AD Amdt-39-10464
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | 747-100 | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200, and -300 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking in the vertical chords, midspar webs, and canted closure webs of the wing strut could result in failure of the strut-to-wing interface and consequent separation of the engine and strut from the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Conduct repetitive detailed visual and/or borescope inspections to detect discrepancies in specified areas of the wing strut. Implement optional terminating actions for the repetitive inspections as provided.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 747-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes. This action requires repetitive detailed visual and/or borescope inspections to detect discrepancies of certain areas of the wing strut. This amendment also provides for an optional terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by reports that fatigue cracking was found in the vertical chords, midspar webs, and canted closure webs. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect and correct fatigue cracking and stress corrosion of the wing strut, which could result in failure of the strut-to-wing interface, and consequent separation of the engine and strut from the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17932-17934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 98-9589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-83-AD; Amendment 39-10464; AD 98-08-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -200, and -300
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-100, -200, and -300 series
airplanes. This action requires repetitive detailed visual and/or
borescope inspections to detect discrepancies of certain areas of the
wing strut. This amendment also provides for an optional terminating
action for the repetitive inspections. This amendment is prompted by
reports that fatigue cracking was found in the vertical chords, midspar
webs, and canted closure webs. The actions specified in this AD are
intended to detect and correct fatigue cracking and stress corrosion of
the wing strut, which could result in failure of the strut-to-wing
interface, and consequent separation of the engine and strut from the
airplane.
DATES: Effective April 28, 1998.
The incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-54A2179, Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997, as listed in the
regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of
April 28, 1998.
The incorporation by reference of certain other publications, as
listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of
the Federal Register as of January 22, 1997 (61 FR 66201, December 17,
1996).
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before June 12, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-83-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington;
telephone (425) 227-2771; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has received several reports of
cracking of the vertical chords, midspar webs, and canted closure webs
on the inboard and outboard struts of certain Boeing Model 747 series
airplanes. Investigation has revealed that the cracking in the vertical
chords was due to fatigue and stress corrosion. Additionally, the
investigation revealed that the cracking in the midspar webs was due to
fatigue. Such fatigue cracking and stress corrosion, if not corrected,
could result in failure of the strut-to-wing interface, and consequent
separation of the engine and strut from the airplane.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
AD 97-12-03, amendment 39-10045 (62 FR 31331, June 9, 1997)
currently requires inspections for cracking, corrosion, and fracturing
of the lower and upper horizontal clevis of the strut midspar fittings;
and replacement of discrepant parts with new parts, or rework, if
necessary. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2179, Revision 1, dated
November 27, 1996, is cited in AD 97-12-03 as the appropriate service
information.
[[Page 17933]]
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-54A2179, Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997, which describes, among
other actions, procedures for performing repetitive detailed visual
and/or borescope inspections to detect fatigue cracking, stress
corrosion, and fracturing of certain parts of the wing spar (the
midspar fitting vertical legs, aft torque bulkhead vertical chords,
midspar webs, and midspar canted closure webs). The alert service
bulletin also describes procedures for certain repair, rework, and
replacement actions. The initial inspection and repetitive intervals
recommended in the alert service bulletin will detect fatigue cracking,
stress corrosion, and fracturing of the subject area in a timely
manner.
Explanation of the Requirements of the Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other Boeing Model 747-100, -200, and -300 series
airplanes of the same type design, this AD is being issued to detect
and correct fatigue cracking, stress corrosion, or fracturing of
certain areas of the wing spar (the midspar fitting vertical legs, aft
torque bulkhead vertical chords, midspar webs, and midspar canted
closure webs), which could cause failure of the strut-to-wing
interface, and consequent separation of the engine and strut from the
airplane. This AD requires repetitive inspections to detect fatigue
cracking, stress corrosion, or fracturing of certain areas of the wing
spar (the midspar fitting vertical legs, aft torque bulkhead vertical
chords, midspar webs, and midspar canted closure webs) to be
accomplished in accordance with the alert service bulletin described
previously. Also, if any fatigue cracking, stress corrosion, or
fracturing is detected that is within the limits specified by the alert
service bulletin, certain corrective actions (repair) shall be
accomplished in accordance with the alert service bulletin. Certain
other corrective actions that are outside the limits specified by the
alert service bulletin shall be accomplished in accordance with a
method approved by the FAA.
Differences Between the Rule and the Relevant Service Information
Operators should note the following differences between the rule
and the relevant alert service bulletin:
1. If any fatigue cracking, stress corrosion, or fracturing is
detected during any inspections required by this AD that is outside the
limits specified in the alert service bulletin, corrective actions must
be accomplished in accordance with a method approved by the FAA.
