AD 2016-06-04
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-400 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-500 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Reports of cracking at certain fastener locations in the window corners of the window belt area, which could cause multiple window corner skin cracks, leading to rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Conduct repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for fatigue cracking in certain fastener locations in the window corners of the window belt area. Perform related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. Operators may choose an optional preventive modification that terminates inspections at the modified location.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours after the effective date of the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking at certain fastener locations in the window corners of the window belt area. This AD requires repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for fatigue cracking in certain fastener locations in the window corners of the window belt area, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also provides an optional preventive modification that terminates the inspections at the modified location. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around fastener locations that could cause multiple window corner skin cracks, which could result in rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400,
and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July
22, 2014.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/be866b732f6cf31086257b9700692796/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is
installed, a ''change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14711-14716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05842]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-0495; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-172-AD;
Amendment 39-18435; AD 2016-06-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This
AD was prompted by reports of cracking at certain fastener locations in
the window corners of the window belt area. This AD requires repetitive
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for fatigue cracking in
certain fastener locations in the window corners of the window belt
area, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
This AD also provides an optional preventive modification that
terminates the inspections at the modified location. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around fastener
locations that could cause multiple window corner skin cracks, which
could result in rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of
the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective April 22, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 22,
2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0495.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0495; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Tsakoumakis, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA
90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5264; fax: 562-627-5210; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91fbf4fffff8f7f4e3bfe5e2f0fafee4fcf0faf8e2d1f7f0f0bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f353a313136393a2d712b2c3e34302a323e34362c1f393e3e71383029">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on March 24, 2015 (80 FR 15523) (``the NPRM'').
The NPRM was prompted by reports of cracking at certain fastener
locations in the window corners of the window belt area. The NPRM
proposed to require repetitive HFEC inspections for fatigue cracking in
certain fastener locations in the window corners of the window belt
area, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around
fastener locations that could cause multiple window corner skin cracks,
which could result in rapid decompression and loss of structural
integrity of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Request for Clarification of Location of the Twelve Fastener
Inspections
Southwest Airlines (SWA) requested that a correction be made to
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD to clarify the areas for the
inspection of the twelve fastener locations. SWA noted that paragraph
(g) of the proposed AD stated to inspect locations ``at the upper
forward and lower aft corners of each window between station (STA) 360
and STA 540 and between STA 727 and STA 908.'' SWA stated that between
STA 727 and STA 908, Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated
July 22, 2014, specifies the location as the lower forward and upper
aft corners.
We agree with the commenter for the reason provided. We have
revised paragraph (g) of this AD to require an inspection of the twelve
fastener locations at the upper forward and lower aft corners of each
window between STA 360 and STA 540 and at the upper aft and lower
forward corners of each window between STA 727 and STA 908.
Request for Clarification of the Intent of the Inspection Requirements
in Paragraph (g) of the Proposed AD
SWA requested that we clarify the intent of paragraph (g) of the
proposed AD. SWA stated that paragraph (g) of the proposed AD states to
accomplish the inspections at the times specified in tables 1 and 2 of
paragraph 1.E.,
[[Page 14712]]
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated
July 22, 2014, and then repeat the inspections at the applicable times
specified in tables 1 and 2 until ``the terminating action in paragraph
(h) of this AD is accomplished,'' which is the optional preventive
modification in Part 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014. SWA stated
that, per note (b) in tables 1 and 2, accomplishment of the preventive
modification in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, is terminating action for both the
initial and repeat inspections at the modified locations. SWA stated
that paragraph (g) of the proposed AD does not mention the option to
accomplish the actions specified in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD in
lieu of the initial inspection specified in paragraph (g) of this AD;
it only states to ``repeat the inspections . . . until the terminating
action specified in paragraph (h) of this AD is done.'' SWA noted it is
unclear if the intent of paragraph (g) of this AD is to require
accomplishment of the Part 1 external surface HFEC inspections of the
skin prior to accomplishing the Part 3 preventive modification
instructions, or if the intent of paragraph (g) of the proposed AD is
to provide the operator the option to accomplish paragraph (h) of the
proposed AD (preventive modification) in lieu of accomplishing
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD (inspections), since the Part 3
modification instructions include open hole HFEC inspections of the
skin.
We agree to provide clarification. Paragraph (g) of this AD is not
required at the time of accomplishment of the preventive modification
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD. Paragraph (h) of this AD states
that the preventive modification (including all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions) terminates the inspections in
paragraph (g) of this AD. This means all inspections (initial and
repetitive) in paragraph (g) of this AD are not required if paragraph
(h) of this AD is done. We have not changed this AD in this regard.
