AD 2016-25-20
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS355E | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS355F | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS355F1 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS355F2 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS355N | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS355NP | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350B | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350B1 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350B2 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350B3 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350BA | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350C | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350D | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | AS350D1 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | EC130B4 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
| aircraft | Airbus Helicopters | EC130T2 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters |
Unsafe Condition
A crack in a bi-directional cross-bar, which could result in failure of a cross-bar and loss of control of the helicopter.
Required Actions
Visually inspect each cross-bar for a crack. If there is any doubt after the visual inspection, a dye-penetrant inspection is required to make sure there are no cracks. If a crack is detected, replace the cross-bar before further flight and send the damaged cross-bar to Airbus Helicopters.
Compliance Time
Within the initial inspection times shown in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD or the next time maintenance of the helicopter involves removing the main gearbox, whichever comes first; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed the compliance times shown in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4, EC130T2, AS350B, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, and AS355NP helicopters with a bi-directional suspension cross-bar (cross-bar) part number (P/N) 350A38-1040-20 or P/N 350A38-1040-00 installed, certificated in any category.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4, EC130T2, AS350B, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, and AS355NP helicopters. This AD requires inspecting each bi- directional suspension cross-bar (cross-bar). This AD was prompted by two reports of cracks in a cross-bar. These actions are intended to prevent the unsafe condition on these products.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 94954-94956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30048]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-3929; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-031-AD;
Amendment 39-18746; AD 2016-25-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus
Helicopters Model EC130B4, EC130T2, AS350B, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3,
AS350BA, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2,
AS355N, and AS355NP helicopters. This AD requires inspecting each bi-
directional suspension cross-bar (cross-bar). This AD was prompted by
two reports of cracks in a cross-bar. These actions are intended to
prevent the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775;
or at <a href="http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub">http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub</a>.
You may review the referenced service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy,
Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
3929; or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations Office (phone: 800-647-5527)
is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations Office, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort
Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e99b868b8c9b9dc78e9b88879da98f8888c78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="53213c313621277d3421323d27133532327d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On April 11, 2016, at 81 FR 21284, the Federal Register published
our notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which proposed to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to Airbus Helicopters
Model EC130B4, EC130T2, AS350B, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA,
AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, and
AS355NP helicopters with a cross-bar part number (P/N) 350A38-1040-20
or P/N 350A38-1040-00 installed. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitively inspecting each cross-bar for a crack and replacing any
cracked cross-bar before further flight. The proposed requirements were
intended to detect cracks in a cross-bar and prevent failure of the
cross-bar and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
The NPRM was prompted by AD No. 2015-0094, dated May 29, 2015,
issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent
[[Page 94955]]
for the Member States of the European Union, to correct an unsafe
condition for Airbus Helicopters Model AS350B, AS350BA, AS350BB,
AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350D, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2,
AS355N, AS355NP, EC130B4, and EC130T2 helicopters. EASA advises that
two cases of cracks in a cross-bar were reported on AS350B3
helicopters. The cracks were found at the transmission deck attachment
fitting holes in helicopters equipped with a cargo hook that had
completed missions with a significant number of torque cycles. Because
of common design features, cracks may also occur on other Model AS350-
series, AS355-series, and EC130-series helicopters. EASA advises that
crack growth may lead to failure of one of the four yokes and
significantly increase stress loads on the remaining yokes. This
condition, if not detected or corrected, could lead to cracks on the
remaining yokes and increased load on the cross-bar, possibly resulting
in cross-bar failure and consequently loss of the helicopter. To
correct this condition, EASA AD No. 2015-0094 requires repetitive
cross-bar inspections and, depending on the findings, replacing the
cross-bar.
Comments
One commenter submitted comments supporting the NPRM (81 FR 21284,
April 11, 2016).
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same
type designs and that air safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Model AS350BB
helicopters. This AD does not apply to the Model AS350BB because it
does not have an FAA type certificate. However, this AD applies to
Model AS350C and AS350D1 helicopters, while the EASA AD does not. The
EASA AD requires a florescent dye-penetrant inspection if the visual
inspection of the bi-directional suspension cross-bar causes doubts.
