AD 2015-15-01
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200B Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200F Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking in the upper and lower skins of the fuselage lap joints, which could result in sudden fracture and failure of a lap joint and rapid in-flight decompression of the airplane fuselage.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the upper and lower skins of the fuselage lap joints for discrepancies, repair if necessary, and perform post-repair inspections for cracking and corrosion. Install structural modifications at the lap joints and conduct post-modification inspections for cracking and corrosion, repairing if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours after the effective date of the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 747-100, -200B, and -200F series airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004-13-02, which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, -200B, and - 200F series airplanes. AD 2004-13-02 required repetitive inspections to find discrepancies in the upper and lower skins of the fuselage lap joints, and repair if necessary. This new AD adds post-repair inspections for cracking and corrosion, and repair if necessary; structural modification at the lap joints; and post-modification inspections for cracking and corrosion, and repair if necessary. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) that indicates the longitudinal lap joints are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). The actions mandated by this AD are necessary to reach the limit of validity (LOV). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the upper and lower skins of the fuselage lap joints, which could result in sudden fracture and failure of a lap joint and rapid in-flight decompression of the airplane fuselage.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, -200B, and
-200F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June
16, 2014.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43940-43944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17978]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-1052; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-140-AD;
Amendment 39-18210; AD 2015-15-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004-13-02,
which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, -200B, and -
200F series airplanes. AD 2004-13-02 required repetitive inspections to
find discrepancies in the upper and lower skins of the fuselage lap
joints, and repair if necessary. This new AD adds post-repair
inspections for cracking and corrosion, and repair if necessary;
structural modification at the lap joints; and post-modification
inspections for cracking and corrosion, and repair if necessary. This
AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH)
that indicates the longitudinal lap joints are subject to widespread
fatigue damage (WFD). The actions mandated by this AD are necessary to
reach the limit of validity (LOV). We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking in the upper and lower skins of the fuselage
lap joints, which could result in sudden fracture and failure of a lap
joint and rapid in-flight decompression of the airplane fuselage.
[[Page 43941]]
DATES: This AD is effective August 28, 2015.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 28,
2015.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
1052.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
1052; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6432; fax: 425-917-6590; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c587aca9a9eb84b6ada3aab7b1ad85a3a4a4eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ad8f3f6f6b4dbe9f2fcf5e8eef2dafcfbfbb4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2004-13-02, Amendment 39-13682 (69 FR 35237,
June 24, 2004). AD 2004-13-02 applied to certain The Boeing Company
Model 747-100, -200B, and -200F series airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on January 23, 2015 (80 FR 3506). The NPRM was
prompted by an evaluation by the DAH that indicates the longitudinal
lap joints are subject to WFD. A structural modification at the lap
joint, and post-modification repetitive inspections of the skin,
existing internal doubler, or splice strap for cracks, and corrective
actions if necessary, are necessary to reach the limit of validity
(LOV). The NPRM proposed to continue to require repetitive inspections
to find discrepancies in the upper and lower skins of the fuselage lap
joints, and repair if necessary; and to add post-repair inspections for
cracking and corrosion, and repair if necessary; structural
modification at the lap joints; and post-modification inspections for
cracking and corrosion, and repair if necessary. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the upper and lower skins of
the fuselage lap joints, which could result in sudden fracture and
failure of a lap joint and rapid in-flight decompression of the
airplane fuselage.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (80
FR 3506, January 23, 2015) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM (80 FR 3506, January 23, 2015)
Boeing stated that it concurs with the content of the proposed rule
(80 FR 3506, January 23, 2015).
Request To Increase Inspection Frequency for Certain Airplanes
An anonymous commenter expressed an opinion that there may be more
reason to check airplanes that are frequently pressurized to a greater
than 2.0 per-square-inch (psi) range than those that are not
pressurized to that extent. The commenter also asked if there should be
a weighted system that requires inspections sooner if an airplane has
proportionally more flight cycles in the greater-than-, rather than the
less-than, 2.0-psi differentials.
