AD 2011-17-12
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700) | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 701) | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 702) | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracks in the joint extrusions securing the outer bondment to the acoustic panel of the nacelle transcowl assemblies. Thrust reverser deployment under rejected take-off or emergency landing load conditions could potentially result in acoustic panel failure and possible runway debris.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the outboard edge of the transcowl joint extrusion for evidence of cracking. Perform an eddy current or liquid penetrant inspection for cracking. Remove and replace affected joint extrusion areas with packers or contact Bombardier for repair instructions. Install new support channels for transcowl assembly reinforcement.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 50 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), serial numbers 10003 through 10265 inclusive; Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705); and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52222-52225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20673]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0515; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-196-AD;
Amendment 39-16776; AD 2011-17-12]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Several cases have been reported of cracks in the joint
extrusions securing the outer bondment to the acoustic panel of the
nacelle transcowl assemblies. Although there is no effect on flight
safety (thrust reverser stowed), thrust reverser deployment under
rejected take-off or emergency landing load conditions could
potentially result in acoustic panel failure and possible runway
debris.
* * * * *
The loss of an acoustic panel during rejected take-off or emergency
landing load conditions could leave debris on the runway. This debris,
if not removed, creates an unsafe condition for other airplanes during
take-off or landing, as those airplanes could impact debris on the
runway and sustain damage. We are issuing this AD to require actions to
correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 26, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 26,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Yates, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7355; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified
products. That supplemental NPRM was published in the Federal Register
on April 6, 2011 (76 FR 18957). That supplemental NPRM proposed to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Several cases have been reported of cracks in the joint
extrusions securing the outer bondment to the acoustic panel of the
nacelle transcowl assemblies. Although there is no effect on flight
safety (thrust reverser stowed), thrust reverser deployment under
rejected take-off or emergency landing load conditions could
potentially result in acoustic panel failure and possible runway
debris.
This [Canadian] directive mandates inspection, repair (if
necessary) and reinforcement of the transcowl assemblies.
The loss of an acoustic panel during rejected take-off or emergency
landing load conditions could leave debris on the runway. This debris,
if not removed, creates an unsafe condition for other airplanes during
take-off or landing, as those airplanes could impact debris on the
runway and sustain damage. The inspection is a detailed visual
inspection of the outboard edge of the transcowl joint extrusion for
evidence of cracking. The repair consists of doing an eddy current or
liquid penetrant inspection for cracking, and depending on the results,
either removing the affected joint extrusion area and replacing with
packers, or contacting Bombardier for repair instructions and
[[Page 52223]]
doing the repair. The reinforcement of the transcowl assemblies
includes installing new support channels. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Request To Allow for Records Review
American Eagle Airlines (AEA) requested that we revise the
supplemental NPRM to allow operators to perform a records review in
lieu of the inspection for part number, serial number, and repair
status of each transcowl assembly, as required by paragraph (g) of the
supplemental NPRM. AEA did not provide reasoning for this request.
We agree to allow operators to perform a records review in lieu of
the inspection for part number, serial number, and repair status of
each transcowl assembly. We have determined that a review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of the inspection, if the
part number, serial number, and repair status of each transcowl
assembly can be conclusively determined from that review. We have
revised paragraph (g) of the final rule accordingly.
Request To Revise Paragraph (g)(1) of the Supplemental NPRM
AEA requested that we revise paragraph (g)(1) of the supplemental
NPRM to remove the reference to paragraph (h) of the supplemental NPRM.
AEA explained that the transcowls specified in paragraph (g)(1) of the
supplemental NPRM are post-modified transcowls and do not need the
inspections required by paragraph (h) of the supplemental NPRM. AEA
reasoned that paragraph (h) of the supplemental NPRM should not apply
to airplanes that have met the conditions specified in paragraph
(g)(1)(i), (g)(1)(ii), or (g)(1)(iii) of the supplemental NPRM.
We agree to revise paragraph (g)(1) of the final rule to remove
reference to paragraph (h) of the final rule. We have determined that
only paragraph (k) of the final rule applies to post-modification
transcowls. We have revised paragraph (g)(1) of the final rule
accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 361 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 8 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $245,480, or $680 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take between 4 and 8 work-hours and require parts costing $0, for a
cost between $340 and $680 per product. We have no way of determining
the number of products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ''significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
[[Page 52224]]
2011-17-12 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16776. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0515; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-196-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 26, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702) airplanes, serial numbers 10003 through 10265 inclusive.
(2) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, serial
numbers 15001 through 15192 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 78: Engine
exhaust.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Several cases have been reported of cracks in the joint
extrusions securing the outer bondment to the acoustic panel of the
nacelle transcowl assemblies. Although there is no effect on flight
safety (thrust reverser stowed), thrust reverser deployment under
rejected take-off or emergency landing load conditions could
potentially result in acoustic panel failure and possible runway
debris.
