AD 2015-26-06
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-211 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-212 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes |
| aircraft | Airbus SAS | A320-231 | Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on the wing center box, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the lower surface panel on the wing center box for fatigue cracking, repair if necessary, and modify the lower surface panel on the wing center box as terminating action for repetitive inspections. Reduce compliance times for repetitive inspections and require an additional repair for certain airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within reduced thresholds and intervals as specified in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Airbus Model A320-211, -212, and -231 airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004-14-09 for certain Airbus Model A320-211, -212, and -231 airplanes. AD 2004-14-09 required repetitive inspections for fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on the wing center box, and repair if necessary; and modification of the lower surface panel on the wing center box, which constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This new AD retains the requirements of AD 2004-14-09, reduces the compliance times for the repetitive inspections, and requires an additional repair for certain airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that, based on the average flight duration, the average weight of fuel at landing is higher than that defined for the analysis of the fatigue-related tasks; and that shot peening might have been improperly done on the chromic acid anodizing (CAA) protection, which would adversely affect fatigue crack protection. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on the wing center box, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-211, -212, and -231
airplanes, certificated in any category, all manufacturer serial
numbers, except those on which Airbus Modification 22418 has been
embodied in production.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1870-1874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32519]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-1275; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-070-AD;
Amendment 39-18354; AD 2015-26-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004-14-09 for
certain Airbus Model A320-211, -212, and -231 airplanes. AD 2004-14-09
required repetitive inspections for fatigue cracking of the lower
surface panel on the wing center box, and repair if necessary; and
modification of the lower surface panel on the wing center box, which
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This new
AD retains the requirements of AD 2004-14-09, reduces the compliance
times for the repetitive inspections, and requires an additional repair
for certain airplanes. This AD was
[[Page 1871]]
prompted by a determination that, based on the average flight duration,
the average weight of fuel at landing is higher than that defined for
the analysis of the fatigue-related tasks; and that shot peening might
have been improperly done on the chromic acid anodizing (CAA)
protection, which would adversely affect fatigue crack protection. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the lower
surface panel on the wing center box, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective February 18, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of February 18,
2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of August
13, 2004 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004).
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of
November 27, 1998 (63 FR 56542, October 22, 1998).
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail">http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail</a>;D=FAA-2015-1275; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#254446464a504b510b444c57524a57514d0840445665444c574750560b464a48"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb9a9898948e958fd59a92898c94898f93d69e9a88bb9a9289998e88d5989496">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="http://www.airbus.com">http://www.airbus.com</a>. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1275.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398,
July 9, 2004). AD 2004-14-09 applied to certain Airbus Model A320-211,
-212, and -231 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
May 8, 2015 (80 FR 26492). The NPRM was prompted by a determination
that, based on the average flight duration, the average weight of fuel
at landing is higher than that defined for the analysis of the fatigue-
related tasks; and that shot peening might have been improperly done on
the CAA protection, which would adversely affect fatigue crack
protection. The NPRM proposed to continue to require repetitive
inspections for fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on the wing
center box, and repair if necessary; and modification of the lower
surface panel on the wing center box, which constitutes terminating
action for the repetitive inspections. The NPRM also proposed to reduce
the compliance times for the repetitive inspections, and would require
a repair for certain airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on the wing center
box, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0065, dated March 14, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition on certain Model A320-
211, -212, and -231 airplanes. The MCAI states:
During center fuselage certification full scale test, damage was
found in the center wing box (CWB) lower surface panel.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the CWB.
To prevent such damage, Airbus developed mod 22418 which
consists in shot-peening of the lower panel in the related area. Mod
22418 has been embodied in production from aeroplane [manufacturer
serial number] (MSN) 0359. For unmodified in-service aeroplanes,
Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB) A320-57-1082 to introduce
repetitive High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC) inspections on the
external face of the center wing box lower panel between Frame (FR)
41 and FR42 to detect damage.
DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile]
France issued AD 2002-342 [<a href="http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/20023420tb_superseded.pdf/AD_F-2002-342_1">http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/20023420tb_superseded.pdf/AD_F-2002-342_1</a>] to require these
inspections and, depending on findings, applicable corrective
action(s). Airbus also issued SB A320-57-1043 as an optional
terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by DGAC
France AD 2002-342.
Since that [DGAC] AD was issued, the results of a survey,
carried out on the A320 fleet, highlighted some differences between
the mission parameters, mainly on the weight of fuel at landing and
on the average flight duration, which are higher than those defined
for the analysis of the fatigue related tasks.
These findings have led to an adjustment of the A320 reference
fatigue mission. Consequently, the threshold and intervals of these
repetitive inspections have been revised and a new threshold figure
expressed in flight hours (FH) has been established.
In addition, it has been identified that, on aeroplanes that
have been modified in accordance with Airbus SB A320-57-1043 (Airbus
mod 22418) at Revision 05 or an earlier Revision, the shot peening
may have been improperly done on the Chromic Acid Anodizing (CAA)
protection, which has no fatigue benefit effect. Therefore, the
inspections per Airbus SB A320-57-1082 are required again on these
aeroplanes.
Consequently, new shot-peening procedures with proper CAA
protection removal instructions have been developed and their
embodiment through Airbus SB A320-57-1043 Revision 06 cancels the
repetitive inspections per Airbus SB A320-57-1082, as required by
DGAC France AD 2002-342.
For the reasons described above, this new [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of DGAC France AD 2002-342, which is superseded, but
requires these actions to be accomplished within reduced thresholds
and intervals. In addition, the optional terminating action
provision (SB A320-57-1043) is amended by including reference to the
SB at Revision 06.
The optional terminating action described in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 06, dated December 5, 2013, is
accomplishing shot peening in the radius of the milling step between
stiffeners 13 and 14 near the fuel pump aperture. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail">http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail</a>;D=FAA-2015-1275-0002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (80 FR 26492, May 8, 2015)
or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (80 FR
[[Page 1872]]
26492, May 8, 2015) for correcting the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 26492, May 8, 2015).
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 06, dated
December 5, 2013. This service information describes procedures for
shot peening in the radius of the milling step between stiffeners 13
and 14 near the fuel pump aperture.
Airbus has also issued Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 04,
dated December 5, 2013. This service information describes procedures
for inspections for cracking of the lower surface panel on the wing
center box.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 46 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The actions that were required by AD 2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718
(69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), and retained in this AD take about 25
work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that were
required by AD 2004-14-09 is $2,125 per product.
The new requirements of this AD will add no additional economic
burden.
We have received no definitive data that will enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD. We
have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail">http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail</a>;D=FAA-2015-1275; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), and adding
the following new AD:
2015-26-06 Airbus: Amendment 39-18354. Docket No. FAA-2015-1275;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-070-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective February 18, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398,
July 9, 2004).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-211, -212, and -231
airplanes, certificated in any category, all manufacturer serial
numbers, except those on which Airbus Modification 22418 has been
embodied in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination that, based on the
average flight duration, the average weight of fuel at landing is
higher than that defined for the analysis of the fatigue-related
tasks; and that shot peening might have been improperly done on the
chromic acid anodizing (CAA) protection, which would adversely
affect fatigue crack protection. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on the wing
center box (WCB), which could result in reduced structural integrity
of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Repetitive Inspections, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (a) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with no
changes. Except as provided by paragraph (k) of this AD: Prior to
the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or within 60 days
after November 27, 1998 (the effective date of AD 98-22-05,
Amendment 39-10851 (63 FR 56542, October 22, 1998)), whichever
occurs later, perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection to detect fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on
the WCB, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082,
Revision 01, dated December 10, 1997; or Revision 03, dated April
30, 2002. Repeat the HFEC inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 7,500 flight cycles until the actions required by paragraph
(i) of this AD are accomplished.
(h) Retained Repair, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (b) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with no
changes. Except as provided by paragraph (j) of this AD, if any
cracking is detected during any inspection required by paragraph (g)
of this AD: Prior to further flight, repair in accordance with
Airbus
[[Page 1873]]
Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 01, dated December 10, 1997;
or Revision 03, dated April 30, 2002. Accomplishment of the repair
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (g) of this AD for the repaired area only.
(i) Retained Inspection/Modification/Repair, With New Terminating
Action
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (c) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with new
terminating action provided. Prior to the accumulation of 25,000
total flight cycles, or within 60 days after November 27, 1998 (the
effective date of AD 98-22-05, Amendment 39-10851 (63 FR 56542,
October 22, 1998)), whichever occurs later: Perform an HFEC
inspection to detect fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on
the WCB, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082,
Revision 01, dated December 10, 1997; or Revision 03, dated April
30, 2002. Accomplishment of the initial inspection required by
paragraph (p) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the
inspection requirements of this paragraph.
