d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b2a2828243e253f652a22393c24393f23662e2a380b2a2239293e3865282426">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="http://www.airbus.com">http://www.airbus.com</a>. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus
Model A318 series airplanes and Model A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on February 10,
2014 (79 FR 7603). We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on August 16,
2012 (77 FR 49386).
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0083, dated May 16, 2012 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model
A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. The MCAI states:
During production of passenger oxygen containers, the
manufacturer B/E Aerospace detected some silicon particles inside
the oxygen generator manifolds. Investigation revealed that those
particles (chips) had chafed from the mask hoses during installation
onto the generator outlets. It was discovered that a defective mask
hose installation device had caused the chafing.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce or
block the oxygen supply, possibly resulting in injury to passengers
when oxygen supply is needed.
To address this potential unsafe condition, EASA issued AD 2011-
0167 [(<a href="http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2011_0167_superseded.pdf/AD_2011_0167_1">http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2011_0167_superseded.pdf/AD_2011_0167_1</a>)] to require the identification [of
the part number and serial number] and modification of the affected
[non-serviceable] oxygen container assemblies. That AD also
prohibited the installation of the affected containers on any
aeroplane as replacement parts.
Since that [EASA] AD was issued, it was established that the
Models A318-121 and A318-122 were missing from the Applicability of
the AD, and clarification was necessary regarding the affected
containers, which are only those marked B/E Aerospace Systems on the
equipment data plate.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2011-0167, which is superseded, expands the
Applicability by adding two aeroplane models, and provides clarity
by providing a list of affected passenger oxygen containers.
Required actions also include replacing the oxygen generator manifold
of the affected oxygen container with a serviceable manifold, doing an
operational check of the manual mask release, and repairing the
passenger oxygen container if necessary. You may examine the MCAI in
the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail">http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail</a>;D=FAA-2012-0807-0006.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the SNPRM (79 FR 7603, February 10,
2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.
``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This AD
Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any
[[Page 45318]]
actions approved by the State of Design Authority (or its delegated
agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
In the SNPRM (79 FR 7603, February 10, 2014), we proposed to
prevent the use of repairs that were not specifically developed to
correct the unsafe condition, by requiring that the repair approval
provided by the State of Design Authority or its delegated agent
specifically refer to this FAA AD. This change was intended to clarify
the method of compliance and to provide operators with better
visibility of repairs that are specifically developed and approved to
correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we proposed to change the
phrase ``its delegated agent'' to include a design approval holder
(DAH) with State of Design Authority design organization approval
(DOA), as applicable, to refer to a DAH authorized to approve required
repairs for the SNPRM.
No comments were provided to the SNPRM (79 FR 7603, February 10,
2014) about these proposed changes. However, a comment was provided for
an NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR 78285,
December 26, 2013). The commenter stated the following: ``The proposed
wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the interpretation that
Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor deviations
(corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD mandated
Airbus service bulletin.''
This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and
retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a
method approved by the FAA, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA),
or Airbus's EASA DOA.
The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature. The DOA signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are EASA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DOA-authorized signature approval are not EASA-
approved, unless EASA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.
Other commenters to the NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013) pointed out that in many cases
the foreign manufacturer's service bulletin and the foreign authority's
MCAI might have been issued some time before the FAA AD. Therefore, the
DOA might have provided U.S. operators with an approved repair,
developed with full awareness of the unsafe condition, before the FAA
AD is issued. Under these circumstances, to comply with the FAA AD, the
operator would be required to go back to the manufacturer's DOA and
obtain a new approval document, adding time and expense to the
compliance process with no safety benefit.
