AD 2020-17-03
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A318-111 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A318-112 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A318-121 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A318-122 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-111 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-112 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-113 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-114 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-115 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-131 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-132 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A319-133 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-211 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-212 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-214 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-216 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-231 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-232 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-233 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-111 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-112 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-131 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-211 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-212 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-213 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-231 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A321-232 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracks on continuity fittings at the lower framing of the front windshield on airplanes on which Airbus Production Modification 22058 has been embodied, which could lead to failure of the continuity fittings at the lower node of the windshield central frame, possibly resulting in decompression of the airplane and injury to occupants.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections of the central node windshield area for cracking, and applicable corrective actions if cracking is found, as specified in EASA AD 2020-0005.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus SAS Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus SAS Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracks on continuity fittings at the lower framing of the front windshield on airplanes on which a certain production modification has been embodied. Additional analysis showed that certain certification requirements for damage tolerance and fatigue are not met on airplanes in a certain post- production modification configuration. This AD requires repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections of the central node windshield area for cracking, and applicable corrective actions if cracking is found, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
category, as identified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2020-0005, dated January 13, 2020 (``EASA AD 2020-0005'').
(1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
(2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
(3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes.
(4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 168 (Friday, August 28, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53152-53156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18930]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0201; Product Identifier 2020-NM-007-AD; Amendment
39-21208; AD 2020-17-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus SAS Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes;
Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes;
Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and
Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracks on continuity
fittings at the lower framing of the front windshield on airplanes on
which a certain production modification has been embodied. Additional
analysis showed that certain certification requirements for damage
tolerance and fatigue are not met on airplanes in a certain post-
production modification configuration. This AD requires repetitive high
frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections of the central node
windshield area for cracking, and applicable corrective actions if
cracking is found, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective October 2, 2020.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 2,
2020.
ADDRESSES: For material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4e5e0d7e4c1c5d7c58ac1d1d6cbd4c58ac1d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0b1b483b095918391de9585829f8091de9585">[email protected]</span></a>; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at <a href="https://ad.easa.europa.eu">https://ad.easa.europa.eu</a>. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
[[Page 53153]]
It is also available in the AD docket on the internet at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0201.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0201; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223;
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e1d0f00040f17401c0f02060f002e080f0f40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0370626d69627a2d71626f6b626d436562622d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0005, dated January 13, 2020
(``EASA AD 2020-0005'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122
airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -215, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and
-232 airplanes. Model A320-215 airplanes are not certified by the FAA
and are not included on the U.S. type certificate data sheet; this AD
therefore does not include those airplanes in the applicability.
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus SAS
Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -
113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212,
-214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -
131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on March 20, 2020 (85 FR 16011). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of fatigue cracks on continuity fittings at the
lower framing of the front windshield on airplanes on which a certain
production modification has been embodied. Additional analysis showed
that certain certification requirements for damage tolerance and
fatigue are not met on airplanes in a certain post-production
modification configuration. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive
HFEC inspections of the central node windshield area for cracking, and
applicable corrective actions if cracking is found, as specified in an
EASA AD.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address fatigue cracks on continuity
fittings at the lower framing of the front windshield on airplanes on
which Airbus Production Modification 22058 (which is included in Airbus
Modification 21999) has been embodied. Additional analysis showed that
certain certification requirements for damage tolerance and fatigue are
not met on airplanes in a post-production Modification 22058
configuration. The FAA is issuing this AD to address this condition,
which could lead to failure of the continuity fittings at the lower
node of the windshield central frame, possibly resulting in
decompression of the airplane and injury to occupants. See the MCAI for
additional background information.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comment received
on the NPRM and the FAA's response.
Request To Allow Alternative Repair Methods
United Airlines requested that for the threshold inspection,
instead of using the inspection procedures specified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1331, dated January 14, 2019 (``Airbus SB A320-53-
1331''), the final rule allow operators to substitute previous repairs
done using the procedures in Airworthiness Limitation Item (ALI) task
531129 [special detailed inspection of center node continuity fittings
and windshield on the left-hand and right-hand sides] of the Airbus
Model A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS), and
procedures for ongoing repairs that contain unique inspection programs,
which are described in Airbus SB A320-53-1331. The commenter stated
that this would prevent discrepancies when operators did threshold
inspections using the procedures described in Airbus SB A320-53-1331.
The commenter noted that the inspection procedures in Airbus SB A320-
53-1331 are based on an assumption that the area of inspection has not
been repaired.
In addition, the commenter remarked that paragraph (2) of EASA AD
2020-0005 partially addresses the issue of inspections done in areas
that were previously repaired. The commenter pointed out that paragraph
(2) of EASA AD 2020-0005 addresses only the central lower node
continuity fittings but that the required inspection involves both the
windshield frame and central lower node continuity fittings. The
commenter explained that the central lower node fittings are a portion
of the general lower windshield frame attachment inspection area. The
commenter stated that it has airplanes with reinforcement repairs on
the windshield frame and that those repairs were developed by Airbus.
