AD 2018-21-06
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | SOCATA | TB 10 | Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes |
| aircraft | SOCATA | TB 200 | Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes |
| aircraft | SOCATA | TB9 | Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
fatigue cracking of the wing front attachments on the wing and fuselage sides
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
inspect the front attachments and install modification kits, replace the wing attachment on the wing side after repetitive inspections
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
SOCATA Model TB 9, Model TB 10, and Model TB 200 airplanes
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98-16-03 for SOCATA Model TB 9 and Model TB 10 airplanes. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as fatigue cracking of the wing front attachments on the wing and fuselage sides. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to SOCATA airplanes listed in the following
groups, certificated in any category:
(1) Group 1 airplanes: Model TB 9, all manufacturer serial
numbers (MSN); and Model TB 10, MSN 001 through 803, 805, 806, 809
through 815, and 820 through 822; and
(2) Group 2 airplanes: Model TB 10, MSN 804, 807, 808, 816
through 819, and 823 through 2229; and Model TB 200, all MSNs.
[[Page 55260]]
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 214 (Monday, November 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55258-55263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24007]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0326; Product Identifier 2018-CE-006-AD; Amendment
39-19464; AD 2018-21-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98-16-03 for
SOCATA Model TB 9 and Model TB 10 airplanes. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as fatigue cracking of the wing front attachments on the wing
and fuselage sides. We are issuing this AD to require actions to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective December 10, 2018.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 10,
2018.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0326; or in person at Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
For service information identified in this AD, contact SOCATA,
Direction des services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France; phone: +33 (0) 5
62 41 73 00; fax: +33 (0) 5 62 41 76 54; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f891969e97b88b979b998c99d69c99909d8ad69b9795"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91f8fff7fed1e2fef2f0e5f0bff5f0f9f4e3bff2fefc">[email protected]</span></a>;
internet: <a href="https://www.mysocata.com/login/accueil.php">https://www.mysocata.com/login/accueil.php</a>. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA, Policy and Innovation
Division, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148. It
is also available on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by
searching for Docket No. FAA-2018-0326.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Quentin Coon, Aerospace Engineer, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-
4168; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bacbcfdfd4ced3d494d9d5d5d4fadcdbdb94ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="255450404b514c4b0b464a4a4b654344440b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 98-16-03, Amendment 39-10677 (63 FR 40359, July
29, 1998) (``AD 98-16-03''). The NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on May 9, 2018 (83 FR 21199), and proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for SOCATA Model TB 9, Model TB 10, and Model TB 200
airplanes. We based the NPRM on MCAI originated by an aviation
authority of another country. The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, issued EASA AD No. 2018-0030, dated January 31,
2018 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''). The MCAI states that:
During a scheduled maintenance inspection, cracks were found on
the wing front attachments of a TB 10 aeroplane.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the aeroplane.
Prompted by these findings, SOCATA issued SB 10-081-57 to
provide inspection and modification instructions, and DGAC France
issued AD 94-264(A), later revised, to require repetitive
inspections of wing front attachments of TB 9 and TB 10 aeroplanes
(all MSN up to 822 inclusive, with some excluded). That [DGAC
France] AD also required installation of reinforcement kits, applied
as repair (if cracks were found) or as modification (if no cracks
were found), of the wing front attachments, on both wing and
fuselage sides, and repetitive replacement of those reinforcements
afterwards.
Since DGAC France AD 94-264(A) R1 was issued, cracks have been
found on wing front attachments, on the wing side, on TB10
aeroplanes to which the AD did not apply, i.e. which were not
subject to repetitive inspections as required by that [DGAC France]
AD. Consequently, SOCATA revised SB 10-081-57 (now at revision (rev)
3), extending the Applicability to all TB 10 aeroplanes, as well as
to TB 200 aeroplanes, and improving the repair solution of the wing
front attachment on wing side.
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of DGAC France AD 94-264(A) R1, which is superseded,
expands the Applicability to all MSN for TB 9 and TB 10 aeroplanes
and includes TB 200 aeroplanes, and requires an improved repair
solution of the wing front attachment on wing side.
The MCAI can be found in the AD docket on the internet at: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2018-0326-0003">https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2018-0326-0003</a>.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comment received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to the comment.
