AD Amdt-39-11130
Unsafe Condition
Tears around the face cushion adjacent to the inner mask housing of passenger and portable oxygen masks may result in reduced oxygen consumption.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the passenger and portable oxygen masks for tears around the face cushion. Replace or repair any torn passenger or portable oxygen mask.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Aircraft equipped with Puritan-Bennett Aero Systems Company C351-2000 series passenger oxygen masks and portable oxygen masks.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to any aircraft equipped with Puritan-Bennett Aero Systems Company (Puritan-Bennett) C351-2000 series passenger oxygen masks and portable oxygen masks. This AD requires inspecting the passenger and portable oxygen masks for tears around the face cushion adjacent to the inner mask housing, and replacing or repairing any torn passenger or portable oxygen mask. This AD is the result of reports received from three airplane manufacturers of defective oxygen masks. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent reduced oxygen consumption when passengers are required to use defective oxygen masks, which could result in passenger injury.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 73 (Friday, April 16, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18804-18806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 99-9251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-CE-29-AD; Amendment 39-11130; AD 99-08-21]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Puritan-Bennett Aero Systems Company
C351-2000 Series Passenger Oxygen Masks and Portable Oxygen Masks
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to any aircraft equipped with Puritan-Bennett Aero Systems
Company (Puritan-Bennett) C351-2000 series passenger oxygen masks and
portable oxygen masks. This AD requires inspecting the passenger and
portable oxygen masks for tears around the face cushion adjacent to the
inner mask housing, and replacing or repairing any torn passenger or
portable oxygen mask. This AD is the result of reports received from
three airplane manufacturers of defective oxygen masks. The actions
specified by this AD are intended to prevent reduced oxygen consumption
when passengers are required to use defective oxygen masks, which could
result in passenger injury.
DATES: Effective June 2, 1999.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 2, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained
from Puritan-Bennett Aero Systems Company, 10800 Pflumm Road, Lenexa,
Kansas 66215; telephone: (913) 338-9800; facsimile: (913) 338-7353.
This information may also be examined at the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-CE-29-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal Register,
800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Imbler, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room
100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316)
946-4147; facsimile: (316) 946-4407.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Events Leading to the Issuance of This AD
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to all aircraft equipped
with any Puritan-Bennett C351-2000 series passenger oxygen mask or
portable oxygen mask having an elastomer cure date between September
1993 and March 1997 was published in the Federal Register as a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on September 22, 1998 (63 FR 50540). The
NPRM proposed to require inspecting the oxygen mask face cushion
adjacent to the inner mask housing for any tear, and, if a tear is
found, repairing or replacing the passenger or portable oxygen mask
with one that has an elastomer cure date later than March 1997.
Accomplishment of the proposed action as specified in the NPRM
would be required in accordance with Nellcor Puritan-Bennett Service
Bulletin No. C351-2000-35-1, Revision 2, date of original issue: July,
1996; date of first revision: February, 1997; date of current revision:
February, 1998.
The NPRM was the result of three airplane manufacturers informing
the FAA that the affected oxygen masks were defective.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Comment Issue No. 1: List in the AD All Passenger Service Units
That Could Contain the Affected Oxygen Masks
Two commenters recommend that the FAA provide, in the proposed AD,
a listing of the passenger service units (PSU) that could contain the
affected oxygen masks. The commenters state that it would be difficult
to detect whether one of the affected oxygen masks was in their fleet
since passenger or portable oxygen masks are not tracked items. As
written, the proposed AD would require inspecting all aircraft
[[Page 18805]]
and spares in the fleet to determine if the AD applied. The PSU's are
equipment that is tracked and including a listing of those would allow
the affected operators to check their logbook to determine AD
applicability.
The FAA concurs that listing the PSU's in the proposed AD would
allow the operators to check the logbook to determine AD applicability.
However, the affected passenger and portable oxygen masks can be
installed in any PSU. Therefore, if an operator does not track
passenger and portable oxygen masks, the FAA knows of no other way to
assure that the unsafe condition does not go undetected than to inspect
each PSU to determine if the affected masks are installed.
No changes to the final rule are required as a result of these
comments.
Comment Issue No. 2: Cost Impact of the Proposed AD
Two commenters feel that the FAA's determination of the cost impact
on U.S. operators of the airplanes that have the affected passenger or
portable oxygen masks installed is misleading. In particular, these
comments are as follows:
<bullet> One commenter states that the cost to inspect each of his/
her fleet's aircraft to determine if the affected oxygen masks are
installed on each PSU is 6 workhours per aircraft; and
<bullet> The other commenter states that the FAA intended to use
the cost calculation of 1 workhour per aircraft for labor time, but
instead multiplied that by the number of masks affected.
The FAA concurs that the cost impact of the proposed AD is
misleading. The FAA has no way of determining the exact number of
affected portable and passenger oxygen masks that would need to be
either inspected and, if necessary, repaired or replaced on each
airplane. For this reason, the FAA is writing the Cost Impact section
in the final rule to account for the cost per mask and not per
airplane.
Comment Issue No. 3: Make the Inspection Repetitive
One commenter recommends that the FAA make the proposed inspections
repetitive. This commenter makes this recommendation based on the
belief that the unsafe condition is a result of aging and fatigue
damage to the affected portable and passenger oxygen masks.
The FAA does not concur that the inspection should be made
repetitive. The oxygen masks that are unsafe were torn at the factory
due to a manufacturing defect. This FAA has determined the time range
of when these torn oxygen masks were manufactured. The proposed AD
would require repair or replacement of any oxygen mask manufactured
during a certain time and revealing a tear, and would prohibit future
installation of any oxygen mask that has a tear.
