AD 2006-07-09
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A318-100 A319-100 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100 Series Airplanes; Model A320-111 Airplanes; and Model A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuator (THSA) primary load path could result in latent loading and eventual failure of the THSA's secondary load path, leading to uncontrolled movement of the horizontal stabilizer and loss of control of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Conduct repetitive detailed inspections of the THSA attachments for proper clearances, cracks, damage, or metallic particles. Perform related corrective actions if necessary. Report inspection results to the manufacturer.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 20 months of the effective date
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100 series airplanes; Model A320-111 airplanes; and Model A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200 series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100 series airplanes; Model A320-111 airplanes; and Model A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200 series airplanes. This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuator (THSA) attachments for proper clearances, and any crack, damage, or metallic particles; related corrective actions if necessary; and a report of the inspection results to the manufacturer. This AD results from a report that during lab testing to verify the performance of the THSA's secondary load path with a simulated failure of the THSA's primary load path, the secondary load path's nut did not jam (as it was supposed to do). We are issuing this AD to ensure the integrity of the THSA's primary load path, which if failed, could result in latent (undetected) loading and eventual failure of the THSA's secondary load path and consequent uncontrolled movement of the horizontal stabilizer and loss of control of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16203-16206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 06-3062]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22794; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-097-AD;
Amendment 39-14536; AD 2006-07-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100
Series Airplanes; Model A320-111 Airplanes; and Model A320-200, A321-
100, and A321-200 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318-100 and A319-100 series airplanes; Model A320-111
airplanes; and Model A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200 series airplanes.
This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the trimmable
horizontal stabilizer actuator (THSA) attachments for proper
clearances, and any crack, damage, or metallic particles; related
corrective actions if necessary; and a report of the inspection results
to the manufacturer. This AD results from a report that during lab
testing to verify the performance of the THSA's secondary load path
with a simulated failure of the THSA's primary load path, the secondary
load path's nut did not jam (as it was supposed to do). We are issuing
this AD to ensure the integrity of the THSA's primary load path, which
if failed, could result in latent (undetected) loading and eventual
failure of the THSA's secondary load path and consequent uncontrolled
movement of the horizontal stabilizer and loss of control of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May 5, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of May 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department
[[Page 16204]]
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, room PL-
401, Washington, DC.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France, for service information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A318-
100 and A319-100 series airplanes; Model A320-111 airplanes; and Model
A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200 series airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on October 27, 2005 (70 FR 61922).
That NPRM proposed to require repetitive detailed inspections of the
trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuator (THSA) attachments for proper
clearances, and any crack, damage, or metallic particles; related
corrective actions if necessary; and a report of the inspection results
to the manufacturer.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Updated Service Information
Since we published the NPRM, we have reviewed Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-27-1164, Revision 03, including Appendix 01, dated August
24, 2005. The actions described in this service bulletin are
essentially the same as the service bulletin we referenced in the NPRM,
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1164, Revision 02, including Appendix
01, dated March 30, 2005, except for some minor procedural changes in
the order of some steps and when an operator should submit an
inspection report. We have revised paragraph (f) of this AD to update
the reference to Revision 03 of the service bulletin, and have added
paragraph (h) to this AD to allow credit for previous actions done in
accordance with Revision 02 of the service bulletin.
Supportive Comments
Three commenters (Airbus, a pilot representing Spirit Airlines
pilots, and the Air Line Pilots Association) support the AD. Air
Transport Association (ATA) members ``generally support the intent of
the rulemaking.''
Request To Extend Compliance Time for Repetitive Inspections
The ATA, on behalf of Northwest Airlines, requests that we extend
the repetitive inspection interval from 20 months to approximately 21-
22 months. The ATA states that accomplishing the repetitive inspections
of the THSA attachments at intervals of 20 months would put a
significant financial and logistical burden on some operators because
some operators have heavy maintenance schedules that exceed the 20-
month interval. Northwest Airlines, in its comments, also states that
it is not aware of any substantiating data that would limit the
inspection interval and believes the increase in the inspection
interval would not affect the level of safety.
We do not agree to increase the inspection interval. The ATA did
not provide any substantive data to support an increase. In addition,
the manufacturer does not support any increase beyond the 20-month
inspection interval, until it completes additional testing. We may
consider a request for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) if
data is provided to support such a request. This AD remains unchanged
in this regard.
Request To Remove Requirement To Inspect Upper THSA Attachments
The ATA, on behalf of U.S. Airways, states that, if the gap
clearance of the lower THSA attachment is within limits, then an
inspection of the upper THSA attachment is unnecessary. The ATA
contends that if the lower THSA attachment shows no sign of damage,
there would be no additional loading on the upper THSA attachment.
