AD 2017-24-10
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | Various | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
cracking found at a certain fuselage frame inner chord
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
repetitive inspections for any cracking of a certain fuselage frame inner chord; identification of the material of a certain fuselage frame inner chord for certain airplanes; and applicable corrective actions
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF, and -300 series airplanes
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF, and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking found at a certain fuselage frame inner chord. This AD requires repetitive inspections for any cracking of a certain fuselage frame inner chord; identification of the material of a certain fuselage frame inner chord for certain airplanes; and applicable corrective actions. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF,
and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01518SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01518SE
is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with
the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57343-57346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26040]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0340; Product Identifier 2017-NM-002-AD; Amendment
39-19114; AD 2017-24-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF, and -300 series airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of cracking found at a certain fuselage
frame inner chord. This AD requires repetitive inspections for any
cracking of a certain fuselage frame inner chord; identification of the
material of a certain fuselage frame inner chord for certain airplanes;
and applicable corrective actions. We are issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 9, 2018.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of January 9,
2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0340.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0340; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muoi Vuong, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5205; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93dee6fcfabdc5e6fcfdf4d3f5f2f2bdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d79aa2b8bef981a2b8b9b097b1b6b6f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 757-200, -200PF, and -300 series airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on May 19, 2017 (82 FR 22915). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of cracking found at a certain fuselage frame inner
chord. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for any
cracking of a certain fuselage frame inner chord, identification of the
material of a certain fuselage frame inner chord for certain airplanes,
and applicable corrective actions. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct such cracks, which could result in the cargo door opening
during flight, and result in rapid decompression of the airplane and
the inability to sustain loads required for continued safe flight and
landing.
[[Page 57344]]
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. FedEx and United Airlines
supported the NPRM.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the supplemental
type certificate (STC) ST01518SE does not affect the actions specified
in the NPRM.
We concur with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of
the proposed AD (82 FR 22915, May 19, 2017) as paragraph (c)(1) of this
AD and added paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of
STC ST01518SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01518SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Request for Credit for Previous Actions Accomplished
Boeing requested credit for previous accomplishment of the
inspections in the NPRM. Boeing stated that Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016 (referenced in the NPRM as
the appropriate source of service information), was published on
November 8, 2016. Boeing commented that the effective date of the AD
could be more than 7 months later than publication date of the service
information. Boeing stated that it is likely that some Model 757
operators have already accomplished the inspections in accordance with
the service information by the time the AD takes effect; therefore, the
AD should provide credit for those inspections.
We acknowledge the commenter's request and agree to clarify.
Paragraph (f) of this AD states to accomplish the actions within the
compliance times specified, unless those actions are already done.
Therefore, if operators have accomplished the inspections in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016, before the effective date of this
AD, no further action is necessary. We have not revised this AD in this
regard.
Request To Include Repair Information and Inspection Instructions
Delta Airlines (DAL) stated that it has concerns that the
Accomplishment Instructions provided in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016, do not include the corrective
action. DAL commented that it will likely accomplish the inspections
during 10-day maintenance visit checks, which would not be sufficient
time for repair development if a crack is found. DAL also commented
that operators would benefit from having corrective actions provided in
the service information.
DAL stated that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016, requires operators to repetitively inspect the inner
chord, and the service information does not provide an option for an
inspection should there be a previously installed FAA-approved repair.
DAL commented that a previous repair of the frame has the potential to
inhibit the ability to accomplish the inspection. DAL also commented
that this leaves operators unable to accomplish the inspection as
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November
8, 2016, and will require additional instruction as an AMOC.
We infer that DAL is requesting to delay issuance of the final rule
until a revision of the service information includes repair data and
alternative inspection instructions for previously accomplished
repairs.
We disagree with the commenter's request. Including the repair data
would delay issuance of this AD. Unique repair configurations may be
necessary depending on the cracking that is detected. It is not
possible to address each individual repair configuration in one AD. The
various repair configurations and locations are unknown and therefore
cannot be addressed at this time. Therefore, if cracking is found, it
must be repaired before further flight using the corrective actions
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November
8, 2016, or in accordance with paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. For
previously approved repairs that prevent accomplishment of the
inspections required by this AD, operators may request approval of an
AMOC using the procedures in paragraph (j) of this AD. We have not
revised this AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016. The service information describes procedures for
repetitive surface high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for
any cracking of the fuselage station (STA) 1380 frame inner chord; an
identification of the material (an inspection or measurement) of the
fuselage STA 1380 frame inner chord; and applicable corrective actions.
This service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 588 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surface HFEC inspection........ 5 work-hours x $85 per $0 $425 per $249,900 per
hour = $425 per inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
inspection cycle.
Identify the material.......... Up to 2 work-hours x 0 Up to $170........ Up to $99,960.
$85 per hour = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57345]]
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2017-24-10 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19114; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0340; Product Identifier 2017-NM-002-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 9, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF,
and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01518SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01518SE
is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with
the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracking found at the
fuselage station (STA) 1380 frame inner chord. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct such cracks, which could result in the
cargo door opening during flight, and result in rapid decompression
of the airplane and the inability to sustain loads required for
continued safe flight and landing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection for Group 1 Airplanes
For Group 1 airplanes as identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016; except as specified in
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, do a surface high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspection for any cracking of the fuselage STA 1380
frame inner chord, and do all applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016; except as
specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the surface HFEC
inspection, thereafter, at the times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016.
(h) Inspection for Group 2 Airplanes
For Group 2 airplanes as identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016, except as specified in
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, identify the material of the fuselage
STA 1380 frame inner chord, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016.
(1) If the fuselage STA 1380 frame inner chord material 2024-T42
aluminum alloy is found during any identification required by
paragraph (h) of this AD: No further action is required by this AD
for that airplane.
(2) If the fuselage STA 1380 frame inner chord material 7075-T73
aluminum alloy is found during any identification required by the
introductory text of paragraph (h) of this AD: Before further
flight, do a surface HFEC inspection for any cracking of the
fuselage STA 1380 frame inner chord, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016; except as specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this
AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the surface HFEC inspection thereafter at the times specified
in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757-53A0101, dated November 8, 2016.
(i) Exceptions to the Service Information
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016, specifies a compliance time ``after the original
issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated
November 8, 2016, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action
and identifies that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance):
Before further flight, repair the crack using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
[[Page 57346]]
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ae9783efe0e383e2efefede183efe3e1ed83fccbdfdbcbdddaddeec8cfcf80c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5dcc8a4aba8c8a9a4a4a6aac8a4a8aaa6c8b780949080969196a5838484cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as RC, the
provisions of paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and (j)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Muoi Vuong,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5205;
fax: 562-627-5210; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dd90a8b2b4f38ba8b2b3ba9dbbbcbcf3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87caf2e8eea9d1f2e8e9e0c7e1e6e6a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a>.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0101, dated November 8,
2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 22, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-26040 Filed 12-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.