AD 2009-19-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100B Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-100B SUD Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200B Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200C Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-200F Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-300 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400D Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747-400F Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747SP Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 747SR Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracking of fuselage frames in section 41 made of 2024 aluminum alloy, which could result in cracking of the adjacent fuselage skin and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect fuselage frames in section 41 for cracking, and take corrective actions if necessary. Repetitive inspections are required at intervals specified in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 12 months of effective date
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 747 airplanes with fuselage frames in section 41 made of 2024 aluminum alloy, as specified in the AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 747 airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the fuselage frames in section 41, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from reports of cracking in fuselage frames made of 2024 aluminum alloy that were installed during previous modification of the frames in section 41 and during production. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct frame cracks, which could result in cracking of the adjacent fuselage skin and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48138-48141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E9-21922]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0136; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-171-AD;
Amendment 39-16022; AD 2009-19-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 747 airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections for
cracking of the fuselage frames in section 41, and corrective actions
if necessary. This AD results from reports of cracking in fuselage
frames made of 2024 aluminum alloy that were installed during previous
modification of the frames in section 41 and during production. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct frame cracks, which could result
in cracking of the adjacent fuselage skin and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective October 27, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of October 27,
2009.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1, fax 206-766-5680; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#49242c672b262c2a2624092b262c20272e672a2624"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcb1b9f2beb3b9bfb3b19cbeb3b9b5b2bbf2bfb3b1">[email protected]</span></a>;
Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9
[[Page 48139]]
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6437;
fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Boeing Model 747 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 2009 (74 FR 8034). That NPRM proposed
to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the fuselage frames
in section 41, and corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Requests To Delay or Withdraw NPRM
Japan Airlines (JAL) asks that we delay issuing the AD until Boeing
revises the referenced service information. JAL states that Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2753, dated August 28, 2008, does not
include access and restoration information for the frame structure
inspection. JAL adds that without this information operators are caused
an undue burden such as engineering costs and validation. JAL notes
that it asked Boeing to develop access and restoration procedures and
Boeing agreed to revise the service information to include those
procedures.
We do not agree to delay issuing the AD to wait for revised service
information, nor has Boeing informed us of its intent to issue revised
service information to include the procedures discussed by the
commenter. We have determined that although Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2753, dated August 28, 2008, does not include access
information for the frame inspection, the majority of operators have
their own acceptable access and closing procedures. Although this AD
does not mandate a particular method of doing the access and closing
procedures, operators can obtain those procedures directly from Boeing
if necessary. We have not changed the AD in this regard.
Northwest Airlines (NWA) would like the NPRM to be withdrawn. NWA
states that, in view of the reported damage findings and service
information specified in the preamble of the NPRM, there is no
justification to support issuing an NPRM which covers a much broader
area than where the crack damage was found. NWA states that the
inspection for cracking of certain critical regions of the body section
41 structure is also addressed in the supplemental structural
inspection document (SSID) inspection program. NWA notes that the SSID
inspection program is mandated in previously issued rulemaking and
should be used to determine if mandated inspections of the entire body
section 41 structure are necessary. NWA adds that additional
justification is needed to support mandating those inspections.
Although we understand NWA's concern, we do not agree to withdraw
the NPRM. We have received several reports of significant cracking of
certain fuselage frames in section 41; the cracked frames were found
when the airplanes had accumulated relatively low flight cycles. As the
fuselage frames on the airplanes affected by this AD are of similar
type design, we have determined that all fuselage frames in section 41
are susceptible to the same unsafe condition.
We are aware that the Boeing Model 747 SSID inspection program, as
mandated by AD 2004-07-22 R1, amendment 39-15326 (73 FR 1052, January
7, 2008), requires repetitive inspections of the fuselage frames in
section 41. However, analysis by the manufacturer shows that a
repetitive inspection interval significantly reduced from the interval
specified in the SSID inspection program is required to ensure safety.
Rather than revising AD 2004-07-22 R1, which is complex and includes
numerous inspections, we have determined that this new AD is
appropriate and must be issued without further delay.
Request To Correct Paragraph Identifiers
Boeing requests a correction to the paragraph identifiers specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD--i.e., to specify paragraphs (h) and (i)
instead of paragraphs (g) and (h).
