AD 2009-23-03
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Textron Aviation Inc. | 1900 | Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D Airplanes |
| aircraft | Textron Aviation Inc. | 1900C | Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D Airplanes |
| aircraft | Textron Aviation Inc. | 1900C (C-12J) | Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D Airplanes |
| aircraft | Textron Aviation Inc. | 1900D | Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracks in the wing rear spar lower caps, which could result in fatigue failure of the wing rear spar lower caps. A rear spar failure could result in complete wing failure and the wing separating from the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Install the new modification kits on the wing rear spar lower caps. Terminate the repetitive inspections required in AD 2006-24-11 when the kits are installed.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 12 months of the effective date (December 14, 2009).
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) to supersede AD 2006-24-11, which applies to certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (HBC) (Type Certificate previously held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D airplanes. AD 2006-24- 11 currently requires you to repetitively inspect the forward, vertical, and aft flanges of both the left and right wing rear spar lower caps for cracks, repair any cracks found, and report the inspection results to the manufacturer. Since we issued AD 2006-24-11, the manufacturer has developed a modification kit to install on the wing rear spar lower caps that will terminate the 200-hour repetitive inspection required in AD 2006-24-11. Consequently, this AD requires installing the new modification kits on the wing rear spar lower caps and terminates the repetitive inspections required in AD 2006-24-11 when the kits are installed. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracks in the wing rear spar lower caps, which could result in fatigue failure of the wing rear spar lower caps. A rear spar failure could result in complete wing failure and the wing separating from the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 215 (Monday, November 9, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57567-57570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E9-26385]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0165; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-055-AD;
Amendment 39-16075; AD 2009-23-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models 1900,
1900C, and 1900D Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) to
supersede AD 2006-24-11, which applies to certain Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation (HBC) (Type Certificate previously held by Raytheon
Aircraft Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D airplanes. AD 2006-24-
11 currently requires you to repetitively inspect the forward,
vertical, and aft flanges of both the left and right wing rear spar
lower caps for cracks, repair any cracks found, and report the
inspection results to the manufacturer. Since we issued AD 2006-24-11,
the manufacturer has developed a modification kit to install on the
wing rear spar lower caps that will terminate the 200-hour repetitive
inspection required in AD 2006-24-11. Consequently, this AD requires
installing the new modification kits on the wing rear spar lower caps
and terminates the repetitive inspections required in AD 2006-24-11
when the kits are installed. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue
cracks in the wing rear spar lower caps, which could result in fatigue
failure of the wing rear spar lower caps. A rear spar failure could
result in complete wing failure and the wing separating from the
airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on December 14, 2009.
On December 14, 2009, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin 57-3816, Issued: January 2008, listed in this AD.
As of December 11, 2006 (71 FR 70297, December 4, 2006), the
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin 57-3815, dated Issued:
October 2006, listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: To get the service information identified in this AD,
contact Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, Attn: Airline Technical Support,
P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201; telephone: (800) 429-5372; fax:
(316) 676-8745; Internet: <a href="http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com">http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com</a>.
To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. The docket number is FAA-2009-0165;
Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-055-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Potter, Aerospace Engineer, 1801
Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946-
4124; fax: (316) 946-4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On February 19, 2009, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that
would apply to certain HBC Models 1900, 1900C, and 1900D airplanes.
This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on February 27, 2009 (74 FR 8885). The NPRM
proposed to supersede AD 2006-24-11 with a new AD that would require
you to install modification kits on the wing rear spar lower caps. The
[[Page 57568]]
proposed AD would also retain the repetitive inspections currently
required in AD 2006-24-11 until the modification kits are installed.
The proposed AD would require you to use Raytheon Mandatory Service
Bulletin 57-3815, Issued: October 2006; and Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 57-3816, Issued: January, 2008, to perform these
actions.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and FAA's response to each comment:
Comment Issue: Address Shoring Requirement
Mr. Scott Robert Lewis states that the shoring procedures specified
in step 5 of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 57-3816,
Issued: January 2008, are inadequate and no reference is given.
Mr. Lewis also states that the maintenance manual gives no
procedures for shoring the aircraft. Trusses must be made and the
aircraft should be supported using approved procedures provided by the
manufacturer.
Mr. Lewis requests references to procedures for the shoring
process.
We agree with the commenter that there are no specific shoring
procedures given to accomplish Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 57-3816, Issued: January 2008.
We rely on maintenance facilities to use best practices to shore
airplanes at the locations specified in the modification kit
installation instructions.
For further assistance with procedures for shoring an airplane, you
may contact the manufacturer as noted in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 57-
3816, Issued: January 2008.
