AD 2019-11-06
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-600 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-700 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-700C Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-800 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-900 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-900ER Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
cracks in the skin and a certain chord at three fastener locations common to the drag link assembly at the chord
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
repetitive inspections of the skin under the drag link assembly for any cracks, and applicable on-condition actions
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks in the skin and a certain chord at three fastener locations common to the drag link assembly at the chord. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the skin under the drag link assembly for any cracks, and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1368, dated February 27, 2018.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00830SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE
is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with
the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27193-27197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12322]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 27193]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0708; Product Identifier 2018-NM-072-AD; Amendment
39-19652; AD 2019-11-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and
-900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks in
the skin and a certain chord at three fastener locations common to the
drag link assembly at the chord. This AD requires repetitive
inspections of the skin under the drag link assembly for any cracks,
and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 17, 2019.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 17,
2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0708.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0708; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3527; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c9c4c9c686d8c7c0c4e8cec9c986cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adccc1ccc383ddc2c5c1edcbcccc83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing
Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on August 14,
2018 (83 FR 40159). The NPRM was prompted by reports of cracks in the
skin and a certain chord at three fastener locations common to the drag
link assembly at the chord. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive
inspections of the skin under the drag link assembly for any cracks,
and applicable on-condition actions.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
American Airlines stated its support for the NPRM. United Airlines
stated that it has no technical objections to the NPRM.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) stated that accomplishing the
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00830SE does not affect the
ability to accomplish the actions specified in the proposed AD.
The FAA concurs with the commenter. The FAA has redesignated
paragraph (c) of the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and
added paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC
ST00830SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Request To Revise Applicability
Southwest Airlines (SWA) requested that paragraph (c) of the
proposed AD be revised to include aircraft with APB STC ST00830SE
installed, with either blended or split scimitar winglets. SWA noted
that paragraph 1.F of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018, addresses the approval statement that the service
information is also approved for airplanes having FAA APB STC ST00830SE
installed, not including any areas affected by the split scimitar
winglet configuration. SWA pointed out that it operates aircraft with
STC ST00830SE installed and it has determined the structure within the
STC ST00830SE area is subject to the concern addressed by the service
information.
The FAA acknowledges the commenter's request. APB has already
stated that winglets installed per STC ST00830SE do not affect the
ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD. In addition,
after the NPRM comment period closed, the FAA contacted APB as a result
of SWA's comment and received additional confirmation that STC
ST00830SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions of this
AD. APB stated, ``NPRM Docket FAA-2018-0708 was reviewed by APB for all
configurations of STC ST00830SE, blended and split scimitar [winglets].
The APB comment of no impact is applicable to all configurations of STC
ST00830SE.'' As stated above, the FAA has added
[[Page 27194]]
paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC ST00830SE
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this
AD.
Request To Address Errors in the Service Information
Alaska Airlines (ASA), Delta Airlines (DAL), SWA, and Skymark
Airlines (SMA) pointed out multiple errors in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018. DAL noted two errors in
the service information that they would like to see addressed in order
to avoid non-compliance with the proposed AD and reduce confusion. ASA
echoed DAL's request to avoid non-compliance with the proposed AD by
correcting the service information and pointed out one error within the
service information, in addition to the ones noted by other commenters.
SWA noted six errors within the service information and requested
paragraph (h) of this proposed AD be revised to add exceptions to the
service information. For one error, SWA noted that the post-repair
instructions of the service information specify inspection standards
that differ from established non-destructive test standards, and SWA
requested paragraph (h) of this proposed AD be revised to include a
provision allowing a deviation from the service information. SMA stated
they have found errors in their initial review of the service
information, which Boeing has acknowledged.
SMA requested to delay the issuance of the final rule until a
revision to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368 is released and
can be incorporated into the final rule. SMA argued that they are
obligated to prepare a work instruction document that corrects any
errors in the service information and this method is not preferable to
SMA for managing the accomplishment of the proposed AD.
The FAA acknowledges the commenters' concerns regarding the
information in the service information that requires clarification or
correction. In light of the critical nature of the identified unsafe
condition, the FAA does not consider it appropriate to delay this final
rule until new service information is available. In addition, the
amount of clarification needed would be overly complex for inclusion in
this AD. Therefore, the FAA has added paragraph (h)(3) to this AD,
``Exceptions to Service Information Specifications,'' to provide
operators with information regarding how to address any actions in the
service information that cannot be accomplished. The FAA has also
revised paragraph (g) of this AD to include a reference to paragraph
(h)(3) of this AD.
