AD Amdt-39-11394
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | 737 | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Incorrect installation of the upper decompression panel on the flight deck door could cause the emergency exit panel to become inoperable, preventing crewmembers from performing essential duties during an emergency evacuation.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Conduct a one-time detailed visual inspection of the upper decompression panel on the flight deck door to verify a minimum overlap dimension. Take corrective action if the inspection reveals an incorrect installation.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 737 series airplanes with certain upper decompression panels installed incorrectly during production.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 737 series airplanes, that requires a one-time detailed visual inspection of the upper decompression panel on the flight deck door to verify that a minimum overlap dimension exists, and corrective action, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports indicating that, during production, some upper decompression panels were installed incorrectly on the flight deck door. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect an incorrectly installed upper decompression panel, which could cause the emergency exit panel on the flight deck door to become inoperable, thereby preventing crewmembers from performing essential duties during an emergency evacuation.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59116-59117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 99-28246]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NM-02-AD; Amendment 39-11394; AD 99-22-16]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 737 series airplanes, that requires
a one-time detailed visual inspection of the upper decompression panel
on the flight deck door to verify that a minimum overlap dimension
exists, and corrective action, if necessary. This amendment is prompted
by reports indicating that, during production, some upper decompression
panels were installed incorrectly on the flight deck door. The actions
specified by this AD are intended to detect an incorrectly installed
upper decompression panel, which could cause the emergency exit panel
on the flight deck door to become inoperable, thereby preventing
crewmembers from performing essential duties during an emergency
evacuation.
DATES: Effective December 7, 1999.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of December 7, 1999.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1157; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 737 series
airplanes was published in the Federal Register on August 20, 1999 (64
FR 45470). That action proposed to require a one-time detailed visual
inspection of the upper decompression panel on the flight deck door to
verify that a minimum overlap dimension exists, and corrective action,
if necessary.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 1,299 airplanes of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 901 airplanes of U.S.
registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1
work hour per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, and that
the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures,
the cost impact of the inspection required
[[Page 59117]]
by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $54,060, or $60 per
airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
99-22-16 BOEING: Amendment 39-11394. Docket 99-NM-02-AD.
Applicability: Model 737 series airplanes, as listed in Boeing
Service Bulletin 737-52-1128, dated April 22, 1999, or in Boeing
Service Bulletin 737-52-1137, dated May 13, 1999; certificated in
any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect an incorrectly installed upper decompression panel,
which could cause the emergency exit panel on the flight deck door
to become inoperable, thereby preventing crewmembers from performing
essential duties during an emergency evacuation, accomplish the
following:
One-Time Inspection
(a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a one-time detailed visual inspection of the upper
decompression panel on the flight deck door to verify that a minimum
overlap dimension of 0.05 inch exists, as specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 737-52-1128, dated April 22, 1999 (for Model 737-
300/-400/-500 series airplanes); or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-52-
1137, dated May 13, 1999 (for Model 737-600/-700/-800 series
airplanes); as applicable.
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual
inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a
specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at
intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such
as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
Corrective Action
(b) If a minimum overlap dimension of 0.05 inch is not found
during the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to
further flight, adjust the decompression panel and, as applicable,
the adjacent decorative channel, in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-52-1128, dated April 22, 1999 (for Model 737-300/-400/-
500 series airplanes); or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-52-1137, dated
May 13, 1999 (for Model 737-600/-700/-800 series airplanes); as
applicable.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
Special Flight Permits
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Incorporation by Reference
(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-52-1128, dated April 22, 1999, or Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-52-1137, dated May 13, 1999, as applicable. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on December 7, 1999.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 22, 1999.
D.L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 99-28246 Filed 11-1-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.