AD 2018-01-01
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11 | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | MD-11F | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
damaged wires could result in fuel starvation as a potential unsafe condition, or a fuel tank fire or explosion, and consequent loss of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
a one-time inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions if necessary, including repair and replacement of the wire assembly.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 100 to 244 work-hours
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This AD requires a one-time inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Boeing Company Model MD-11 and MD-11F
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 216-219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0500; Product Identifier 2017-NM-009-AD; Amendment
39-19142; AD 2018-01-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. This AD was
prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This AD
requires a one-time inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed
at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective February 7, 2018.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 7,
2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740; telephone 562-797-1717; internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also
available on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0500.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0500; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S[eacute]rj Harutunian, Aerospace
Engineer, Propulsion Section, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5254; fax: 562-627-5210; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#582b3d2a327630392a2d2c2d36313936183e3939763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dba8bea9b1f5b3baa9aeafaeb5b2bab59bbdbabaf5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 30, 2017 (82 FR 24597). The NPRM was prompted by fuel
system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. The NPRM proposed to
require a one-time inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed
at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct potential ignition sources
inside the tail fuel tank,
[[Page 217]]
which, in combination with flammable vapors, could result in a fuel
tank fire or explosion, and consequent loss of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Supportive Comment
The Air Line Pilots Association International stated that it agreed
with the intent of the NPRM.
Request To Clarify the Description of the Unsafe Condition
Boeing asked that we clarify the description of the unsafe
condition identified in paragraph (e) of the proposed AD to add the
potential of fuel starvation as the end-level effect. Boeing stated
that referenced service information specifies that the unsafe condition
could result in engine fuel starvation.
We agree that damaged wires could result in fuel starvation as a
potential unsafe condition. However, we have no SFAR88 analysis or
service difficulty reports associated with the loss of system functions
or fuel starvation from the chafed or damaged wires identified in this
AD. We do have previous Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88)
ADs for wire harnesses in the same area that were issued to prevent
wire chafing and potential ignition sources inside the fuel tank. The
actions required by this AD are intended primarily to reduce the risk
of other incidents of wires chafing and subsequent fuel tank fire or
explosion. Therefore, we have made no change to this AD in this regard.
Request To Change Certain Estimates in Costs of Compliance Section
FedEx asked that the work-hours under the On-Condition Costs for
the replacement be increased from 16 to 100. FedEx stated that the
replacement cost specifies 16 work-hours, but noted that replacement of
only one affected part will actually take about 100 hours. FedEx added
that 100 work-hours is only for one damaged wire assembly.
United Parcel Service (UPS) asked that the work-hours under the On-
Condition Costs for the replacement be increased from 16 to 244. UPS
stated that it has previously replaced this wire harness and it
required 244 work hours to complete the replacement. UPS also asked
that the cost for parts for the repair be added. UPS stated that it has
sourced the materials and the cost is $1,680 per airplane (or $168 per
transition location).
We agree to revise the estimated on-condition work-hours. When
issuing a service bulletin, Boeing estimates work-hours under expected
conditions for direct labor only. As operators implement the service
bulletin, they may find the actual work-hours are higher or lower than
estimated. We have updated the Costs of Compliance section of this AD
to reflect between 100 and 244 work-hours. We have also included the
parts cost estimate provided for repairs.
Request To Add Information Notice To Service Information Citation
FedEx asked that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150 IN 02,
dated February 24, 2017, be added to the service information cited in
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD. FedEx stated that the one-time
inspection and corrective actions in paragraph (g) specify performing a
detailed inspection in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
FedEx added that since the referenced service information was issued,
Boeing released an information notice (IN 02) with part numbers for
three new wire assembly kits.
We disagree with the commenter's request. Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11-28A150 IN 02, dated February 24, 2017, provides updated
kit information for the operators. The individual wire assembly part
numbers in the new kits are the same wire assembly part numbers needed
for the replacement required by this AD as specified in the figures in
Part 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016. Since this AD only
requires the replacement of certain individual wire assembly part
numbers and not the kit part numbers that consist of the individual
wire assembly part numbers, we have made no change to this AD in this
regard.