We anticipate that Boeing will publish a revision to Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, to address known
errors. The FAA will consider issuing a global AMOC to address known
errors if the new revision is not published soon after the effective
date of this AD. After the publication of the revision, the FAA will
review the revision in consideration of an AMOC to this AD, or may
consider future rulemaking action.
Regarding SWA's comment on post-repair and post-modification
inspections, those inspections will not be required by this AD, as
discussed in the response to the request below to exclude post-repair
and post-modification inspections.
Request To Exclude Post-Repair and Post-Modification Inspections
Boeing and SWA requested that the proposed AD be revised to exclude
the post-repair/post-modification inspection requirements specified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, as
AD-mandated actions. The commenters pointed to paragraph (j) of AD
2017-02-10, Amendment 39-18789 (82 FR 10258, February 10, 2017) (``AD
2017-02-10'') as an example of post-repair and post-modification
inspections that are specified in the service information but are
excepted by the AD.
Note that the service information referenced in AD 2017-02-10
identified post-repair and post-modification inspection procedures, but
the AD excepted those inspections because the inspections are
airworthiness limitations and are required by maintenance and
operational rules. Therefore, it was unnecessary to mandate them in AD
2017-02-10.
The FAA agrees with the commenters' requests for the reasons
provided. The FAA infers that SWA meant to include in its comment a
reference to Table 5 of paragraph 1.E, Compliance, of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018. This table is
associated with the Part 8 post-repair inspections of the
Accomplishment Instructions. The FAA has added paragraph (h)(4) to
exclude the post-repair and post-modification inspection requirements
specified in Parts 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018,
as AD-mandated actions. The FAA has also revised paragraph (g) of this
AD to include a reference to paragraph (h)(4) of this AD.
In addition, Parts 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018, were incorrectly labeled as required for compliance
(RC). This will likely be corrected in a future revision to this
service bulletin.
Request To Include Optional Terminating Action
SWA requested to add a paragraph that specifies an AMOC for the
requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2013-19-23, Amendment 39-17605 (78
FR 61173, October 3, 2013) (``AD 2013-19-23''). SWA pointed out that
the accomplishment of Part 4 or Part 5 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018, will prohibit the D626A001-9-01 inspection for
Principal Structural Element (PSE) 53-30-02-4, as required by paragraph
(g) of AD 2013-19-23.
The FAA partially agrees with the commenter's request. After the
NPRM comment period closed, the FAA queried Boeing and confirmed that
this repair should indeed be considered a method of compliance, as
suggested by SWA. The FAA has added paragraph (j) to this AD to allow
an optional terminating action for the inspections of PSE 53-30-02-4
required by the airworthiness limitations specified in paragraph (g) of
AD 2013-19-23. The optional terminating action is the accomplishment of
the actions specified in Part 4 or Part 5 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018. The FAA has also revised paragraph (b) of this AD to
reflect that this AD affects AD 2013-19-23.
Request To Add Inspection Condition of ``No Crack Found''
ASA noted that Tables 1, 2, and 3 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance''
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018,
are missing Condition 1.3, which should provide instructions on how to
proceed in the case that no crack is found during the specified
inspection. ASA suggested using the same language found in Condition
2.3 of Tables 1, 2, and 3 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018. ASA
reasoned that it requires clear and correct reference documents to
develop accurate engineering documents and avoid noncompliance with the
requirements of the AD.
The FAA agrees with the commenter's request for the reasons
provided. There
[[Page 27195]]
should also be a Condition 1.3 in the appropriate places in the
Accomplishment Instructions as well as paragraph 1.E., Compliance.
These issues have been coordinated with Boeing, and they have indicated
that this will be addressed in a future revision to Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018. The FAA has
added paragraph (h)(5) to this AD to provide instructions regarding how
to proceed if no crack is found upon accomplishment of Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1368, dated February 27, 2018. The FAA has also revised paragraph
(g) of this AD to include a reference to paragraph (h)(5) of this AD.
Request To Approve AMOCs for AD 2017-02-10
ASA requested to revise the proposed AD to include AMOCs previously
approved for AD 2017-02-10. ASA pointed out that during their
accomplishment of AD 2017-02-10, they completed repairs in the same
area as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018.
The FAA does not agree with the request to allow AMOCs previously
approved for AD 2017-02-10 to be approved for this AD. After the NPRM
comment period closed, the FAA coordinated this issue with Boeing.
Boeing indicated that different types of repairs have been encountered
during the service history of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-53-1294, Revision 2, dated December 9, 2015, which is referred to
as the appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
required actions specified in AD 2017-02-10. For some repairs required
by this AD, an AMOC approved for AD 2017-02-10 would also be suitable
for this AD. However, this is not the case for all types of repairs,
and therefore, all AMOCs previously approved for AD 2017-02-10 cannot
be approved for this AD. This AD has not been changed in this regard.
