AD 2011-08-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-601 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-603 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-605R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-620 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-622 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-622R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 C4-605R Variant F | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 F4-605R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 F4-622R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-203 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-204 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-221 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-222 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-304 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-322 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-324 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-325 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) |
Unsafe Condition
The ball screw nut assemblies of the first 70 Trimmable Horizontal Stabilizer Actuators (THSA) manufactured by Goodrich were fitted with an upper attachment gimbal having a thickness of 58 mm (2.28 in), which is different from the design of the final production standard. In case of failure of this gimbal, the THSA upper attachment primary load path would be lost, leading to engagement of the secondary load path, which may fail and result in loss of control of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Identify THSA with a 58 mm (2.28 in) gimbal installed. Perform repetitive general visual inspections to check for engagement of the secondary load path. Depending on findings, take associated corrective actions, including contacting Airbus for repair instructions and performing the repair.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (collectively called A300-600 Series Airplanes).
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22302-22305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8279]
[[Page 22302]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0803; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-124-AD;
Amendment 39-16655; AD 2011-08-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and
Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes, and
Model A300 C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600
Series Airplanes)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
The ball screw nut assemblies of the first 70 Trimmable
Horizontal Stabilizer Actuators (THSA) manufactured by Goodrich were
fitted with an upper attachment gimbal having a thickness of 58 mm
(2.28 in), which is different from the design of the final
production standard. The gimbal installed on the subsequent THSAs
(final production standard) is more robust, having a thickness of
70mm (2.76 in).
During the fatigue life demonstration of the THSA upper
attachment primary load path elements, only a gimbal having a
thickness of 70mm (2.76 in) was used. Thereafter, no additional
justification work to demonstrate the robustness of the upper
attachment fitted with a gimbal of 58 mm was accomplished. In case
of failure of this gimbal, the THSA upper attachment primary load
path would be lost and the THSA upper attachment secondary load path
would engage.
Because the upper attachment secondary load path will only
withstand the loads for a limited period of time, the condition
where it would be engaged and not detected could lead to failure of
the secondary load path, which would likely result in loss of
control of the aeroplane.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May 26, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 23, 2010 (75
FR 51698). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
The ball screw nut assemblies of the first 70 Trimmable
Horizontal Stabilizer Actuators (THSA) manufactured by Goodrich were
fitted with an upper attachment gimbal having a thickness of 58 mm
(2.28 in), which is different from the design of the final
production standard. The gimbal installed on the subsequent THSAs
(final production standard) is more robust, having a thickness of
70mm (2.76 in).
During the fatigue life demonstration of the THSA upper
attachment primary load path elements, only a gimbal having a
thickness of 70mm (2.76 in) was used. Thereafter, no additional
justification work to demonstrate the robustness of the upper
attachment fitted with a gimbal of 58 mm was accomplished.
In case of failure of this gimbal, the THSA upper attachment
primary load path would be lost and the THSA upper attachment
secondary load path would engage.
Because the upper attachment secondary load path will only
withstand the loads for a limited period of time, the condition
where it would be engaged and not detected could lead to failure of
the secondary load path, which would likely result in loss of
control of the aeroplane.
As the affected ball screw nut assemblies (including the gimbal)
could have been moved from one THSA to another during maintenance
operation and because the change from the old design to the final
production standard design is not identified through a dedicated
THSA Part Number, a gimbal with thickness of 58 mm (2.28 in) can be
fitted on any A310 or A300-600 aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires the
identification of the THSA which have a 58 mm (2.28 in) gimbal
installed, repetitive [general visual] inspections to check whether
there is engagement of the secondary load path and, depending on
findings, associated corrective action(s).
Corrective actions include contacting Airbus for repair instructions
and doing the repair. You may obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Request To Add Notation to Tolerance Measurements
FedEx requested that we add the ``+/-'' notation to the tolerance
measurements in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of the proposed NPRM.
We verified that the NPRM published in the Federal Register
includes those notations, as does this final rule. No change has been
made to the AD in this regard.
Request for Terminating Action
FedEx requested that we consider terminating the repetitive
inspections if the THSA gimbal is ``thick'' (70mm (2.75 in.) +/-5mm
(0.20 in)). FedEx stated that when they removed ``thin'' (58 mm (2.28
in.)) THSA gimbals from four of their airplanes, they replaced them
with ``thick'' gimbals. FedEx also stated that Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletins A310-27A2104 and A300-27A6067, both Revision 01, both dated
May 12, 2010, do not include a terminating action for the repetitive
inspections when the ``thick'' THSA gimbal is installed.
We agree that the repetitive inspections need to be terminated when
a ``thick'' THSA gimbal is installed. Paragraph (i) has been added to
this AD accordingly. Also, the Cost of Compliance paragraph has been
updated to include the on-condition cost of replacing the gimbal.
Request for Change of Compliance Time
FedEx and UPS requested that we change the interval of the
repetitive inspections to 130 flight cycles, 650 flight hours, or 6
months, whichever occurs later. FedEx stated that they are unaware of
any failures of the THSA primary load path on the A300-600, A310-200,
or A310-300 airplanes. UPS stated that they do a detailed visual
inspection of the THSA every 30 months, and have not experienced a
single instance of primary load path failure. FedEx stated that since
the FAA mandates inspections of these THSA on a regular basis, and
FedEx has never experienced a primary load path failure, the compliance
time for the repetitive inspections should be extended.