2. Additionally, operators should note that, while this AD cites
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2179, Revision 2, dated December
4, 1997, as the appropriate service information for this AD, this AD
does not supersede the requirements of AD 97-12-03, which cites
Revision 1 of the same alert service bulletin as the appropriate
service information.
3. Although the alert service bulletin referenced in this AD
provides procedures to detect and correct fatigue cracking, stress
corrosion, or fracturing of the midspar fitting vertical legs, aft
torque bulkhead vertical chords, midspar webs, and midspar canted
closure webs for certain airplanes identified as Group 5 airplanes,
this AD does not require any action for those airplanes. At this time,
the FAA has not received any reports of cracked structure on the
airplanes designated as Group 5 airplanes. However, the FAA may
consider further rulemaking if additional information indicates that
the identified unsafe condition is found on Group 5 airplanes.
Determination of Rule's Effective Date
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 98-NM-83-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
[[Page 17934]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
98-08-15 Boeing: Amendment 39-10464. Docket 98-NM-83-AD.
Applicability: Model 747-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes
having line positions 1 through 886 inclusive, certificated in any
category; excluding airplanes on which the strut/wing modification
has been accomplished in accordance with AD 95-13-07, amendment 39-
9287; or AD 95-10-16, amendment 39-9233; and excluding airplanes
designated as Group 5 in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54A2179,
Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking or stress corrosion of
certain areas of the wing strut (the midspar fitting vertical leg,
aft bulkhead vertical chords, the midspar webs, and the canted
closure webs), which could cause failure of the strut-to-wing
interface, and consequent separation of the engine and strut from
the airplane; accomplish the following:
(a) Perform detailed visual and/or borescope inspections to
detect fatigue cracking, stress corrosion, or fracture of the
midspar fitting vertical legs, the aft torque bulkhead vertical
chords, the midspar webs and the midspar canted closure webs at the
time specified in paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this AD, as
applicable; in accordance with Part III of Section III of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
54A2179, Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997. Thereafter, repeat the
inspections in accordance with and at the times specified in the
alert service bulletin.
(1) For airplanes identified as Group 1 in the alert service
bulletin: Perform the inspections on the inboard struts and the
outboard struts, prior to the accumulation of 5,000 total landings,
or within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
(2) For airplanes identified as Group 6 in the alert service
bulletin: Perform the inspections on the inboard struts, prior to
the accumulation of 5,000 total landings or within 90 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(3) For airplanes identified as Groups 2, 3, and 4 in the alert
service bulletin: Perform the inspections on the inboard struts,
prior to the accumulation of 12,000 total landings, or within 90
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(b) If any fatigue cracking, stress corrosion, or fracturing is
detected during any inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD
that is within the limits specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-54A2179, Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997, prior to further
flight, repair in accordance with the alert service bulletin.
(c) If any fatigue cracking, stress corrosion, or fracturing is
detected during any inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD
that is beyond the limits specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-54A2179, Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997, prior to further
flight, accomplish corrective actions in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), Seattle, Washington.
(d) Accomplishment of the strut/wing modification specified in
paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this AD, as applicable, constitutes
terminating action for the requirements of this AD.
(1) For airplanes equipped with General Electric Model CF6-45 or
-50 series engines, or Pratt & Whitney Model JT9D-70 series engines:
Accomplish the strut/wing modification in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2158, Revision 2, dated August 15,
1996.
(2) For airplanes equipped with Pratt & Whitney Model JT9D
series engines (excluding Model JT9D-70 engines): Accomplish the
strut/wing modification in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-54A2159, Revision 2, dated March 14, 1996.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit
their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Seattle ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(g) Except as provided by the requirements of paragraph (c) of
this AD, the actions and the terminating modifications shall be done
in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2179,
Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997; Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
54A2158, Revision 2, dated August 15, 1996; and Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-54A2159, Revision 2, dated March 14, 1996.
(1) The detailed visual and borescope inspections shall be done
in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2179,
Revision 2, dated December 4, 1997. The incorporation by reference
of that service bulletin was approved by the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The strut/wing modification, if accomplished, shall be done
in accordance with the Boeing Alert Service Bulletins listed in the
following table. The incorporation by reference of those documents
was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register on
January 22, 1997 (61 FR 66201, December 17, 1996):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revision
Referenced service bulletin level Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
747-54A2158....................... 2 Aug. 15, 1996.
747-54A2159....................... 2 March 14, 1996.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane
Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(h) This amendment becomes effective on April 28, 1998.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 6, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-9589 Filed 4-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.