AD 2001-13-16
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-601 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-603 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-605R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-620 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 B4-622R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 F4-605R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 F4-622R | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-203 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-204 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-221 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-222 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-304 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-322 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-324 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus | A310-325 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Failure of the ejection jack on the ram air turbine (RAT) when deployed at high airspeeds, leading to a loss of ability to properly restrain the movement of the RAT, possibly resulting in damage to the RAT itself and to other airplane components, and reduced hydraulic pressure or electrical power during an emergency.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Within 34 months after the effective date, modify the RAT per Airbus Service Bulletin A310-29-2086, Revision 01 (for Model A310 series airplanes), or A300-29-6048, Revision 01 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes), both dated July 12, 2000, as applicable. No person shall install an ejection jack, part number 730820, unless it has been modified per the specified service bulletin.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 34 months after the effective date of August 6, 2001.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series airplanes, certificated in any category, except for airplanes on which Airbus Modification 12259 has been embodied.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series airplanes, that requires replacement of the ejection jack on the ram air turbine (RAT). The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the ejection jack on the RAT from failing when the RAT is deployed at high airspeeds, leading to a loss of ability to properly restrain the movement of the RAT, possibly resulting in damage to the RAT itself and to other airplane components. In the event of an emergency, failure of the ejection jack on the RAT could also result in a reduction of hydraulic pressure or electrical power on the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34798-34800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-16201]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-261-AD; Amendment 39-12297; AD 2001-13-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and Model A300 B4-
600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600)
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R,
and A300 F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series airplanes, that
requires replacement of the ejection jack on the ram air turbine (RAT).
The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the ejection
jack on the RAT from failing when the RAT is deployed at high
airspeeds, leading to a loss of ability to properly restrain the
movement of the RAT, possibly resulting in damage to the RAT itself and
to other airplane components. In the event of an emergency, failure of
the ejection jack on the RAT could also result in a reduction of
hydraulic pressure or electrical power on the airplane. This action is
intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective August 6, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 6, 2001.
[[Page 34799]]
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate,
Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, ANM-
116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Ave., SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A310 and
Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (collectively called
A300-600) series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
February 14, 2001 (66 FR 10234). That action proposed to require
replacement of the ejection jack on the ram air turbine (RAT).
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the single comment received.
The commenter generally supports the proposed rule, but requests
credit for accomplishment of the modification in accordance with the
original issue of the service bulletins. The FAA agrees and has added a
new NOTE 2 giving such credit.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change described
previously. The FAA has determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 117 Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300
B4-600R, and A300 F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will
take approximately 6 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required
actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. There
will be no charge for required parts. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $42,120 or $360
per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-13-16 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-12297. Docket 2000-NM-
261-AD.
Applicability: Model A310 and Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R,
and A300 F4-600R (collectively called A300-600) series airplanes;
certificated in any category, except for airplanes on which Airbus
Modification 12259 has been embodied.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent the ejection jack on the ram air turbine (RAT) from
failing when the RAT is deployed at high airspeeds, leading to a
loss of ability to properly restrain the movement of the RAT,
possibly resulting in damage to the RAT itself and to other airplane
components and in reduced hydraulic pressure or electrical power, if
such failure occurs during an emergency, accomplish the following:
Modification
(a) Within 34 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
the RAT per Airbus Service Bulletin A310-29-2086, Revision 01 (for
Model A310 series airplanes), or A300-29-6048, Revision 01 (for
Model A300-600 series airplanes), both dated July 12, 2000, as
applicable.
Note 2: Modification of the RAT accomplished prior to the
effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-29-6048 or Airbus Service Bulletin A310-29-2086, both dated
April 6, 2000, as applicable, is considered acceptable for
compliance with the action specified in paragraph (a) of this AD.
(b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
on any airplane an ejection jack, part number 730820, unless it has
been modified per paragraph (a) of this AD.
Note 3: The Airbus service bulletins refer to Hamilton
Sundstrand Service Bulletin No. ERPS03/04EJ-29-1, as an additional
source of service information for accomplishment of the modification
of the RAT and testing of the modified RAT.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
[[Page 34800]]
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The modification shall be done in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-29-6048, Revision 01, dated July 12, 2000; or
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-29-2086, Revision 01, dated July 12,
2000; as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus
Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
Note 5: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directive 2000-284-317(B), dated July 12, 2000.
Effective Date
(f) This amendment becomes effective on August 6, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 21, 2001.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-16201 Filed 6-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.