We are changing the final rule AD action based on this comment.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed
except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these
minor corrections:
<bullet> Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
<bullet> Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 243 airplanes in the U.S.
registry and will reduce costs by $12.8 million because the costs of
the repetitive inspections currently required by AD 2006-24-11 will
exceed the required modification costs over the life of the affected
airplanes.
We estimate the following direct costs (the sum of labor and parts
costs) to do the inspections:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total direct Total direct
Labor cost Parts cost cost per cost on U.S.
airplane operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 work-hours x $80 per hour = $800.......................... $20 $820 $199,260
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following direct costs to do the modification:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total direct Total direct
Labor cost Parts cost cost per cost on U.S.
airplane operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
250 work-hours x $80 per hour = $20,000...................... $2,200 $22,200 $5,394,600
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given an average usage rate of 1,571 hours time-in-service, AD
2006-24-11 requires approximately 7.9 inspections a year. The
approximate annual cost of these repetitive inspections is $6,500.
Based on these figures, a cost savings from incorporating the
modification instead of doing the repetitive inspections will occur
after 5 years on average. That is, the cost savings on the repetitive
inspections no longer required will be greater than or equal to the
total cost of the modification.
The results of our cost analysis are summarized in the table below.
(See docket for full analysis.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount per Total--U.S.
airplane operators
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Costs (the sum of labor and * $22,200 * $5,394,600
parts)...........................
Out-of-Service Costs (average).... * 1,796 * 436,510
-------------------------------------
Total Costs................... * 23,996 * 5,831,110
-------------------------------------
Cost savings over the life of the ** 76,638 ** 18,622,984
airplane on AD 2006-24-11
repetitive inspections that would
no longer be required after
modification.....................
Net Cost Savings.............. 52,641 12,791,873
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Per airplane costs are shown rounded to the nearest dollar.
Consequently, the corresponding totals for all U.S. operators may
differ slightly from the per airplane costs multiplied by the total
number of airplanes.
** Cost savings over the life of the airplane are calculated as follows.
For each affected airplane, we use the airplane's estimated usage rate
to estimate the number of inspections a year and multiply that figure
by $820 to estimate inspection cost a year. (As noted above, such
estimates average to 7.9 inspections a year and about $6,500 in annual
inspection costs.) We then calculate a 7 percent annuity factor for
the number of years of the airplane's life remaining to a presumed
retirement age of 40. In calculation of the annuity factor, we assume
annual inspection costs are discounted at mid-year. The present value
of the inspection costs can then be calculated as the annual
inspection cost multiplied by the years-to-40 annuity factor.
[[Page 57569]]
Notes: This analysis assumed January 1, 2009, as the effective
date of the AD and discount cost savings to that date. Updating to
January 1, 2010, to be closer to the actual effective date will have
little effect on the results. Costs are undiscounted, as we assume
compliance as soon as the AD becomes effective.
These results are based on the assumption that the life-span of
the airplanes affected by this AD is 40 years. This assumption is
not crucial to the cost-beneficial nature of the rule, since 95
percent of the affected airplanes achieve cost savings on or before
age 30.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.
Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objective of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation.
To achieve that principle, the RFA requires agencies to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain the rationale for
their actions. The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities, including
small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a proposed or
final rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. If the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in
the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a proposed or final rule is
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the
head of the agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required. The FAA did make such a determination for this AD. The
basis for this determination is now discussed.
This AD will supersede existing AD 2006-24-11. The cost analysis
for this AD shows that the modification will have a cost savings from
the accumulative repetitive inspection cost now required in AD 2006-24-
11, reflecting cost savings for 241 of the 243 affected airplanes. For
the two firms that own the two airplanes where the analysis did not
show a cost savings, we have identified one as a subsidiary of General
Electric Capital Corporation and the other as the subsidiary of a firm
that is probably large. General Electric Capital Corporation is not a
small entity. We were unable to determine the size classification of
the other firm. Even if the corporate parent of the unidentified firm
is a small firm, this AD will impact at most one firm, and one firm is
not a substantial number.
Therefore, the Acting FAA Administrator certifies that this rule
will not impose a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and
other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed
it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a
request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket
No. FAA-2009-0165; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-055-AD'' in your
request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2006-24-11, Amendment 39-14840 (71 FR 70297, December 4, 2006), and
adding the following new AD:
2009-23-03 Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate
previously held by Raytheon Aircraft Company): Amendment 39-16075;
Docket No. FAA-2009-0165; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-055-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective on December 14, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-24-11, Amendment 39-14840. AD
2006-18-51 relates to the subject of this AD.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the following airplane models and serial
numbers that are certificated in any category:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Serial numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group 1 Model Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) 1900................................ UA-3.
