AD 2000-20-15
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 A300-600 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking of the rear fittings of fuselage frame FR40 at stringer 27, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracks in the stiffeners at stringer 27 of the rear fitting of fuselage frame FR40, left and right, in accordance with specified Airbus Service Bulletins. Repetitive inspections or repair are required, as applicable. Alternatively, a modification can be installed to defer inspections for a certain period.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Varies by model and flight cycle/flight hour thresholds, as detailed in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 series airplanes, on which Airbus Modification 11525 has not been accomplished, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 series airplanes, that requires a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracking of the rear fittings of fuselage frame FR40 at stringer 27, and repetitive inspections or repair, as applicable. In lieu of accomplishing the repetitive inspections, this amendment requires a modification that would allow the inspection to be deferred for a certain period of time. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the rear fittings of fuselage frame FR40 at stringer 27, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60349-60351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-25533]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-207-AD; Amendment 39-11926; AD 2000-20-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 and A300-600 series airplanes,
that requires a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect
cracking of the rear fittings of fuselage frame FR40 at stringer 27,
and repetitive inspections or repair, as applicable. In lieu of
accomplishing the repetitive inspections, this amendment requires a
modification that would allow the inspection to be deferred for a
certain period of time. This amendment is prompted by issuance of
mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil
airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended
to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the rear fittings of fuselage
frame FR40 at stringer 27, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
DATES: Effective November 15, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of November 15, 2000.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 and
A300-600 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on May
10, 2000 (65 FR 30033). That action proposed to require a high
frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracking of the rear
fittings of fuselage frame FR40 at stringer 27, and repetitive
inspections or repair, as applicable. In lieu of accomplishing the
repetitive inspections, that action proposed to require a modification
that would allow the inspection to be deferred for a certain period of
time.
Comment Received
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the single comment received.
Request To Revise Compliance Times
The commenter questions the compliance times specified in the
proposed AD. The commenter notes that there are small discrepancies
between the compliance thresholds recommended in the referenced service
bulletins for Airbus Model A300 B2, B4-100, and B4-600 series
airplanes, and the thresholds specified by the proposed AD. The
commenter suggests that it would be preferable for the compliance times
in the AD to be in line with those in the service bulletins, since this
would avoid confusion by operators and reduce the number of questions
that may be raised.
The FAA concurs. For the reasons stated in the proposed AD, the FAA
specified fixed compliance times for accomplishment of the required
actions, rather than permitting use of the ``adjustment-for-range''
formula for calculating compliance times. During discussions with the
manufacturer to determine an interim method of calculating the fixed
compliance times, flight cycle thresholds and intervals for certain
models were recommended for reduction from those in the service
bulletins, based on the average flight times of those models.
Subsequently, a revised method for calculation of such fixed compliance
times was defined by the manufacturer. This method allows use of the
flight cycle thresholds and intervals specified in the referenced
service bulletins.
The FAA has determined that, consistent with the manufacturer's
revised method for calculation of fixed compliance times, the flight
cycle thresholds and intervals recommended in the referenced service
bulletins constitute acceptable compliance times for this AD. The final
rule has been
[[Page 60350]]
revised accordingly. Because the flight cycle compliance times for
certain airplane models have been increased rather than reduced, and
the flight hour compliance times are unchanged, such revision imposes
no additional restrictions on operators.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comment
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change described
previously. The FAA has determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 85 airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour per
airplane to accomplish the required HFEC inspection, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the inspection on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$5,100, or $60 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Should an operator be required to accomplish the modification
rather than the repetitive inspections, it will take approximately 3
work hours per airplane to accomplish. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the modification required by this AD on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $15,300, or $180 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-20-15 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-11926. Docket 98-NM-207-
AD.
Applicability: Model A300 and A300-600 series airplanes, on
which Airbus Modification 11525 has not been accomplished;
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (h) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking of the rear fittings of
fuselage frame FR40 at stringer 27, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Inspection
(a) Perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to
detect cracks in the stiffeners at stringer 27 of the rear fitting
of fuselage frame FR40, left and right, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-53-0332, dated November 24, 1997 (for Model
A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes), or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-
57-6075, dated November 24, 1997 (for Model A300-600 series
airplanes); as applicable; at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), or
(a)(8) of this AD.
