AD 2004-23-20
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B2 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2, A300 B4, A300 B4-600, and A300 B4-600R Series Airplanes; and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F and A300 F4-605R Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracking in the area surrounding certain fuselage attachment holes, which could result in a ruptured frame foot and reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Modify certain fuselage frames as specified in Airbus Service Bulletins A300-53-0271 and A300-53-6125. This modification terminates certain repetitive inspections.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the earlier of the flight-cycle and flight-hour grace periods specified in the service bulletins.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A300 B2, A300 B4, A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R Series Airplanes; and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F and A300 F4-605R Airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Airbus Model A300 B4-601, A300 B4-603, A300 B4-620, A300 B4-605R, A300 B4-622R, and A300 F4-605R airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive inspections for cracking in the area surrounding certain fuselage attachment holes, installation of new fasteners for certain airplanes, and certain follow-on corrective actions if necessary. This new AD requires modifying certain fuselage frames, which would terminate certain repetitive inspections. This AD also adds airplanes to the applicability. This AD is prompted by the development of a modification intended to prevent cracking of the center section of the fuselage, which could result in a ruptured frame foot and reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68779-68782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 04-25785]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2004-18593; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-21-AD;
Amendment 39-13875; AD 2004-23-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2, A300 B4, A300 B4-
600, and A300 B4-600R Series Airplanes; and Model A300 C4-605R Variant
F and A300 F4-605R Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to all Airbus Model A300 B4-601, A300 B4-603, A300
B4-620, A300 B4-605R, A300 B4-622R, and A300 F4-605R airplanes. That AD
currently requires repetitive inspections for cracking in the area
surrounding certain fuselage attachment holes, installation of new
fasteners for certain airplanes, and certain follow-on corrective
actions if necessary. This new AD requires modifying certain fuselage
frames, which would terminate certain repetitive inspections. This AD
also adds airplanes to the applicability. This AD is prompted by the
development of a modification intended to prevent cracking of the
center section of the fuselage, which could result in a ruptured frame
foot and reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective January 3, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-
0271, Revision 03, dated June 13, 2003; and Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-53-6125, Revision 01, dated June 13, 2003; as listed in the AD, is
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 3, 2005.
On May 7, 2001 (66 FR 17490, April 2, 2001), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-53-6122, dated February 9, 2000.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. You
can examine this information at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at
<a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>, or in person at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-
401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical information: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-
2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
Plain language information: Marcia Walters, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adc0ccdfcec4cc83daccc1d9c8dfdeedcbcccc83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5a8a4b7a6aca4ebb2a4a9b1a0b7b685a3a4a4eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.
Examining the Docket
The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any final
disposition. You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) with an AD to supersede
AD 2001-06-10, amendment 39-12157 (66 FR 17490, April 2, 2001). The
existing AD applies to all Airbus Model A300 B4-601, A300 B4-603, A300
B4-620, A300 B4-605R, A300 B4-622R, and A300 F4-605R airplanes. The
proposed AD, published in the Federal Register on July 16, 2004 (69 FR
42612), would require modifying certain fuselage frames, which would
terminate certain repetitive inspections, and add airplanes to the
applicability.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments that have been
submitted on the proposed AD.
Request To Clarify Grace Period
One commenter requests that we clarify the grace period specified
in paragraph (i) of the proposed AD, specifically regarding the
following sentence:
For airplanes that have exceeded the specified threshold, this AD
requires compliance within the earlier of the flight-cycle and flight-
hour grace periods specified in the service bulletin.
The commenter states that this language could be confusing. In Note
(01), paragraph 1.E.(2)(b) (``COMPLIANCE''), of Airbus Service
Bulletins A300-53-0271 and A300-53-6125, the grace period is described
in terms of flight hours and flight cycles only for airplanes that have
exceeded their ``design service goal'' (DSG). For airplanes that have
exceeded the ``threshold'' but not their DSG, the service bulletins (in
Note (02)) describe the grace period as the earlier of accomplishment
of two service bulletins required by related AD 96-13-11, amendment 39-
9679 (61 FR 35122, July 5, 1996).
We partially agree. For airplanes above their DSG, NOTE (01)
specifies the imprecise grace period ``3,300FC/3700FH for B2, 2900FC/
3900FH for B4-100 and 2,200FC/4500FH for B4-200.'' We added the
sentence quoted by the commenter only to specify that the grace period
must be determined by the earlier of the flight-hour and flight-cycle
values. While ``design service goal'' might have been more precise than
``threshold'' in this context, we referred to these two terms
collectively as ``the specified threshold'' to clarify the compliance-
time conditions of the service bulletins. We have revised
[[Page 68780]]
paragraph (i) of this final rule to clarify the method for determining
the appropriate grace period.
