AD 96-18-19
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-7-1 | Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-7-100 | Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-7-101 | Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-7-102 | Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-7-103 | Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Disbonding of fuselage skin panels due to a manufacturing process error, which could result in degradation of the structural capability of the airplane fuselage.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a non-destructive inspection of fuselage skin panels within 6 months after the effective date using Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 7-51-1, Revision 'A'. If disbonding is found, repair it prior to further flight. Repeat inspections every 3 years if no disbonding is detected.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3 years if no disbonding is detected.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
de Havilland Model DHC-7 series airplanes, serial numbers 003 through 113 inclusive.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
Skin Panels of Fuselage
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
AD Final Rules - DRS_96-18-19.html Copy URL Print/Save as PDF Document Versions Feedback Details AD Number: 96-18-19 Document Type: AD Final Rules Docket Number: 95-NM-264-AD Subject Heading: Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes Subject: Skin Panels of Fuselage Status: Current Citation: Federal Register: September 9, 1996 (Volume 61, Number 175) Citation Publish Date: 09/09/1996 Effective Date: 10/15/1996 Make: Viking Air Limited Model: DHC-7-1 | DHC-7-100 | DHC-7-101 | DHC-7-102 | DHC-7-103 Product Type: Aircraft Product Subtype: Large Airplane Affected AD: Superseded AD: Affected By: Superseded By: Service/Office: Office of Primary Responsibility: CFR Part Reference: Part 39 Comments: AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES FINAL RULES: 96-18-19 CITATION: [Federal Register: September 9, 1996 (Volume 61, Number 175)] PAGE NUMBER: [Page 47410] DOCKET NUMBER: 95-NM-264-AD AMENDMENT: 39-9746 AD NUMBER: 96-18-19 SUBJECT HEADING: Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes ACTION: Final rule SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain de Havilland Model DHC-7 series airplanes, that requires repetitive non-destructive inspections to detect disbonding of fuselage skin panels, and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report of disbonding on fuselage skin panels, which was attributed to a manufacturing process error. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent disbonding of the skin panels of the fuselage, which could result in degradation of the structural capability of the airplane fuselage. DATES: Effective October 15, 1996. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of October 15, 1996. ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario, Canada M3K 1Y5. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sol Maroof, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 256-7522; fax (516) 568-2716. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain de Havilland Model DHC-7 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on May 21, 1996 (61 FR 25417). That action proposed to require repetitive non-destructive inspections to detect disbonding of the fuselage skin panels, and repair, if necessary. Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the single comment received. The commenter supports the proposed rule. Conclusion After careful review of the available data, including the comment noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed. Cost Impact The FAA estimates that 50 de Havilland Model DHC-7 series airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 18 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $54,000, or $1,080 per airplane, per inspection cycle. The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. Regulatory Impact The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES." List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 - [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive: REGULATORY TEXT: 96-18-19 DE HAVILLAND, INC.: Amendment 39-9746. Docket 95-NM-264-AD. Applicability: Model DHC-7 series airplanes, serial numbers 003 through 113 inclusive; certificated in any category. NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent disbonding of the skin panels of the fuselage, which could result in degradation of the structural capability of the airplane fuselage, accomplish the following: (a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, perform a non-destructive inspection to detect disbonding of the fuselage skin panels, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 7-51-1, Revision 'A', dated March 31, 1995. (1) If no disbonding is detected, repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3 years. (2) If any disbonding is detected, prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, New York ACO. NOTE 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the New York ACO. (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (d) The inspections shall be done in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 7-51-1, Revision 'A', dated March 31, 1995. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario, Canada M3K 1Y5. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (e) This amendment becomes effective on October 15, 1996. FOOTER:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
AD Final Rules - DRS_96-18-19.html Copy URL Print/Save as PDF Document Versions Feedback Details AD Number: 96-18-19 Document Type: AD Final Rules Docket Number: 95-NM-264-AD Subject Heading: Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes Subject: Skin Panels of Fuselage Status: Current Citation: Federal Register: September 9, 1996 (Volume 61, Number 175) Citation Publish Date: 09/09/1996 Effective Date: 10/15/1996 Make: Viking Air Limited Model: DHC-7-1 | DHC-7-100 | DHC-7-101 | DHC-7-102 | DHC-7-103 Product Type: Aircraft Product Subtype: Large Airplane Affected AD: Superseded AD: Affected By: Superseded By: Service/Office: Office of Primary Responsibility: CFR Part Reference: Part 39 Comments: AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES FINAL RULES: 96-18-19 CITATION: [Federal Register: September 9, 1996 (Volume 61, Number 175)] PAGE NUMBER: [Page 47410] DOCKET NUMBER: 95-NM-264-AD AMENDMENT: 39-9746 AD NUMBER: 96-18-19 SUBJECT HEADING: Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-7 Series Airplanes ACTION: Final rule SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain de Havilland Model DHC-7 series airplanes, that requires repetitive non-destructive inspections to detect disbonding of fuselage skin panels, and repair, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report of disbonding on fuselage skin panels, which was attributed to a manufacturing process error. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent disbonding of the skin panels of the fuselage, which could result in degradation of the structural capability of the airplane fuselage. DATES: Effective October 15, 1996. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of October 15, 1996. ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario, Canada M3K 1Y5. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sol Maroof, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 256-7522; fax (516) 568-2716. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain de Havilland Model DHC-7 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on May 21, 1996 (61 FR 25417). That action proposed to require repetitive non-destructive inspections to detect disbonding of the fuselage skin panels, and repair, if necessary. Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the single comment received. The commenter supports the proposed rule. Conclusion After careful review of the available data, including the comment noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed. Cost Impact The FAA estimates that 50 de Havilland Model DHC-7 series airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 18 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $54,000, or $1,080 per airplane, per inspection cycle. The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. Regulatory Impact The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES." List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 - [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive: REGULATORY TEXT: 96-18-19 DE HAVILLAND, INC.: Amendment 39-9746. Docket 95-NM-264-AD. Applicability: Model DHC-7 series airplanes, serial numbers 003 through 113 inclusive; certificated in any category. NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent disbonding of the skin panels of the fuselage, which could result in degradation of the structural capability of the airplane fuselage, accomplish the following: (a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, perform a non-destructive inspection to detect disbonding of the fuselage skin panels, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 7-51-1, Revision 'A', dated March 31, 1995. (1) If no disbonding is detected, repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3 years. (2) If any disbonding is detected, prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, New York ACO. NOTE 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the New York ACO. (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (d) The inspections shall be done in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 7-51-1, Revision 'A', dated March 31, 1995. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario, Canada M3K 1Y5. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (e) This amendment becomes effective on October 15, 1996. FOOTER:
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 8, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.