2026-15-12
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: The emergency exit door could not be opened from inside the airplane.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes
Airworthiness Airworthiness Directives
19767 ADs indexed for Airworthiness aircraft.
Models
Recent ADs
2026-17-05
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Various Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: Rescue hoist assemblies may have non-conformant overload clutch assemblies.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Various Helicopters
2026-17-07
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: The incorrect installation of the swashplate duplex bearing could lead to bearing failure and subsequent loss of main rotor control.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters
2026-17-06
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Engines
Unsafe Condition: Premature failure of certain lubrication/scavenge pumps causing engine in-flight shut-downs (IFSDs).
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Engines
2026-17-01
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: Cracks in the forward and aft upper corner of the bulk cargo door due to fatigue.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
2026-17-02 Recurring
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: Shim gaps exceeding engineering allowances and high pull up forces on components may cause fatigue cracks at fastener holes in lower side of body splice plates, rear spar terminal fittings, lower c...
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
2026-17-04 Recurring
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: Failure of the main landing gear (MLG) door actuators could result in loss of MLG door function.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
2026-17-03
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines AG Engines
Unsafe Condition: Certain 3rd stage high pressure compressor (HPC) rotor blades were susceptible to shroud wear and blade failure.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines AG Engines
2026-16-07
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: unsafe condition on these products.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional Airplanes
2026-16-10 Recurring
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: The unsafe condition involves excessive vibration levels on the tail rotor drive shaft, which could lead to failure of the tail rotor drive shaft, sliding flange, or equipped splined sleeve.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
2026-16-09
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate Previously Held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: unsafe condition on these products.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate Previously Held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Airplanes
2026-16-08 Recurring
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Engines
Unsafe Condition: Cracking of the intermediate pressure (IP) compressor variable inlet guide vanes (VIGVs) due to high-cycle fatigue propagation.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Engines
2026-16-06 Recurring
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: Fatigue cracking in the lower outboard wing skin at the inboard fastener of stringer L-9.5 and the lower outboard wing skin of stringer L-6.5 on airplanes with winglets installed per STC ST01920SE.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
2026-16-04
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: The determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
2026-16-03 Recurring
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: Cracks in the legs of the side supports of the tail rotor transmission fan.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
2026-16-05
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: Magnetization on the solenoid valves for the three main servo-controls, the regulator block, and the tail servo-control due to a diode not properly installed in the hydraulic circuit.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
2026-17-10
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Lycoming Engines
Unsafe Condition: Piston pin failure resulting in metal particulate contamination in the engine oil and engine failure.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Lycoming Engines
2026-17-51
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Bell Textron Canada Limited Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: in-flight fatigue failure of a tail rotor pitch horn
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Bell Textron Canada Limited Helicopters
2026-15-17 Recurring
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; Various Helicopters
Unsafe Condition: The main rotor shaft (MRS) on certain helicopter models requires a lower life limit due to a design re-evaluation showing potential cracking or overstress from repetitive external lift operations.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Various Helicopters
2026-15-11
final ruleAirworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Unsafe Condition: Cracks in the bear strap at the forward upper corner of the forward galley door cutout.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes