AD 99-15-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-11 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-12 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-13 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-14 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-15 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-15F | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-21 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-31 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32 (VC-9C) | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32F | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32F (C-9A) | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-32F (C-9B) | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-33F | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-34 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-34F | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-41 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | DC-9-51 | (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracks found in the fuselage skin and doubler at the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb could result in rapid decompression and reduced structural integrity.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a one-time visual inspection to determine if all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been modified. Conduct low frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracks in the fuselage skin and doubler at all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb. Perform follow-on repetitive inspections and modifications as necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 3,575 landings after the effective date of the AD or prior to accumulating 28,000 landings since modification.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, -50 series airplanes and C-9 military airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
Corners Of Aft Lower Cargo Doorjamb
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
AD Final Rules - 991505.pdf Copy URL Document Versions Feedback DetailsAttachments/Public Comments AD Number: 99-15-05 Document Type: AD Final Rules Docket Number: 97-NM-49-AD Subject Heading: (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 Subject: Corners Of Aft Lower Cargo Doorjamb Status: Current Citation: (Federal Register: July 14, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 134)) Citation Publish Date: 07/14/1999 Effective Date: 08/18/1999 Make: The Boeing Company Model: DC-9-11 | DC-9-12 | DC-9-13 | DC-9-14 | DC-9-15 | DC-9-15F | DC-9-21 | DC-9-31 | DC-9-32 | DC-9-32 (...Show more Product Type: Aircraft Product Subtype: Large Airplane Affected AD: Superseded AD: Affected By: Superseded By: Service/Office: Office of Primary Responsibility: CFR Part Reference: Part 39 (64 FR 37838 No. 134 07/14/1999) Comments: CORRECTION: (Federal Register: September 10, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 175); Page 49080-49082; www.acc...Show more Automatic Zoom Actual Size Page Fit Page Width 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 200% 300% 400% 125% of 10 1 [Federal Register: September 10, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 175)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 49080-49082] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr10se99-3] ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. 97-NM-49-AD; Amendment 39-11224; AD 99-15-05] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 Series Airplanes, and C-9 (Military) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Final rule; correction. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– SUMMARY: This document corrects information in an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series airplanes, and C- 9 (military) airplanes. That AD currently requires a one-time visual inspection to determine if all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been previously modified. That AD also requires low frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracks of the fuselage skin and doubler at all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb, various follow-on repetitive inspections, and modification, if necessary. This amendment corrects two typographical errors involving reference to a certain Principal Structural Element (PSE) and correction of a compliance time. This correction is necessary to ensure that the correct PSE is inspected, and that an appropriate period of time is permitted for compliance with a certain inspection. DATE: Effective August 18, 1999. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 18, 1999 (64 FR 37838, July 14, 1999). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wahib Mina, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 1999, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued AD 99-15-05, amendment 39-11224 (64 FR 37838, July 14, 1999), which applies to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series airplanes, and C-9 (military) airplanes. That AD requires a one-time visual inspection to determine if all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been previously modified. That AD also requires low frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracks of the fuselage skin and doubler at all corners of the aft lower 2 cargo doorjamb, various follow-on repetitive inspections, and modification, if necessary. That AD was prompted by fatigue cracks found in the fuselage skin and doubler at the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb. The actions specified by that AD are intended to detect and correct such fatigue cracking, which could result in rapid decompression of the fuselage and consequent reduced structural integrity of the airplane. Need for the Correction The FAA has noted that a typographical error exists in paragraph (d) of the existing AD that involves the compliance time for performing a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracks on the skin adjacent to a certain modification of the corners of the right lower cargo doorjamb. That AD specified that the HFEC inspection should be performed ''prior to the accumulation of 28,000 landings since accomplishment of that modification, or within 3,500 landings after the effective date of the AD.'' However, the intent of the FAA was to specify ''prior to the accumulation of 28,000 landings since accomplishment of that modification, or within 3,575 landings after the effective date of the AD.'' Paragraph (d) of the existing AD has been revised to correctly specify 3,575 landings. Additionally, a typographical error occurred in the identification of the Principle Structural Element (PSE) specified in paragraph (e) of the existing AD. The PSE was identified as ''PSE 53.09.033;'' however, the appropriate number for the PSE should have been identified as ''53.09.035;'' That correction has been included in this AD. Correction of Publication This document corrects the typographical errors in AD 99-15-05, and correctly adds the AD as an amendment to section 39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.13). The final rule is being reprinted in its entirety for the convenience of affected operators. The effective date of the AD remains August 18, 1999. Since this action only identifies the appropriate PSE to be inspected and corrects a compliance time (which actually extends the compliance period somewhat from the existing AD), it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no additional burden on any person. Therefore, the FAA has determined that notice and public procedures are unnecessary. List of Subject in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Correction Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39–AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Corrected] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by correctly adding the following airworthiness directive (AD):
