AD 2007-01-11
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-101 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-102 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-103 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-106 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-201 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-202 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-301 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-311 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-315 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-400 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-401 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-402 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of the alternate release mechanism of the flight compartment door, which could delay or impede the evacuation of the flightcrew during an emergency.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Revise procedures for modifying and inspecting the flight compartment door. Reduce the applicability of the existing AD for certain cockpit doors no longer subject to the requirements.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes, with specific applicability reduced as outlined in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD), which applies to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 series airplanes. That AD currently requires modification of the flight compartment door; repetitive inspections for wear of the flight compartment door hinges following modification; and repair or replacement of the hinges with new hinges if necessary. This new AD requires using revised procedures for modifying and inspecting the flight compartment door and reduces the applicability of the existing AD. This AD results from a determination that certain cockpit doors are no longer subject to the existing requirements. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the alternate release mechanism of the flight compartment door, which could delay or impede the evacuation of the flightcrew during an emergency. This failure also could result in the flightcrew not being able to assist passengers in the event of an emergency.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 18 (Monday, January 29, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3928-3930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E7-1200]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-25904; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-077-AD;
Amendment 39-14883; AD 2007-01-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -
300 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), which applies to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -
300 series airplanes. That AD currently requires modification of the
flight compartment door; repetitive inspections for wear of the flight
compartment door hinges following modification; and repair or
replacement of the hinges with new hinges if necessary. This new AD
requires using revised procedures for modifying and inspecting the
flight compartment door and reduces the applicability of the existing
AD. This AD results from a determination that certain cockpit doors are
no longer subject to the existing requirements. We are issuing this AD
to prevent failure of the alternate release mechanism of the flight
compartment door, which could delay or impede the evacuation of the
flightcrew during an emergency. This failure also could result in the
flightcrew not being able to assist passengers in the event of an
emergency.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 5, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of March 5,
2007.
On May 12, 1999 (64 FR 16803, April 7, 1999), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Bombardier
Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `C,' dated September 1, 1997;
and Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `D,' dated
February 27, 1998.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division,
123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada, for service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ezra Sasson, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7320; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD 99-08-04, amendment 39-
11109 (64 FR 16803, April 7, 1999). The existing AD applies to certain
Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes. That NPRM
was published in the Federal Register on September 26, 2006 (71 FR
56070). That NPRM proposed to continue to require modification of the
flight compartment door; repetitive inspections for wear of the flight
compartment door hinges following modification; and repair or
replacement of the hinges with new hinges if necessary. That NPRM also
proposed to require using revised procedures for modifying and
inspecting the flight compartment door and to reduce the applicability
of the existing AD.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments that have been
received on the NPRM.
Request To Publish Service Information/Incorporate by Reference in NPRM
The Modification and Replacement Parts Association (MARPA) states
that ADs are based on service information that originates from the type
certificate holder or its suppliers. MARPA adds that manufacturer's
service documents are privately authored instruments, generally having
copyright protection against duplication and distribution. When a
service document is incorporated by reference into a public document,
such as an AD, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51, it loses
its private, protected status and becomes a public document. MARPA
notes that if a service document is used as a mandatory element of
compliance it should not simply be referenced, but should be
incorporated by reference. MARPA believes that public laws, by
definition, should be public, which means they cannot rely upon private
writings for compliance. MARPA adds that the legal interpretation of a
document is a question of law, not of fact; therefore, unless the
service document is incorporated by reference, it cannot be considered.
MARPA is concerned that failure to incorporate essential service
information could result in a court decision invalidating the AD.
MARPA points out that in another AD issued from a Directorate other
than the Transport Airplane Directorate, the FAA advised that documents
are not incorporated by reference into proposed actions; only in final
actions. MARPA can point to hundreds, if not thousands, of final rules
where the documents were not incorporated by reference-either
intentionally or by oversight. MARPA can also provide hundreds of
references where the incorporation by reference text has been included
in the proposed rule; thus there does not seem to be a consistent
policy from action to action and across all Directorates on how to
handle this issue.
MARPA also states that service documents incorporated by reference
should be made available to the public by publication in the Docket
Management System (DMS), keyed to the action that incorporates those
documents. MARPA notes that the stated purpose of the incorporation by
reference method is brevity, to keep from expanding the Federal
Register needlessly by publishing documents already in the hands of the
affected individuals. MARPA adds that, traditionally, ``affected
individuals'' means aircraft owners and operators, who are generally
provided service
[[Page 3929]]
information by the manufacturer. MARPA adds that, a new class of
affected individuals has emerged, since the majority of aircraft
maintenance is now performed by specialty shops instead of aircraft
owners and operators. MARPA notes that this new class includes
maintenance and repair organizations, component servicing, and/or
servicing alternatively certified parts under section 21.303
(``Replacement and modification parts'') of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.303). MARPA notes that the concept of brevity is
now nearly archaic as documents exist more frequently in electronic
format than on paper. Therefore, MARPA asks that the service documents
deemed essential to the accomplishment of the NPRM be incorporated by
reference into the regulatory instrument and published in DMS.
In conclusion, MARPA notes that ``looking at'' a policy or
procedure is not exactly the same as implementing it. Therefore, MARPA
will continue to comment and request until such time as a decision has
been implemented.
