AD 2002-08-51
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B2 B4 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes Equipped With General Electric CF6-50 Engines |
| engine | General Electric | CF6-50 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes Equipped With General Electric CF6-50 Engines |
Unsafe Condition
Uncommanded in-flight deployment of a thrust reverser, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Deactivate both thrust reversers and revise the airplane flight manual (AFM) to require performance penalties during certain takeoff conditions.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes equipped with General Electric CF6-50 engines.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment adopting airworthiness directive (AD) 2002-08-51 that was sent previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes equipped with General Electric CF6-50 engines by individual notices. This AD requires deactivating both thrust reversers and revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to require performance penalties during certain takeoff conditions to ensure that safe and appropriate performance is achieved for airplanes on which both thrust reversers have been deactivated. This action is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent uncommanded in-flight deployment of a thrust reverser, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 1, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21569-21572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 02-10245]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002-NM-107-AD; Amendment 39-12728; AD 2002-08-51]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series
Airplanes Equipped With General Electric CF6-50 Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment
adopting airworthiness directive (AD) 2002-08-51 that was sent
previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Airbus Model A300
B2 and B4 series airplanes equipped with General Electric CF6-50
engines by individual notices. This AD requires deactivating both
thrust reversers and revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to
require performance penalties during certain takeoff conditions to
ensure that safe and appropriate performance is achieved for airplanes
on which both thrust reversers have been deactivated. This action is
prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information
by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by
this AD are intended to prevent uncommanded in-flight deployment of a
thrust reverser, which could result in reduced controllability of the
airplane.
DATES: Effective May 6, 2002, to all persons except those persons to
whom it was made immediately effective by emergency AD 2002-08-51,
issued April 8, 2002, which contained the requirements of this
amendment.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of May 6, 2002.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before May 31, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2002-NM-107-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal
[[Page 21570]]
holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232. Comments
may also be sent via the Internet using the following address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0e9fdb1bebdfdb9b1a2b3bfbdbdb5bea490b6b1b1feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ca5b1fdf2f1b1f5fdeefff3f1f1f9f2e8dcfafdfdb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must contain
``Docket No. 2002-NM-107-AD'' in the subject line and need not be
submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or
ASCII text.
The applicable service information may be obtained from Airbus
Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2797; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 8, 2002, the FAA issued emergency
AD 2002-08-51, which is applicable to Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4
series airplanes equipped with General Electric CF6-50 engines.
The FAA has received a report that, on February 16, 2002,
uncommanded deployment of a thrust reverser occurred on the number 1
engine of a McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-30 airplane equipped with
General Electric CF6-50 engines. The uncommanded deployment occurred
following climb and level-out at 17,000 feet. The flightcrew reported
severe buffeting of the airplane with yaw to the left and pitch down of
about five degrees. The ``REV UNLOCK'' light was illuminated prior to
onset of the buffeting. The flightcrew shut down the engine, dumped
fuel, turned back to the departure airport, and landed the airplane. No
injuries were reported among passengers or crew.
Uncommanded deployment of a thrust reverser with a dual translating
cowl requires a minimum of two failures: (1) The over pressure shut-off
valve (OPSOV) must let pressure enter into the thrust reverser
actuation system; and (2) the directional pilot valve (DPV) must
command this pressure in the deploy direction. The cause of the
presence of pressure in the thrust reverser system has not been
determined.
Results of a subsequent investigation by the engine manufacturer
revealed that the DPV was misassembled during overhaul by the DPV
manufacturer in 1997. The DPV was installed on the incident airplane in
1999. The misassembly involved incorrect installation of a washer and
bushing in the DPV piston/poppet assembly. Results of vibration-table
testing showed that a DPV misassembled in this way could change
positions from ``stow command'' to ``deploy command'' on its own. When
a DPV is in the ``deploy command'' position, a single failure of the
OPSOV could result in an uncommanded deployment of the thrust reverser
during flight. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes equipped with General
Electric CF6-50 engines have the same nacelle and thrust reverser
system as the airplane on which the event described previously
occurred. Since a misassembled DPV may be installed on Model A300 B2
and B4 series airplanes, those airplanes may be subject to the unsafe
condition identified in this AD.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex (AOT) A300/78A0023, dated
April 5, 2002, which describes procedures for deactivating both thrust
reversers on Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes. The Direction
Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the airworthiness
authority for France, classified this AOT as mandatory and issued
French telegraphic airworthiness directive 2002-189(B), dated April 5,
2002, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in
France.