Request for an Explanation of Compliance Time
Daher requested that we explain why the compliance times in the
NPRM are presented in landings and do not match the compliance times in
the EASA AD, which uses both hours time-in-service (TIS) and number of
landings.
The NPRM retained the compliance times from AD 98-16-03, which were
based in landings instead of hours TIS. The NPRM also retained the
formula for converting hours TIS to landings from AD 98-16-03 for
airplanes with an unknown number of landings. Because we also retained
the effective date of AD
[[Page 55259]]
98-16-03 for certain actions, we determined the NPRM would not use both
landings and hours TIS, as in the EASA AD.
Change to the Final Rule
In the NPRM, in table 1 to paragraph (g)(1) and table 4 to
paragraph (i)(1), we inadvertently referenced the incorrect paragraph
designator in the retained compliance times as, ``See paragraph (g) of
this AD.'' In this AD, we corrected the paragraph designator to read,
``See paragraph (k) of this AD.''
We also revised the incorporation by reference of the service
information to specify the provisions required for each action, instead
of the entire service document.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed except for the changes previously described and other
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Daher Service Bulletin SB 10-081, Revision 3, dated
December 2017. The service bulletin describes procedures for inspecting
the front attachments and installing modification kits. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 126 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the inspection requirements of this AD. We also estimate
that it would take about 25 work-hours per product to comply with the
replacement/modification (wing and fuselage sides) requirements of this
AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would
cost about $3,000 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $677,880, or $5,380 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions to
replace the wing attachment on the wing side, resulting from the
repetitive inspections, would take about 9 work-hours and require parts
costing $3,000, for a cost of $3,765 per product. We have no way of
determining the number of products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to small airplanes, gliders,
balloons, airships, domestic business jet transport airplanes, and
associated appliances to the Director of the Policy and Innovation
Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0326; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (telephone (800)
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
98-16-03, Amendment 39-10677 (63 FR 40359, July 29, 1998) and adding
the following new AD:
2018-21-06 SOCATA: Amendment 39-19464; Docket No. FAA-2018-0326;
Product Identifier 2018-CE-006-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective December 10, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 98-16-03, Amendment 39-10677 (63 FR 40359,
July 29, 1998) (``AD 98-16-03'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to SOCATA airplanes listed in the following
groups, certificated in any category:
(1) Group 1 airplanes: Model TB 9, all manufacturer serial
numbers (MSN); and Model TB 10, MSN 001 through 803, 805, 806, 809
through 815, and 820 through 822; and
(2) Group 2 airplanes: Model TB 10, MSN 804, 807, 808, 816
through 819, and 823 through 2229; and Model TB 200, all MSNs.
[[Page 55260]]
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as fatigue cracking
of the wing front attachments on the wing and fuselage sides. We are
issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the wing front
attachments, which could lead to structural failure of the airplane
and loss of control.
(f) Compliance
Unless already done, do the following actions listed in
paragraphs (g) through (j) of this AD. The compliance times of this
AD are presented in landings instead of hours time-in-service (TIS).
If the number of landings is unknown, multiply the number of hours
TIS by 1.5. For the purposes of this AD, the ``XX'' in the kit
numbers can be any numerical value.
(g) Actions for Airplanes NOT EQUIPPED With Modification Kit
OPT109110XX
(1) Within the compliance time specified in table 1 to paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, do an initial inspection of the wing front
attachments on the wing side. Inspect repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 landings. Follow paragraphs B(1)
through B(4) under the Description of Accomplishment Instructions in
SOCATA Daher Service Bulletin SB 10-081, Revision 3, December 2017
(SB 10-081, Revision 3).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05NO18.003
(2) If a crack was found during any inspection required in
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, before further flight, install the
modification reinforcement kit OPT10911002 for the front attachment
on the wing side. Follow paragraph B(5) under the Description of
Accomplishment Instructions in SB 10-081, Revision 3.
(3) Within the compliance time specified in table 2 to paragraph
(g)(3) of this AD, unless already done as corrective action as
specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, install the modification
reinforcement kit OPT10911002 for the front attachment on the wing
side. Follow paragraph B(5) under the Description of Accomplishment
Instructions in SB 10-081, Revision 3.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05NO18.004
(h) Actions for Airplanes EQUIPPED With Modification Kit OPT109110XX
(1) Within the compliance time specified in table 3 to paragraph
(h)(1) of this AD, do an initial inspection of the reinforced front
attachment on the wing side. Inspect repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 landings. Follow paragraphs B(1)
through B(4) under the Description of Accomplishment Instructions in
SB 10-081, Revision 3.