(1) For Model A300 B2 series airplanes that have accumulated
less than 26,000 total flight cycles as of the effective date of
this AD: Inspect at the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Prior to the accumulation of 11,600 total flight cycles, or
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Prior to the accumulation of 14,300 total flight hours, or
within 3,800 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(2) For Model A300 B2 series airplanes that have accumulated
26,000 or more total flight cycles as of the effective date of this
AD: Inspect within 2,200 flight cycles or 2,800 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(3) For Model A300 B4-100 series airplanes that have accumulated
less than 20,000 total flight cycles as of the effective date of
this AD: Inspect at the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs
(a)(3)(i) and (a)(3)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Prior to the accumulation of 9,200 total flight cycles, or
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Prior to the accumulation of 15,700 total flight hours, or
within 5,800 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(4) For Model A300 B4-100 series airplanes that have accumulated
20,000 or more total flight cycles as of the effective date of this
AD: Inspect within 1,800 flight cycles or 3,400 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(5) For Model A300 B4-200 series airplanes that have accumulated
less than 14,000 total flight cycles as of the effective date of
this AD: Inspect at the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs
(a)(5)(i) and (a)(5)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Prior to the accumulation of 8,300 total flight cycles, or
within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Prior to the accumulation of 17,200 total flight hours, or
within 6,200 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(6) For Model A300 B4-200 series airplanes that have accumulated
14,000 or more total flight cycles as of the effective date of this
AD: Inspect within 1,700 flight cycles or 3,500 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
[[Page 60351]]
(7) For Model A300-600 series airplanes that have accumulated
less than 18,000 total flight cycles as of the effective date of
this AD: Inspect at the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs
(a)(7)(i) and (a)(7)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Prior to the accumulation of 6,200 total flight cycles, or
within 2,700 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Prior to the accumulation of 15,100 total flight hours, or
within 7,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(8) For Model A300-600 series airplanes that have accumulated
18,000 or more total flight cycles as of the effective date of this
AD: Inspect within 1,400 flight cycles or 3,600 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
Repetitive Inspections
(b) If no crack is detected during the initial inspection
required by paragraph (a) of this AD, except as provided by
paragraph (e) of this AD, repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (a) of this AD at the time specified in paragraph (b)(1),
(b)(2), (b)(3), or (b)(4) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For Model A300 B2 series airplanes: Repeat at intervals not
to exceed 2,200 flight cycles or 2,700 flight hours, whichever
occurs first.
(2) For Model A300 B4-100 series airplanes: Repeat at intervals
not to exceed 1,800 flight cycles or 3,000 flight hours, whichever
occurs first.
(3) For Model A300 B4-200 series airplanes: Repeat at intervals
not to exceed 1,700 flight cycles or 3,500 flight hours, whichever
occurs first.
(4) For Model A300-600 series airplanes: Repeat at intervals not
to exceed 1,400 flight cycles or 3,400 flight hours, whichever
occurs first.
Repair Cracking Found During Inspections
(c) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD and the crack is less than 0.787
inches long, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0332, dated November 24, 1997 (for
Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes), or Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-57-6075, dated November 24, 1997 (for Model A300-600 series
airplanes); as applicable. Perform the inspection required by
paragraph (a) of this AD one more time at the time specified in
paragraph (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4) of this AD, as
applicable, and accomplish the actions specified in paragraph (f) or
(g) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For Model A300 B2 series airplanes: Within 44,500 flight
cycles or 54,600 flight hours after accomplishment of the repair,
whichever occurs first.
(2) For Model A300 B4-100 series airplanes: Within 35,200 flight
cycles or 56,700 flight hours after accomplishment of the repair,
whichever occurs first.
(3) For Model A300 B4-200 series airplanes: Within 31,900 flight
cycles or 66,100 flight hours after accomplishment of the repair,
whichever occurs first.
(4) For Model A300-600 series airplanes: Within 23,700 flight
cycles or 57,500 flight hours after accomplishment of the repair,
whichever occurs first.
(d) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD and the crack is 0.787 inches long
or more, prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, or the Direction Generale de
l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated agent). For a repair
method to be approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
as required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Deferral of Repetitive Inspections by Modification
(e) In lieu of accomplishing the requirements of paragraph (b)
of this AD, prior to further flight after accomplishing the
inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, modify the rear
fitting at stringer 27 at FR40 of the center fuselage in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0333, dated November 24, 1997
(Model A300 B2 and B4 series airplanes), or Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-57-6076, dated November 24, 1997 (for Model A300-600 series
airplanes); as applicable. Following accomplishment of the
modification, perform the inspection required by paragraph (a) of
this AD one more time at the time specified in paragraph (e)(1),
(e)(2), (e)(3), or (e)(4) of this AD, as applicable, and accomplish
the actions specified in paragraph (f) or (g) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) For Model A300 B2 series airplanes: Within 59,600 flight
cycles or 73,100 flight hours after accomplishment of the
modification, whichever occurs first.
(2) For Model A300 B4-100 series airplanes: Within 47,100 flight
cycles or 75,900 flight hours after accomplishment of the
modification, whichever occurs first.
(3) For Model A300 B4-200 series airplanes: Within 42,700 flight
cycles or 88,400 flight hours after accomplishment of the
modification, whichever occurs first.
(4) For Model A300-600 series airplanes: Within 31,700 flight
cycles or 76,800 flight hours after accomplishment of the
modification, whichever occurs first.
Follow-on Action if No Cracking Is Found During Certain Inspections
(f) If no crack is detected during the inspection required by
paragraph (c) or (e) of this AD, prior to further flight, contact
the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, or the DGAC (or its
delegated agent) for the next inspection time(s), and repeat the
inspection(s) thereafter at those times.
Repair for Cracking Found During a Certain Inspection
(g) If any crack is detected during the inspection required by
paragraph (c) or (e) of this AD, prior to further flight, repair it
in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, or the DGAC (or its delegated agent). For a repair
method to be approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
as required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(h) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(i) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(j) Except as required by paragraphs (d), (f), and (g) of this
AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-53-0332, dated November 24, 1997; Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-57-6075, dated November 24, 1997; Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-53-0333, dated November 24, 1997; or Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-57-6076, dated November 24, 1997; as applicable. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directive 98-028-242 (B), dated January 28, 1998.
(k) This amendment becomes effective on November 15, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 29, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-25533 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.