Therefore, no changes to the final rule are required as a result of
these comments.
Comment Issue No. 4: Extend the Compliance Time
One commenter recommends that the FAA extend the compliance time of
the proposed AD. This commenter states that the 90 calendar day
compliance time would be difficult to meet and the economic impact due
to unnecessary downtime would be significant. The commenter suggests a
6 calendar month compliance time to coincide with regularly scheduled
maintenance.
The FAA concurs. The FAA initially chose 90 calendar days based
upon a balance between safety and practicality of implementation. The
commenter presents a strong case for extending the compliance time
based upon practicality of implementation and the FAA has determined
that extending to 6 calendar months will not adversely affect aviation
safety.
The compliance time of the final rule has been changed accordingly.
The FAA's Determination
After careful review of all available information related to the
subject presented above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the
public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for
the change in the write-up in the Cost Impact section, the change in
compliance time, and minor editorial corrections. The FAA has
determined that these changes and the minor editorial corrections will
not change the meaning of the AD and will not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already proposed.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 10,500 oxygen masks will be affected by this
AD, that it will take approximately 1 workhour per oxygen mask to
accomplish the inspection and replacement, and that the average labor
rate is approximately $60 an hour. Puritan-Bennett will repair or
replace oxygen mask assemblies found defective at no cost to the owner/
operator of any affected aircraft. Based on these figures, the total
cost impact of the inspection is estimated to be $630,000, or $60 per
mask. The cost per aircraft will vary based on the number of oxygen
masks each aircraft has installed and the number that would require
replacement.
Compliance Time
The compliance time of this AD is presented in calendar time
instead of hours time-in-service (TIS).
The FAA has determined that calendar time compliance is the most
desirable method because the use of these oxygen masks is not related
to hours time-in-service. The unsafe condition exists regardless of
whether the aircraft is in operation. Therefore, to assure that the
above-referenced condition is corrected within a reasonable period of
time, a compliance schedule based upon calendar time instead of hours
TIS is utilized.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 18806]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
99-08-21 Puritan-Bennett Aero Systems Company: Amendment 39-11130;
Docket No. 98-CE-29-AD.
Applicability: Puritan-Bennett C351-2000 series passenger oxygen
masks and portable oxygen masks, part numbers as listed below, that
(1) have elastomer cure dates between September 1993 and March 1997;
and (2) are installed in aircraft that are certificated in any
category:
Passenger Masks
C351-2000-00
C351-2000-02
C351-2000-21
C351-2000-38
C351-2000-52
C351-2000-59
C351-2000-63
114006-01
174006-16
174006-30
174006-31
174290-21
174290-22
174290-24
174290-26
174291-21
174291-23
174291-24
174501-00
174504-01 (C351-2000-205)
174505-01 (C351-2000-201)
174506-00 (C351-2000-223)
174509-00 (C351-2000-302)
174510-01 (C351-2000-224)
174510-08 (C351-2000-231)
174510-09 (C351-2000-232)
174510-10 (C351-2000-233)
174510-11 (C351-2000-234)
Drop-Out Box Assemblies
115055-04
115055-10
175011-01
175015-00
175016-00
175105-00
175109-00
175112-10
175112-11
175112-21
175112-90
175205-00
175210-00
175215-01
175222-11
175222-13
175222-20
175222-21
175222-90
175224-00
175242-00
175242-01
175242-02
175303-00
175308-00
Emergency Oxygen Portable Assemblies
176960-13
176960-14
176980-00
176965-SMB2
176965-SCOB2
176965-SMO2
176965-SCMB2
Note 1: This AD applies to each aircraft equipped with an oxygen
mask identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless
of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area
subject to the requirements of this AD. For aircraft that have been
modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the
requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this AD. The request should include an assessment
of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the
unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition
has not been eliminated, the request should include specific
proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated in the body of this AD, unless
already accomplished.
To prevent reduced oxygen consumption when passengers are required
to use defective oxygen masks, which could result in passenger injury,
accomplish the following:
(a) Within the next 6 calendar months after the effective date
of this AD, inspect the passenger or portable oxygen masks for any
tear in the face cushion in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT
INSTRUCTIONS section in Nellcor Puritan-Bennett Service Bulletin No.
C351-2000-35-1, Revision 2, date of original issue: July, 1996; date
of first revision: February, 1997; date of current revision:
February, 1998. The face cushion is adjacent to the inner mask
housing. If a tear is found, prior to further flight, replace or
repair the mask in accordance with the service bulletin.
(b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
in any aircraft, Puritan-Bennett C351-2000 series passenger oxygen
masks and portable oxygen masks that are specified in the
Applicability section of this AD, unless they have been inspected
and found airworthy in accordance with paragraph (a) of this AD.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance times that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita,
Kansas 67209. The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate
FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to
the Manager, Wichita ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Wichita ACO.
(e) The inspection and replacement or repair required by this AD
shall be done in accordance with Nellcor Puritan-Bennett Service
Bulletin No. C351-2000-35-1, Revision 2, date of original issue:
July, 1996; date of first revision: February, 1997; date of current
revision: February, 1998. This incorporation by reference was
approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from
Puritan-Bennett Aero Systems Company, 10800 Pflumm Road, Lenexa,
Kansas 66215. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800
North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on June 2, 1999.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 7, 1999.
Carolanne L. Cabrini,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 99-9251 Filed 4-15-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.