AD 2001-09-14
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A330-243 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 Series Airplanes Equipped With Rolls Royce Trent 700 Series Engines |
| aircraft | Airbus | A330-341 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 Series Airplanes Equipped With Rolls Royce Trent 700 Series Engines |
| aircraft | Airbus | A330-342 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 Series Airplanes Equipped With Rolls Royce Trent 700 Series Engines |
| aircraft | Airbus | A330-343 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 Series Airplanes Equipped With Rolls Royce Trent 700 Series Engines |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking of the hinge assemblies and the 12 o'clock beam structure of the thrust reverser C-duct, which could cause failure of the thrust reverser hinge, resulting in separation of the thrust reverser from the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the hinge assemblies and the beam structure of the upper extreme edge of the thrust reverser unit C-duct for cracks. If necessary, take corrective action. Perform detailed visual inspections of hinges 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the same area for cracks, and take corrective action if necessary. Repeat these inspections at applicable intervals.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the intervals specified in the Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3006, Revision 05.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 series airplanes equipped with Rolls Royce Trent 700 series engines.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 series airplanes equipped with Rolls Royce Trent 700 series engines. This action requires repetitive inspections of certain components, and corrective action, if necessary. This action is necessary to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the hinge assemblies and the 12 o'clock beam structure of the thrust reverser C-duct, which could cause failure of the thrust reverser hinge, resulting in separation of the thrust reverser from the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23838-23840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 01-11223]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-389-AD; Amendment 39-12221; AD 2001-09-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and
-343 Series Airplanes Equipped With Rolls Royce Trent 700 Series
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 series
airplanes equipped with Rolls Royce Trent 700 series engines. This
action requires repetitive inspections of certain components, and
corrective action, if necessary. This action is necessary to detect and
correct fatigue cracking of the hinge assemblies and the 12 o'clock
beam structure of the thrust reverser C-duct, which could cause failure
of the thrust reverser hinge, resulting in separation of the thrust
reverser from the airplane. This action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective May 25, 2001.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of May 25, 2001.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before June 11, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-389-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1821357976753571796a7b7775757d766c587e7979367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e47531f101353171f0c1d1113131b100a3e181f1f50191108">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must
contain ``Docket No. 2000-NM-389-AD'' in the subject line and need not
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or
ASCII text.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2797; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile
(DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified the
FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on Airbus Model A330-243, -341,
-342, and -343 series airplanes equipped with Rolls Royce Trent 700
series engines. The DGAC advises that, during flight tests,
unexpectedly high fatigue loads were measured on the hinges integrated
on the 12 o'clock beam which forms the upper edge of the thrust
reverser C-duct. The hinges are unable to withstand these high fatigue
loads for the design life of the airplane. Resulting fatigue cracks, if
not detected and corrected, could cause failure of the thrust reverser
hinge, which could result in separation of the thrust reverser from the
airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A330-78-3006, Revision 05, dated
March 6, 2001, which describes procedures for a general visual
inspection of the hinge assemblies and the beam structure of the upper
extreme edge of the thrust reverser unit C-duct for cracks, and
corrective action, if necessary; a detailed visual inspection, if
applicable, of hinges 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the same area for cracks, and
corrective action, if necessary; and repetitions of these inspections,
as applicable, at applicable intervals. Accomplishment of the actions
specified in the service bulletin is intended to adequately address the
identified unsafe condition. The DGAC classified this service bulletin
as mandatory and issued French airworthiness directive 1997-118-047(B)
R2, dated September 20, 2000, in order to assure the continued
airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3006, Revision 05, dated March 6,
2001, references Rolls Royce Service Bulletin RB.211-78-B115, Revision
2, dated October 29, 1999, as an additional source of service
information for
[[Page 23839]]
accomplishment of the inspections and corrective actions.
FAA's Conclusions
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.19) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of
the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
Explanation of Requirements of the Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design that may be
registered in the United States at some time in the future, this AD is
being issued to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the hinge
assemblies and the 12 o'clock beam structure of the thrust reverser C-
duct, which could cause failure of the thrust reverser hinge, resulting
in separation of the thrust reverser from the airplane. This AD
requires accomplishment of the actions specified in the Airbus service
bulletin described previously.