We do not agree that documents should be incorporated by reference
during the NPRM phase of rulemaking. The Office of the Federal Register
(OFR) requires that documents that are necessary to accomplish the
requirements of the AD be incorporated by reference during the final
rule phase of rulemaking. This final rule incorporates by reference the
documents necessary for the accomplishment of the actions required by
this AD. Further, we point out that while documents that are
incorporated by reference do become public information, they do not
lose their copyright protection. For that reason, we advise the public
to contact the manufacturer to obtain copies of the referenced service
information.
In regard to MARPA's request to post service bulletins on the
Department of Transportation's DMS, we are currently in the process of
reviewing issues surrounding the posting of service bulletins on the
DMS as part of an AD docket. Once we have thoroughly examined all
aspects of this issue and have made a final determination, we will
consider whether our current practice needs to be revised. No change to
the final rule is necessary in response to this comment.
Clarification of Paragraph (h) of This AD
We have changed paragraph (h) of this AD to clarify that the
modification required by paragraph (f) of this AD is included in the
inspection requirements in paragraph (h).
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously.
We have determined that this change will neither increase the economic
burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
This AD affects about 167 airplanes of U.S. registry. The new
actions of this AD add no additional economic burden. The current costs
for this AD are repeated for the convenience of affected operators, as
follows:
The modification takes about 4 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour. The manufacturer states that
it will supply required parts to the operators at no cost. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the modification is $53,440, or
$320 per airplane.
The inspection takes about 2 work hours per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of the inspection is $26,720, or $160 per airplane, per inspection
cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
removing amendment 39-11109 (64 FR 16803, April 7, 1999) and by adding
the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2007-01-11 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment
39-14883. Docket No. FAA-2006-25904; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-
077-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective March 5, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 99-08-04.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200 and -300
series airplanes, certificated in any category; equipped with a
flight compartment door installation having part number (P/N)
82510074-(*), 82510294-(*), 82510310-001, 8Z4597-001, H85250010-(*),
82510700-(*), or 82510704-(*); except P/Ns 82510704-502 and
82510704-503.
Note 1: (*) denotes all dash numbers.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a determination that certain cockpit
doors are no longer subject to the existing requirements. We are
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the
[[Page 3930]]
alternate release mechanism of the flight compartment door, which
could delay or impede the evacuation of the flightcrew during an
emergency. This failure also could result in the flightcrew not
being able to assist passengers in the event of an emergency.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of Ad 99-08-04 With Revised Procedures
Modification
(f) Except as required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 90
days after May 12, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99-08-04), modify
the lower hinge assembly and main door latch (Modification 8/2337)
of the flight compartment door, in accordance with Bombardier
Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `D,' dated February 27,
1998; or Revision `H,' dated September 9, 2004. After the effective
date of this AD, only Revision `H' may be used for accomplishing the
modification.
(g) For airplanes on which the modification required by
paragraph (f) of this AD was done before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39,
dated August 30, 1996; or Revision `A,' dated October 31, 1996:
Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, do the
modification required by paragraph (f) of this AD in accordance with
Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-39, Revision `H,' dated September
9, 2004.
Inspection
(h) Within 800 flight hours after doing the modification
required by paragraph (f) or (g) of this AD, as applicable: Inspect
the hinge areas around the hinge pin holes of the flight compartment
door for wear in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-
52-39, Revision `D,' dated February 27, 1998; or Revision `H,' dated
September 9, 2004. After the effective date of this AD, only
Revision `H' may be used for accomplishing the inspection.
(1) If no wear is detected, or if the wear is less than or equal
to 0.020 inch in depth, repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours.
(2) If any wear is detected and its dimension around the hinge
pin holes is less than 0.050 inch and greater than 0.020 inch in
depth, prior to further flight, perform the applicable corrective
actions specified in the service bulletin. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours.
(3) If any wear is detected and its dimension around the hinge
pin holes is greater than or equal to 0.050 inch in depth, prior to
further flight, replace the worn hinges with new hinges in
accordance with the service bulletin. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours.
Credit for Actions Accomplished Previously
(i) Modifications and inspections done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-
39, Revision `B,' dated July 4, 1997; Revision `C,' dated August 1,
1997; Revision `E,' dated May 10, 1999; Revision `F,' dated February
4, 2000; or Revision `G,' dated May 17, 2001; are considered
acceptable for compliance with the modification and inspections
required by this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 99-08-04 are
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of paragraphs
(f), (g), (h), and (i) of this AD.
(3) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(k) Canadian airworthiness directive CF-1996-20R4, dated August
10, 2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39,
Revision `D,' dated February 27, 1998; and Bombardier Service
Bulletin 8-52-39, Revision `H,' dated September 9, 2004; as
applicable, to perform the actions that are required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-39,
Revision `H,' dated September 9, 2004, in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) On May 12, 1999 (64 FR 16803, April 7, 1999), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-52-39, Revision `D,' dated
February 27, 1998.
(3) Contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft
Division, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada,
for a copy of this service information. You may review copies at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC;
on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or
go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 26, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-1200 Filed 1-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.