Based on these comments, we removed the requirement that the DAH-
provided repair specifically refer to this AD. Before adopting such a
requirement, the FAA will coordinate with affected DAHs and verify they
are prepared to implement means to ensure that their repair approvals
consider the unsafe condition addressed in this AD. Any such
requirements will be adopted through the normal AD rulemaking process,
including notice-and-comment procedures, when appropriate. We also have
decided not to include a generic reference to either the ``delegated
agent'' or ``DAH with State of Design Authority design organization
approval,'' but instead we have provided the specific delegation
approval granted by the State of Design Authority for the DAH
throughout this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM (79 FR 7603, February 10, 2014) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM (79 FR 7603, February 10, 2014).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 22 airplanes of U.S. registry.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement (The average number of 3 work-hours x $85 per $0 $255 $5,610
oxygen containers per airplane is hour = $255.
50.).
Operational check..................... 3 work-hours x $85 per 0 255 5,610
hour = $255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45319]]
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
repairs:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair (from operational check)............... 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 $0 $85
Repair (from part number check of the 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 0 85
passenger oxygen container).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail">http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail</a>;D=FAA-2012-0807; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2014-13-12 Airbus: Amendment 39-17888. Docket No. FAA-2012-0807;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-191-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective September 9, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122
airplanes; A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes; A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes; A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer serial
numbers (MSN).
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of silicon particles inside the
oxygen generator manifolds, which had chafed from the mask hoses
during installation onto the generator outlets. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct non-serviceable oxygen generator manifolds,
which could reduce or block the oxygen supply, and result in injury
to passengers when oxygen supply is needed.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Part Number and Serial Number Identification
Within 5,000 flight cycles, or 7,500 flight hours, or 24 months,
whichever occurs first after the effective date of this AD, identify
the part number and serial number of each passenger oxygen
container. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in
lieu of this identification if the part number and serial number of
the oxygen container can be conclusively determined from that
review.
(h) Replacement, Check, Repair
If the part number of the passenger oxygen container is listed
in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and the serial number of the
passenger oxygen container is listed in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD:
Within the compliance time specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, do
the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(3), (h)(4), and (h)(5) of
this AD, except as provided by paragraphs (i)(1) through (i)(7) of
this AD.
(1) (Type I: 15 and 22 minutes) 12C15Lxxxxx0100,
12C15Rxxxxx0100, 13C15Lxxxxx0100, 13C15Rxxxxx0100, 14C15Lxxxxx0100,
14C15Rxxxxx0100, 12C22Lxxxxx0100, 12C22Rxxxxx0100, 13C22Lxxxxx0100,
13C22Rxxxxx0100, 14C22Lxxxxx0100, and 14C22Rxxxxx0100; and (Type II:
15 and 22 minutes) 22C15Lxxxxx0100, 22C15Rxxxxx0100,
22C22Lxxxxx0100, and 22C22Rxxxxx0100.
Note 1 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD: The passenger emergency
oxygen container assemblies listed in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD
are products having the mark ``B/E AEROSPACE'' on the identification
plate.
[[Page 45320]]
(2) ARBA-0000 to ARBA-9999 inclusive, ARBB-0000 to ARBB-9999
inclusive, ARBC-0000 to ARBC-9999 inclusive, ARBD-0000 to ARBD-9999
inclusive, ARBE-0000 to ARBE-9999 inclusive, BEBF-0000 to BEBF-9999
inclusive, BEBH-0000 to BEBH-9999 inclusive, BEBK-0000 to BEBK-9999
inclusive, BEBL-0000 to BEBL-9999 inclusive, and BEBM-0000 to BEBM-
9999 inclusive.
(3) Replace the oxygen generator manifold of any affected oxygen
passenger container with a serviceable manifold, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
35A1047, dated March 29, 2011.
(4) Do an operational check of the manual mask release, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-35A1047, dated March 29, 2011. If the operational
check fails, before further flight, repair the manual mask release,
using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-
authorized signature.