Cost Impact
None of the airplanes affected by this action are on the U.S.
Register. All airplanes included in the applicability of this rule
currently are operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign registry;
therefore, they are not directly affected by this AD action. However,
the FAA considers that this rule is necessary to ensure that the unsafe
condition is addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes
are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S.
Register in the future, it would require approximately 5 work hours to
accomplish the required inspections, at an average labor rate of $60
per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD would
be $300 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since this AD action does not affect any airplane that is currently
on the U.S. register, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no
additional burden on any person. Therefore, prior notice and public
procedures hereon are unnecessary and the amendment may be made
effective in less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not
preceded by notice and opportunity for public comment, comments are
invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this
rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may
desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be
submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption
ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date
for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light
of the comments received. Factual information that supports the
commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating
the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional
rulemaking action would be needed.
Submit comments using the following format:
<bullet> Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
<bullet> For each issue, state what specific change to the proposed
AD is being requested.
<bullet> Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each
request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2000-NM-389-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped
and returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2001-09-14 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-12221. Docket 2000-NM-
389-AD.
Applicability: Model A330-243, -341, -342 and -343 series
airplanes; certificated in any category; that are equipped with
Rolls Royce Trent 700 series engines.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
[[Page 23840]]
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking of the hinge assemblies
and the 12 o'clock beam structure of the thrust reverser C-duct,
which could cause failure of the thrust reverser hinge, resulting in
separation of the thrust reverser from the airplane, accomplish the
following:
Initial and Repetitive Inspections
(a) Perform a general visual inspection of the hinge assemblies
and the 12 o'clock beam structure of the right and left thrust
reversers for cracks, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A330-78-3006, Revision 05, dated March 6, 2001, according to the
criteria in Table 1 of this AD, below:
Table 1--Initial Inspection
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If-- Then inspect--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither Airbus Modification 46879 nor Before the accumulation of
47358 has been embodied on the airplane. 1,200 total flight cycles,
or within 6 months after
the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first.
Either Airbus Modification 46879 or 47358 Before the accumulation of
have been embodied on the airplane. 2,000 total flight cycles,
or 6 months after the
effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) If no crack is found during the general visual inspection
required by paragraph (a) of this AD, before further flight, perform
a detailed visual inspection of the lugs of hinges 2, 3, 4, and 5 of
the right and left thrust reversers for cracks in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-78-3006, Revision 05, dated March 6,
2001.
(i) If no crack is found as a result of the detailed visual
inspection mandated by paragraph (a)(1) of this AD, repeat the
general visual inspection mandated by paragraph (a) of this AD
according to the schedule in Table 2 of this AD.
(ii) If a crack is found as a result of the detailed visual
inspection mandated by paragraph (a)(1) of this AD:
(A) Before further flight, replace the affected thrust reverser
with a new or serviceable thrust reverser in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A330-78-3006, Revision 05, dated March 6, 2001.
(B) Repeat the general visual inspection mandated in paragraph
(a) of this AD according to the schedule in Table 2 of this AD.
(2) If a crack is found during the general visual inspection
required by paragraph (a) of this AD, accomplish the actions
required by paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight, replace the affected thrust reverser
with a new or serviceable thrust reverser in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A330-78-3006, Revision 05, dated March 6, 2001.
(ii) Repeat the general visual inspection mandated in paragraph
(a) of this AD according to the schedule in Table 2 of this AD,
below:
Table 2.--Repetitive Inspections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then repeat the inspection
If-- at intervals not to exceed--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither Airbus Modification 46879 nor 1,200 flight cycles.
47358 has been embodied on the airplane.
Either Airbus Modification 46879 or 47358 2,000 flight cycles.
has been embodied on the airplane.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior
area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting,
flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as a mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-78-3006, Revision 05, dated March 6, 2001. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 5: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directive 1997-118-047(B) R2, dated September 20,
2000.
Effective Date
(e) This amendment becomes effective on May 25, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 30, 2001.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-11223 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.