(1) If no cracking is detected: Prior to further flight, modify
the lower surface panel on the WCB, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 02, dated May 14, 1997; or
Revision 05, dated April 30, 2002. Accomplishment of the
modification constitutes terminating action for the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Except as provided by paragraph (j) of this AD: If any
cracking is detected, prior to further flight, repair in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 01, dated
December 10, 1997, or Revision 03, dated April 30, 2002; and modify
any uncracked area, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
57-1043, Revision 02, dated May 14, 1997, or Revision 05, dated
April 30, 2002. Accomplishment of the repair of cracked area(s) and
modification of uncracked area(s) constitutes terminating action for
the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Retained Service Bulletin Exception, With Revised Repair
Instructions
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (d) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with
revised repair instructions. If any cracking is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (h) or (i)(2) of this AD, and the
applicable service bulletin specifies to contact Airbus for an
appropriate action: Prior to further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate; or the Direction
G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated
agent); or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). After the effective date of
this AD only repair using a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA;
or the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA.
(k) Retained Provision for Certain Inspection Exception, With No
Changes
This paragraph restates the provision of paragraph (e) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with no
changes. The actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD are not
required to be accomplished if the requirements of paragraph (i) of
this AD are accomplished at the time specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD.
(l) Retained Initial Inspection, With Terminating Action
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (f) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with
terminating action provided. For airplanes on which neither the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD nor the modification
required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD has been done before August
13, 2004 (the effective date of AD 2004-14-09): Perform an HFEC
inspection to detect fatigue cracking of the lower surface panel on
the WCB, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082,
Revision 01, dated December 10, 1997; or Revision 03, dated April
30, 2002; at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (l)(1)
and (l)(2) of this AD. Accomplishment of the inspection required by
this paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of this
AD. Accomplishment of the initial inspection required by paragraph
(p) of this AD terminates the inspection requirements of this
paragraph.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 13,200 total flight cycles or
39,700 total flight hours, whichever is first.
(2) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or
within 3,500 flight cycles after August 13, 2004 (the effective date
of AD 2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004)),
whichever is later.
(m) Retained Repetitive Inspections, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with no
changes. If no cracking is detected during the inspection required
by paragraph (g) or (l) of this AD: Repeat the inspection required
by paragraph (l) of this AD at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (m)(1) or (m)(2) of this AD. Accomplishment of the
modification required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.
(1) For airplanes on which the inspections required by paragraph
(g) of this AD have been initiated before August 13, 2004 (the
effective date of AD 2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398,
July 9, 2004)): Do the next inspection within 5,700 flight cycles
after accomplishment of the last inspection, or within 1,800 flight
cycles after August 13, 2004, whichever is later. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 5,700 flight
cycles.
(2) For airplanes on which no inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD has been done before August 13, 2004 (the effective
date of AD 2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9,
2004)): Do the next inspection within 5,700 flight cycles after
accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph (l) of this
AD. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed
5,700 flight cycles.
(n) Retained Repair/Modification, With Revised Repair Instructions
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2004-14-09, Amendment 39-13718 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004), with
revised repair instructions. If any cracking is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (l) or (m) of this AD, prior to
further flight, repair in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-57-1082, Revision 01, dated December 10, 1997, or Revision 03,
dated April 30, 2002; and modify any uncracked area, in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 02, dated May
14, 1997, or Revision 05, dated April 30, 2002. Where Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1082 specifies to contact Airbus for an appropriate
repair action: Prior to further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate; or the DGAC (or its delegated
agent)); or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. After the effective date of
this AD only repair using a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA;
or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. Accomplishment of the repair of
cracked area(s) and modification of uncracked area(s) constitutes
terminating action for the requirements of paragraphs (g) through
(n) of this AD.
(o) New Requirement of This AD: Repair of Certain Airplanes
For airplanes on which the actions specified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1043 have not been accomplished, and on which a
repair has been accomplished, as specified in the service
information identified in paragraph (o)(1), (o)(2), (o)(3), or
(o)(4) of this AD: Within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; the EASA; or
Airbus's EASA DOA.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, dated October 31,
1996.
