AD 2017-05-03
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH | BO-105C | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus Helicopters) (Previously Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH) |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH | BO-105LS A-3 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus Helicopters) (Previously Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH) |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH | BO-105S | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus Helicopters) (Previously Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH) |
Unsafe Condition
Incorrect bonding of the erosion protective shell to the main rotor blade (MRB) could result in loss of the shell in-flight, which could strike the tailboom or the tail rotor, causing an imbalance in the main rotor and high vibrations. These vibrations could damage the helicopter, leading to loss of tail rotor control and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect each main rotor blade (MRB) shell for debonding within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS until the MRB reaches 200 hours TIS. If debonding is found, repair or replace the MRB before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 10 hours TIS for the initial inspection, followed by inspections at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS until the MRB reaches 200 hours TIS.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Helicopters Model BO-105C, BO-105LS A-3, and BO-105S helicopters with certain part-numbered MRBs where the shell was last replaced between December 1, 2010, and February 28, 2015, inclusive, or where the most recent date of shell replacement cannot be determined from maintenance records.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus Helicopters Model BO-105C, BO-105LS A-3, and BO-105S helicopters. This AD requires inspecting each main rotor blade (MRB) for debonding, and is prompted by a report of incorrect bonding of the shell to the MRB. These actions are intended to detect and prevent an unsafe condition on these products.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 40 (Thursday, March 2, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12293-12295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03963]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0155; Directorate Identifier 2016-SW-051-AD;
Amendment 39-18813; AD 2017-05-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(Airbus Helicopters) (Previously Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus
Helicopters Model BO-105C, BO-105LS A-3, and BO-105S helicopters. This
AD requires inspecting each main rotor blade (MRB) for debonding, and
is prompted by a report of incorrect bonding of the shell to the MRB.
These actions are intended to detect and prevent an unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 17, 2017.
We must receive comments on this AD by May 1, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
<bullet> Fax: 202-493-2251.
<bullet> Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0155; or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at
<a href="http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub">http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub</a>. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#036e6277776b66742d65766f6f6671436562622d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91fcf0e5e5f9f4e6bff7e4fdfdf4e3d1f7f0f0bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any
[[Page 12294]]
recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one
copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically,
commenters should submit them only one time. We will file in the docket
all comments that we receive, as well as a report summarizing each
substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this
rulemaking during the comment period. We will consider all the comments
we receive and may conduct additional rulemaking based on those
comments.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued Emergency AD No. 2016-0118-E, dated June 17,
2016, to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters Model BO105
C, BO105 D, BO105 LS A-3, and BO105 S helicopters, all variants except
CB-5, D, DS, DBS-5, and CBS-5. According to EASA, during an inspection
on a Model BO105 S helicopter, debonding was found on the erosion
protective shell (shell) of an MRB, caused by incorrect preparation of
the shell prior to the bonding process. EASA further states that this
condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in loss of the
shell in-flight, which could strike the tailboom or the tail rotor,
causing an imbalance in the main rotor and high vibrations. EASA also
advises that these high vibrations could damage the helicopter,
resulting in loss of tail rotor control and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
To address this unsafe condition, EASA AD 2016-0118-E requires
repetitive inspections of the shells for debonding within 10 hours
time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at 50-hour TIS intervals. After
the shells have completed 200 hours TIS since the shell was installed
and completed an inspection of the shell, the EASA AD no longer
requires the repetitive 50 hour TIS inspections. The EASA AD applies to
certain part-numbered MRBs on which the shell was last replaced between
December 1, 2010, and February 28, 2015, inclusive, or for which there
is no maintenance record available to determine the date the shell was
last replaced.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
Germany and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with Germany, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same
type designs.
Related Service Information
We reviewed Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
(EASB) BO105-10A-128, Revision 0, dated June 16, 2016, for Model
BO105C, D, and S helicopters and EASB No. BO105 LS-10A-016, Revision 0,
dated June 16, 2016, for Model BO105 LS A-3 helicopters. This service
information specifies repetitively inspecting the MRB shell for
delamination in accordance with the helicopter's maintenance manual
procedures.
Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD is applicable to the Model BO105D helicopter; this AD
is not because it does not have a type certificate in the U.S. The EASA
AD prohibits installing an affected MRB on any helicopter until its AD
actions have been complied with. This AD does not.
AD Requirements
This AD applies to helicopters with certain part-numbered MRBs with
shells that were last replaced between December 1, 2010, and February
28, 2015, inclusive or where the most recent date of replacement of the
shell cannot be determined from the helicopter maintenance records.
This AD requires inspecting each MRB shell for debonding within 10
hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS until
the MRB reaches 200 hours TIS. After the blade has accumulated 200
hours TIS since the last shell replacement, the 50 hours TIS
inspections are terminated. If there is any debonding, this AD requires
repairing or replacing the MRB before further flight.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 73 helicopters of U.S. Registry.
At an average labor rate of $85, we estimate that operators may
incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. Inspecting
the MRB shells will require 1 work-hour, for a total cost of $85 per
helicopter and $6,205 for the fleet, per inspection cycle. If required,
replacing an MRB will require 2 work-hours and required parts will cost
$114,000, for a cost per helicopter of $114,170.
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
Providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adopting
these AD requirements would delay implementing the safety actions
needed to correct this known unsafe condition. Therefore, we find that
the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment
prior to the adoption of this rule because the inspections required by
this AD must be accomplished within 10 hours TIS and 50 hours TIS, a
very short interval for helicopters used in helicopter air ambulance
operations.
Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
[[Page 12295]]
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2017-05-03 Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Previously
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH): Amendment 39-18813; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0155; Directorate Identifier 2016-SW-051-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model BO-
105C, BO-105LS A-3, and BO-105S helicopters, certificated in any
category, with a main rotor blade (MRB) part number 105-15103, 105-
15141, 105-15141V001, 105-15143, 105-15150, 105-15150V001, 105-
15152, 105-81013, 105-87214, 1120-15101, or 1120-15103 that has less
than 200 hours time-in-service (TIS) since the MRB erosion
protective shell (shell) was last replaced, and where the shell was
last replaced between December 1, 2010, and February 28, 2015,
inclusive or where the most recent date of replacement of the shell
is unknown.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as debonding of the shell
of an MRB. This condition could result in loss of the shell in-
flight, which could strike the tailboom or tail rotor, resulting in
loss of tail rotor control, high main rotor vibration, and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective March 17, 2017.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 10 hours TIS, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
50 hours TIS:
(1) Inspect by tap test each MRB for debonding of the shell.
(2) If the shell has debonded in any area, before further
flight, repair any debonding that does not exceed the maximum repair
damage limits, or replace the MRB.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation
Safety Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate,
FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817)
222-5110; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7decaa6b4b0caa1b3b0caa6aaa8a4cab582969282949394a7818686c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10293d5143473d5644473d515d5f533d4275616575636463507671713e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB)
BO105-10A-128 for Model BO105C, D, and S helicopters and EASB BO105
LS-10A-016 for Model BO105 LS A-3 helicopters, both Revision 0, and
dated June 16, 2016, which are not incorporated by reference,
contain additional information about the subject of this final rule.
For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or
at <a href="http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub">http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub</a>. You may review a copy
of the service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort
Worth, TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Emergency AD No. 2016-0118-E, dated June 17,
2016. You may view the EASA AD on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA-2017-0155.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6210 Main Rotor
Blade.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 21, 2017.
Lance T. Gant,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-03963 Filed 3-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.