We do not agree with the commenter's request for different
inspection intervals based on pressurization ranges. The proposed
inspection intervals were based on airplanes flying in a normal
condition, which included full pressurization. In the past, if an
operator had documentation substantiating flight cycles of less than
2.0 psi, some of the inspection requirements could be reduced. This
reduced inspection requirement was relieving in nature and occurred
roughly 10 years ago. We have since determined that fleet findings did
not support this relief and have disallowed reduced inspection
requirements in future ADs. We have not provided this relief in this
AD. We have not changed this final rule in this regard.
Request To Increase WFD Rule Applicability
An anonymous commenter requested a reason why the WFD regulation
applies only to Boeing and not to any other airplane manufacturer. The
commenter stated that it seems like this type of WFD would be present
in more than just Boeing airplanes, and yet the regulation and
requirement for inspection seems to single out Boeing. The commenter
suggested that it would make sense to consolidate and apply these
requirements equally over all the types of airplanes.
We do not agree with the commenter's request. On May 24, 2012, we
made effective Amendment 26-6 of 14 CFR 26.21, ``Limit of Validity,''
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 26.21). This regulation
required all design approval holders (DAHs) to develop an LOV for
affected airplanes, which affected several manufacturers and models
(not exclusively Boeing). The LOV is established by means of
engineering data that support the structural maintenance program that
corresponds to the period of time, stated as a number of total
accumulated flight cycles or flight hours or both, during which it is
demonstrated that WFD will not occur in the airplane. We have not
changed this final rule in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (80 FR 3506, January 23, 2015) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 3506, January 23, 2015).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2,
dated June 16, 2014. The service information describes procedures for
inspections and repairs of cracks and corrosion in the skin at lap
joints in the fuselage. This service information is reasonably
available because the
[[Page 43942]]
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this
AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 2 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections [actions retained 5,628 work-hours x $85 $0 $478,380 per $956,760 per
from AD 2004[dash]13[dash]02, per hour = $478,380 per inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
Amendment 39[dash]13682 (69 FR inspection cycle.
35237, June 24, 2004)].
Modification [new action]........ Up to 3,764 $0 Up to $319,940...... Up to $639,880.
work[dash]hours x $85
per hour = $319,940.
Post-modification/ Up to 3,764 $0 Up to $319,940 per Up to $639,880 per
post[dash]repair inspections work[dash]hours x $85 inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
[new action]. per hour = $319,940 per
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2004-13-02, Amendment 39-13682 (69 FR 35237, June 24, 2004), and adding
the following new AD:
2015-15-01 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18210; Docket No. FAA-
2014-1052; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-140-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective August 28, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2004-13-02, Amendment 39-13682 (69 FR 35237,
June 24, 2004).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, -200B, and
-200F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June
16, 2014.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder (DAH) that indicates the longitudinal lap joints are subject
to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracking in the upper and lower skins of the
fuselage lap joints, which could result in sudden fracture and
failure of a lap joint and rapid in-flight decompression of the
airplane fuselage.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspections for Corrosion, and Corrective Actions
For airplanes identified as Groups 2 through 14 in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014:
Except as provided by paragraph (l)(3) of this AD, at the applicable
time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, do an
external low frequency eddy current inspection for corrosion at the
upper row of fasteners in the lap joint, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision
2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the inspection at the upper row of fasteners in the lap joint
thereafter at the applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463,
Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph
(l)(3) of this AD. Accomplishment of a structural modification in
accordance with Part 5 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463,
Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph
(l)(1) of this AD, terminates the inspection requirements of this
paragraph in the area of the modification only. The actions required
by paragraph (j) of this AD are still applicable in the area of the
modification.
(h) Inspections for Cracking, and Corrective Actions
For airplanes identified as Groups 2 through 14 in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin
[[Page 43943]]
747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014: Except as provided by
paragraph (l)(3) of this AD, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, do an internal medium
frequency eddy current inspection for skin cracks at the lower row
of fasteners in the lap joint, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June
16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the
inspection at the lower row of fasteners in the lap joint thereafter
at the applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463,
Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph
(l)(3) of this AD. Accomplishment of a structural modification in
accordance with Part 5 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463,
Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph
(l)(1) of this AD, terminates the inspection requirements of this
paragraph in the area of the modification only. The actions required
by paragraph (j) of this AD are still applicable in the area of the
modification.
