AD 2013-23-15
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100B Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100B SUD Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200B Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200C Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200F Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400D Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400F Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747SP Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747SR Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Certain fuselage frames are subject to widespread fatigue damage, leading to fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin that can propagate and grow, resulting in reduced structural integrity and sudden decompression of the airplane in flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Conduct repetitive inspections for skin cracks at specified shear tie end fastener locations of the fuselage frames, using either external detailed or high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections. Repair cracks if necessary. For airplanes with certain existing repair doublers, conduct repetitive inspections for skin cracks next to the shear tie and take corrective actions if necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the compliance times specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012, unless already done.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2009-06-02, which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. AD 2009-06-02 required repetitive inspections for skin cracks at the shear tie end fastener locations of the fuselage frames, and repair of cracks if necessary. This new AD also requires repetitive inspections for skin cracks next to the shear tie on airplanes with certain existing repair doublers, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also revises the applicability to include additional airplanes. This AD was prompted by additional cracking found on an airplane not affected by AD 2009-06-02. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin that can propagate and grow, and result in reduced structural integrity and sudden decompression of the airplane in flight.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-
400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24,
2012.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70214-70216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27845]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0461; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-169-AD;
Amendment 39-17670; AD 2013-23-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2009-06-02,
which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747SR,
and 747SP series airplanes. AD 2009-06-02 required repetitive
inspections for skin cracks at the shear tie end fastener locations of
the fuselage frames, and repair of cracks if necessary. This new AD
also requires repetitive inspections for skin cracks next to the shear
tie on airplanes with certain existing repair doublers, and corrective
actions if necessary. This AD also revises the applicability to include
additional airplanes. This AD was prompted by additional cracking found
on an airplane not affected by AD 2009-06-02. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin that can
propagate and grow, and result in reduced structural integrity and
sudden decompression of the airplane in flight.
DATES: This AD is effective December 30, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 30,
2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6577; fax: 425-917-6590; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbd9dec9d3dad5de95dad7dac1dac9fbdddada95dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c7e796e747d7279327d707d667d6e5c7a7d7d327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2009-06-02, Amendment 39-15838 (74 FR 11013,
March 16, 2009). AD 2009-06-02 applied to the specified products. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 3, 2013 (78 FR 33012).
The NPRM proposed to continue to require repetitive inspections for
skin cracks at the shear tie end fastener locations of the fuselage
frames, and repair of cracks if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to
require repetitive inspections for skin cracks next to the shear tie on
airplanes with certain existing repair doublers, and corrective actions
if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to revise the applicability to
include additional airplanes.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(78 FR 33012, June 3, 2013) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Revise Repetitive Inspection Type
Boeing requested that we revise paragraph (h) of the NPRM (78 FR
33012, June 3, 2013) to correct the required inspection method for the
repetitive inspections. The NPRM specified repeating the ``external
detailed inspection'' at the times specified in table 4 or table 5 of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24,
2012. Boeing noted however that the compliance times in those tables
are for internal high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection.
We agree with the request. Paragraph (h) of this AD requires an
internal HFEC inspection; the inspections that must be repeated are
also internal HFEC inspections. We have revised paragraph (h) in this
final rule to specify that the inspection to be repeated is an internal
HFEC inspection.
Request To Revise Description of Unsafe Condition
Boeing requested that we revise the description of the unsafe
condition to clarify that the subject of the unsafe condition is the
fuselage area--not the frame shear ties, as stated in the NPRM (78 FR
33012, June 3, 2013).
We agree with the request and rationale. We have revised paragraph
(e) in this final rule to explain that the fuselage skin--not the ties
themselves--is subject to widespread fatigue damage.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously
[[Page 70215]]
and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor
changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 33012, June 3, 2013) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 33012, June 3, 2013).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 234 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection............ 30 or 49 work-hours $0 $2,550 or $4,165 per Up to $974,610 per
(depending on inspection) inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
x $85 per hour = $2,550
or $4,165 per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2009-06-02, Amendment 39-15838 (74 FR 11013, March 16, 2009), and
adding the following new AD:
2013-23-15 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17670; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0461; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-169-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective December 30, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2009-06-02, Amendment 39-15838 (74 FR
11013, March 16, 2009).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-
400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24,
2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that certain fuselage frames are subject to
widespread fatigue damage. The actions were developed to support the
airplane's limit of validity of the engineering data that support
the established structural maintenance program. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin that
can propagate and grow, and result in reduced structural integrity
and sudden decompression of the airplane in flight.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Repetitive Inspections
At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682,
Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012, except as provided by paragraphs
(i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD, do an external detailed or high
frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for skin cracks at
specified shear tie end fastener locations of the fuselage frames,
and do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012, except as required by
paragraph (i)(3) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions
before further flight. Repeat the external detailed or HFEC
inspection thereafter at the applicable time specified in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682,
Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012.
(h) Post-Repair Inspections
For any external repair doubler in the inspection area specified
in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012, that has an upper or
lower fastener row that is common to a shear tie end fastener: At
the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this
AD, whichever occurs later, do an internal HFEC inspection for
cracks in the skin next to the shear tie, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision
1, dated May 24, 2012, except as required by
[[Page 70216]]
paragraph (i)(3) of this AD. Do all corrective actions before
further flight. Repeat the internal HFEC inspection thereafter at
the time specified in Table 4 or Table 5 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682,
Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012, as applicable.
(1) Before further flight after an inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Within 2,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
(i) Service Information Clarifications and Exceptions
(1) Paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012, specifies
certain compliance times in terms of the effective date of AD 2009-
06-02, Amendment 39-15838 (74 FR 11013, March 16, 2009). The
effective date of AD 2009-06-02 is April 20, 2009.
(2) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated May 24, 2012,
specifies counting the compliance time ``after the revision 1 date
of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the
applicable time after the effective date of this AD.
(3) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1,
dated May 24, 2012, specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions, this AD requires repair before further flight using a
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2682, dated May 8, 2008.
(k) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#043d29454a4929576165707068612945474b2945494b47295661757161777077446265652a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fb6a2cec1c2a2dceaeefbfbe3eaa2ceccc0a2cec2c0cca2ddeafefaeafcfbfccfe9eeeea1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Berhane Alazar,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6577; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#036166716b626d662d626f62796271436562622d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc9e998e949d9299d29d909d869d8ebc9a9d9dd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be obtained at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2682, Revision 1, dated
May 24, 2012.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 6, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-27845 Filed 11-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.