AD 2008-06-04
final rule
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B2-1A | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B2-1C | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B2-203 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B2K-3C | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-103 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-203 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-2C | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-601 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-603 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-605R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-620 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-622R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 F4-605R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 F4-622R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-622 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 C4-605R Variant F | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
unsafe condition on an aviation product.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 12, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13078-13081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E8-4480]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28665; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-081-AD;
Amendment 39-15416; AD 2008-06-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Three cases of outer deflector panel found detached or broken
during ground inspection have been reported to Airbus. * * * [A]n
operator has also reported a missing portion of hinge on one panel.
* * * Mishandling or failure of the small portion of hinge located
inboard of the affected deflector panel is suspected to be the main
cause of the deflector damage. This can cause misalignment of the
deflector panel followed by hinge pin migration and possible further
damages to the deflector on flap retraction. If not corrected, such
situation could lead to the loss of deflector panel and injured
people on the ground.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April 16, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 16,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Stafford, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1622; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 10, 2007 (72 FR
37477). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Three cases of outer deflector panel found detached or broken
during ground inspection have been reported by operators to Airbus.
The affected deflector panel is the most outboard of the two outer
deflectors. In addition, an operator has also reported a missing
portion of hinge on one panel. The missing portion of hinge is held
to the structure through one Camloc fastener.
Mishandling or failure of the small portion of hinge located
inboard of the affected deflector panel is suspected to be the main
cause of the deflector damage.
[[Page 13079]]
This can cause misalignment of the deflector panel followed by
hinge pin migration and possible further damages to the deflector on
flap retraction. If not corrected, such situation could lead to the
loss of deflector panel and injured people on the ground.
The aim of this Airworthiness Directive (AD) is to mandate the
one time inspection to detect and prevent damage to inner and outer
shroud box deflectors.
The corrective action includes repairing any discrepancy, or removing
the affected deflector door according to the configuration deviation
list (CDL). You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received.
Request To Refer to Later Revision of Service Bulletin
Airbus requests that we refer to Revision 01 of Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-57-6104, dated April 27, 2007. In the NPRM, we referred
to the original issue of that service bulletin, dated November 7, 2006,
as the appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
required actions.
We agree with Airbus' request to refer to Revision 01 of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-57-6104. Revision 01 of the service bulletin
updates the operator and aircraft effectivity to show the latest
information, and changes the industry support information. No
additional work is required by this revision of the service bulletin.
Although Revision 01 notes that it adds a manufacturer serial number
(MSN) to the effectivity of the service bulletin, that MSN was already
specified in the applicability of our NPRM.
We have changed paragraph (f) of this AD, and Table 1 of this AD,
to refer to Revision 01 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6104. We
have also added paragraph (f)(3) to the AD to give credit to operators
that have done the actions previously in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-57-6104, including Appendix 01, dated November 7, 2006.
Explanation of Change to Paragraph (f)(1)(ii)--Flight Manual References
We have revised paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of the NPRM to specify that
operators must remove the affected deflector door according to a method
approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent). That paragraph also specifies
that one approved method for removing the door is described in Airbus
A300 Flight Manual (FM), Appendix--Configuration Deviation List,
Chapter 6.03.27, dated February 1, 1993; or Airbus A300-600 FM,
Appendix--Configuration Deviation List, Chapter 6.03.27, dated May 1,
1992; as applicable.
This wording makes it clear that there may be other approved
variations of the Configuration Deviation List and, if so, that these
other variations would also be acceptable for compliance.
Explanation of Change to Paragraph (f)(2)--Reporting
We have changed paragraph (f)(2) of the NPRM to specify that
reports are necessary only if any discrepancy is found as a result of
the inspection done in accordance with paragraph (f). We find that
requiring reports for inspections where no discrepancy is found puts an
undue burden on the operator.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect about 167 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
will take about 16 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD for U.S.
operators to be $213,760, or $1,280 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
[[Page 13080]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-06-04 Airbus: Amendment 39-15416. Docket No. FAA-2007-28665;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-081-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective April
16, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 series
airplanes, all certified models, all serial numbers, certificated in
any category; except Airbus Model A300-600 series airplanes from
manufacturer's serial number 0872 onward, which received application
of Airbus modifications 13245 and 13282 during production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Three cases of outer deflector panel found detached or broken
during ground inspection have been reported by operators to Airbus.
The affected deflector panel is the most outboard of the two outer
deflectors. In addition, an operator has also reported a missing
portion of hinge on one panel. The missing portion of hinge is held
to the structure through one Camloc fastener.
Mishandling or failure of the small portion of hinge located
inboard of the affected deflector panel is suspected to be the main
cause of the deflector damage.
This can cause misalignment of the deflector panel followed by
hinge pin migration and possible further damages to the deflector on
flap retraction. If not corrected, such situation could lead to the
loss of deflector panel and injured people on the ground.
The aim of this Airworthiness Directive (AD) is to mandate the
one time inspection to detect and prevent damage to inner and outer
shroud box deflectors.
The corrective action includes repairing any discrepancy, or
removing the affected deflector door according to the configuration
deviation list (CDL).
Actions and Compliance
(f) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, unless
already done, do a detailed visual inspection of the inner and outer
shroud box flap deflectors in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0247, including
Appendix 01, dated November 7, 2006 (for Model A300 series
airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6104, Revision 01,
including Appendix 01, dated April 27, 2007 (for Model A300-600
series airplanes); as applicable.
(1) If any discrepancy or damage is found, before next flight do
the action in paragraph (f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Repair the affected flap deflector in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0247,
including Appendix 01, dated November 7, 2006; or Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-57-6104, Revision 01, including Appendix 01, dated
April 27, 2007; as applicable.
(ii) Remove the affected deflector door according to a method
approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent). One approved method is
described in Airbus A300 Flight Manual (FM), Appendix--Configuration
Deviation List, Chapter 6.03.27, dated February 1, 1993; or Airbus
A300-600 FM, Appendix--Configuration Deviation List, Chapter
6.03.27, dated May 1, 1992; as applicable. The removed door may be
reinstalled once it has been repaired in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0247,
including Appendix 01, dated November 7, 2006; or Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-57-6104, Revision 01, including Appendix 01, dated
April 27, 2007; as applicable.
(2) Report to Airbus any discrepancy found as a result of the
inspection done in accordance with paragraph (f) of this AD, using
the inspection report included in Appendix 01 of the applicable
service bulletin specified in paragraph (f) of this AD.
(3) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6104, including
Appendix 01, dated November 7, 2006, are acceptable for compliance
with the corresponding requirements of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, ANM-
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, International Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1622; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2007-0062, dated
March 7, 2007, and the service information identified in Table 1 of
this AD, for related information.
Table 1.--Airbus Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service information Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57- November 7, 2006.
0247, including Appendix 01.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57- April 27, 2007.
6104, Revision 01, including
Appendix 01.
Airbus A300 Flight Manual, February 1, 1993.
Appendix--Configuration Deviation
List, Page 5, Chapter 6.03.27,
Revision 01.
Airbus A300-600 Flight Manual, May 1, 1992.
Appendix--Configuration Deviation
List, Page 5, Chapter 6.03.27,
Revision 01.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13081]]
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information specified in Table 2 of
this AD to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Table 2.--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service information Revision level Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-0247, Original................... November 7, 2006.
including Appendix 01.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6104, 01......................... April 27, 2007.
including Appendix 01.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 28, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-4480 Filed 3-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.