(i) Structural Modification
For airplanes identified as Groups 2 through 14 in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014: At
the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June
16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph (l)(2) of this AD, do a
structural modification at the lap joints, and all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision
2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
Accomplishment of the structural modification required by this
paragraph terminates the inspections required by paragraphs (g),
(h), and (k) of this AD in the area of the modification only. The
actions required by paragraph (j) of this AD are still applicable in
the area of the modification.
(j) Post-Modification Inspections and Corrective Actions
For airplanes on which the actions required by paragraph (i) of
this AD have been done: At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD, do an internal high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspection for cracks of the skin or existing
internal doublers, and an open-hole HFEC inspection for splice strap
cracks, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014.
If any cracking is found, before further flight, repair using a
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (n) of this AD. Repeat the inspections of the skin,
internal doublers, and splice straps thereafter at the applicable
intervals specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014.
(k) Post-Repair Inspections and Corrective Actions
For airplanes with any new or existing external doubler repair
accomplished at a lap joint and the repair doubler length is 40
inches or longer: At the applicable time specified in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463,
Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, except as provided by paragraph
(l)(2) of this AD, do an internal HFEC inspection for cracking or
corrosion of the repairs, and do all applicable corrective actions,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014,
except as provided by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspection of
external doubler repairs accomplished at lap joints thereafter at
the applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463,
Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014. Accomplishment of a structural
modification in accordance with Part 5 of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014, except as
provided by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD, terminates the inspection
requirements of this paragraph in the area of the modification only.
The actions required by paragraph (j) of this AD are still
applicable in the area of the modification.
(l) Exceptions
(1) If, during any action required by this AD, Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014,
specifies to contact Boeing for an inspection or modification
procedure, or repair instructions: Before further flight, do the
inspection, or modification, or repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this
AD.
(2) Where Paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated June 16, 2014,
specifies a compliance time ``after the Revision 2 date of this
service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
(3) For the compliance threshold and repetitive interval
calculations for inspections required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, the provisions specified in paragraphs (l)(3)(i) and
(l)(3)(ii) of this AD apply regarding differential pressure.
(i) For inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Flight cycles in which the cabin differential pressure was at 2.0
pounds-per-square-inch (psi) or less need not be counted in the
flight-cycle determination, provided that flight cycles with
momentary spikes in cabin differential pressure above 2.0 psi were
included as full pressure flight cycles. For this provision to
apply, all cabin pressure records must have been maintained for each
airplane. No fleet-averaging of cabin pressure is allowed.
(ii) For inspections done on or after the effective date of this
AD: All flight cycles must be counted, regardless of differential
pressure.
(m) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using the service information
identified in paragraph (m)(1) or (m)(2) of this AD.
(1) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, dated March 7,
2002, including Appendices A, B, and C, dated March 7, 2002, which
was incorporated by reference in AD 2004-13-02, Amendment 39-13682
(69 FR 35237, June 24, 2004).
(2) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 1, dated
April 16, 2009, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (o)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5fce8848b88e896a0a4b1b1a9a0e884868ae884888a86e897a0b4b0a0b6b1b685a3a4a4eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b22365a555636487e7a6f6f777e365a5854365a56545836497e6a6e7e686f685b7d7a7a357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2004-13-02, Amendment 39-13682 (69 FR
35237, June 24, 2004), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Bill Ashforth,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6432; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbf9d2d7d795fac8d3ddd4c9cfd3fbdddada95dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aceec5c0c082eddfc4cac3ded8c4eccacdcd82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (p)(3) and (p)(4) of this AD.
(p) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference
[[Page 43944]]
(IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2463, Revision 2, dated
June 16, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet
<a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 10, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-17978 Filed 7-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.