This AD does not require a florescent dye-penetrant inspection. The
EASA AD requires returning the damaged bi-directional suspension cross-
bar to Airbus Helicopters, and this AD does not.
Related Service Information
Airbus Helicopters has issued Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No.
EC130-05A021 for Model EC130B4 helicopters; ASB No. EC130-05A022 for
Model EC130T2 helicopters; ASB No. AS350-05.00.84 for Model AS350B,
AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA, AS350BB, AS350D, and military Model
AS350L1 helicopters; and ASB No. 355-05.00.73 for Model AS355E, AS355F,
AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, and AS355 NP helicopters (ASBs). All of the
ASBs are Revision 0 and dated May 21, 2015. The ASBs specify visually
inspecting the cross-bar. If there is any doubt after the visual
inspection, the ASBs call for a dye-penetrant inspection to make sure
there are no cracks. If a crack is detected, the ASBs call for
replacing the cross-bar before further flight and sending the damaged
cross-bar to Airbus Helicopters.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1,132 helicopters of U.S. Registry
and that labor costs average $85 a work-hour. Based on these estimates,
we expect the following costs:
<bullet> Visually inspecting the cross-bar requires 16.5 work-hours
for a labor cost of about $1,403. No parts are needed so that the cost
for the U.S. fleet totals $1,588,196 per inspection cycle.
<bullet> Replacing the cross-bar costs $1,630 for parts. No
additional labor costs are needed.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on helicopters identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-25-20 Airbus Helicopters: Amendment 39-18746; Docket No. FAA-
2015-3929; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-031-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4, EC130T2,
AS350B, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1,
AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, and AS355NP helicopters
with a bi-directional suspension cross-bar (cross-bar) part number
(P/N) 350A38-1040-20 or P/N 350A38-1040-00 installed, certificated
in any category.
[[Page 94956]]
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in a bi-
directional cross-bar, which could result in failure of a cross-bar
and loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective January 31, 2017.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
(1) Within the initial inspection times shown in Table 1 to
paragraph (e) of this AD or the next time maintenance of the
helicopter involves removing the main gearbox, whichever comes
first; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed the compliance
times shown in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD, inspect each
cross-bar for a crack. For purposes of this AD, a torque cycle is
defined as one landing with or without stopping the rotor or one
external load-carrying operation; an external load-carrying
operation occurs each time a helicopter picks up an external load
and drops it off.
Table 1 to Paragraph (e)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial and recurrent
Helicopter model inspection interval
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AS350B, AS350BA, AS350B1, AS350B2, 4,500 hours time-in-service
AS350C, AS350D, and AS350D1. (TIS) or 60,000 torque cycles,
whichever occurs first.
AS350B3, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, 3,300 hours TIS or 60,000
AS355F2, AS355N, and AS355 NP. torque cycles, whichever
EC130B4................................ occurs first.
EC130T2................................ 3,300 hours TIS or 40,000
torque cycles, whichever
occurs first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight, replace the
cross-bar.
(f) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits are prohibited.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort
Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2cbdfb3a1a5dfb4a6a5dfb3bfbdb1dfa097838797818681b2949393dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a29b8fe3f1f58fe4f6f58fe3efede18ff0c7d3d7c7d1d6d1e2c4c3c38cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin No. EC130-05A021,
No. EC130-05A022, No. AS350-05.00.84, and No. AS355-05.00.73, all
Revision 0 and all dated May 21, 2015, which are not incorporated by
reference, contain additional information about the subject of this
final rule. For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-
3775; or at <a href="http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub">http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub</a>. You may review
the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2015-0094, dated May 29, 2015. You may
view the EASA AD on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> in
Docket No. FAA-2015-3929.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6300, Main Rotor
Drive System.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 6, 2016.
Scott A. Horn,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-30048 Filed 12-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.