Further, U.S. Airways notes that if the gap clearance of the lower THSA
attachment is incorrect, then the THSA is replaced. Part of the
replacement procedures involve inspecting all of the THSA attachments,
thus eliminating any safety concerns with the actuator or attachments.
We infer that the ATA requests that we remove the requirement to
inspect the upper THSA attachment. We do not agree to remove the
inspection requirement for the upper THSA attachment. The designs of
both attachments include primary and secondary load paths that operate
independently of each other. Therefore, a finding of proper clearance
during the lower THSA attachment's inspection is no guarantee that the
upper THSA attachment is not damaged. This AD has not changed in this
regard.
Request To Allow Credit for Previously Accomplished Inspections
US Airways also requests that we mandate the actions of Airbus
Alert Service Bulletin A320-27A1164, dated September 10, 2004, to
prevent unnecessary work for operators that have performed lower THSA
attachment inspections in accordance with that service bulletin.
We disagree with U.S. Airways' request to mandate the alert service
bulletin. However, we agree to allow credit for the alert service
bulletin as it applies to the lower THSA attachment. Since the
publication of the alert service bulletin and of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-27-1164, Revision 01, including Appendix 01, dated
December 17, 2004, it has been found that an inspection of the upper
THSA attachment is also necessary. Therefore, the actions in the alert
service bulletin and Revision 01 are acceptable only for the lower THSA
attachment. The upper THSA attachment must be inspected in accordance
with Revision 03, dated August 24, 2005, or have been inspected before
the effective date of this AD in accordance with Revision 02, dated
March 30, 2005. Paragraph (i) of this AD has been added to allow credit
for the lower THSA attachment inspection(s).
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
This AD will affect about 700 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
actions will take about 1 work hour per airplane, at an average labor
rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost
of the AD for U.S. operators is $45,500, or $65 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
[[Page 16205]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2006-07-09 Airbus: Amendment 39-14536. Docket No. FAA-2005-22794;
Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-097-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective May 5, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A318-111 and -112
airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -
133 airplanes; Model A320-111 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214,
-231, -232, and -233 airplanes; Model A321-111, -112, and -131
airplanes, and Model A321-211, -212, -213, -231 and -232 airplanes;
certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report that during lab testing to
verify the performance of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer
actuator's (THSA's) secondary load path with a simulated failure of
the THSA's primary load path, the secondary load path's nut did not
jam (as it was supposed to do). We are issuing this AD to ensure the
integrity of the THSA's primary load path, which if failed, could
result in latent (undetected) loading and eventual failure of the
THSA's secondary load path and consequent uncontrolled movement of
the horizontal stabilizer and loss of control of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Action
(f) Within 20 months since first flight, or within 600 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
do detailed inspections of the THSA attachments for proper
clearances and any crack, damage, or metallic particles, and do
related corrective actions as applicable, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1164,
Revision 03, including Appendix 01, dated August 24, 2005, except as
described in paragraph (g) of this AD. Do corrective actions before
further flight. Thereafter, repeat the inspections at intervals not
to exceed 20 months.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
(g) If any metallic particles are detected during the inspection
required by paragraph (f) of this AD: Before further flight, repair
the damage according to a method approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate;
or the Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC)
(or its delegated agent).
Previous Actions
(h) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1164, Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated March 30, 2005, are acceptable for
compliance with the requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
(i) Inspections of the lower THSA attachment done before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Alert Service
Bulletin A320-27A1164, dated September 10, 2004; or Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-27-1164, Revision 01, including Appendix 01, dated
December 17, 2004; are acceptable for compliance with the lower THSA
attachment inspection requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Inspection Reports
(j) Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative)
of the inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD to Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD.
The report must include the inspection results, a description of any
discrepancies found, the airplane serial number, and the number of
landings and flight hours on the airplane. Appendix 01 of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-27-1164, Revision 02, dated March 30, 2005, or
of Revision 03, dated August 24, 2005, is an acceptable method to
comply with this paragraph. Under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements
contained in this AD and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
(1) If the inspection was done after the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If any inspection was accomplished prior to the effective
date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
[[Page 16206]]
Related Information
(l) French airworthiness directive F-2005-051, dated March 30,
2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1164, Revision
03, including Appendix 01, dated August 24, 2005, to perform the
actions that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this document in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, for a copy of this
service information. You may review copies at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at
<a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 22, 2006.
Michael Zielinski,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 06-3062 Filed 3-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.