[[Page 55261]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05NO18.005
(2) Replacing kit OPT109110XX with kit OPT10911002 on an
airplane, at intervals not to exceed 6,000 landings, is acceptable
to comply with the inspection requirements of paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD for that airplane. Follow paragraph B(5) under the
Description of Accomplishment Instructions in SB 10-081, Revision 3.
(3) If a crack was found during any inspection required in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, before further flight, do the
applicable corrective actions. Follow paragraph B(5) under the
Description of Accomplishment Instructions in SB 10-081, Revision 3.
(i) Actions for Group 1 Airplanes
(1) Within the compliance time specified in table 4 to paragraph
(i)(1) of this AD, do an initial inspection of the wing front
attachments on the fuselage side. Inspect repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 landings. Follow paragraphs B(1)
through B(4) under the Description of Accomplishment Instructions in
SB 10-081, Revision 3.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05NO18.006
(2) If a crack was found during any inspection required in
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, before further flight, do the
applicable corrective actions. Follow paragraph B(5) under the
Description of Accomplishment Instructions in SB 10-081, Revision 3.
(3) Unless already done as corrective action required in
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, within the compliance time specified in
table 5 to paragraph (i)(3) of this AD, reinforce the front
attachment on fuselage side. Follow paragraph B(5)(b) under the
Description of Accomplishment Instructions in SB 10-081, Revision 3.
[[Page 55262]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05NO18.007
(4) Before or upon accumulating 12,000 landings after the
reinforcement modification required in paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of
this AD, replace the reinforced front attachment on the fuselage
side. Follow paragraph B(5)(c) under the Description of
Accomplishment Instructions in SB 10-081, Revision 3.
(j) Replacement of the Reinforced Front Attachment
Replacement of the reinforced front attachment on the wing side
and/or replacement of the reinforced front attachment on the
fuselage side does not terminate the inspections required in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (i)(1) of this AD. After replacement, the
initial and repetitive inspection cycle starts over.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This AD allows credit for the initial inspections required in
paragraphs (g)(1), (h)(1), and (i)(1) of this AD if done before the
effective date of this AD by following Socata Service Bulletin No.
SB 10-081-57, Revision 1, dated August 1996 or Revision 2, dated
January 2017. This AD also allows credit for any replacement that
may have been required based on the initial inspection required in
paragraphs (g)(1), (h)(1), and (i)(1) of this AD if done before the
effective date of this AD by following Socata Service Bulletin No.
SB 10-081-57, Revision 1, dated August 1996 or Revision 2, dated
January 2017. After the effective date of this AD, you must do any
inspections or replacements by following SB 10-081, Revision 3.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Small Airplane Standards Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Quentin Coon, Aerospace Engineer,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816)
329-4168; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2657534348524f4808454949486640474708414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f786829299839e99d994989899b7919696d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must
instead be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager,
Small Airplane Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA).
(m) Related Information
Refer to MCAI EASA No. 2018-0030, dated January 31, 2018; and
Socata Service Bulletin No. SB 10-081-57, Revision 1, dated August
1996, or Revision 2, dated January 2017, for related information.
The MCAI can be found in the AD docket on the internet at: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2018-0326-0003">https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2018-0326-0003</a>.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) SOCATA Daher Service Bulletin SB 10-081, Revision 3,
December 2017.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
SOCATA, Direction des services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France; phone:
+33 (0) 5 62 41 73 00; fax: +33 (0) 5 62 41 76 54; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e38a8d858ca3908c80829782cd87828b8691cd808c8e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b22252d240b3824282a3f2a652f2a232e3965282426">[email protected]</span></a>; internet: <a href="https://www.mysocata.com/login/accueil.php">https://www.mysocata.com/login/accueil.php</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Policy and
Innovation Division, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
816-329-4148. In addition, you can access this service information
on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0326.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
[[Page 55263]]
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 26, 2018.
Melvin J. Johnson,
Aircraft Certification Service, Deputy Director, Policy and Innovation
Division, AIR-601.
[FR Doc. 2018-24007 Filed 11-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.