We agree with the Boeing comment. The paragraph identifiers were
incorrectly identified in the NPRM; therefore, we have changed those
identifiers in paragraph (g) of this AD accordingly.
Change to AD Preamble
The Costs of Compliance paragraph has been revised to note that for
certain airplanes, it may be necessary to accomplish more than one Part
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2732, dated August 28, 2008,
depending on airplane configuration.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously. We also determined that
this change will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 165 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD. For airplanes on which
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2732, dated August 28, 2008, must
be done, accomplishment of more than one Part of the alert service
bulletin may be required, depending on airplane configuration.
Table--Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Number of
Work labor U.S-
Inspection hours rate per Cost per product registered Fleet cost
hour airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 50 $80 Up to $4,000, per 94 Up to $376,000, per
53A2732, Part 1. inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
[[Page 48140]]
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 650 80 Up to $52,000, per 94 Up to $4,888,000,
53A2732, Part 2. inspection cycle. per inspection
cycle.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 6 80 $480, per inspection 94 Up to $45,120, per
53A2732, Part 3. cycle. inspection cycle.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 51 80 Up to $4,080, per 94 Up to $383,520, per
53A2732, Part 4. inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 11 80 Up to $880, per 94 Up to $82,720, per
53A2732, Part 5. inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 52 80 Up to $4,160, per 94 Up to $391,040, per
53A2732, Part 6. inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 13 80 Up to $1,040, per 94 Up to $97,760, per
53A2732, Part 7. inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 54 80 Up to $4,320, per 94 Up to $406,080, per
53A2732, Part 8. inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747- 244 80 Up to $19,520, per 71 Up to $1,385,920,
53A2753. inspection cycle. per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-19-05 Boeing: Amendment 39-16022. Docket No. FAA-2009-0136;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-171-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective October 27,
2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747 airplanes, certificated
in any category, as specified in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this
AD, as applicable.
(1) Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-
200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2732, dated
August 28, 2008.
(2) Boeing Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F series
airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2753, dated August 28, 2008.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of cracking in fuselage frames
made of 2024 aluminum alloy that were installed during previous
modification of the frames in section 41 and during production. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct frame cracks, which could
result in cracking of the adjacent fuselage skin and consequent
rapid decompression of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions
(g) At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2732
or 747-53A2753, both dated August 28, 2008, as applicable, do the
detailed inspection for cracking of the fuselage frames in section
41, and do all applicable corrective actions, by accomplishing all
the actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2732 or 747-53A2753, both dated August
28, 2008, as applicable; except as provided by paragraphs (h) and
(i) of this AD. Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed
those specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2732 or 747-53A2753, both dated August 28, 2008, as
applicable. If any crack is found, do all corrective actions before
further flight.
Note 1: As specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 747-
53A2732 and 747-53A2753, both dated August 28, 2008, an optional
special detailed inspection behind
[[Page 48141]]
the P14 and P15 electrical terminal panels using the borescope may
be done.
(h) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 747-53A2732 and 747-
53A2753, both dated August 28, 2008, recommend an initial inspection
threshold relative to the date on Boeing Alert Service Bulletins
747-53A2732 and 747-53A2753, both dated August 28, 2008; this AD
requires the initial inspection threshold relative to the effective
date of this AD.
(i) If any crack is found during any inspection required by this
AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 747-53A2732 and 747-53A2753,
both dated August 28, 2008, specify to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair the cracking using
a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA,
Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356;
telephone (425) 917-6437; fax (425) 917-6590. Or, e-mail information
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#497064080704641a2c283d3d252c64080a06640804060a641b2c383c2c3a3d3a092f2828672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c35214d4241215f696d78786069214d4f43214d41434f215e697d79697f787f4c6a6d6d226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2732 dated
August 28, 2008; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2753, dated
August 28, 2008; as applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1, fax 206-766-5680; e-mail
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80ede5aee2efe5e3efedc0e2efe5e9eee7aee3efed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="711c145f131e14121e1c31131e14181f165f121e1c">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="https://www.myboeingfleet.com">https://www.myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 1, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-21922 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.