We disagree. We are not currently in a position to assess the
robustness of the
[[Page 22303]]
primary load path of the THSA fitted with a ``thin'' gimbal. Without
more data on the robustness of the THSA primary load path, we can only
rely on the THSA secondary load path (SLP). Tests of the THSA SLP
demonstrated that an engaged SLP had a low durability. The inspection
interval was determined from the THSA SLP test results. As it was not
possible to determine if the wear rate was mainly driven by the flight
cycles or by the flight hours, it was decided to use a double
compliance time for the inspection threshold and interval. No change
has been made to the AD in this regard. However, operators may request
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (m) of this AD.
Request To Include Latest Revision of Service Information
UPS requested that we include the latest revision of the service
information in this AD.
We agree. Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletins A310-
27A2104 and A300-27A6067, both Revision 02, both including Appendix 01,
both dated October 18, 2010. These service bulletins were revised for
minor changes such as deleting THS zeroing in job set-up and deleting
the THSA functional test in close-up. Changes have been made to
reference Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletins A310-27A2104 and A300-
27A6067, both Revision 02, both including Appendix 01, both dated
October 18, 2010. Paragraph (j) of this AD has also been revised to
give credit for Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletins A310-27A2104 and
A300-27A6067, both Revision 01, both dated May 12, 2010.
Request To Exempt Certain THSAs From Inspections
UPS requested that inspections be exempt on any THSAs outside the
first 70 serial number range provided that the THSAs have not been
repaired, reworked or overhauled. UPS stated that since those were the
oldest THSAs, they most likely have been removed due to the existing
THSA life limit. UPS stated that none of these THSAs were delivered on
UPS airplanes. Additionally, UPS stated that the only way this suspect
gimbal could be on another unit is if it was swapped from one unit to
another in the shop.
We disagree with excluding certain THSAs from the inspection
required in this AD. It is essential that all the fleet is inspected.
Airbus could not determine precisely that the affected THSAs were
conclusively on the first 70 airplanes manufactured, and it is likely
that additional THSAs may have the same configuration. Also, once in
service, some THSAs may have been swapped from one airplane to another
and reliable documentation for the equipment swapping is not always
available. No change has been made to the AD in this regard.
Request To Re-Identify Compliant THSAs
UPS requested a requirement to re-identify the compliant THSAs. UPS
stated that without the requested requirement it is difficult to ensure
continued compliance, especially dealing with spares, loans, or even
new purchases.
We disagree. Although there is presently no requirement to re-
identify the compliant THSAs, compliance is maintained by the warning
introduced in the aircraft maintenance manual. The warning states that
``before installation of the THS Actuator, make sure that the gimbal is
not 58mm +/-5mm.'' No change has been made to the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 170 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $28,900, or $170 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 60 work-hours and require parts costing $50,000, for a cost
of $55,100 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
[[Page 22304]]
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2011-08-05 Airbus: Amendment 39-16655. Docket No. FAA-2010-0803;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-124-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 26,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620,
B4-622, B4-605R, B4-622R, F4-605R, and F4-622R airplanes; Model A300
C4-605R Variant F airplanes; and Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -
304, -322, -324, and -325 airplanes; certificated in any category,
all certified models, all manufacturer serial numbers.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
The ball screw nut assemblies of the first 70 Trimmable
Horizontal Stabilizer Actuators (THSA) manufactured by Goodrich were
fitted with an upper attachment gimbal having a thickness of 58 mm
(2.28 in), which is different from the design of the final
production standard. The gimbal installed on the subsequent THSAs
(final production standard) is more robust, having a thickness of
70mm (2.76 in).
During the fatigue life demonstration of the THSA upper
attachment primary load path elements, only a gimbal having a
thickness of 70mm (2.76 in) was used. Thereafter, no additional
justification work to demonstrate the robustness of the upper
attachment fitted with a gimbal of 58 mm was accomplished.
In case of failure of this gimbal, the THSA upper attachment
primary load path would be lost and the THSA upper attachment
secondary load path would engage.
Because the upper attachment secondary load path will only
withstand the loads for a limited period of time, the condition
where it would be engaged and not detected could lead to failure of
the secondary load path, which would likely result in loss of
control of the aeroplane.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 130 flight cycles or 650 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, measure the
thickness of the THSA upper attachment gimbal, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-27A6067, Revision 02, dated October 18, 2010 (for Model A300-
600 series airplanes); or A310-27A2104, Revision 02, dated October
18, 2010 (for Model A310 series airplanes).
(1) If, during the measurement required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, the gimbal thickness is 58 mm (2.28 in.) +/- 5 mm (0.20 in.),
before further flight, do a general visual inspection of the THSA
upper attachment to determine if the THSA upper attachment secondary
load path is engaged, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-27A6067,
Revision 02, dated October 18, 2010 (for Model A300-600 series
airplanes); or A310-27A2104, Revision 02, dated October 18, 2010
(for Model A310 series airplanes). Repeat the inspection thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 130 flight cycles or 650 flight hours,
whichever occurs first, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-27A6067,
Revision 02, dated October 18, 2010 (for Model A300-600 series
airplanes); or A310-27A2104, Revision 02, dated October 18, 2010
(for Model A310 series airplanes).