Explanation of Change to Emergency AD
The ``Explanation of Relevant Service Information'' section of the
emergency AD states, ``The DGAC * * * issued French telegraphic
airworthiness directive 2001-523(B), dated April 5, 2002, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.'' The number of
the French telegraphic airworthiness directive as cited in the
emergency AD is incorrect. The correct number is 2002-189(B). The
correct number has been cited in the section above as well as in NOTE 4
of this amendment. The date for the French telegraphic airworthiness
directive, April 5, 2002, is correct as cited.
FAA's Conclusions
This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above as it pertains to Airbus Model A300 B2
and B4 series airplanes. The FAA has examined the findings of the DGAC,
reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is
necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Explanation of the Requirements of the Rule
Since the unsafe condition described is likely to exist or develop
on other airplanes of the same type design registered in the United
States, the FAA issued emergency AD 2002-08-51 to prevent uncommanded
in-flight deployment of a thrust reverser, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane. The AD requires deactivating
both thrust reversers in accordance with the AOT described previously.
Additionally, this airworthiness directive requires revising the FAA-
approved airplane flight manual (AFM) to require performance penalties
during certain takeoff conditions to ensure that safe and appropriate
performance is achieved for airplanes on which both thrust reversers
have been deactivated. On an interim basis, this AD includes a penalty
of five percent of the acceleration-stop distance for takeoffs on wet
or contaminated runways. This penalty is an estimate that is necessary
to provide an acceptable level of safety until we receive more
information and a more precise performance penalty can be established.
Since it was found that immediate corrective action was required,
notice and opportunity for prior public comment thereon were
impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and good cause
existed to make the AD effective immediately by individual notices
issued on April 8, 2002, to all known U.S. owners and operators of
Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes equipped with General
Electric CF6-50 engines. These conditions still exist, and the AD is
hereby published in the Federal Register as an amendment to section
39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.13) to make it
effective to all persons.
[[Page 21571]]
Similar AD Action on Other Airplanes
As stated above, the incident described previously occurred on a
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-30 airplane equipped with General
Electric CF6-50 engines. The FAA is planning to issue an airworthiness
directive similar to this one, to require revising the AFM and
deactivating the thrust reversers under certain conditions on those
airplanes. Because the identified unsafe condition may be especially
critical for Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes, the FAA
finds it appropriate to proceed with this action applying to those
airplanes now.
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim action until final action is
identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2002-NM-107-AD.'' The postcard will be date-stamped
and returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2002-08-51 Airbus: Amendment 39-12728. Docket 2002-NM-107-AD.
Applicability: Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes equipped
with General Electric CF6-50 engines, certificated in any category.
Note 1: Airbus Model A300 B4-600 series airplanes (commonly
referred to as ``A300-600 series airplanes'') are not affected by
this AD.
Note 2: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent uncommanded in-flight deployment of a thrust
reverser, accomplish the following:
Thrust Reverser Deactivation and AFM Revision
(a) Within 72 clock hours after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD.
(1) Deactivate both thrust reversers according to Airbus All
Operators Telex A300/78A0023, dated April 5, 2002.
(2) Revise the Limitations Section of the Airplane Flight Manual
(AFM) to include the following (this may be accomplished by
inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM):
``When the runway is wet or contaminated, reduce by five percent
the corrected acceleration-stop distance resulting from the airplane
flight manual takeoff performance analysis.
(Note: This supersedes any relief provided by the Master Minimum
Equipment List (MMEL).)''
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance or
Operations Inspector, as applicable, who may add comments and then
send it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The deactivation of thrust reversers shall be done in
accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex A300/78A0023, dated April
5, 2002. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1
Rond Point Maurice
[[Page 21572]]
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
telegraphic airworthiness directive 2002-189(B), dated April 5,
2002.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on May 6, 2002, to all
persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately
effective by emergency AD 2002-08-51, issued April 8, 2002, which
contained the requirements of this amendment.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 19, 2002.
Lirio Liu-Nelson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 02-10245 Filed 4-30-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.