AD 2007-02-22
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A310 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Corrosion and wear in the splined couplings and sliding bearings of the flap transmission system could lead to damaged, missing, or incorrectly installed components, reducing the functional integrity of the flap transmission system and potentially affecting airplane control.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect for missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed wiper rings in the splined couplings of the flap transmission shafts. Inspect for missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed rubber gaiters and straps on the sliding bearing/plunging joints of the flap transmission. Take corrective action if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours after the effective date of the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
All Airbus Model A310 airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A310 airplanes. This AD requires doing repetitive inspections for any missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed wiper rings in the splined couplings of the flap transmission shafts; inspections for any missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed rubber gaiters and straps on the sliding bearing/plunging joints of the flap transmission; and corrective action if necessary. This AD results from reviews in which the manufacturer determined that the splined couplings and sliding bearings of the flap transmission system could be affected by corrosion and wear. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct damaged, missing, or incorrectly installed components of the flap transmission system, which could result in reduced functional integrity of the flap transmission system and consequent reduced control of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 17 (Friday, January 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3708-3710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E7-1080]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-25966; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-149-AD;
Amendment 39-14909; AD 2007-02-22]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A310 airplanes. This AD requires doing repetitive
inspections for any missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed wiper
rings in the splined couplings of the flap transmission shafts;
inspections for any missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed rubber
gaiters and straps on the sliding bearing/plunging joints of the flap
transmission; and corrective action if necessary. This AD results from
reviews in which the manufacturer determined that the splined couplings
and sliding bearings of the flap transmission system could be affected
by corrosion and wear. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
damaged, missing, or incorrectly installed components of the flap
transmission system, which could result in reduced functional integrity
of the flap transmission system and consequent reduced control of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 2, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of March 2,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France, for service information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Stafford, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1622; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A310
airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on October
3, 2006 (71 FR 58320). That NPRM proposed to require doing repetitive
inspections for any missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed wiper
rings in the splined couplings of the flap transmissions shafts;
inspections for any missing, damaged, or incorrectly installed rubber
gaiters and straps on the sliding bearing/plunging joints of the flap
transmission; and corrective action if necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Request To Revise Inspection Type
Airbus requests that the type of inspection specified in paragraph
(f) of the NPRM be revised from general visual inspection to detailed
inspection. The commenter states that calling the inspection a detailed
inspection would be more relevant because cleaning of the work area is
specified in the service bulletin referenced in paragraph (f) of the
NPRM.
We agree with the commenter. We have revised this final rule to
clarify that our intent is to require a detailed inspection.
Additionally, we have added a note to the final rule to define that
inspection.
Request To Incorporate Service Information
The Modification and Replacement of Parts Association (MARPA)
states that typically airworthiness directives are based on service
information originating with the type certificate holder or its
suppliers. MARPA also states that manufacturer's service documents are
privately authored instruments generally enjoying copyright protection
against duplication and distribution. MARPA contends that when a
service document is incorporated by reference pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 into a public document such as an
airworthiness directive, it loses its private, protected status and
becomes itself a public document. MARPA explains that if a service
document is used as a mandatory element of compliance it should not
simply be referenced, but should be incorporated into the regulatory
document. MARPA states that public laws by definition must be public
which means they cannot rely for compliance upon private writings.
MARPA is concerned that failure to incorporate essential service
information could result in a court decision invalidating the
airworthiness directive.
MARPA also states that incorporation by reference service documents
should be made available to the public by publication in the Docket
Management System (DMS) keyed to the action that incorporates them.
MARPA explains that the stated purpose of the incorporation by
reference method of the Federal Register is brevity; to keep from
expanding the Federal Register needlessly by publishing documents
already in the hands of the affected individuals. MARPA notes that
traditionally, ``affected individuals'' has meant aircraft owners and
operators who are generally provided service information by the
manufacturer. However, MARPA states that a new class of affected
individuals has emerged since the majority of aircraft maintenance is
now performed by specialty shops instead of aircraft owners and
operators. MARPA states that this new class includes maintenance and
repair organizations, component servicing and repair shops, parts
purveyors and distributors and organizations manufacturing or servicing
alternatively certified parts under section 21.303 (``Replacement
[[Page 3709]]
and modification parts'') of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.303). Further, MARPA states that the concept of brevity is now
nearly archaic as documents exist more frequently in electronic format
than on paper.
We understand MARPA's comment concerning incorporation by
reference. The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) requires that
documents that are necessary to accomplish the requirements of the AD
be incorporated by reference during the final rule phase of rulemaking.
This final rule incorporates by reference the document necessary for
the accomplishment of the requirements mandated by this AD. Further, we
point out that while documents that are incorporated by reference do
become public information, they do not lose their copyright protection.
For that reason, we advise the public to contact the manufacturer to
obtain copies of the referenced service information.
In regard to the commenter's request to post service bulletins on
the Department of Transportation's DMS, we are currently in the process
of reviewing issues surrounding the posting of service bulletins on the
DMS as part of an AD docket. Once we have thoroughly examined all
aspects of this issue and have made a final determination, we will
consider whether our current practice needs to be revised. No change to
the final rule is necessary in response to this comment.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Average Cost per U.S.-
Action Work hours labor rate airplane registered Fleet cost
per hour airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection, per inspection cycle...... 3 $80 $240 63 $15,120, per inspection cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2007-02-22 Airbus: Amendment 39-14909. FAA-2006-25966; Directorate
Identifier 2006-NM-149-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective March 2, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A310 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reviews in which the manufacturer
determined that the splined couplings and sliding bearings of the
flap transmission system could be affected by corrosion and wear. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct damaged, missing, or
incorrectly installed components of the flap transmission system,
which could result in reduced functional integrity of the flap
transmission system and consequent reduced control of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial and Repetitive Inspections
(f) Within 2,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD: Do a detailed inspection for any missing, damaged, or
incorrectly installed wiper rings in the splined couplings of the
flap transmission shafts; and a detailed inspection for any missing,
damaged, or incorrectly installed rubber gaiters and straps on the
sliding bearing/plunging joints of the flap transmission; in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A310-27-2099, dated February 17, 2006. Repeat the
inspections
[[Page 3710]]
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight cycles.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Corrective Actions
(g) If any damaged, missing or incorrectly installed wiper
rings, rubber gaiters, or straps are found during any inspection
required by paragraph (f) of this AD: Within 400 flight cycles after
accomplishing the inspection, replace the applicable component with
a serviceable component in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A310-27-2099, dated February
17, 2006.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(i) The European Aviation Safety Agency's airworthiness
directive 2006-0111, dated May 12, 2006, also addresses the subject
of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A310-27-2099, dated
February 17, 2006, to perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by reference of this document in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, for a copy
of this service information. You may review copies at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the
Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr/locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr/locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 16, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-1080 Filed 1-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.