AD 2024-11-02

final rule
Data completeness: 90%

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AD Number
2024-11-02
Status
final_rule
Effective Date
Product Category
aircraft
Docket
Docket No. FAA-2023-2242
FR Citation
89 FR 58958

Applicability

TypeManufacturerModelDetails
aircraft Bombardier Various Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

Unsafe Condition

Failure or degradation of the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator (HSTA) and motor brake assembly could result in loss of control of the airplane.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Required Actions

Revise the existing maintenance or inspection program to incorporate new or more restrictive maintenance tasks, including inspections and overhauls of the HSTA as specified in the referenced service information.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Compliance Time

Within 12 months of the effective date (August 26, 2024).

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Affected Aircraft

Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-100-1A10 airplanes.

AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.

Document Text

Show extracted text (verify against official source)
58958 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations concerns with this rulemaking or its potential to limit participation in the industry. AMS therefore determined the assessment rate change will not have an impact on Tribes in the production area. Accordingly, AMS made no changes to the rule based on the comments received. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https:// www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/ moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. After consideration of all relevant material presented, including the information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and other available information, AMS has determined that this rule is consistent with and will effectuate the purposes of the Act. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 905 Grapefruit, Marketing agreements, Oranges, Pummelos, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Tangerines. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 905 as follows: PART 905—ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT, TANGERINES, AND PUMMELOS GROWN IN FLORIDA ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 905 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. ■ 2. Section 905.235 is revised to read as follows: § 905.235 Assessment rate. On and after August 1, 2023, an assessment rate of $0.02 per 4 ⁄ 5 -bushel carton or equivalent is established for Florida citrus covered under the Order. Erin Morris, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2024–15975 Filed 7–19–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2023–2242; Project Identifier MCAI–2023–00704–T; Amendment 39–22763; AD 2024–11–02] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes AGENCY : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION : Final rule. SUMMARY : The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD–100–1A10 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive maintenance tasks are necessary. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive maintenance tasks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES : This AD is effective August 26, 2024. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 26, 2024. ADDRESSES : AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2023–2242; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Material Incorporated by Reference: • For Bombardier material, contact Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400 Co ˆ te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Que ´bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–2999; email ac.yul@ aero.bombardier.com; website bombardier.com . • You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. It is also available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2023–2242. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Gabriel Kim, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516– 228–7300; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@ faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD–100–1A10 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2023 (88 FR 87725). The NPRM was prompted by AD CF–2023– 34, dated May 25, 2023, issued by Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada (referred to after this as the MCAI). The MCAI states that new or more restrictive maintenance tasks have been developed. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive maintenance tasks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address failure or degradation of the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator (HSTA) and motor brake assembly. A failed or degraded HSTA or motor brake assembly could result in loss of control of the airplane. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2023–2242. Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive Comments The FAA received comments from a commenter. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA’s response to each comment. Request for Revised Compliance Language The commenter requested a revision to paragraph (g) of the proposed AD to reflect the language from MCAI that more explicitly allows for the use of superseding Temporary Revisions or later revisions. The commenter stated that the proposed phrase, ‘‘incorporate the information specified in,’’ is too open to interpretation. The FAA partially agrees with the request to revise the proposed language. The phrase ‘‘incorporate the information specified’’ refers to the information stated in the tasks referenced in figures 1 and 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD. As long as the information in the referenced task remains the same, an operator can show compliance with that task without having to obtain an alternative method of compliance VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Jul 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM 22JYR1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1