Request for Clarification of Existing Repairs
SWA requested clarification about existing repairs that meet the
requirements of note (a) in tables 1 and 2 of paragraph l.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated
July 22, 2014. SWA also requested to extend the note to apply to
existing repairs that address damage other than cracking, provided that
the repairs are evaluated and approved by Boeing via an FAA Form 8100-
9. In addition, SWA requested we clarify whether note (a) applies only
to reinforcing repairs that encompass all twelve fastener locations at
a window corner, or if note (a) also applies to existing non-
reinforcing oversize hole repairs.
We partially agree with the commenter. We agree with adding a
paragraph to this AD to provide credit for previously approved repairs
to address cracking issues, because Boeing Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) approved repairs installed prior the effective date
of this AD are acceptable for terminating the initial and repetitive
inspections in the area under the repair. We disagree with allowing any
other repair as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) because
other repairs may or may not address the cracking issue. However,
operators may request approval of an AMOC for these repairs using the
procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.
We have added new paragraph (g)(1) to this AD to specify that the
inspections required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this
AD may be terminated in areas with repairs installed prior to the
effective date of this AD, provided the repairs are reinforcing and
address the cracking issue addressed in this AD, and installation was
approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA via FAA Form 8100-9.
Request for Clarification of the Termination of Inspection for Repaired
Area for Group 1 Airplanes
All Nippon Airways (ANA) requested we clarify if, for Group 1
airplanes as identified in paragraph 1.A.1 ``Effectivity,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, areas repaired
using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014,
is terminating action for the repaired area. ANA pointed out that table
1 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014,
includes this wording.
We agree to provide clarification. Accomplishing a repair in
accordance with Part 6 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, also
terminates the inspection of the repaired area for Group 1 airplanes.
We have added new paragraph (g)(2) to this AD to specify that repairs
done in accordance with Part 6 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014,
terminate the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD in only
the repaired area for Group 1 airplanes only.
Request To Include Provisions for Airplanes Previously Inspected,
Modified, and/or Repaired
SWA requested that we revise the NPRM to include provisions for
airplanes that were previously inspected, modified, and/or repaired
using step 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53-1306, dated September 22, 2010; Revision 1, dated March
17, 2010; Revision 2, dated October 25, 2011; or Revision 3, dated
January 22, 2014; as terminating action for the inspections required by
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD, as well as any documented deviations
that were approved by the Boeing ODA via an FAA Form 8100-9.
SWA stated that step 3 of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1306 (all
revisions) includes inspection, preventive modification, and repair
instructions for the window corner locations addressed by the proposed
AD. Figures 8 through 10 of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1306 (all
revisions) provide inspection and preventive modification instructions,
which also include instructions for a fastener oversize repair, edge
margin requirements, and window forging replacement. Figures 13 through
18 provide external reinforcing repair instructions. Figures 40 through
43 were added in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1306, Revision 3, dated
January 22, 2014, to incorporate the option to replace the window belt
panels in lieu of accomplishing the window corner inspections,
preventive modification, and approved repairs. SWA stated that it
considers the instructions in Step 3 of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-
1306 (all revisions) to meet the intent of the proposed AD since the
instructions address and eliminate the unsafe condition that prompted
the proposed AD.
We do not agree to revise this AD because Boeing Service Bulletin
737-53-1306 is specific for SWA. We do not consider it appropriate to
include various provisions in an AD applicable only to a single
operator's unique configuration of affected airplanes. However, SWA may
submit a request for an approval of an AMOC using the procedures
specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. We have not changed this AD in
this regard.
Requests To Clarify Required Actions
SWA and ANA requested that we clarify which actions specified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
[[Page 14713]]
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, are required. SWA stated that paragraph
(j)(3) of the proposed AD (paragraph (l)(3) in this AD) indicates that
steps identified as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance) in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, must be accomplished
``in order to comply with this AD.''
The commenters noted that there are ``RC'' steps in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, that are not clearly
addressed in the proposed AD. SWA noted that Parts 7 and 8 of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, contain steps
that are identified as ``RC;'' however, the proposed AD does not
mention the compliance times for these actions. SWA stated that Part 7
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014,
provides window frame replacement instructions, and steps 5 and 6 in
Part 8 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22,
2014, provide post-repair/post-modification inspection instructions for
window frames with short edge margin conditions at the compliance times
specified in tables 3, 4, and 8 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014. SWA assumed that actions identified in
Table 3 and Table 8 are not required for compliance and that the
actions identified in Table 4 are required for compliance. SWA also
pointed out that step 10 of Part 2 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, is not ``RC,'' but could result in
accomplishment of Part 7 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328,
dated July 22, 2014, which has ``RC'' steps.
