AD 2011-03-15
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-200 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-300F Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 767-400ER Series | Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Incorrectly installed main track downstop assemblies can allow the main track downstop hardware to fall into the track housing and cause a puncture in the track housing when the slat is retracted, potentially resulting in a fuel leak and increased risk of fire.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a detailed inspection for correct main track downstop assembly, thread protrusion, and damaged or missing parts of the main track downstop assemblies of the outboard slats. Investigate and correct as necessary. Perform a detailed inspection for foreign objects, debris, and damage to the wall of the track housing of the outboard slats, and correct as necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
The Boeing Company Model 767 airplanes, as specified in the referenced service bulletin.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model 767 airplanes. This AD requires doing a detailed inspection for correct main track downstop assembly, thread protrusion, and damaged and missing parts of the main track downstop assemblies of the outboard slats, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also requires doing a detailed inspection for foreign objects, debris and damage to the wall of the track housing of the outboard slats, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from reports of broken bolts in the outboard slat main track downstop assembly. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct incorrectly installed main track downstop assemblies, which can allow the main track downstop hardware to fall into the track housing and cause a puncture in the track housing when the slat is retracted. This condition, if not corrected, could result in a fuel leak and an increased risk of fire.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8615-8618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2515]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0377; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-246-AD;
Amendment 39-16599; AD 2011-03-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 767 airplanes. This AD requires doing a detailed inspection for
correct main track downstop assembly, thread protrusion, and damaged
and missing parts of the main track downstop assemblies of the outboard
slats, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
This AD also requires doing a detailed inspection for foreign objects,
debris and damage to the wall of the track housing of the outboard
slats, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from
reports of broken bolts in the outboard slat main track downstop
assembly. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct incorrectly
installed main track downstop assemblies, which can allow the main
track downstop hardware to fall into the track housing and cause a
puncture in the track housing when the slat is retracted. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in a fuel leak and an
increased risk of fire.
DATES: This AD is effective March 22, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of March 22,
2011.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c3139723e33393f33311c3e333935323b723f3331"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91fcf4bff3fef4f2fefcd1f3fef4f8fff6bff2fefc">[email protected]</span></a>;
Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6577; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model 767 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17887). That NPRM proposed to require
doing a detailed inspection for correct main track downstop assembly,
thread protrusion, and damaged and missing parts of the main track
downstop assemblies of the outboard slats, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary. That proposed AD also proposed to
require doing a detailed inspection for foreign objects debris and
damage to the wall of the track housing of the outboard slats, and
corrective actions if necessary.
Relevant Service Information
The NPRM referred to Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-
57-0118, dated October 8, 2009. We reviewed Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, Revision 1, dated October 21, 2010. This
service bulletin revision adds an option to inspect either the bolt or
nut for looseness by applying torque to the main track downstop
assembly nut or the bolt head, corrects a reference, and removes the
references to slat numbers 6 and 7 in Appendix A. This service bulletin
revision does not add any additional work for the affected airplanes.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received from the commenters.
Request To Add Boeing Document D-590 as Source of Additional Guidance
American Airlines (AAL) requested that we specify that Boeing
Document D-590 may be used as a source for acceptable fastener and
material
[[Page 8616]]
substitution in a note in the General Information section of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-57-0118, dated October 8, 2009.
From this request, we infer that AAL asked that we include Boeing
Document D-590 as a source for the acceptable fastener and material
substitution in the NPRM. We disagree that adding this document to the
requirements of the AD is necessary. Boeing Document D-590 is the
collection of many Boeing standards and specifications. We have
determined that this document is too broad for this AD. We have not
changed the final rule in regard to this issue.
Request To Clarify Fitting Location
AAL requested that we clarify the fitting location. AAL stated that
it believes the 114T2520 fitting located at outboard slat station (OSS)
426.997 should be removed to facilitate proper torque checking of the
bolts. AAL stated that Boeing confirmed that it is acceptable to remove
the stop fitting(s) as required for access and that it is safe to
remove the stop fitting(s) without rigging the slats. AAL also stated
that Boeing does not plan to revise Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-57-0118, dated October 8, 2009, to include removal or
installation procedures for the stop fitting(s) for access purposes.
AAL reported that Boeing does plan to add a note in the next revision
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, dated October
8, 2009, that states ``if it is necessary to remove more parts for
access, you can remove those parts. You must install all parts removed
for access before the airplane is put back in service.'' As a result,
AAL requested that we revise the NPRM to incorporate a note providing
steps to remove the up-stop fitting as required to facilitate the
torque check, to reinstall the up-stop fitting in accordance with
Boeing Drawing 114T2160, and to torque the nuts using Boeing Airplane
Company (BAC) procedure 5009 or an equivalent operator procedure.
We agree that clarification might be necessary. Based on the best
data available, the manufacturer provided the procedures necessary to
do the required actions. Note 8 in Section A. ``General Information''
of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-57-0118, Revision 1, dated October 21, 2010, states, ``If
it is necessary to remove more parts for access, you can remove those
parts. If you can get access without removing identified parts, it is
not necessary to remove all of the identified parts.'' The procedures
in AD rulemaking actions, however, typically do not include procedures
such as the steps required to gain access and close up. We have updated
the final rule to refer to the latest issue of the service information.