(5) Check if the part number of the passenger oxygen container
is listed in B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005,
Revision 1, dated December 15, 2012; or B/E Aerospace Service
Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, Revision 1, dated December 20, 2011, as
applicable. If the part number is listed in B/E Aerospace Service
Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005, Revision 1, dated December 15, 2012; or
B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, Revision 1, dated
December 20, 2011: Within the compliance time specified in paragraph
(g) of this AD, repair using a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA;
or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(i) Exceptions
(1) Oxygen containers that meet the conditions specified in
paragraph (i)(1)(i) or (i)(1)(ii) of this AD are compliant with the
requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(i) Oxygen containers Type I having a part number listed in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and having a serial number listed in
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, that have been modified prior to the
effective date of this AD, as specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005,
Revision 1, dated December 15, 2012.
(ii) Oxygen containers Type II having a part number listed in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and having a serial number listed in
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, that have been modified prior to the
effective date of this AD, as specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003,
Revision 1, dated December 20, 2011.
(2) Airplanes on which Airbus Modification 150703 or Airbus
Modification 150704 has not been embodied in production do not have
to comply with the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD, unless
an oxygen container having a part number listed in paragraph (h)(1)
of this AD and having a serial number listed in paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD has been replaced since the airplane's first flight.
(3) Airplanes on which Airbus Modification 150703 or Airbus
Modification 150704 has been embodied in production and which are
not listed by model and MSN in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047,
dated March 29, 2011, are not subject to the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, unless an oxygen container having
a part number listed in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and having a
serial number listed in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD has been
replaced since the airplane's first flight.
(4) Model A319 airplanes that are equipped with a gaseous oxygen
system for passengers, installed in production with Airbus
Modification 33125, do not have the affected passenger oxygen
containers installed. Unless these airplanes have been modified in-
service (no approved Airbus modification exists), the requirements
of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD do not apply to these
airplanes.
(5) Airplanes that have already been inspected prior to the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047, dated March
29, 2011, must be inspected and, depending on the findings,
corrected, within the compliance time defined in paragraph (g) of
this AD, as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable,
except as specified in paragraph (i)(6) of this AD.
(6) Airplanes on which the passenger oxygen container has been
replaced before the effective date of this AD, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
35A1047, dated March 29, 2011, are compliant with the requirements
of the paragraph (h) of this AD for that passenger oxygen container.
(7) The requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD apply
only to passenger oxygen containers that are Design A, as defined in
figure 1 to paragraph (i)(7) of this AD.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 45321]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05AU14.000
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
Note 1 to figure 1 to paragraph (i)(7) of this AD: Figure 1 is
a reproduction of material from EASA Airworthiness Directive 2012-
0083, dated May 16, 2012. The words ``Appendix 1 of this AD'' in
this figure refer to Appendix 1 of the EASA AD.
(j) Parts Installation Limitations
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
oxygen container having a part number specified in paragraph (h)(1)
of this AD and having a serial number specified in paragraph (h)(2)
of this AD, on any airplane, unless the container has been modified
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of any of the
service information specified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), or (j)(3)
of this AD, as applicable.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047, dated March 29, 2011.
(2) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005, Revision
1, dated December 15, 2012.
[[Page 45322]]
(3) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, Revision
1, dated December 20, 2011.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service information specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005, dated
March 14, 2011, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(2) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, dated
March 17, 2011, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be
emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#053c28444b48283434332844484a46285740545040565156456364642b626a73"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9aa3b7dbd4d7b7ababacb7dbd7d5d9b7c8dfcbcfdfc9cec9dafcfbfbb4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2012-0083,
dated May 16, 2012, for related information. This MCAI may be found
in the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail">http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail</a>;D=FAA-2012-0807-0006.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be viewed at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047, dated March 29, 2011.
(ii) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005, Revision
1, dated December 15, 2012.
(iii) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, Revision
1, dated December 20, 2011.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b2a2828243e253f652a22393c24393f23662e2a380b2a2239293e3865282426"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="274644444852495309464e55504855534f0a42465467464e554552540944484a">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="http://www.airbus.com">http://www.airbus.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 9, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-16706 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.