We agree to clarify the actions required by this AD. The post-
modification and post-repair inspections identified in Table 4 and
Table 5 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, are required by this AD. The
accomplishment instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, are unclear. Therefore, we have added new
paragraph (i) to this AD to specify the actions identified in Table 4
and Table 5 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014. We have redesignated
subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
Regarding Part 7 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328,
dated July 22, 2014, if operators chose to do the modification, certain
actions specified in Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5 of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, are identified as ``RC''
steps. Within those steps, there is an on-condition action, which
specifies to do Part 7; thus, step 1 of Part 7 of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014 is required for compliance.
Steps 2, 3, and 4 of Part 8 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, are referenced in Table 3 and Table 8 in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, and are not required by this AD. We have
added new paragraph (k) of this AD to clarify that the post-
modification inspections specified in Table 3 and Table 8 in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328,
dated July 22, 2014, are airworthiness limitations that are required by
maintenance and operational rules; therefore, these inspections are not
required by this AD. We have redesignated subsequent paragraphs
accordingly.
Request To Clarify Office Responsible for AMOCs
ANA requested that we clarify the office responsible for AMOCs. ANA
stated that paragraph (j) of the proposed AD specifies that the Seattle
ACO has the authority to approve AMOCs. However, ANA noted it has seen
other ADs for out of production airplanes that refer to the Los Angeles
ACO.
We agree to clarify. The Los Angeles ACO is currently responsible
for AMOCs for the airplanes identified in this AD. We have revised
paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(4) of this AD (paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(4)
of the proposed AD) to refer to the Los Angeles ACO.
Requests for Clarification of Incorrect References
Boeing and SWA requested that we clarify incorrect references in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014. The
commenters stated that note (e) in Figure 5 of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, incorrectly references table
2 of paragraph 3.B., Work Instructions, for post repair/modification
inspections of short edge margins on window frames. The commenters
stated that these references should be to table 3 of paragraph 3.B.,
Work Instructions. Boeing also identified the notes in figures 9, 10,
11, and 12 as additional locations where the reference to table 2
should be to table 3. The commenters requested that we clarify in this
AD that repeat post repair and modification inspections for window
frames with short edge margins are defined in table 3 rather than table
2 of paragraph 3.B, Work Instructions, in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014.
We agree with the commenters that the identified table references
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, are
incorrect. We have added new paragraphs (j)(3) and (j)(4) to this AD to
specify the correct table references. We have also added new paragraph
(j)(5) to this AD to clarify that operators must comply with the edge
margin requirements in Table 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014. We have
also revised paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD to include references to
paragraphs (j)(3), (j)(4), and (j)(5) of this AD.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing Supplemental
Type Certificate (STC) ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/
Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
be866b732f6cf31086257b9700692796/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect
the actions specified in the NPRM.
We concur with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of
the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and added new paragraph
(c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC ST01219SE does not
affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD.
Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is installed, a
``change in product'' AMOC approval request is not necessary to comply
with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously--and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July
22, 2014. The service information describes procedures for HFEC
inspections for
[[Page 14714]]
fatigue cracking in certain fastener locations in the window corners of
the window belt area, and related investigative and corrective actions.
This service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 142 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs: Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection................. Up to 2,312 work- $0 Up to $196,520 per Up to $27,905,840 per
hours x $85 per hour inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
= $196,520 per
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Costs: Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preventive modification....................... 108 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 $9,180
$9,180.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of aircraft that might need repairs:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair...................... Up to 18 work-hours x $0 Up to $1,530 per repair.
$85 per hour = $1,530
per repair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-06-04 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18435 ; Docket No. FAA-
2015-0495; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-172-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective April 22, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400,
and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July
22, 2014.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/be866b732f6cf31086257b9700692796/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is
installed, a ''change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking at certain
fastener locations in the window corners of the window belt area. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking around
the fastener
[[Page 14715]]
locations that could cause multiple window corner skin cracks, which
could result in rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity
of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspections
At the applicable time specified in tables 1 and 2 of paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328,
dated July 22, 2014, except as required by paragraph (j)(1) of this
AD: Do external surface high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspections for cracking of the skin at the 12 fastener locations at
the upper forward and lower aft corners of each window between
station (STA) 360 and STA 540 and at the upper aft and lower forward
corners of each window between STA 727 and STA 908, left-side and
right-side of the fuselage, at and between stringers S-11 and S-13;
and all applicable related investigative and corrective actions; in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, except as
required by paragraphs (j)(2), (j)(3), (j)(4), and (j)(5) of this
AD. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight. Repeat the inspections at the applicable
times specified in tables 1 and 2 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,''
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014.