* * * * *
The loss of an acoustic panel during rejected take-off or emergency
landing load conditions could leave debris on the runway. This
debris, if not removed, creates an unsafe condition for other
airplanes during take-off or landing, as those airplanes could
impact debris on the runway and sustain damage.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection, Repair, and Reinforcement
(g) Within 5,000 flight hours or 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, inspect for the part number
and serial number of each transcowl assembly, and, as applicable,
the repair status of each transcowl assembly. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
part number and serial number of each transcowl assembly, and, as
applicable, the repair status of each transcowl assembly can be
conclusively determined from that review.
(1) If all transcowl assemblies installed on any airplane meet
one of the conditions listed in paragraph (g)(1)(i), (g)(1)(ii), or
(g)(1)(iii) of this AD, no further action is required by this AD,
except paragraph (k) of this AD must be complied with.
(i) Having part number (P/N) KCN624-2003-3, -4, -5, -6, -7, or -
8, as listed in Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-029, Revision
C, dated November 10, 2010.
(ii) Having P/Ns CN624-2001-XXX or KCN624-2001-X (XXX and X mean
various dash numbers), with serial number (S/N) SB0965 or higher.
(iii) Having P/Ns CN624-2001-XXX or KCN624-2001-X (XXX and X
mean various dash numbers), and repaired in accordance with one of
the Bombardier repair engineering orders (REOs) listed in paragraph
1.D. of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008, Revision B, dated
December 22, 2010; or paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier Service Bulletin
670SH-78-029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010.
(2) If one or more of the transcowl assemblies have P/N CN624-
2001-XXX or KCN624-2001-X (XXX and X mean various dash numbers),
with S/N SB0964 or lower, and have not been repaired in accordance
with one of the Bombardier REOs listed in paragraph 1.D. of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008, Revision B, dated December
22, 2010; or paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-
029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010; do the actions specified
in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, if any high-energy stop
occurs and the thrust reversers are deployed above 68% N1, or if a
rejected take-off (RTO) occurs and the thrust reversers are deployed
above 68% N1: Perform a detailed inspection for cracks of each
transcowl assembly (left, right, upper, and lower) before further
flight, by doing the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2),
and (h)(3) of this AD. Doing the requirements of paragraph (i) of
this AD terminates the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) Open the cowling on the left and right engines.
(2) Do a detailed inspection for cracks of the joint extrusion
of the upper and lower transcowl assembly on the left and right
engines at the location of the joint piece. If no cracks are found,
close the cowlings on the left and right engines.
(3) If any crack is found on one or more transcowl assemblies
during the inspection required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD,
before further flight, repair and reinforce the cracked part(s) in
accordance with paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Note 1: Procedure--Part 3 of Task 05-51-27-210-801 of Chapter
05, Part 2, Volume 1, of the Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet
Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), CSP B-001, Revision 34, dated
November 20, 2010, provides guidance for opening and closing the
cowling on the left and right engines.
(i) For transcowl assemblies identified in paragraph (g)(2) of
this AD: Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, within
5,000 flight hours or 24 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever comes first, do a detailed inspection for cracking on each
transcowl assembly, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008, Revision
B, dated December 22, 2010; or Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-
029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010. Accomplishment of the
actions specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD for all
transcowl assemblies identified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD
terminates the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) If any cracking of the joint extrusion is found, before
further flight, repair and reinforce the joint extrusion on each
transcowl assembly, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008, Revision
B, dated December 22, 2010; or Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-
029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010.
(2) If no cracking is found, before further flight, reinforce
the joint extrusion on each transcowl assembly, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
670BA-78-008, Revision B, dated December 22, 2010; or Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670SH-78-029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(j) Inspections, repairs, and reinforcement of the joint
extrusion on each transcowl is also acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding requirements of paragraph (i) of this AD if done
before the effective date of this AD in accordance with the service
information listed in table 1 of this AD.
Table 1--Credit Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Revision Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008. Original.................... September 19, 2008.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008. A........................... July 10, 2009.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-029. Original.................... July 3, 2008.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-029. A........................... June 30, 2009.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-029. B........................... November 25, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 52225]]
Parts Installation
(k) As of the effective date of this AD, no replacement or spare
transcowl assembly having P/N CN624-2001-XXX or KCN624-2001-X (XXX
and X mean various dash numbers), with S/N SB0964 or lower, may be
installed on any airplane, except for a transcowl assembly on which
any repair listed in paragraph 1.D. of Bombardier Service Bulletin
670BA-78-008, Revision B, dated December 22, 2010, or paragraph 1.A.
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH-78-029, Revision C, dated
November 10, 2010, has been done; and except for a transcowl that
has been inspected as specified in paragraph (i) of this AD and all
applicable actions specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this
AD, as applicable, have been done.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(l) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the NYACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(m) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-33,
dated July 28, 2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008,
Revision B, dated December 22, 2010; and Bombardier Service Bulletin
670SH-78-029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-78-008,
Revision B, dated December 22, 2010; and Bombardier Service Bulletin
670SH-78-029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010; as applicable; to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#23574b470d405149634246514c0d414c4e414251474a46510d404c4e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3a7bbb7fdb0a1b993b2b6a1bcfdb1bcbeb1b2a1b7bab6a1fdb0bcbe">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="http://www.bombardier.com">http://www.bombardier.com</a>.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 8, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-20673 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.