AD 2012-12-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Boeing | Various | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking of the intercostals on the forward and aft sides of the forward entry door cutout, which could result in loss of the forward entry door and rapid decompression of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect for cracking under the stop fittings and intercostal flanges at stringers S-14L, S-15L, and S-16L. Extend the repetitive interval for certain airplanes. Add a one-time inspection to detect missing fasteners. Add repetitive inspections for cracking of the cargo barrier net fitting and stringer S-15L aft intercostal, with repair if necessary. Update or add certain inspection and repair instructions.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the applicable repetitive interval or before further flight, depending on the specific inspection requirement.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, as specified in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are superseding two existing airworthiness directives (ADs) for certain Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. The first existing AD currently requires, for certain airplanes, repetitive inspections of the Station (STA) 348.2 frame to detect cracking under the stop fittings and intercostal flanges at stringers S-14L, S-15L, and S-16L, and corrective action if necessary. The second existing AD currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the intercostal webs, attachment clips, and stringer splice channels, and corrective action if necessary. This new AD requires that the inspection for cracking under the stop fittings be done on additional airplanes; extends the repetitive interval for certain airplanes; adds a one-time inspection to detect missing fasteners; and updates or adds certain inspection and repair instructions. This new AD also requires, for certain airplanes, repetitive inspections of the cargo barrier net fitting for cracking, and repair if necessary. This new AD also adds, for certain airplanes, repetitive inspections for cracking of the stringer S-15L aft intercostal, and repair if necessary. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of the STA 348.2 frame above the two outboard fasteners attaching the frame inner chord and door stop fittings, and in the outboard chord at stringer S-16L. We have also received reports of missing fasteners in the STA 348.2 frame inner chord. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the intercostals on the forward and aft sides of the forward entry door cutout, which could result in loss of the forward entry door and rapid decompression of the airplane.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36139-36143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14373]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1255; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-182-AD;
Amendment 39-17084; AD 2012-12-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding two existing airworthiness directives (ADs)
for certain Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes. The first existing AD currently requires, for certain
airplanes, repetitive inspections of the Station (STA) 348.2 frame to
detect cracking under the stop fittings and intercostal flanges at
stringers S-14L, S-15L, and S-16L, and corrective action if necessary.
The second existing AD currently requires repetitive inspections to
detect cracking of the intercostal webs, attachment clips, and stringer
splice channels, and corrective action if necessary. This new AD
requires that the inspection for cracking under the stop fittings be
done on additional airplanes; extends the repetitive interval for
certain airplanes; adds a one-time inspection to detect missing
fasteners; and updates or adds certain inspection and repair
instructions. This new AD also requires, for certain airplanes,
repetitive inspections of the cargo barrier net fitting for cracking,
and repair if necessary. This new AD also adds, for certain airplanes,
repetitive inspections for cracking of the stringer S-15L aft
intercostal, and repair if necessary. This AD was prompted by reports
of cracking of the STA 348.2 frame above the two outboard fasteners
attaching the frame inner chord and door stop fittings, and in the
outboard chord at stringer S-16L. We have also received reports of
missing fasteners in the STA 348.2 frame inner chord. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the intercostals on
the forward and aft sides of the forward entry door cutout, which could
result in loss of the forward entry door and rapid decompression of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective July 23, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of July 23, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of September 9,
2009 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009).
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of November 1,
2005 (70 FR 56361, September 27, 2005).
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of June 4, 2004
(69 FR 23646, April 30, 2004).
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: (425) 917-
6450; fax: (425) 917-6590; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#29684548470779464145694f4848074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d091bcb1befe80bfb8bc90b6b1b1feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede airworthiness directives AD 2004-09-09, Amendment
39-13598 (69 FR 23646, April 30, 2004); and AD 2009-16-14, Amendment
39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009). Those ADs apply to the
specified products. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
November 28, 2011 (76 FR 72858). The NPRM proposed to retain certain
requirements of AD 2004-09-09 and AD 2009-16-14. The NPRM proposed to
also add airplanes to the applicability for the high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspection for cracking of the stop fittings at the
shear web at the STA 348.2 frame; extend the repetitive interval for
the HFEC inspection of the STA 348.2 frame for Model 737-200C
airplanes; add an inspection to detect missing fasteners of the STA
348.2 frame inner chord; and update or add certain inspection and
repair instructions.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(76 FR 72858, November 28, 2011) and the FAA's response to each
comment.
Support for NPRM (76 FR 72858, November 28, 2011)
Boeing concurs with the contents of the NPRM (76 FR 72858, November
28, 2011).
