AD 2011-25-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-300F Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-400ER Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Possible sources of ignition in a fuel tank caused by electrical fault or uncommanded dry operation of the main tank boost pumps and center auxiliary tank override and jettison pumps.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Install new panel assemblies in the main equipment center or on the forward cargo compartment sidewall. Remove certain relays from some panels in the main equipment center. Revise the maintenance program to incorporate Airworthiness Limitations No. 28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28. For airplanes with optional water system drain plumbing, install the new panel assemblies at an alternative location and change the interconnecting wiring between the P141 panel and the P36 and P37 panels. For airplanes with a deactivated center fuel tank, perform an alternative functional test for the left and right override/jettison pumps.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 767 airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for The Boeing Company Model 767 airplanes. This AD requires installing new panel assemblies in the main equipment center or on the forward cargo compartment sidewall and removing certain relays from some panels in the main equipment center. This AD also requires revising the maintenance program to incorporate Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) No. 28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28. This AD also includes an alternative location for the installation of the new panel assemblies for airplanes that have the optional water system drain plumbing and changing the interconnecting wiring between the P141 panel and the P36 and P37 panels. For airplanes with a deactivated center fuel tank, this AD also requires an alternative functional test for the left and right override/jettison pumps. We are issuing this AD to prevent possible sources of ignition in a fuel tank caused by electrical fault or uncommanded dry operation of the main tank boost pumps and center auxiliary tank override and jettison pumps. This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. An ignition source in the fuel tank could result in a fire or an explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -
300F, and -400ER series airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated
August 19, 2010.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
according to paragraph (o) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2442-2446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2012-468]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1221; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-097-AD;
Amendment 39-16881; AD 2011-25-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for The
Boeing Company Model 767 airplanes. This AD requires installing new
panel assemblies in the main equipment center or on the forward cargo
compartment sidewall and removing certain relays from some panels in
the main equipment center. This AD also requires revising the
maintenance program to incorporate Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) No.
28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28. This AD also includes an alternative
location for the installation of the new panel assemblies for airplanes
that have the optional water system drain plumbing and changing the
interconnecting wiring between the P141 panel and the P36 and P37
panels. For airplanes with a deactivated center fuel tank, this AD also
requires an alternative functional test for the left and right
override/jettison pumps. We are issuing this AD to prevent possible
sources of ignition in a fuel tank caused by electrical fault or
uncommanded dry operation of the main tank boost pumps and center
auxiliary tank override and jettison pumps. This AD was prompted by
fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. An ignition source
in the fuel tank could result in a fire or an explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective February 22, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of February 22,
2012.
The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of certain other publications listed in this
AD as of January 12, 2010 (74 FR 68515, December 28, 2009).
The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of certain other publications listed in this
AD as of September 9, 2009 (74 FR 38905, August 5, 2009).
For service information identified in this AD contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone (206) 544-
5000, extension 1; fax (206) 766-5680; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8088c38f82888e8280ad8f828884838ac38e8280"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f525a115d505a5c50527f5d505a565158115c5052">[email protected]</span></a>;
Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (425) 227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: (800) 647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elias Natsiopoulos, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; phone: (425) 917-6478; fax: (425) 917-6590; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d0801040c1e43030c191e04021d021801021e2d0b0c0c430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d3831343c2e73333c292e34322d322831322e1d3b3c3c733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that
would apply to the specified products. That supplemental NPRM published
in the Federal Register on April 5, 2011 (76 FR 18664). That
supplemental NPRM proposed to require installing new panel assemblies
in the main equipment center or on the forward cargo compartment
sidewall and removing certain relays from some panels in the main
equipment center. That supplemental NPRM also proposed to require
revising the maintenance program to incorporate Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) No. 28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28. For certain
airplanes that supplemental NPRM proposed to require prior or
concurrent
[[Page 2443]]
installation of a second fuel crossfeed valve. That supplemental NPRM
also proposed an alternative location for the installation of the new
panel assemblies for airplanes that have the optional water system
drain plumbing and changing the interconnecting wiring between the P141
panel and the P36 and P37 panels. For airplanes with a deactivated
center fuel tank, that supplemental NPRM proposed to require an
alternative functional test for the left and right override/jettison
pumps.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the
supplemental NPRM (76 FR 18664, April 5, 2011) and the FAA's response
to each comment.
Support for Supplemental NPRM (76 FR 18664, April 5, 2011)
Boeing concurs with the content of the supplemental NPRM (76 FR
18664, April 5, 2011). Continental Airlines has no technical objections
or comments to the supplemental NPRM.