Request To Clarify Paragraph (h) of the Proposed AD
FedEx and UPS requested that we clarify the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. FedEx stated that paragraph (h) of
the proposed AD provides information to perform different tests than
those listed in steps 1.f, 1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016. FedEx stated it is not clear if the
required test after rework is in accordance with steps 1.a. through
1.j. of Part 4 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated
October 6, 2016, or per the actions specified in (h)(1), (h)(2), and
(h)(3) of this AD only. FedEx and UPS also stated that the proposed AD
should require test procedures only for the section that Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, is addressing and
not all the systems associated with wire assemblies AJS9013 and
AJS9014. FedEx and UPS also noted that the airplane maintenance manual
(AMM) references in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of the proposed AD are
incorrect (AMM 28-28-01 should be AMM 28-08-01; AMM 26-21-02 should be
AMM 28-21-02).
We agree to clarify which actions are required by this AD. Steps
1.f, 1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, are
required for compliance (RC) after any rework is done and only address
the system affected by this AD. The other steps identified as ``RC
exempt'' as specified in Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, are
not a part of the requirements of this AD.
The intent of paragraph (h) of the proposed AD was to specify the
corrective action for RC tests. Steps 1.f, 1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016, specify to accomplish tests but the
steps do not specify corrective actions if the tests fail. To clarify
that the tests themselves are not exceptions to Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, we have removed paragraph
(h) of the proposed AD and included the corrective action statement for
the tests in paragraph (g) of this AD.
We acknowledge that the AMM references in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of the proposed AD were incorrect and note that the AMM
references for the tests are identified correctly in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
[[Page 218]]
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated
October 6, 2016. The service information describes procedures for a
one-time detailed inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed
at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions that include
repair and replacement of the wire assembly. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 110 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection........................ 4 work-hours x $85 per $0 $340 $37,400
hour = $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs/
replacements that will be required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these repairs/replacements:
On-condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair............................ 9 work-hours x $85 per Up to $1,680......... Up to $2,445.
hour = $765.
Replacement....................... Between 100 and 244 work- $57,526.............. Between $66,026 and
hours x $85 per hour = $78,266.
between $8,500 and
$20,740.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2018-01-01 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19142; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0500; Product Identifier 2017-NM-009-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective February 7, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Boeing Company Model MD-11 and MD-11F
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28; Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We
[[Page 219]]
are issuing this AD to detect and correct potential ignition sources
inside the tail fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable
vapors, could result in a fuel tank fire or explosion, and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) One-Time Inspection and Corrective Actions
Within 27 months after the effective date of this AD, do a one-
time detailed inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are
installed at the wire harness breakouts, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016. If metallic transitions are
installed, no further action is required by this paragraph. If
metallic transitions are not installed, do the corrective actions
required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable,
and if, after any repair or replacement is done, any test fails,
before further flight, do corrective actions, repeat the test, and
do applicable corrective actions until the test is passed.
(1) Repair any affected wire assembly before further flight, in
accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, or
replace any affected wire assembly with a new wire assembly before
further flight, in accordance with Part 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated
October 6, 2016. If the replacement is done, no further action is
required for that wire assembly only.
(2) Within 24 months after accomplishment of the repair required
by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD: Replace any repaired wire assembly
with a new wire assembly, in accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f76620e010262030e0e0c00620e02000c621d2a3e3a2a3c3b3c0f292e2e61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80b9adc1cecdadccc1c1c3cfadc1cdcfc3add2e5f1f5e5f3f4f3c0e6e1e1aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact S[eacute]rj
Harutunian, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, Los Angeles ACO
Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-
4137; phone: 562-627-5254; fax: 562-627-5210; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#493a2c3b236721283b3c3d3c27202827092f2828672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e49781968eca8c85969190918a8d858aa4828585ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6,
2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562-797-1717; internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 26, 2017.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-28379 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.