Requests To Remove or Revise Exception to Certain Service Information
Southwest Airlines (SWA) asked that paragraph (r) of the NPRM (76
FR 72858, November 28, 2011) be removed, or revised to provide
clarification. SWA stated that the exception specified in paragraph (r)
of the NPRM does not allow the sequence of steps in the Work
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1,
dated June 29, 2010, to be changed. SWA added that it has serious
concerns
[[Page 36140]]
that this paragraph effectively eliminates all flexibility when
accomplishing open access, the order of which locations get inspected,
and close access. SWA noted that this becomes very difficult in a
maintenance environment where other activities may be worked
concurrently. SWA asked if the intent of the exception in paragraph (r)
of the NPRM is to make removing the windscreen before the lavatory and
removing the fasteners identified in Circle Note 1 prior to removing
the fasteners identified in Circle Note 2 conditions of compliance. SWA
understands that certain steps contained in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010, might have to be
accomplished in a specific order. However, SWA noted that the umbrella
restriction imposed by paragraph (r) of the NPRM goes beyond that
intent and results in restrictions when performing maintenance.
Scandanavian Airlines Systems (SAS) asked that we include an option
of removing the shear web before accomplishing the inspection specified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June
24, 2010, as part of the access procedures specified in the NPRM (76 FR
72858, November 28, 2011). SAS stated that it has previously
accomplished the inspections as an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) to AD 2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5,
2009). SAS noted that it also received clarification from the
manufacturer regarding the shear web removal step in Parts 1 and 2 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1204, Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010. SAS stated that the shear web
removal is not part of the inspection procedures specified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated March 26, 2007.
We agree with the commenters for the reasons provided. We have
revised paragraph (r) of this AD accordingly.
Request To Include Reference to Previously Approved AMOCs
SWA asked that we include a reference to AMOCs approved for AD
2005-20-03, Amendment 39-14296 (70 FR 56361, September 27, 2005) in the
NPRM (76 FR 72858, November 28, 2011). SWA pointed out that paragraph
(m)(4) of AD 2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5,
2009), stated that ``AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD
2005-20-03 are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of
this AD, provided the repetitive inspection intervals (if any) do not
exceed 6,000 flight cycles.'' SWA specified that paragraph (t)(5) of
the NPRM can be interpreted to mean that an AMOC issued for AD 2005-20-
03, which was approved as an AMOC to AD 2009-16-14, will be considered
as an AMOC to the NPRM.
We agree with the commenter that AMOCs approved for AD 2005-20-03,
Amendment 39-14296 (70 FR 56361, September 27, 2005), as specified in
paragraph (m)(4) of AD 2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901,
August 5, 2009), are still approved for the corresponding requirements
of this AD. For clarity, we have added a new paragraph (t)(5) to this
AD to include that information, and we reidentified the existing
paragraph (t)(5) of the NPRM (76 FR 72858, November 28, 2011) as
paragraph (t)(6) in this final rule.
Explanation of Additional Changes Made to This AD
We have clarified the compliance time in paragraph (q) of this AD
by adding the phrase ``whichever occurs later.''
We have updated certain headings throughout this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously--and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (76 FR 72858, November 28, 2011) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 72858, November 28, 2011).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 581 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections for cracking 18 work-hours x $0 $1,530 per $888,930 per inspection cycle.
under the stop fittings and $85 per hour = inspection
intercostal flanges $1,530 per cycle.
[retained from AD 2004-09- inspection
09, Amendment 39-13598 (69 cycle.
FR 23646, April 30, 2004)].
Inspection of areas forward 2 work-hours x 0 $170 per $98,770 per inspection cycle.
of the aft entry door $85 per hour = inspection
[retained from AD 2009-16- $170 per cycle.
14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 inspection
FR 38901, August 5, 2009)]. cycle.
Inspection of areas aft of 1 work-hour x 0 $85 per $49,385 per inspection cycle.
the forward entry door $85 per hour = inspection
[retained from AD 2009-16- $85 per cycle.
14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 inspection
FR 38901, August 5, 2009)]. cycle.
Inspection for missing 1 work-hour x 476 $561........... $325,941.
fasteners [new action]. $85 per hour =
$85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the inspections. We have no
way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
repairs:
[[Page 36141]]
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair of cracking if done in Unknown................. Unknown................. Unknown.
accordance with a method approved by
the FAA.