Request To Add Service Bulletin Reference
One commenter requests that we revise Table 1 of the proposed AD to
add Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6122. The commenter provides no
further explanation.
We find that clarification of Table 1 is necessary. Table 1
identifies the service bulletin references for the requirements of
paragraph (i) of this AD. Service Bulletin A300-53-6122 is the
reference for the requirements of paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD.
That service bulletin does not provide information relevant to Table 1.
We have not changed the final rule regarding this issue.
Request To Approve Future Service Information
One commenter requests that we revise the proposed AD to indicate
that any approved revisions of the identified service bulletins are
acceptable, as stated in the parallel French airworthiness directives
F-224-001 and F-224-002, both dated January 7, 2004.
We cannot accept as-yet unpublished service documents for
compliance with the requirements of an AD. Referring to an unavailable
service bulletin in an AD violates Office of the Federal Register
regulations for approving materials that are incorporated by reference.
We have not changed the final rule regarding this issue. However, under
the provisions of paragraph (k)(1) of this final rule, affected
operators may request approval to use a later revision of the
referenced service bulletin as an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC).
Request To Clarify Repair Approval
One commenter requests that we revise paragraphs (j) and (k) of the
proposed AD to clarify the acceptability of DGAC-or Airbus-approved
repairs. The commenter points out that such explicit approval would
eliminate the processing time and work duplication for requests for
AMOCs if an approval by DGAC or its agent is available. We infer that
the commenter is requesting that paragraph (k) of this AD provide
explicit approval of repairs done in accordance with a method approved
by the DGAC, as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
We do not agree. We cannot allow operators to contact the
manufacturer for repair instructions; to do so would be delegating our
rulemaking authority to the manufacturer. Furthermore, we do not agree
that clarification is necessary regarding approvals for repairs
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD, which specifically allows repair
approval by the DGAC or its delegated agent. Concerning paragraph (k)
of this AD, AMOCs must be approved by the FAA.
Request To Approve Alternative Materials
One commenter reports that the oversize fasteners (specified in
Airbus Service Bulletins A300-53-0271 and A300-53-6125) may be
difficult to obtain. The commenter therefore requests that we revise
the proposed AD to approve use of the alternative substitute fasteners
listed in the Airbus Structural Repair Manual (SRM) or the Airbus
Process and Materials Specification Manual.
We do not find it necessary to revise the AD regarding this issue.
Because the service bulletins refer to the appropriate sections of the
applicable Airbus SRM, the specific substitute parts listed in the SRM
are considered acceptable for any repair or modification required by
this AD.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments that have been submitted, and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described
previously. We have determined that these changes will neither increase
the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor Number of U.S.-
Action Model Work rate per Parts cost Cost per airplane registered Fleet cost
hours hour airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.................... A300-600 6 $65 None required....... $390, per inspection.......... 106 $41,340, per
inspection.
Modification.................. A300 90 65 2,000............... 7,850......................... 24 188,400.
Modification.................. A300-600 56 65 4,000............... 7,640......................... 106 809,840.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
[[Page 68781]]
2004-23-20 Airbus: Amendment 39-13875. Docket No. FAA-2004-18593;
Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-21-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective January 3, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2001-06-10, amendment 39-12157.
Paragraph (i) of this AD terminates certain requirements of AD 96-
13-11, amendment 39-9679.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A300 B2, A300 B4, A300
B4-600, and A300 B4-600R series airplanes; and all Airbus Model A300
C4-605R Variant F and A300 F4-605R airplanes; certificated in any
category; except those airplanes modified by Airbus Modification
12168.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by the development of a modification
intended to prevent cracking of the center section of the fuselage,
which could result in a ruptured frame foot and reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD 2001-06-10
Inspections
(f) For Model A300 B4-600 and A300 B4-600R series airplanes, and
Model A300 C4-605R Variant F and A300 F4-605R airplanes: Perform a
high-frequency eddy-current or rototest inspection to detect
cracking in the area surrounding the frame feet attachment holes
between fuselage frames (FR) 41 and FR46 from stringers 24 to 28,
left- and right-hand sides, in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-53-6122, dated February 9, 2000, at the time specified
in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2), as applicable.