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 01, dated
December 10, 1997.
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 02, dated
July 26, 1999.
(4) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 03, dated
April 30, 2002.
(p) New Requirement of This AD: Repetitive WCB Inspections
At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (p)(1) and (p)(2)
of this AD: Do an HFEC inspection for cracking of the lower surface
panel on the WCB, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 04, dated December
5, 2013. Repeat the inspection of the lower surface panel on the WCB
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 7,200 flight cycles or 14,400
flight hours, whichever occurs first. Accomplishment of
[[Page 1874]]
the initial inspection required by this paragraph terminates the
inspections required by paragraphs (g), (i), and (l) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes on which the actions specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-57-1043 have not been done: At the later of
the times specified in paragraphs (p)(1)(i) and (p)(1)(ii) of this
AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 20,700 flight cycles or 41,400
flight hours, whichever occurs first since first flight of the
airplane.
(ii) Within 7,200 flight cycles or 14,400 flight hours,
whichever occurs first after doing the most recent inspection as
specified in the service information specified in paragraph (o)(1),
(o)(2), (o)(3), or (o)(4) of this AD.
(2) For airplanes on which the actions specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-57-1043 have been done: At the latest of the
times specified in paragraphs (p)(2)(i), (p)(2)(ii), and (p)(2)(iii)
of this AD.
(i) Within 7,200 flight cycles or 14,400 flight hours, whichever
occurs first since doing the actions specified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1043.
(ii) Within 3,750 flight cycles or 7,500 flight hours, whichever
occurs first after July 31, 2012 (as described in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 04, dated December 5, 2013).
(iii) Within 850 flight cycles or 1,700 flight hours, whichever
occurs first after the effective date of this AD.
(q) New Requirement of This AD: Repair of WCB
If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (p) of this AD: Before further flight, repair using a
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA.
(r) New Optional Terminating Action
Modification of an airplane, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043,
Revision 06, dated December 5, 2013, constitutes terminating action
for the actions required by paragraph (p) of this AD.
(s) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for applicable actions required
by paragraphs (g) through (n) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using the applicable
Airbus Service Information provided in paragraphs (s)(1) through
(s)(8) of this AD.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, dated February 16,
1993, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 01, dated
June 14, 1996, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 02, dated May
14, 1997, which was incorporated by reference on November 27, 1998
(63 FR 56542, October 22, 1998).
(4) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 03, dated
October 24, 1997, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(5) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 04, dated May
15, 1999, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(6) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 01, dated
December 10, 1997, which was incorporated by reference on November
27, 1998 (63 FR 56542, October 22, 1998).
(7) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 02, dated
July 26, 1999, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(8) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 03, dated
April 30, 2002, which was incorporated by reference on August 13,
2004 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004).
(t) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be
emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fbc2d6bab5b6d6cacacdd6bab6b4b8d6a9beaaaebea8afa8bb9d9a9ad59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3cadeb2bdbedec2c2c5deb2bebcb0dea1b6a2a6b6a0a7a0b3959292dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(u) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0065, dated March 14, 2014,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2015-1275.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (v)(6) and (v)(7) of this AD.
(v) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
February 18, 2016.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 06, dated
December 5, 2013.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 04, dated
December 5, 2013. (4) The following service information was approved
for IBR on August 13, 2004 (69 FR 41398, July 9, 2004).
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 05, dated
April 30, 2002.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 03, dated
April 30, 2002.
(5) The following service information was approved for IBR on
November 27, 1998 (63 FR 56542, October 22, 1998).
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1043, Revision 02, dated May
14, 1997. Pages 1 through 6, 8, 13, and 14 of this service bulletin
are marked Revision 02, dated May 14, 1997; pages 7, 9 through 12,
and 15 of this service bulletin are from the original issue, dated
February 16, 1993.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1082, Revision 01, dated
December 10, 1997.
(6) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbaaa8a8a4bea5bfe5aaa2b9bca4b9bfa3e6aeaab88baaa2b9a9beb8e5a8a4a6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="127371717d677c663c737b60657d60667a3f77736152737b607067613c717d7f">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="http://www.airbus.com">http://www.airbus.com</a>.
(7) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(8) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 18, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-32519 Filed 1-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.