Repair of cracking if done in 24 work-hours........... $11,856................. $13,896.
accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1,
dated June 29, 2010.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2004-09-09, Amendment 39-13598 (69 FR 23646, April 30, 2004); and AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009); and
adding the following new AD:
2012-12-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17084; Docket No. FAA-
2011-1255; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-182-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 23, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2004-09-09, Amendment 39-13598 (69 FR
23646, April 30, 2004); and AD 2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR
38901, August 5, 2009).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of the station (STA)
348.2 frame above the two outboard fasteners attaching the frame
inner chord and door stop fittings, and in the outboard chord at
stringer S-16L. We have also received reports of missing fasteners
in the STA 348.2 frame inner chord. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracking of the intercostals on the forward and
aft sides of the forward entry door cutout, which could result in
loss of the forward entry door and rapid decompression of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Initial and Repetitive Inspections at STA 348.2 for Model
737-200C Series Airplanes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (a) of AD
2004-09-09, Amendment 39-13598 (69 FR 23646, April 30, 2004), with
revised service information. For Model 737-200C series airplanes:
Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD, prior to the
accumulation of 46,000 total flight cycles, or within 2,250 flight
cycles after June 4, 2004 (the effective date of AD 2004-09-09),
whichever occurs later, do detailed and eddy current inspections of
the STA 348.2 frame for cracking under the stop fittings and
intercostal flanges at stringers 14L, 15L, and 16L by accomplishing
paragraphs 3.A and 3.B.1 through 3.B.7 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, dated
April 10, 2003; or by accomplishing Part 1 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision
1, dated June 29, 2010. Do the actions in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, dated April 10, 2003; or Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010.
Any applicable repair must be accomplished prior to further flight.
Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000
flight cycles. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010,
may be used to accomplish the actions required by this paragraph.
(h) Retained Corrective Action for Paragraph (g) of This AD
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (b) of AD
2004-09-09, Amendment 39-13598 (69 FR 23646, April 30, 2004), with
revised service information. If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, and Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, dated April 10, 2003; or Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010;
specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before further
flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(t) of this AD.
[[Page 36142]]
(i) Retained Initial Compliance Time for Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (f) of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009). For
all Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1204, Revision 1, dated March 26, 2007: Before the accumulation
of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within 4,500 flight cycles after
November 1, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-20-03, Amendment 39-
14296 (70 FR 56361, September 27, 2005)), whichever occurs later: Do
the inspections required by paragraphs (k) and (l) of this AD.
(j) Retained Initial Compliance Time for Model 737-200C Series
Airplanes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009). For
all Model 737-200C series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated March 26, 2007:
Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within
4,500 flight cycles after September 9, 2009 (the effective date of
AD 2009-16-14), whichever occurs later, do the inspection required
by paragraph (m) of this AD.
(k) Retained Initial Inspection for Group 1 Configuration Airplanes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009), with
revised service information. For Group 1 airplanes identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated March
26, 2007: Perform a detailed inspection for cracking of the
intercostal web, attachment clips, and stringer splice channels; and
a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for cracking of the
stringer splice channels located forward and aft of the forward
entry door; and do all applicable corrective actions before further
flight; in accordance with Parts 1 and 2 of the Work Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1204, dated June
19, 2003, or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1,
dated March 26, 2007; or in accordance with Parts 1, 2, 4, and 5 of
the Work Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010. After September 9, 2009 (the
effective date of AD 2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901,
August 5, 2009), and until the effective date of this AD, Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated March 26,
2007; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2,
dated June 24, 2010; may be used to accomplish the actions required
by this paragraph. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010,
may be used to accomplish the actions required by this paragraph.
(l) Retained Initial Inspection for Cargo Configuration Airplanes
(Forward of the Forward Entry Door)
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009), with
revised service information. For Group 2 cargo airplanes identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated
March 26, 2007: Perform a detailed inspection for cracking of the
intercostal webs and attachment clips located forward of the forward
entry door, and do all applicable corrective actions before further
flight, in accordance with Part 3 of the Work Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1204, dated June 19, 2003,
or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated
March 26, 2007; or in accordance with Part 3 of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010. After
September 9, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-16-14, Amendment
39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009), and until the effective date
of this AD, Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1,
dated March 26, 2007; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010; may be used to accomplish the
actions required by this paragraph. As of the effective date of this
AD, only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2,
dated June 24, 2010, may be used to accomplish the actions required
by this paragraph.
(m) Retained Initial Inspection for Cargo Configuration Airplanes (Aft
of the Forward Entry Door)
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009), with
revised service information. For Group 2 cargo airplanes identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated
March 26, 2007: Perform a detailed inspection for cracking of the
intercostal webs and attachment clips located aft of the forward
entry door, and do all applicable corrective actions before further
flight, in accordance with Part 4 of the Work Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated March 26,
2007; or in accordance with Part 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010. As of the effective
date of this AD, only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010, may be used to accomplish the
actions required by this paragraph.
(n) Retained Repeat Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009). Repeat
the inspections required by paragraphs (k), (l), and (m) of this AD
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles after the
previous inspection, or within 3,000 flight cycles after September
9, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-1614), whichever occurs
later.