58959 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations (AMOC) approval. The FAA has revised paragraph (g) of this AD to include ‘‘incorporate the information in the tasks specified . . .’’ to clarify that it’s only the information within the task that is mandated to be incorporated into the maintenance or inspection program and that as long as that task information doesn’t change from the time limit/ maintenance check (TLMC) document revision specified in figures 1 and 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD an AMOC is not required. Request for Reference to Later Revision of Service Information The commenter requested that the FAA revise figures 1 and 2 to paragraph (g) of the proposed AD to reference a general revision of a TLMC instead of a temporary revision. The commenter stated that without the language from the MCAI that states permission to use ‘‘or later revision,’’ the proposed AD would not allow the use of the general revision of the TLMC that contains the task information. The commenter added that an operator would then be required to maintain a copy of the temporary revision and general revisions of the TLMC that are noted in figures 1 and 2 to paragraph (g) of the proposed AD. The FAA provides the following clarification. As previously mentioned, the AD requires that the maintenance or inspection program be revised to incorporate the task information specified in the applicable time TLMC or temporary revision (TR) document. Therefore, as long the information is the same in the general revision of a TLMC as the task information specified in the TR document, an AMOC is not required. The FAA has revised paragraph (g) of this AD for clarification. Conclusion This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA’s bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on this product. Except for minor editorial changes, and any other changes described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any operator. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 The FAA reviewed the following Bombardier service information, which describes new or more restrictive airworthiness limitation maintenance tasks that specify inspection and overhaul of the HSTA and add flight cycle and flight-hour limitations. Note: The asterisk (or ‘‘one star’’) or double asterisk (‘‘two star’’) with the last three digits of the task numbers indicates that the task is an airworthiness limitation task. • Sections 5–10–20, ‘‘Time Limits— Supplementary Limitations,’’ and 5–10– 40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’ of part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 350 Time Limits/Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 350 TLMC, Revision 13, dated June 14, 2022, which include Task 27– 40–00–104*, ‘‘Restoration (Overhaul) of the Horizontal-Stabilizer Trim-Actuator (HSTA), Part No. C47100–004 and subs,’’ and Task 27–41–05–104*, ‘‘Restoration (Overhaul) of the Horizontal-Stabilizer Trim-Actuator (HSTA), Part No. C47100–004/-005.’’ • Sections 5–10–20, ‘‘Time Limits— Supplementary Limitations,’’ and 5–10– 40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’ of part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 300 Time Limits/Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 300 TLMC, Revision 23, dated June 14, 2022, which include Task 27– 40–00–104*, ‘‘Restoration (Overhaul) of the Horizontal-Stabilizer Trim-Actuator (HSTA), Part No. C47100–004 and subs,’’ and Task 27–41–05–104*, ‘‘Restoration (Overhaul) of the Horizontal-Stabilizer Trim-Actuator (HSTA), Part No. C47100–004/-005.’’ • Temporary Revision 5–2–31, dated January 31, 2023, which includes Task 27–40–00–108**, ‘‘Restoration (Inspection) of the Horizontal-Stabilizer Trim-Actuator (HSTA), Part No. C47100–003 and subs.’’ • Temporary Revision 5–2–102, dated January 31, 2023, which includes Task 27–40–00–108**, ‘‘Restoration (Inspection) of the Horizontal-Stabilizer Trim-Actuator (HSTA), Part No. C47100–003 and subs.’’ These documents are distinct since they apply to different airplane models. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this AD affects 737 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD: The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane estimate. Therefore, the agency estimates the average total cost per operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours × $85 per work-hour). Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Jul 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM 22JYR1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1