(2) 1900C............................... UB-1 through UB-74.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group 2 Model Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) 1900C (C-12J)....................... UC-1 through UC-174, and UD-1
through UD-6.
(2) 1900D............................... UE-1 through UE-439.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from the manufacturer developing a
modification kit to install on the wing rear spar lower caps that
will terminate the 200-hour repetitive inspection required in AD
2006-24-11. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracks in the
wing rear spar lower caps, which could result in fatigue failure of
the wing rear spar lower caps. A rear spar failure could result in
complete wing failure and the wing separating from the airplane.
[[Page 57570]]
Compliance
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes: Repetitively inspect at intervals not to Follow the procedures in
Repetitively inspect both the left and exceed 200 hours time-in-service (TIS) Raytheon Mandatory Service
right wing rear spar lower caps for after the last inspection required by Bulletin 57-3815, Issued:
cracks and other damage, such as loose AD 2006-24-11. October 2006.
or missing fasteners.
(2) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes: If Before further flight after any For the repair scheme,
cracks are found, repair all cracks by inspection required by paragraph (e)(1) contact Hawker Beechcraft
obtaining and incorporating an FAA- of this AD where cracks are found. Corporation at P.O. Box
approved repair scheme from the 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-
manufacturer. 0085; phone: (800) 429-
5372; fax: (316) 676-8745;
e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0d4cfcdffd0c5c1d9e0d2c1c38ed2c1d98ec3cfcd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14607b794b6471756d546675773a66756d3a777b79">[email protected]</span></a>.
(3) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes: Report the repetitive inspection results Follow the procedures in
Report the inspection results to Hawker within 30 days after the inspection. Raytheon Mandatory Service
Beechcraft Company (formerly Raytheon Bulletin 57-3815, Issued:
Aircraft Company) using the instructions October 2006.
and forms in the service bulletin.
Complete all sections of the required
forms. Reporting requirements have been
approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB control
number 2120-0056.
(4) For Group 1 airplanes: Install Upon reaching 22,000 total hours TIS or Follow the procedures in
Modification Kit 114-4052-1 and within the next 3 years after December Hawker Beechcraft
Modification Kit 114-4067-0001. 14, 2009 (the effective date of this Mandatory Service Bulletin
AD), whichever occurs later. Installing SB 57-3816, Issued:
the modification kits terminates the January 2008. For further
repetitive inspections required by assistance with procedures
paragraph (e)(1) of this AD. for shoring an airplane,
you may contact the
manufacturer at the
address specified in
paragraph (h)(3) of this
AD.
(5) For Group 2 airplanes: Install Upon reaching 22,000 total hours TIS or Follow the procedures in
Modification Kit 118-4012-1 or 118-4012- within the next 3 years after December Hawker Beechcraft
3 and Modification Kit 118-4014-0003. 14, 2009 (the effective date of this Mandatory Service Bulletin
AD), whichever occurs later. Installing SB 57-3816, Issued:
the modification kits terminates the January 2008. For further
repetitive inspections required by assistance with procedures
paragraph (e)(1) of this AD. for shoring an airplane,
you may contact the
manufacturer at the
address specified in
paragraph (h)(3) of this
AD.
(6) For all affected Group 1 and Group 2 As of December 14, 2009 (the effective Not applicable.
airplanes: You may install the date of this AD).
modification kits specified in
paragraphs (e)(4) and (e)(5) of this AD
at any time before the required
compliance times specified in paragraphs
(e)(4) and (e)(5) of this AD. Installing
the modification kits terminates the
repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(f) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Steve Potter, Aerospace Engineer, ACE-118W, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209, phone: (316) 946-4124, fax: (316) 946-4107. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(g) AMOCs approved for AD 2006-24-11 are not approved for this
AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin 57-3815,
Issued: October 2006, and Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin 57-3816, Issued: January 2008, to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 57-3816, Issued: January 2008, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR part 51.
(2) On December 11, 2006 (71 FR 70297, December 4, 2006), the
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin 57-3815, Issued:
October 2006.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Hawker Beechcraft, Attn: Airline Technical Support, P.O. Box 85,
Wichita, Kansas 67201; telephone: (800) 429-5372; fax: (316) 676-
8745; Internet: <a href="http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com">http://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com</a>.
(4) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call (816) 329-3768.
(5) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 27, 2009.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-26385 Filed 11-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.