(2) If, during the measurement required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, the gimbal thickness is not 58 mm (2.28 in.) +/- 5 mm (0.20
in.), except for the requirements of paragraph (l) of this AD, no
further action is required of this AD.
(h) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD, the THSA upper attachment secondary load path is found to
be engaged, before further flight, contact Airbus for repair
instructions and do the repair.
Optional Terminating Action
(i) Replacing the gimbal with a ``thick'' gimbal (70 mm (2.75
in.) +/- 5mm (0.20 in)), in accordance with Goodrich Actuation
Systems Component Maintenance Manual with Illustrated Parts List,
Horizontal Stabilizer Actuator P/N 47142 Series, Document 27-44-13,
Revision 8, dated December 12, 2008, is a terminating action for the
requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, except as required by
paragraph (l) of this AD.
Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Issue of Service
Bulletin
(j) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD,
in accordance with the applicable service bulletins specified in
Table 1 of this AD, are considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding action specified in this AD.
Table 1--Credit Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300-27A6067 (for Model A300- Original............ May 6, 2010.
600 series airplanes).
A300-27A6067 (for Model A300- 01.................. May 12, 2010.
600 series airplanes).
A310-27A2104 (for Model A310 Original............ May 6, 2010.
series airplanes).
A310-27A2104 (for Model A310 01.................. May 12, 2010.
series airplanes).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Requirement
(k) Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative)
of the measurement required by paragraph (g) of this AD to Airbus,
as identified in Appendix 01 of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-27A6067, Revision 02, dated October 18, 2010 (for Model A300-
600 series airplanes); or A310-27A2104, Revision 02, dated October
18, 2010 (for Model A310 series airplanes); at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD. The report must
include the information specified in Appendix 01 of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300-27A6067, Revision 02, dated October 18, 2010
(for Model A300-600 series airplanes); or A310-27A2104, Revision 02,
dated October 18, 2010 (for Model A310 series airplanes).
(1) If the measurement was done on or after the effective date
of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the measurement was done before the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD.
[[Page 22305]]
Parts Installation
(l) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
on any airplane, a THSA, unless it is in compliance with the
requirements of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: The MCAI does not include a reporting
requirement; however, the service bulletin recommends reporting.
Paragraph (k) of this AD specifies a reporting requirement.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(m) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Information may be e-mailed to:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6effb97989bfbe7e7e0fb979b9995fb849387839385828596b0b7b7f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ba2b6dad5d6b6aaaaadb6dad6d4d8b6c9decacedec8cfc8dbfdfafab5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
Related Information
(n) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010-0092, dated
May 21, 2010; Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-27A6067,
Revision 02, including Appendix 01, dated October 18, 2010; Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-27A2104, Revision 02, including
Appendix 01, dated October 18, 2010; and Goodrich Actuation Systems
Component Maintenance Manual with Illustrated Parts List, Horizontal
Stabilizer Actuator, P/N 47142 Series, Document 27-44-13, Revision
8, dated December 12, 2008, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-27A2104,
Revision 02, including Appendix 01, dated October 18, 2010; and
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-27A6067, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated October 18, 2010; to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. If you
accomplish the optional terminating actions specified by this AD,
you must use Goodrich Actuation Systems Component Maintenance Manual
with Illustrated Parts List, Horizontal Stabilizer Actuator, P/N
47142 Series, Document 27-44-13, Revision 8, dated December 12,
2008, to perform those actions unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(The LOEP in Goodrich Actuation Systems Component Maintenance Manual
with Illustrated Parts List, Horizontal Stabilizer Actuator, P/N
47142 Series, Document 27-44-13, Revision 8, dated December 12,
2008, specifies that page 749 is placed after page 748a; the correct
placement of page 749 is between pages 748 and 747a. The LOEP of
this document identifies two pages for the Illustrated Parts List
section; there is only one page for that section (page 1001-1). The
date on page 1014-1 of this document is incorrect; the correct date
is March 6, 1998.)
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bddcdeded2c8d3c993dcd4cfcad2cfc9d590d8dccefddcd4cfdfc8ce93ded2d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e786848488928993c9868e95908895938fca828694a7868e95859294c984888a">[email protected]</span></a>;
Internet <a href="http://www.airbus.com">http://www.airbus.com</a>.
(3) For Goodrich service information identified in this AD,
contact Goodrich Corporation Actuation Systems, Stafford Road,
Fordhouses, Wolverhampton WV10 7EH, England; telephone +44 (0) 1902
624938; fax: +44 (0) 1902 788100; e-mail
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d59484e455d584f5e035a42415b485f454c405d5942436d4a4242495f444e45034e4240"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e09485838890958293ce978f8c96859288818d90948f8ea0878f8f8492898388ce838f8d">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="http://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs">http://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs</a>.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 23, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-8279 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.