Request To Add Material Incorporated by Reference Paragraph
Boeing requested to add a paragraph to the proposed AD titled
``Material Incorporated by Reference,'' stating that this paragraph is
missing.
For clarification, the paragraph titled ``Material Incorporated by
Reference'' is not currently included in NPRMs, but is included in all
final rule ADs.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor
changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018. This service information describes procedures for an
ultrasonic inspection of the skin under the drag link assembly and
repair for any cracks; repetitive inspections for any cracks, including
ultrasonic inspections, high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections,
low frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections, and detailed
inspections; and a preventive modification if no crack is found. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1,664 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection...................... 28 work-hours x $85 $0 $2,380 per $3,960,320 per
per hour = $2,380 inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required. The FAA has no way of
determining the number of aircraft that might need these on-condition
actions:
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 56 work-hours x $85 per $24,020 Up to $28,780.
hour = $4,760.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance
[[Page 27196]]
of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category
airplanes and associated appliances to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2019-11-06 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19652; Docket No. FAA-
2018-0708; Product Identifier 2018-NM-072-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 17, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD affects AD 2013-19-23, Amendment 39-17605 (78 FR 61173,
October 3, 2013) (``AD 2013-19-23'').
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1368, dated February 27, 2018.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST00830SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST00830SE
is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with
the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks in the skin and the
station (STA) 540 bulkhead chord at the three fastener locations
common to the drag link assembly at the STA 540 bulkhead chord. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address cracking in the STA 540 bulkhead
chord or skin, which could result in the inability of a primary
structural element to sustain limit load. This condition, if not
addressed, could result in possible rapid decompression and loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
Except as required by paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(5) of this
AD: At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018, do all applicable actions identified as ``RC''
(required for compliance) in, and in accordance with, the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1368, dated February 27, 2018.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of this
service bulletin,'' this AD requires using ``the effective date of
this AD.''
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated
February 27, 2018, specifies contacting Boeing: This AD requires
repair before further flight using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(3) If any action(s) identified as RC in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, cannot be
accomplished as specified therein, those action(s) must be
accomplished using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(4) Parts 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018,
specify post-repair/modification airworthiness limitation
inspections in compliance with 14 CFR 25.571(a)(3) at the repaired/
modified locations to support compliance with 14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2)
or 129.109(b)(2). Although Parts 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, are identified as RC, this AD does
not require accomplishment of Parts 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1368, dated February 27, 2018. As airworthiness limitations,
these inspections are required by maintenance and operational rules.
It is therefore unnecessary to mandate them in this AD. Deviations
from these inspections require FAA approval, but do not require
approval of an AMOC.
(5) For airplanes on which any crack is found during any Part 2
inspection specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368,
dated February 27, 2018, and no crack is found during the Part 3
inspection specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018: Before
further flight, do the preventative modification specified in Part 5
of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, on each side of the airplane
on which no crack was found during the Part 3 inspection.
(i) Optional Terminating Action for Repetitive Inspections
(1) Accomplishment of the repair in accordance with Part 4 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, terminates the repetitive
inspections specified in Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27,
2018, on the side of the airplane on which the repair was done, as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Accomplishment of the preventive modification in accordance
with Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, terminates
the repetitive inspections specified in Part 2 or Part 6, as
applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27, 2018, on the side
of the airplane on which the preventive modification was done, as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Optional Terminating Action for Certain Requirements of AD 2013-19-
23
Accomplishment of the repair specified in Part 4 or the
modification specified in Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February 27,
2018, terminates the repetitive inspections specified in the
airworthiness limitations required by paragraph (g) of AD 2013-19-23
for Principal Structural Element (PSE) 53-30-02-4 on the side of the
airplane on which the repair or modification was done.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs
[[Page 27197]]
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c55412d2221413f090d18180009412d2f23412d21232f413e091d19091f181f2c0a0d0d420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="330a1e727d7e1e60565247475f561e72707c1e727e7c701e6156424656404740735552521d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as specified in paragraphs (h)(2) through (h)(5) of
this AD: For service information that contains steps that are
labeled as RC, the provisions of paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii)
of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(l) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Alan Pohl, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3527; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e1808d808fcf918e898da1878080cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bfaf7faf5b5ebf4f3f7dbfdfafab5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1368, dated February
27, 2018.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. (5) You may view this service information that is
incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May 29, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-12322 Filed 6-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.