58960 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations The Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive: 2024–11–02 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39–22763; Docket No. FAA–2023–2242; Project Identifier MCAI–2023–00704–T. (a) Effective Date This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 26, 2024. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD–100–1A10 airplanes, certificated in any category, having serial numbers (S/Ns) 20003 through 20500 inclusive, and 20501 through 20959 inclusive. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/Maintenance Checks; 27, Stabilizer. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive maintenance tasks are necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address failure or degradation of the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator (HSTA) and motor brake assembly. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in loss of control of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the information in the tasks specified in figure 1 or 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD, as applicable. The initial compliance time for doing the tasks is at the time specified in the applicable temporary revision (TR) or time limit/maintenance check (TLMC) document specified in figures 1 and 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. When the information in the applicable TR has been incorporated into the general revision of that Bombardier TLMC, the maintenance or inspection program may be revised using the information in the general revision. Figure 1 to Paragraph (g)—Tasks for Model BD–100–1A10 Airplanes Having S/Ns 20003 Through 20500 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Jul 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM 22JYR1 ER22JY24.200</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 Task number Task title TLMC TLMC or TR document section Restoration (Inspection) of the Horizontal- 5-10-40, Bombardier Temporary Stabilizer Trim- Certification 27-40-00-108** Actuator Maintenance Revision 5-2-102, dated (HSTA), Part No. Requirements January 31, 2023 C47100-003 and subs Restoration Part 2, "Airworthiness (Overhaul) of the Limitations," of the Horizontal- 5-10-40, Bombardier Challenger 2 7-40-00-104 * Stabilizer Trim- Certification 300 Time Actuator Maintenance Limits/Maintenance (HSTA), Part No. Requirements Check, Publication No. C4 7100-004 and CH 300 TLMC, Revision subs 23, dated June 14, 2022 Restoration Part 2, "Airworthiness (Overhaul) of the Limitations," of the Horizontal 5-10-20, Time Bombardier Challenger 27-41-05-104* Stabilizer Trim Limits- 300 Time actuator (HSTA), Supplementary Limits/Maintenance Part No. C47100- Limitations Check, Publication No. 004/-005 CH 300 TLMC, Revision 23, dated June 14, 2022

58961 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Note 1 to Figure 1 to paragraph (g): The section number in the footer on certain pages of the TLMC sections is incomplete ( i.e., ‘‘05–10–2’’ instead of ‘‘05–10–20’’ and ‘‘05– 10–4’’ instead of ‘‘05–10–40’’). Note 2 to Figure 1 to paragraph (g): The asterisk (or ‘‘one star’’) or double asterisk (‘‘two star’’) with the last three digits of the task numbers listed in figures 1 and 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD indicates that the task is an airworthiness limitation task. Figure 2 to Paragraph (g)—Tasks for Model BD–100–1A10 Airplanes Having S/Ns 20501 Through 20959 (h) No Alternative Actions, or Intervals After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions ( e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions and intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. (i) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, mail it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, at the address identified in paragraph (j) of this AD or email to: 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. If mailing information, also submit information by email. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Bombardier Inc.’s Transport Canada Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature. (j) Additional Information For more information about this AD, contact Gabriel Kim, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516– 228–7300; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. (k) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Section 5–10–20, ‘‘Time Limits— Supplementary Limitations,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 300 Time Limits/ Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 300 TLMC, Revision 23, dated June 14, 2022. Note 3 to paragraph (k)(2)(i): The section number in the footer on pages 1 and 2 of Section 5–10–20, ‘‘Time Limits— Supplementary Limitations,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 300 Time Limits/ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Jul 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM 22JYR1 ER22JY24.201</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 Task number Task title TLMC section TLMC or TR document Restoration (Inspection) of the Horizontal- 5-10-40, Bombardier Temporary Stabilizer Certification 27-40-00-108** Trim-Actuator Maintenance Revision 5-2-31, dated (HSTA), Part Requirements January 31, 2023 No. C47100- 003 and subs Restoration Part 2, "Airworthiness (Overhaul) of Limitations," of the the Horizontal- 5-10-40, Bombardier Challenger 2 7-40-00-104 * Stabilizer Certification 350 Time Trim-Actuator Maintenance Limits/Maintenance (HSTA), Part Requirements Check, Publication No. No. C47100- CH 350 TLMC, Revision 004 and subs 13, dated June 14, 2022 Restoration Part 2, "Airworthiness (Overhaul) of Limitations," of the the Horizontal 5-10-20, Time Bombardier Challenger 27-41-05-104* Stabilizer Trim Limits- 350 Time actuator Supplementary Limits/Maintenance (HSTA), Part Limitations Check, Publication No. No. C47100- CH 350 TLMC, Revision 004/-005 13, dated June 14, 2022