Requests To Revise or Remove Paragraph (j) of the Supplemental NPRM (76
FR 18664, April 5, 2011)
Several commenters requested to either revise or remove paragraph
(j) of the supplemental NPRM (76 FR 18664, April 5, 2011). ABX Air
recommended that paragraph (j) of the supplemental NPRM be revised to
specify that prior or concurrent accomplishment of Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-28-0034, Revision 3, dated March 14, 1996, is only
required if Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated
August 19, 2010, has been done in accordance with the requirements in
paragraph (g) of the supplemental NPRM. ABX added that an operator may
choose not to incorporate Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034 as long
as an alternative method which complies with the requirements in
paragraph (g) is approved in accordance with paragraph (o) of the
supplemental NPRM. British Airways (BAB) requested that the requirement
in paragraph (j) of the supplemental NPRM be removed for any
alternative designs (e.g., TDG Aerospace UFI). Japan Airlines (JAL)
noted that the installation of a second crossfeed valve, as required by
paragraph (j) of the supplemental NPRM, does not have a direct
relationship with the electrical fault or uncommanded dry operation of
the main tank boost pumps and center auxiliary tank override and
jettison pumps, and is not a possible source of ignition.
We acknowledge the commenters' concerns and have removed paragraph
(j) from this AD. The installation of a dual crossfeed valve system is
an option that operators may do to improve airplane reliability, or as
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to the requirements of AD
88-21-03 R1, Amendment 39-6077 (53 FR 46605, November 18, 1988). That
action (installation of a dual crossfeed configuration) is not
necessary for the installation of the ground fault interrupter (GFI) or
to address uncommanded dry operation of the main boost pumps and center
auxiliary tank override and jettison pumps. This AD requires
installation of GFI for both single and dual crossfeed valve
configurations. We agree that a single crossfeed valve configuration is
acceptable (not incorporating Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034,
Revision 3, dated March 14, 1996), and we are working with Boeing to
expedite the revision of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085 in order
to provide procedures for a modification to add GFI protection on
airplanes with single crossfeed valve configurations.
In addition, we have clarified the actions by revising paragraph
(g) of this AD to specify the actions for airplanes with a dual
crossfeed valve configuration and adding paragraph (h) of this AD to
specify actions for airplanes with a single crossfeed valve
configuration (i.e., a dual crossfeed valve configuration has not been
installed in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034). For
airplanes with a dual crossfeed valve configuration, the installation
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated
August 19, 2010, must be done. For airplanes with a single crossfeed
valve configuration, there are two options: (1) Doing the installation
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated
August 19, 2010, provided that prior to or concurrently with the
installation of the ground fault interrupt relays, a dual crossfeed
valve is installed in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-
0034, Revision 3, dated March 14, 1996, or (2) maintaining the single
crossfeed valve configuration and modifying the airplane to install a
GFI using a method approved by the FAA. We have revised the subsequent
paragraph identifiers accordingly.
Requests To Postpone AD Issuance
All Nippon Airways (ANA), ABX, BAB, and JAL requested that issuance
of the AD be postponed until Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085,
Revision 2, dated August 19, 2010, has been revised. ABX noted that
Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated August 19, 2010,
contains instructions to modify airplanes with two fuel crossfeed
valves, but no instructions to modify airplanes with one crossfeed
valve. The commenters stated that Boeing is in the process of revising
this service bulletin to change the concurrent requirement and provide
wiring changes and an alternative installation for airplanes having a
single crossfeed valve system.
We do not agree to delay issuance of this AD until Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated August 19, 2010, is revised,
due to the severity of the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. As
noted previously, paragraph (h) of this AD has been added to provide
two options for airplanes that currently have a single crossfeed valve
configuration. Also noted previously, Boeing is currently revising
Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, and it will be issued after it is
completed. Therefore, as specified previously, we have changed
paragraph (g) of this AD and added paragraph (h) of this AD.
Requests To Allow AMOCs to AD 2009-16-06, Amendment 39-15989 (74 FR
38905, August 5, 2009), To Terminate Paragraph (i) of the Supplemental
NPRM (76 FR 18664, April 5, 2011)
Two commenters requested that we allow AMOCs for AD 2009-16-06,
Amendment 39-15989 (74 FR 38905, August 5, 2009), to terminate the
requirements of paragraph (i) of the supplemental NPRM (76 FR 18664,
April 5, 2011). United Airlines (UA) requested that the supplemental
NPRM include a new paragraph to allow an AMOC to AD 2009-16-06, to
terminate prior or concurrent installation of an automatic shutoff
system for the auxiliary fuel tank pump as required by paragraph (i) of
the supplemental NPRM. UA stated that accomplishing the requirements in
AD 2009-16-06 terminates the requirements in paragraph (i) of the
supplemental NPRM, and noted that during compliance with that AD it
obtained FAA AMOC Letter 140S-09-331, dated September 25, 2009, to
install an automatic system for the auxiliary fuel tank pump in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0083, Revision 1, dated
April 26, 2007. That AMOC was only applicable to three of UA's 35 Model
767-300 airplanes because Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0083, Revision
1, dated April 26, 2007, was accomplished on the remaining 32 airplanes
before the effective date of AD 2009-16-06. UPS stated that it obtained
[[Page 2444]]
FAA-AMOC 140S-10-218, dated June 22, 2010, which approved the use of
alternate terminal blocks because those identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-28A0083, Revision 2, dated February 12, 2009, had been
superseded. UPS requested that paragraph (i) of the supplemental NPRM
be updated to include that any approved AMOCs terminate the
requirements of paragraph (i) of the supplemental NPRM.