The commenter shared that the repair design approval sheet (RDAS)
provided by Airbus stated ``impact to ALI 531129'' since the repair
reinforced and covered the windshield frame pockets. The commenter
concluded that a new inspection method and inspection intervals were
defined in that RDAS.
Furthermore, the commenter noted that windshield replacement is a
substantial cost and burden to operators, and alternative repairs are
highly desirable to reduce the cost of a windshield frame and
continuity fitting repair.
Although the FAA acknowledges the commenter's concern about window
replacement costs, the agency disagrees with the commenter's request.
The FAA is not aware of a global RDAS, issued under Airbus SAS's EASA
Design Organization Approval, that is applicable to the entire U.S.-
registered airplane fleet. The RDAS issued to United Airlines is
specific to the configuration of the airplanes in United Airlines'
fleet. Therefore, the FAA cannot revise corrective actions relative to
the unsafe condition identified in this AD for the entire U.S.-
registered fleet based on the United Airlines' fleet configuration,
which was altered by certain previously approved repairs. Paragraph
(i)(1) of this AD states that operators may use the procedures found in
14 CFR 39.19 to request an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) if
an airplane's configuration does not allow compliance with the
requirements of an AD.
In addition, paragraph (7) of EASA AD 2020-0005 specifies that
accomplishment of inspections using ALI task 531129, as specified in
table 1 to paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2020-0005, is acceptable for
compliance with
[[Page 53154]]
the requirements of paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2020-0005 for only the
first inspection that is required after the effective date of that EASA
AD.
EASA, the State of Design Authority for these airplane models,
conducted a risk assessment, along with a cost benefit analysis, and
developed corrective actions that are required to mitigate the risk of
the unsafe condition addressed in EASA AD 2020-0005. The FAA finds that
the service information specified in EASA AD 2020-0005, including the
modification procedure in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1329, dated
December 21, 2018 (``Airbus SB A320-53-1329''), is necessary to address
the unsafe condition. The purpose of the actions specified in Airbus SB
A320-53-1329 is to prevent cracks on the front windshield frame and
continuity fitting by installing reinforced parts. Therefore, the FAA
has not revised this AD regarding this issue.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule as proposed, except for minor
editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2020-0005 describes procedures for repetitive HFEC
inspections of the central node windshield area for cracking, and
applicable corrective actions if cracking is found. The corrective
actions include modification or repair. This material is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1,203 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,615........................ $0 $1,615 $1,942,845
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Table does not include estimated costs for reporting.
The FAA estimates that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the reporting requirement in this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the
cost of reporting the inspection results on U.S. operators to be
$102,255, or $85 per product.
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition modifications that would be required based on the results of
any required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition modifications:
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Modifications *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,122 work-hours x $85 per hour = $316,043 $411,413
$95,370..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the agency
to provide cost estimates for the on-condition repairs specified in
this AD.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation
Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
[[Page 53155]]
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2020-17-03 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-21208; Docket No. FAA-2020-0201;
Product Identifier 2020-NM-007-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective October 2, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
category, as identified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2020-0005, dated January 13, 2020 (``EASA AD 2020-0005'').
(1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
(2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
(3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes.
(4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracks on continuity
fittings at the lower framing of the front windshield on airplanes
on which Airbus Production Modification 22058 (which is included in
Airbus Modification 21999) has been embodied. Additional analysis
showed that certain certification requirements for damage tolerance
and fatigue are not met on airplanes in a post-production
Modification 22058 configuration. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address this condition, which could lead to failure of the
continuity fittings at the lower node of the windshield central
frame, possibly resulting in decompression of the airplane and
injury to occupants.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2020-0005.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0005
(1) Where EASA AD 2020-0005 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0005 does not apply
to this AD.
(3) Paragraph (8) of EASA AD 2020-0005 specifies to report
inspection results to Airbus within a certain compliance time. For
this AD, report inspection results at the applicable time specified
in paragraph (h)(3)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the inspection.
(ii) If the inspection was done before the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the effective date
of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#764f5b3720255b373f245b4145465b373b39353610171758111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99a0b4d8cfcab4d8d0cbb4aeaaa9b4d8d4d6dad9fff8f8b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020-0005 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, RC
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(4) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement: A federal agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 1
hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
All responses to this collection of information are mandatory as
required by this AD. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or
any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden to Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax 206-231-3223; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0172606f6b60782f73606d69606f416760602f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9deefcf3f7fce4b3effcf1f5fcf3ddfbfcfcb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020-0005,
dated January 13, 2020.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For information about EASA AD 2020-0005, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcfdf8cffcd9ddcfdd92d9c9ced3ccdd92d9c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d3c390e3d181c0e1c5318080f120d1c531808">[email protected]</span></a>; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at <a href="https://ad.easa.europa.eu">https://ad.easa.europa.eu</a>.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call
[[Page 53156]]
206-231-3195. This material may be found in the AD docket on the
internet at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0201.
(5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dbbdbebfa9bebcf5b7bebcbab79bb5baa9baf5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="640201001601034a0801030508240a0516054a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>, or go to: <a href="https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued on August 6, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-18930 Filed 8-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.