(o) Retained Exceptions to Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-53-1204
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (l) of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009), with
revised service information. Do the actions required by paragraphs
(i), (j), (k), (l), (m), and (n) of this AD by accomplishing all the
applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1204, dated June
19, 2003; Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1,
dated March 26, 2007; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010; except as provided by paragraphs
(o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD. After September 9, 2009 (the effective
date of AD 2009-16-14), and until the effective date of this AD,
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated March
26, 2007; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2,
dated June 24, 2010; may be used to accomplish the actions required
by this paragraph. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010,
may be used to accomplish the actions required by this paragraph.
(1) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1204,
dated June 19, 2003; Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 1, dated March 26, 2007; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010; specifies to contact
Boeing for repair instructions: Before further flight, repair using
a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (t) of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1204,
dated June 19, 2003; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 1, dated March 26, 2007; specifies a compliance time
relative to the date of a service bulletin, this AD requires
compliance relative to September 9, 2009 (the effective date of AD
2009-16-14, Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009). Where
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1204, dated June
19, 2003; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1,
dated March 26, 2007; specifies a compliance time relative to the
date of the initial release of a service bulletin, this AD requires
compliance relative to November 1, 2005 (the effective date of AD
2005-20-03, Amendment 39-14296 (70 FR 56361, September 27, 2005)).
(p) New One-Time Inspection for Missing Fasteners at STA 348.2
For Groups 2 and 3 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010: Within 4,500
flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, do a detailed
inspection to detect missing fasteners of the STA 348.2 frame, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010,
except as required by paragraph (r) of this AD. If any fastener is
missing, before further flight, repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (t) of this
AD.
[[Page 36143]]
(q) New Initial and Repetitive Inspections at STA 348.2 for Model 737-
100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes
For Groups 2 and 3 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010: Before the
accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within 4,500 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
do HFEC and surface eddy current inspections for cracking of the
frame, HFEC inspections for cracking of the reinforcement angle and
shear web, and a detailed inspection for cracking of the STA 348.2
frame outer chord, inner chord, and reinforcement angle, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010,
except as required by paragraph (r) of this AD. If any crack is
found during any inspection required by this paragraph, before
further flight, do all applicable corrective actions in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010, except as
required by paragraph (r) of this AD, and except where that service
bulletin specifies to contact Boeing, before further flight, repair
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (t) of this AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles.
(r) New Exceptions to Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 737-53A1204 and
737-53A1240
(1) Note 1 of paragraph 3.A of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June
29, 2010, is to be disregarded when accomplishing the actions
required by this AD.
(2) The access and restoration instructions identified in the
Work Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010; are not required by
this AD. Operators may perform those actions in accordance with
approved maintenance procedures.
(3) The use of Boeing Drawing 65-88700 is not allowed when
accomplishing the actions required by this AD in accordance with the
Work Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204,
Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2010.
(s) New Initial and Repetitive Inspections of the S-15L Aft Intercostal
and Cargo Barrier Net Fitting for Model 737-200C Series Airplanes
For Group 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June 24, 2010: Before the
accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within 4,500 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
do initial detailed and HFEC inspections for cracking of the S-15L
aft intercostal between BS 348.2 and BS 360, and do a detailed
inspection of the cargo barrier net fitting at the intercostal, in
accordance with Figure 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2, dated June
24, 2010. If any cracking is found, before further flight repair
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (t) of this AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles.
(t) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, it may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85bca8c4cbc8a8d6e0e4f1f1e9e0a8c4c6caa8c4c8cac6a8d7e0f4f0e0f6f1f6c5e3e4e4abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="30091d717e7d1d63555144445c551d71737f1d717d7f731d6255414555434443705651511e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2004-09-09,
Amendment 39-13598 (69 FR 23646, April 30, 2004), are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding requirements of this AD.
(5) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2005-20-03,
Amendment 39-14296 (70 FR 56361, September 27, 2005), are approved
as AMOCs for the corresponding requirements of this AD, provided the
repetitive inspection intervals (if any) do not exceed 6,000 flight
cycles.
(6) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2009-16-14,
Amendment 39-15987 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009), are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding requirements of this AD.
(u) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Alan Pohl, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone (425) 917-6450; fax
(425) 917-6590; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#58193439367608373034183e3939763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1b09d909fdfa19e999db1979090df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>.
(v) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
July 23, 2012.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, Revision 1, dated
June 29, 2010.
(ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 2,
dated June 24, 2010.
(4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
September 9, 2009 (74 FR 38901, August 5, 2009).
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1204, Revision 1, dated
March 26, 2007.
(5) The following service information was approved for IBR on
November 1, 2005 (70 FR 56361, September 27, 2005).
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1204, dated
June 19, 2003.
(6) The following service information was approved for IBR on
June 4, 2004 (69 FR 23646, April 30, 2004).
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1240, dated April 10,
2003.
(7) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(8) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(9) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 4, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-14373 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.