We acknowledge the commenters' concerns and provide the following.
The related FAA-approved AMOCs should be accepted for terminating the
requirements of paragraph (j) of this AD (referred to as paragraph (i)
in the supplemental NPRM (76 FR 18664, April 5, 2011)), because the
intent of those requirements is met by those AMOCs. It is not necessary
to add a new paragraph or revise paragraph (j) of this AD, because
accomplishing the AMOCs to AD 2009-16-06, Amendment 39-15989 (74 FR
38905, August 5, 2009), meets the requirements of AD 2009-16-06, and
therefore terminates the requirements of paragraph (j) of this AD.
Paragraph (j) of this AD already states that ``Accomplishing the
requirements of AD 2009-16-06, terminates the requirements of this
paragraph.'' We have made no change to the AD in this regard.
Requests To Revise Paragraph (k) of the Supplemental NPRM (76 FR 18664,
April 5, 2011)
UA asked that paragraph (k) of the supplemental NPRM (76 FR 18664,
April 5, 2011) be revised to add a reference to Revision May 2010 of
Section 9 of the Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document,
D622T001-9. UA stated that paragraph (k) requires concurrent revision
of the maintenance program by incorporating Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) No. 28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28 of Section 9 of the Boeing 767
MPD Document, D622T001-9, Revision April 2008; Revision March 2009; or
Revision May 2009. UA added that subsequent to Revision May 2009,
Boeing has issued Revision May 2010. UPS also requested that paragraph
(k) of the supplemental NPRM be revised to add Revision 22, dated April
2011, of Section 9 of the Boeing 767 MPD, Document D622T001-9.
We agree that Boeing 767 MPD Document, D622T001-9, Revision May
2010 should be added to paragraph (k) of this AD. However, we do not
agree to add Revision 22, dated April 2011. That revision does not
affect Section 9 of MPD Document D622T001-9, as referred to in
paragraph (k) of this AD. We have revised paragraph (k) of this AD
accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that
these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 416 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation of GFI equipment Between 216 and Between $52,285 Between $70,645 Up to $31,964,608.
and wiring. 279 work-hours x and $53,123. and $76,838.
$85 per hour =
between $18,360
and $23,715.
Installation of second crossfeed Between 274 and Between $30,838 Between $54,128 Between
valve (prior/concurrent action). 302 work-hours x and $66,903. and $92,573. $22,517,248 and
$85 per hour = $38,510,368.
between $23,290
and $25,670.
Installing automatic shutoff Between 3 and 29 Between $421 and Between $676 and Between $281,216
system (prior/concurrent work-hours x $85 $9,374. $11,839. and $4,925,024.
action; required by AD 2009-16- per hour =
06, Amendment 39-15989 (74 FR between $255 and
38905, August 5, 2009)). $2,465.
Revising the maintenance program 1................. None.............. $85............... $35,360.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
[[Page 2445]]
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2011-25-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16881; Docket No. FAA-
2009-1221; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-097-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective February 22,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -
300F, and -400ER series airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated
August 19, 2010.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
according to paragraph (o) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent possible sources of
ignition in a fuel tank caused by electrical fault or uncommanded
dry operation of the main tank boost pumps and center auxiliary tank
override and jettison pumps. An ignition source in the fuel tank
could result in a fire or an explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Installation for Airplanes on Which a Dual Crossfeed Valve Has Been
Installed
For airplanes on which a dual crossfeed valve has been installed
as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034 as of the
effective date of this AD: Within 60 months after the effective date
of this AD, install ground fault interrupt relays (P140 and P141
panel assemblies) and all applicable parts and components in the
main equipment center or in the forward cargo compartment sidewall,
as applicable, and remove the fuel boost pump control relays from
the P33, P36, and P37 panels, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2,
dated August 19, 2010, except as required by paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(h) Installation for Airplanes on Which a Dual Crossfeed Valve Has Not
Been Installed
For airplanes on which a dual crossfeed valve has not been
installed as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034 as of
the effective date of this AD: Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, do the actions specified in paragraph (h)(1) or
(h)(2) of this AD.
