AD 99-23-22 R2

AD Final Rules - DRS_99-23-22_R.html
Copy URL
Print/Save as PDF
Document Versions
 Feedback
Details
AD Number:
99-23-22 R2
Document Type:
AD Final Rules
Docket Number:
2000-NM-81-AD
Subject Heading:
Airworthiness Directives; Various Transport Category Airplanes Equipped with Mode "C" Transponder(s)...Show more
Subject:
Transponders
Status:
Current
Citation:
(Federal Register: April 20, 2000)
Citation Publish Date:
04/20/2000
Effective Date:
04/20/2000
Make:
Airbus | BAE Systems (Operations) Limited | The Boeing Company | Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A. |...Show more
Model:
A300 B2-1A | A300 B2-1C | A300 B2-203 | A300 B2K-3C | A300 B4-103 | A300 B4-203 | A300 B4-2C | A310-...Show more
Product Type:
Aircraft
Product Subtype:
Large Airplane
Affected AD:
Superseded AD:
99-23-22 R1
Affected By:
Superseded By:
Service/Office:
Office of Primary Responsibility:
CFR Part Reference:
Part 39 (65 FR 21133 4/20/2000)
Comments:
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES FINAL RULES: 99-23-22 R2
CITATION:   [Federal Register: April 20, 2000]

PAGE NUMBER:   [Page 21133]

DOCKET NUMBER:   2000-NM-81-AD

AMENDMENT:   39-11686

AD NUMBER:   99-23-22 R2

SUBJECT HEADING:   Airworthiness Directives; Various Transport Category Airplanes Equipped with Mode "C" Transponder(s) with Single Gillham Code Altitude Input

ACTION:   Final rule; rescission

SUMMARY:   This amendment rescinds Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99-23-22 R1, which is applicable to various transport category airplanes equipped with Mode "C" transponder(s) with single Gillham code altitude input. That AD requires repetitive tests to detect discrepancies of the Mode "C" transponder(s), air data computer, and certain wiring connections; and corrective actions, if necessary. The requirements of that AD were intended to prevent false advisories that direct the flightcrew to change course and either climb or descend, which could result in the flightcrew deviating the airplane from its assigned flight path, and a possible mid-air collision. Since the issuance of that AD, test data have been collected that demonstrate that the repetitive tests are unnecessary.

DATES:   Effective April 20, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   Peter Skaves, Aerospace Engineer, Airplane and Flight Crew Interface
Branch, ANM-111, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056;
telephone (425) 227-2795; fax (425) 227-1320.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  
On November 4, 1999, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued AD 99-23-22, amendment 39-11418 (64 FR 61493, November 12, 1999), as revised by AD 99-23-22 R1, amendment 39-11473 (64 FR 70181, December 16, 1999), applicable to various transport category airplanes equipped with Mode "C" transponder(s) with single Gillham code altitude input. That AD requires repetitive tests to detect discrepancies of the Mode "C" transponder(s), air data computer, and certain wiring connections; and corrective actions, if necessary. That action was prompted by reports that, during level flight, the Traffic Alert Collision Avoidance System (TCAS II) issued false advisories that directed the flightcrew to change course and either climb or descend. Such false advisories, if not corrected, could result in the flightcrew deviating the airplane from its assigned flight path and a possible mid-air collision.

Actions Since Issuance of Previous AD
The compliance time for the initial test of the Mode "C" transponder(s) with single Gillham altitude code input, as required by AD 99-23-22 R1, has passed. Therefore, the FAA assumes that the test has been conducted at least once, and all applicable corrective actions have been accomplished, on all transport category airplanes affected by that AD. The following is a summary of the airplane inspections and test results:

Aircraft Test Results (AD 99-23-22 R1)
Aircraft test results reviewed = 1,142
Aircraft passing tests without corrective action required = 1,055
Aircraft failing tests with corrective action required = 87
Percent of aircraft that failed the AD test = 7.6%

Aircraft Wiring/Avionics Failures
Mode "C" transponder failures = 49
Air Data Computer (ADC) failures = 14
Encoding altimeter failures = 3
Gillham code wiring failures = 1
Miscellaneous wiring failures = 8
Failures sources under review = 12

The results of the transponder tests required by AD 99-23-22 R1 revealed that numerous Mode "C" transponders failed the test, and many of the Mode "C" test failures have been determined to be caused by a particular transponder type. All other test failures reported by operators appear to be random and isolated.

The FAA concludes that continued repetitive tests on the applicable airplane models listed in AD 99-23-22 R1 are unnecessary since the corrective actions have been accomplished on all transport category airplanes identified in that AD.

In addition, the FAA has determined that the repetitive performance of the tests required by AD 99-23-22 R1 may result in increased or accelerated component wear, which could contribute to reports of incorrect airplane altitude.

Future Rulemaking
Over 50 percent of the airplane test failures have been reported by operators to be caused by Mode "C" transponders. The FAA is conducting further reviews to determine whether a systematic root cause failure of that Mode "C" transponder exists. Based on the results of these reviews, the FAA may consider further rulemaking to address potential problems concerning the Mode "C" transponder.

FAA’s Determination

Because the results of the tests required by AD 99-23-22 R1 have identified and corrected the causes of the identified unsafe condition, and because repetitive performance of the test may increase or accelerate component wear and contribute to reports of incorrect airplane altitude, the FAA has determined that it is necessary to rescind AD 99-23-22 R1 to prevent operators from performing unnecessary and potentially harmful repetitive tests.

Since this action rescinds a requirement to perform unnecessary actions, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no additional burden on any person. Therefore, notice and public procedures hereon are unnecessary, and the rescission may be made effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

The Rescission
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-11473.

REGULATORY TEXT:  
99-23-22 R2 TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES: Amendment 39-11686. Docket No. 2000-NM-81-AD. Rescinds AD 99-23-22 R1, Amendment 39-11473.

Applicability: Transport category airplanes, as listed below, certificated in any category, equipped with any Mode "C" transponder with single Gillham code altitude input, including, but not limited to, the transponder part numbers listed below. Whether a Mode "C" transponder has a single Gillham code altitude input may be determined by reviewing the transponder installation instructions.

Airplane Models:
Airbus Industrie	Lockheed	Boeing (MDC)	Bombardier
A300	L-1011 TriStar	DC-10-30	CL-215-1A10
A310	L-188 Electra	DC-10-40	CL-215-6B11
British Aerospace	CASA	DC-9	CL-600-1A11
BAe Avro 146-RJ	CN-235	DC-9-81	CL-600-2A12
BAe ATP	Dassault Aviation	DC-9-82	CL-600-2B16
Fokker	Mystere Falcon 50	DC-9-83	Gulfstream
F28 Mark 0070	Mystere Falcon 900	DC-9-87	G1159 (G-II)
F28 Mark 0100	Mystere Falcon 200	Boeing 707	G-1159A (G-III)
F28 Mark 1000-4000	Fan Jet Falcon Series G	Boeing 727	G-IV
		Boeing 737	
		Boeing 747	
Mode "C" Transponder Part Numbers:
Rockwell Collins	Bendix	Wilcox	IFF
622-2224-001	066-1056-00	97637-201	APX-100
622-2224-003	066-1056-01	97637-301	APX-101
522-2703-001	066-1123-00		
522-2703-011	2041599-6508		
787-6211-001			
787-6211-002			
This rescission is effective April 20, 2000.

FOOTER:   Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 7, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.