58962 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 300 TLMC, Revision 23, dated June 14, 2022, is incorrectly identified as ‘‘05–10–2’’ instead of ‘‘05–10–20.’’ (ii) Section 5–10–20, ‘‘Time Limits— Supplementary Limitations,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 350 Time Limits/ Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 350 TLMC, Revision 13, dated June 14, 2022. Note 4 to paragraph (k)(2)(ii): The section number in the footer on pages 1 and 2 of Section 5–10–20, ‘‘Time Limits— Supplementary Limitations,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 350 Time Limits/ Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 350 TLMC, Revision 13, dated June 14, 2022, is incorrectly identified as ‘‘05–10–2’’ instead of ‘‘05–10–20.’’ (iii) Section 5–10–40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 300 Time Limits/ Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 300 TLMC, Revision 23, dated June 14, 2022. Note 5 to paragraph (k)(2)(iii): The section number in the footer on the cover page of Section 5–10–40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 300 Time Limits/Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 300 TLMC, Revision 23, dated June 14, 2022, is incorrectly identified as ‘‘05–10–4’’ instead of ‘‘05–10–40.’’ (iv) Section 5–10–40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 350 Time Limits/ Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 350 TLMC, Revision 13, dated June 14, 2022. Note 6 to paragraph (k)(2)(iv): The section number in the footer on the cover page of Section 5–10–40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger 350 Time Limits/Maintenance Check, Publication No. CH 350 TLMC, Revision 13, dated June 14, 2022, is incorrectly identified as ‘‘05–10–4’’ instead of ‘‘05–10–40.’’ (v) Bombardier Temporary Revision 5–2– 31, dated January 31, 2023. (vi) Bombardier Temporary Revision 5–2– 102, dated January 31, 2023. (3) For Bombardier material, contact Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400 Co ˆ te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Que ´bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–2999; email ac.yul@ aero.bombardier.com; website bombardier.com . (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov. Issued on July 16, 2024. James D. Foltz, Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2024–15972 Filed 7–19–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2023–1891; Project Identifier AD–2023–00612–R; Amendment 39–22774; AD 2024–12–10] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Centerpointe Aerospace Inc. Helicopters AGENCY : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION : Final rule. SUMMARY : The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Centerpointe Aerospace Inc. (Centerpointe) Model S–58BT, S–58DT, S–58ET, S–58FT, S–58HT, and S–58JT helicopters. This AD was prompted by an indication of a crack on the angle gearbox mount (AGBM). This AD requires repetitively performing a fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) of the AGBM at specified time intervals and, depending on the results, removing the AGBM from service. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES : This AD is effective August 26, 2024. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 26, 2024. ADDRESSES : AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2023–1891; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Material Incorporated by Reference: • For Centerpointe Aerospace service information identified in this AD, contact Centerpointe Aerospace Inc., 279 Blackland Road, Fate, TX 75189; phone: (972) 636–9601; email: Operations@avnresources.com; website: californiahelicopter.com . • You may view this service information at the FAA, Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. It is also available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2023–1891. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jacob Fitch, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; phone: (817) 222– 4130; email: jacob.fitch@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Centerpointe Model S– 58BT, S–58DT, S–58ET, S–58FT, S–58HT, and S– 58JT helicopters. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on October 3, 2023 (88 FR 68002). The NPRM was prompted by fatigue cracking that was found on a Model S–58BT helicopter during a preflight inspection. The fatigue cracking was found in the angle supports and cross-members forming the edges of the AGBM. Due to their similarity to the Model S–58BT helicopter, the FAA determined that Centerpointe Model S–58DT, S–58ET, S–58FT, S–58HT, and S–58JT helicopters are also affected by the same unsafe condition. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require repetitive FPIs of the AGBM for a crack. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive Comments The FAA received comments from one commenter, Midwest Helicopter Airways, Inc. (Midwest). Midwest disagrees with the FAA’s determination of the unsafe condition in the proposed AD and opines that a supplemental enhanced visual inspection in addition to inspections performed on the AGBM during routine maintenance is sufficient. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA’s response to each comment. Request To Change the Unsafe Condition Midwest stated its opinion that the root cause for the failure of the AGBM structural member was not a result of fatigue cracking, but was due to improper installation, routing, or securing of an electrical wire. Midwest submitted photos sent from a VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Jul 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM 22JYR1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1

Source: Official FAA Source ↗

Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026

Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain

This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.