AD 2000-02-39
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus | A300 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracking of the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door panels, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage pressure vessel.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform either a one-time ultrasonic inspection or repetitive visual inspections followed by an eventual ultrasonic inspection to detect cracking. Take corrective actions if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Not specified in the provided text.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 series airplanes. This action requires either a one-time ultrasonic inspection, or repetitive visual inspections and eventual ultrasonic inspection, to detect cracking of the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door panels, and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect and correct cracking of the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door panels, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage pressure vessel.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5756-5758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-2467]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-16-AD; Amendment 39-11557; AD 2000-02-39]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 series airplanes. This
action requires either a one-time ultrasonic inspection, or repetitive
visual inspections and eventual ultrasonic inspection, to detect
cracking of the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door
panels, and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is
prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information
by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified in
this AD are intended to detect and correct cracking of the longitudinal
skin splice above the mid-passenger door panels, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the fuselage pressure vessel.
DATES: Effective February 22, 2000.
[[Page 5757]]
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 22, 2000.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before March 8, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-16-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite
700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile
(DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified the
FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A300
series airplanes. The DGAC advises that, during a routine maintenance
check, a horizontal crack of 35.6 inches was detected in the
surrounding panel above the right mid-passenger door. The exact cause
of the cracking is unknown at this time. The area of the crack is
covered by a sealant bead at the junction of two skin panels and is not
visible from the outside. After the insulation blankets were removed
from the inside, the crack was visually detected 1 inch below stringer
11, and started 9 inches from frame 29 and extended 6.7 inches aft
frame 30. Such cracking, if not detected and corrected, could result in
reduced structural integrity of the fuselage pressure vessel.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex (AOT) A300-53A0352, dated
January 4, 2000, which describes procedures for a one-time ultrasonic
inspection and repetitive detailed visual inspections to detect
cracking of the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door
panels below stringer 11 left- and right-hand and between frames 28A
and 30A, and corrective actions, if necessary. The corrective actions
involve installing either a temporary or permanent repair. The
temporary repair consists of stop drilling all cracks and installing an
external doubler attached with rivets. The temporary repair is to be
replaced with a permanent repair within 2,000 flight cycles. The
permanent repair consists of cutting out all cracked areas, and
installing an external doubler with a milled step. The DGAC classified
this AOT as mandatory and issued French airworthiness directive T2000-
001-300(B), Revision 1, dated January 7, 2000, in order to assure the
continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
FAA's Conclusions
This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of
the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
Explanation of Requirements of Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered
in the United States, this AD is being issued to detect and correct
cracking of the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door
panels, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
fuselage pressure vessel. This AD requires accomplishment of the
actions specified in the AOT described previously, except as discussed
below. This AD also requires that operators report results of all
inspection findings to Airbus.
Differences Between Rule and AOT
Operators should note that, unlike the procedures described in the
Airbus AOT, this AD would not permit further flight if cracks are
detected. The FAA has determined that, because of the safety
implications and consequences associated with such cracking, any cracks
must be repaired or modified prior to further flight.
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim action. The inspection reports
that are required by this AD will enable the manufacturer to obtain
better insight into the nature, cause, and extent of the cracking, and
eventually to develop final action to address the unsafe condition.
Once final action has been identified, the FAA may consider further
rulemaking.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2000-NM-16-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between
[[Page 5758]]
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore,
it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
2000-02-39 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-11557. Docket 2000-NM-16-
AD.
Applicability: Model A300 series airplanes, having serial
numbers 1 through 156 inclusive; certificated in any category;
except those airplanes on which Airbus Modification 2611 has been
installed.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct cracking of the longitudinal skin splice
above the mid-passenger door panels, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the fuselage pressure vessel, accomplish the
following:
Ultrasonic or Detailed Visual Inspection
(a) Within 14 days after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the requirements of either paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of
this AD, in accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) A300-
53A0352, dated January 4, 2000.
(1) Perform a one-time ultrasonic inspection to detect cracking
of the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door panels
below stringer 11 (left-and right-hand) and between frames 28A and
30A.
(i) If no cracking is detected, no further action is required by
this AD.
(ii) If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight,
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (b) of this AD.
(2) Perform a detailed visual inspection to detect cracking of
the longitudinal skin splice above the mid-passenger door panels
below stringer 11 (left- and right-hand) and between frames 28A and
30A.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirrors, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
(i) If no cracking is detected, accomplish the requirements of
paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(A) and (a)(2)(i)(B) of this AD.
(A) Repeat the detailed visual inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 80 flight cycles; and
(B) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this AD.
(ii) If any cracking is detected, prior to further flight,
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (b) of this AD.
Corrective Actions
(b) For airplanes on which any cracking is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, prior
to further flight, install either a temporary or permanent repair,
in accordance with Airbus AOT A300-53A0352, dated January 4, 2000.
(1) If a temporary repair is installed, prior to the
accumulation of 2,000 flight cycles after the installation of the
temporary repair, install the permanent repair.
(2) If a permanent repair is installed, no further action is
required by this AD.
Reporting Requirement
(c) Within 10 days after accomplishing the initial inspection
required by paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, and after all
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this AD,
as applicable, submit a report of the inspection results (both
positive and negative findings) to: Mr. Rolland Filaquier--AI/SE-
A21, Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France. Information collection requirements contained in this
regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number
2120-0056.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus All
Operators Telex A300-53A0352, dated January 4, 2000. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directive T2000-001-300(B), Revision 1, dated January
7, 2000.
(g) This amendment becomes effective on February 22, 2000.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 31, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-2467 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.