(1) For airplanes on which Task 53-15-54 in Maintenance Review
Board Document (MRBD), Revision 3, dated April 1998, has not been
accomplished as of May 7, 2001 (the effective date of AD 2001-06-
10): Perform the inspection at the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Prior to the accumulation of the total flight-cycle or
flight-hour threshold, whichever occurs first, specified in
paragraph 1.E. (``Compliance'') of the service bulletin; or
(ii) Within the applicable grace period specified in paragraph
1.E. (``Compliance'') of the service bulletin.
(2) For airplanes on which Task 53-15-54 in the MRBD, Revision
3, dated April 1998, has been accomplished as of May 7, 2001:
Perform the next repetitive inspection at the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within the flight-cycle or flight-hour interval, whichever
occurs first, specified in paragraph 1.E. (``Compliance'') of the
service bulletin, following the latest inspection accomplished in
accordance with the MRBD; or
(ii) Within the grace period specified in paragraph 1.E.
(``Compliance'') of the service bulletin.
(g) For airplanes on which no cracking is detected during the
inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD, prior to further
flight, install new fasteners as applicable, in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6122, dated February 9, 2000; and
repeat the inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD
thereafter at intervals not to exceed the applicable intervals
specified in paragraph 1.E. (``Compliance'') of the service
bulletin, until the actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD
have been done.
Corrective Actions
(h) For airplanes on which cracking is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD: Prior to further
flight, except as required by paragraph (j) of this AD, accomplish
corrective actions (e.g., performing rotating probe inspections,
reaming out cracks, cold working fastener holes, and installing
oversized fasteners) in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-53-6122, dated February 9, 2000. Repeat the inspection required
by paragraph (f) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed
the applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.E.
(``Compliance'') of the service bulletin, until the actions required
by paragraph (i) of this AD have been done.
New Requirements of This AD
Modification: All Airplanes
(i) For all airplanes: Within the compliance times specified in
paragraph 1.E. of the applicable service bulletin listed in Table 1
of this AD, modify the fuselage frames in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin. For
airplanes that have exceeded their design service goal, as specified
in NOTE (01) of paragraph 1.E. of the service bulletin, this AD
requires compliance within the earlier of the flight-cycle and
flight-hour grace periods specified in the service bulletin.
Table 1.--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revision level(s) also
Airbus service acceptable for compliance
Airplane model bulletin Required revision level if done before the
effective date of this AD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300 B2 and A300 B4 series airplanes... A300-53-0271 Revision 03, dated June Original, dated September
13, 2003. 10, 1991.
Revision 01, dated
February 16, 1993.
Revision 02, dated July
13, 2000.
A300 B4-600 and A300 B4-600R series A300-53-6125 Revision 01, dated June Original, dated November
airplanes, and A300 C4-605 Variant F 13, 2003. 8, 2000.
and A300 F4-605R airplanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) For the affected Model A300 B4-600 series airplanes:
Accomplishment of the modification terminates the requirements of
this AD.
(2) For Model A300 B2 and A300 B4 series airplanes:
Accomplishment of the modification terminates certain repetitive
inspections required by AD 96-13-11, i.e., inspections of the frame
feet holes for frames 41 to 46 (as specified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-53-0345) and frames 48 to 54 (as specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-53-238). However, the repetitive inspections
of the frame foot angle radius (as specified in Service Bulletin
A300-53-238), which are required by AD 96-13-11, must continue.
Exceptions to Service Bulletin Procedures
(j) During any inspection required by this AD, if the applicable
service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
appropriate instructions: Before further flight, perform applicable
corrective action in accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile
(DGAC) (or its delegated agent).
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, has the
authority to approve alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2001-06-10,
amendment 39-12157, are approved as AMOCs with the corresponding
requirements of this AD.
Related Information
(l) French airworthiness directives F-2004-001 and F-2004-002,
both dated January 7, 2004, also address the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) Unless the AD specifies otherwise, you must use the service
information that is
[[Page 68782]]
specified in Table 2 of this AD to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, as applicable.
Table 2.--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service bulletin Revision level Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53- 03................................... June 13, 2003.
0271.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53- Original............................. February 9, 2000.
6122.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53- 01................................... June 13, 2003.
6125.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-53-0271, Revision 03, dated June 13, 2003; and Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-53-6125, Revision 01, dated June 13, 2003; is approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) On May 7, 2001 (66 FR 17490, April 2, 2001), the Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6122, dated February 9, 2000.
(3) For copies of the service information, contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may
be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 10, 2004.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-25785 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.