Request To Revise Requirements for Torque Check
AAL stated that a single torque check could be accomplished rather
than the two distinct checks as specified in Steps 1 and 2 of Figures 2
and 5 of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, dated
October 8, 2009. AAL stated that in these figures, the torque check is
accomplished by first holding the bolt head and applying force to the
nut to verify that it does not turn on the bolt threads. AAL stated
that the torque is checked secondly by applying torque to the head and
verifying that the bolt does not rotate. AAL stated that applying
torque to the nut without holding the head will adequately test the
same conditions. AAL stated that if the bolt and nut are loose and if
torque is applied to the nut, either the nut will turn on the bolt or
the bolt will turn with the nut. AAL stated that if neither turns, then
they are tight. AAL asserted that this procedure would eliminate some
work steps and simplify the task.
We agree with the reasons provided by the commenter. As stated
previously Boeing has released Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-
57-0118, Revision 1, dated October 21, 2010, which corrects that
information. We have revised the final rule to refer to this service
bulletin as the appropriate source of service information.
Request To Change Reference to Airplane Maintenance Manual (AMM)
Continental Airlines (CAL) requested that Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, dated October 8, 2009, be revised to
correct the reference to the AMM section to 27-81-34, not 27-81-00.
We agree. As stated previously Boeing has released Special
Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, Revision 1, dated October 21,
2010, which corrects that information. We have revised the final rule
to refer to this revision as the appropriate source of service
information.
Request To Revise Costs of Compliance
United Airlines (United) requested that we revise the Costs of
Compliance section of the NPRM. United noted that the FAA estimated 8
work-hours to comply with the proposed requirements of the NPRM, and
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, dated October 8,
2009, estimated 22 work-hours.
We disagree with the request to revise the Costs of Compliance
section of this AD. The economic analysis is limited to the cost of
actions actually required by the rule. It does not consider the costs
of ``on condition'' actions (e.g., ``repair, if necessary'') because,
regardless of AD direction, those actions would be required to correct
an unsafe condition identified in an airplane and ensure operation of
that airplane in an airworthy condition, as required by the Federal
Aviation Regulations. We have made no change to this final rule
regarding this issue.
Request To Add Damage Reporting Allowance in Paragraph (h) of the NPRM
Boeing requested that we clarify that if damage is found while
inspecting the slat track housing, operators should contact the FAA for
approval of an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) only when the
damage exceeds the allowance contained in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767-57-0118. Boeing stated that this service bulletin
contains damage blend-out allowances (0.015-inch blend-out depth on a
0.063-inch-thick wall) for the slat track housing in Figure 8. Boeing
stated that the NPRM does not provide for the existing repair
information contained in this service bulletin and requires that all
repairs be submitted to the FAA for approval of AMOCs.
We agree with the request for the reasons the commenter provided,
and we have revised paragraph (h) of this AD accordingly.
Explanation of Change to This AD
We added a new paragraph (k) to this final rule to provide
information on the federal Paperwork Reduction Act. We have
reidentified subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that
these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 361 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 8 work-hours per product to
comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost $0
[[Page 8617]]
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to
the U.S. operators to be $245,480, or $680 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2011-03-15 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16599. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0377; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-246-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 22,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, -
300F, and -400ER series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-0118,
Revision 1, dated October 21, 2010.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of broken bolts in the main
track downstop assembly of the outboard slat. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct incorrectly
installed main track downstop assemblies, which can allow the main
track downstop hardware to fall into the track housing and cause a
puncture in the track housing when the slat is retracted. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in a fuel leak and an
increased risk of fire.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(g) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) Do a detailed inspection for correct assembly, thread
protrusion, and damaged and missing parts of the main track downstop
assemblies of outboard slats 1 through 5 and slats 8 through 12, and
do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, Revision 1, dated
October 21, 2010. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.
(2) Do a detailed inspection for foreign objects debris and
damage to the wall of the track housing of the outboard slats 1
through 5 and slats 8 through 12, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with Part 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-
0118, Revision 1, dated October 21, 2010, except as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions
before further flight.
Exception to the Service Bulletin
(h) If any damage is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, and that damage exceeds the allowable
damage contained in Figure 8 of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-57-0118, Revision 1, dated October 21, 2010, before
further flight, replace the track housing or repair the damage using
a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(i) Actions accomplished in accordance with Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 767-57-0118, dated October 8, 2009,
before the effective date of this AD, are acceptable for compliance
with the corresponding actions specified in this AD, provided that
the provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD are complied with.
Reporting
(j) Submit a report of positive findings of the inspections
required by paragraph (g) of this AD to the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD. The report must
include the inspection results, a description of any discrepancies
found, the airplane registry, variable or line number, and the
number of landings and flight hours on the airplane. The report does
not need to include reporting on slats 6 and 7. Under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements contained in this AD and has assigned OMB
Control Number 2120 0056.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.
Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
(k) A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800
[[Page 8618]]
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(l)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Berhane Alazar, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6577; fax (425) 917-6590.
Information may be e-mailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6ffeb87888beb95a3a7b2b2aaa3eb878589eb878b8985eb94a3b7b3a3b5b2b586a0a7a7e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a99084e8e7e484faccc8ddddc5cc84e8eae684e8e4e6ea84fbccd8dcccdadddae9cfc8c887cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-
57-0118, Revision 1, dated October 21, 2010, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d4048034f42484e42406d4f424844434a034e4240"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f39e96dd919c96909c9eb3919c969a9d94dd909c9e">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 28, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-2515 Filed 2-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.