Accomplishing the preventive modification specified in paragraph (h)
of this AD terminates the repetitive inspections required by this
paragraph at the modified location only.
(1) The inspections required by the introductory text of
paragraph (g) of this AD may be terminated in areas with repairs
installed prior to the effective date of this AD, provided the
repairs are reinforcing and address the cracking issue identified in
this AD, and installation was approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) via FAA Form
8100-9.
(2) For Group 1 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014: Window corner crack
repairs terminate the inspection required by the introductory text
of paragraph (g) of this AD in the repaired area only. The repair,
including all applicable related investigative and corrective
actions, must be done in accordance with Part 6 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, except as required by paragraphs
(j)(2), (j)(3), (j)(4), and (j)(5) of this AD.
(h) Preventive Modification
Accomplishment of a preventive modification in the fastener
locations in the window corners of the window belt area between STA
360 and STA 540 and between STA 727 and STA 908, left-side and
right-side of the fuselage, at and between stringers S-11 and S-13,
terminates the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD at
the modified location only. The modification, including all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions, must be
done in accordance with Part 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014,
except as required by paragraphs (j)(2), (j)(3), (j)(4), and (j)(5)
of this AD.
(i) Repetitive Inspections, Replacements, and Corrective Actions
For airplanes having any condition identified in Table 4 or
Table 5 of paragraph l.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014: At the applicable times
specified in Table 4 and Table 5 of paragraph l.E., ``Compliance,''
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014,
do a window frame replacement or an internal detailed inspection for
cracks of the window forging around the fastener collars, as
applicable, and do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, except as required by
paragraphs (j)(2), (j)(3), (j)(4), and (j)(5) of this AD. Repeat the
inspections at the applicable times specified in table 4 and table 5
of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014.
(j) Exceptions to the Service Information Specifications
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July
22, 2014, specifies a compliance time ``after the original issue
date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within
the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July
22, 2014, specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions:
Before further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD. Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July
22, 2014, specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions, and
specifies that action as Required for Compliance (RC), this AD
requires repair as specified in this paragraph.
(3) Where note (e) of Figure 5 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, specifies to ``Refer to Paragraph
3.B., Work Instructions, Table 2 for edge margin requirements,''
operators must comply with Table 3 of paragraph 3.B., ``Work
Instructions,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated
July 22, 2014, for edge margin requirements.
(4) Where the notes for fastener codes A and B in figures 9, 10,
11, and 12 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July
22, 2014, refer to ``Paragraph 3.B., Work Instructions, Table 2''
for edge margin requirements, operators must comply with Table 3 of
paragraph 3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, for edge margin
requirements.
(5) Where note (e) of figures 6, 7, and 8 and step 1.a.(1) of
Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, specifies to ``Refer to
Paragraph 3.B., Work Instructions, Table 3 for edge margin
requirements,'' operators must comply with Table 3 of paragraph
3.B., ``Work Instructions,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, for edge margin requirements.
(k) Post-Repair Inspections/Post-Modification Inspections
Table 3 and Table 8 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22, 2014, specify
post-modification airworthiness limitation inspections in compliance
to 14 CFR 25.571(a)(3) at the modified locations, which support
compliance with 14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2). As
airworthiness limitations, these inspections are required by
maintenance and operational rules. It is therefore unnecessary to
mandate them in this AD. Deviations from these inspections require
FAA approval, but do not require an alternative method of
compliance.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c75610d020161000d0d0f03610d01030f611e293d39293f383f0c2a2d2d622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8eb7a3cfc0c3a3c2cfcfcdc1a3cfc3c1cda3dcebfffbebfdfafdcee8efefa0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) Except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as RC, the
provisions of paragraphs (l)(3)(i) and (l)(3)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with this AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(4) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation,
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
[[Page 14716]]
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Jennifer
Tsakoumakis, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Blvd.,
Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5264; fax: 562-627-5210;
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbd1ded5d5d2dddec995cfc8dad0d4ced6dad0d2c8fbdddada95dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e141b101017181b0c500a0d1f15110b131f15170d3e181f1f50191108">[email protected]</span></a>.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1328, dated July 22,
2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 7, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05842 Filed 3-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.