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
AD Final Rules - 991505.pdf Copy URL Document Versions Feedback DetailsAttachments/Public Comments AD Number: 99-15-05 Document Type: AD Final Rules Docket Number: 97-NM-49-AD Subject Heading: (Correction) Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 Subject: Corners Of Aft Lower Cargo Doorjamb Status: Current Citation: (Federal Register: July 14, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 134)) Citation Publish Date: 07/14/1999 Effective Date: 08/18/1999 Make: The Boeing Company Model: DC-9-11 | DC-9-12 | DC-9-13 | DC-9-14 | DC-9-15 | DC-9-15F | DC-9-21 | DC-9-31 | DC-9-32 | DC-9-32 (...Show more Product Type: Aircraft Product Subtype: Large Airplane Affected AD: Superseded AD: Affected By: Superseded By: Service/Office: Office of Primary Responsibility: CFR Part Reference: Part 39 (64 FR 37838 No. 134 07/14/1999) Comments: CORRECTION: (Federal Register: September 10, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 175); Page 49080-49082; www.acc...Show more Automatic Zoom Actual Size Page Fit Page Width 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 200% 300% 400% 125% of 10 1 [Federal Register: September 10, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 175)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 49080-49082] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr10se99-3] ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. 97-NM-49-AD; Amendment 39-11224; AD 99-15-05] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 Series Airplanes, and C-9 (Military) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Final rule; correction. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– SUMMARY: This document corrects information in an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series airplanes, and C- 9 (military) airplanes. That AD currently requires a one-time visual inspection to determine if all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been previously modified. That AD also requires low frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracks of the fuselage skin and doubler at all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb, various follow-on repetitive inspections, and modification, if necessary. This amendment corrects two typographical errors involving reference to a certain Principal Structural Element (PSE) and correction of a compliance time. This correction is necessary to ensure that the correct PSE is inspected, and that an appropriate period of time is permitted for compliance with a certain inspection. DATE: Effective August 18, 1999. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 18, 1999 (64 FR 37838, July 14, 1999). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wahib Mina, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 1999, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued AD 99-15-05, amendment 39-11224 (64 FR 37838, July 14, 1999), which applies to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series airplanes, and C-9 (military) airplanes. That AD requires a one-time visual inspection to determine if all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been previously modified. That AD also requires low frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracks of the fuselage skin and doubler at all corners of the aft lower 2 cargo doorjamb, various follow-on repetitive inspections, and modification, if necessary. That AD was prompted by fatigue cracks found in the fuselage skin and doubler at the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb. The actions specified by that AD are intended to detect and correct such fatigue cracking, which could result in rapid decompression of the fuselage and consequent reduced structural integrity of the airplane. Need for the Correction The FAA has noted that a typographical error exists in paragraph (d) of the existing AD that involves the compliance time for performing a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracks on the skin adjacent to a certain modification of the corners of the right lower cargo doorjamb. That AD specified that the HFEC inspection should be performed ''prior to the accumulation of 28,000 landings since accomplishment of that modification, or within 3,500 landings after the effective date of the AD.'' However, the intent of the FAA was to specify ''prior to the accumulation of 28,000 landings since accomplishment of that modification, or within 3,575 landings after the effective date of the AD.'' Paragraph (d) of the existing AD has been revised to correctly specify 3,575 landings. Additionally, a typographical error occurred in the identification of the Principle Structural Element (PSE) specified in paragraph (e) of the existing AD. The PSE was identified as ''PSE 53.09.033;'' however, the appropriate number for the PSE should have been identified as ''53.09.035;'' That correction has been included in this AD. Correction of Publication This document corrects the typographical errors in AD 99-15-05, and correctly adds the AD as an amendment to section 39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.13). The final rule is being reprinted in its entirety for the convenience of affected operators. The effective date of the AD remains August 18, 1999. Since this action only identifies the appropriate PSE to be inspected and corrects a compliance time (which actually extends the compliance period somewhat from the existing AD), it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no additional burden on any person. Therefore, the FAA has determined that notice and public procedures are unnecessary. List of Subject in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Correction Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39–AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Corrected] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by correctly adding the following airworthiness directive (AD):
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 8, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.