(1) Install ground fault interrupt relays (P140 and P141 panel
assemblies) and all applicable parts and components in the main
equipment center or in the forward cargo compartment sidewall, as
applicable, and remove the fuel boost pump control relays from the
P33, P36, and P37 panels, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2,
dated August 19, 2010, except as required by paragraph (i) of this
AD. Prior to or concurrently with the installation of the ground
fault interrupt relays, install a dual crossfeed valve in accordance
with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034, Revision 3, dated March
14, 1996.
(2) Maintain the single crossfeed valve configuration and
install a GFI, in accordance with a method approved using the
procedures specified in paragraph (o)(1) of this AD.
(i) Exception to Service Bulletin
Although paragraph 3.B.29.e. of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated August 19,
2010, specifies an alternative functional test of the left and right
center override pumps as an option, this AD requires that test for
airplanes on which the center tank is deactivated.
(j) Prior/Concurrent Installations
For airplanes identified in paragraph 1.A.1. of Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-28A0083, Revision 2, dated February 12, 2009; or Boeing
Service Bulletin 767-28A0084, Revision 1, dated April 26, 2007:
Prior or concurrently with accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) and (h)(1) of this AD, install an automatic shutoff
system for the auxiliary fuel tank pump, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0083,
Revision 2, dated February 12, 2009; or Boeing Service Bulletin 767-
28A0084, Revision 1, dated April 26, 2007; as applicable.
Accomplishing the requirements of AD 2009-16-06, Amendment 39-15989
(74 FR 38905, August 5, 2009), terminates the requirements of this
paragraph.
(k) Maintenance Program Revision
Concurrently with accomplishing the actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h)(1) of this AD, or within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Revise the
maintenance program by incorporating Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) No. 28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28 of Section 9 (``Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements
(CMRs)'') of the Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD)
Document, D622T001-9, Revision April 2008; Revision March 2009;
Revision May 2009; or Revision May 2010. The initial compliance time
for the actions specified in AWLs No. 28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28 is
within 1 year after accomplishing the installation required by
paragraph (g) or (h)(1) of this AD, or within 1 year after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(l) Terminating Action for AWLs Revision
Incorporating AWLs No. 28-AWL-27 and No. 28-AWL-28 into the
maintenance program in accordance with paragraph (g)(2) of AD 2008-
11-01, Amendment 39-15523 (73 FR 29414, May 21, 2008), or paragraph
(g)(2) of AD 2008-11-01 R1, Amendment 39-16145 (74 FR 68515,
December 28, 2009), terminates the action required by paragraph (k)
of this AD.
(m) No Alternative Inspections or Inspection Intervals
After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph (k) of
this AD, no alternative inspections or inspection intervals may be
used unless the inspections or intervals are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (o) of this AD.
(n) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
Actions done before the effective date of this AD in accordance
with the service information identified in paragraphs (n)(1) through
(n)(5) of this AD are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of this AD.
(1) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, dated January 10,
2008.
[[Page 2446]]
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 1, dated June
25, 2009.
(3) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-28A0083, dated May 3,
2006.
(4) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0083, Revision 1, dated April
26, 2007.
(5) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-28A0084, dated May 3,
2006.
(o) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a13076b646707794f4b5e5e464f076b6965076b67656907784f5b5f4f595e596a4c4b4b044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="596074181714740a3c382d2d353c74181a16741814161a740b3c282c3c2a2d2a193f3838773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(p) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Elias Natsiopoulos,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6478; fax (425) 917-6590;
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5d0d9dcd4c69bdbd4c1c6dcdac5dac0d9dac6f5d3d4d49bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1d4ddd8d0c29fdfd0c5c2d8dec1dec4dddec2f1d7d0d09fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.
(q) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 on the date specified:
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034, Revision 3, dated March
14, 1996, approved for IBR February 22, 2012.
(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0083, Revision 2, dated
February 12, 2009, approved for IBR September 9, 2009 (74 FR 38905,
August 5, 2009).
(iii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0084, Revision 1, dated
April 26, 2007, approved for IBR September 9, 2009 (74 FR 38905,
August 5, 2009).
(iv) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28A0085, Revision 2, dated
August 19, 2010, approved for IBR February 22, 2012.
(v) Section 9 of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data Document,
D622T001-9, Revision April 2008, approved for IBR January 12, 2010
(74 FR 68515, December 28, 2009).
(vi) Section 9 of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data Document,
D622T001-9, Revision March 2009, approved for IBR February 22, 2012.
(vii) Section 9 of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data
Document, D622T001-9, Revision May 2009, approved for IBR January
12, 2010 (74 FR 68515, December 28, 2009).
(viii) Section 9 of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data
Document, D622T001-9, Revision May 2010, approved for IBR February
22, 2012.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
(206) 544-5000, extension 1; fax (206) 766-5680; email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69b93d894999395999bb69499939f9891d895999b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8959dd69a979d9b9795b89a979d91969fd69b9795">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(3) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (425) 227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call (202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 22, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-468 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.