AD 2009-16-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Fokker Services | F27 Mark 050 | Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F.27 Mark 050 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
A broken fork of the inner flap outboard drive shaft caused extensive damage to the left hand inner flap and nacelle, resulting in asymmetric flap extension and interference between the flap and the nacelle. The failure was caused by cyclic load due to regularly reaching the mechanical end stop position.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the clearance between the flap mechanical drive nut and the up-and-down stop. Perform a non-destructive inspection of certain components if abutment marks are present or when the up and/or down stop touches the drive nut after a full up or down selection in the hydraulic mode. Readjust the up-stop position if clearance is incorrect. Replace any parts found with cracks during the non-destructive inspection with serviceable parts.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Fokker Model F.27 Mark 050 airplanes, all serial numbers, in a post-Fokker Service Bulletin SBF50-27-030 configuration.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38910-38912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E9-18417]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0691; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-061-AD;
Amendment 39-15988; AD 2009-16-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F.27 Mark 050 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During the walk around check on a Fokker 50 (F27 Mark 050)
aeroplane, extensive damage was found on the left hand (LH) inner
flap and nacelle. The damage had been caused by a broken fork of the
inner flap outboard drive shaft. This resulted in asymmetric flap
extension and interference between the flap and the nacelle. A
metallurgical investigation showed that the fork end failed in a
fatigue mode. Most probably the failure was caused by the ``cyclic
load'' as a result of regularly reaching the mechanical end stop
position.
* * * * *
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to further cases of
asymmetric flap extension, possibly resulting in loss of control of
the aeroplane.
* * * * *
This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 20, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of August 20,
2009.
We must receive comments on this AD by September 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
<bullet> Fax: (202) 493-2251.
<bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0047, dated March 2, 2009 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
During the walk around check on a Fokker 50 (F27 Mark 050)
aeroplane, extensive damage was found on the left hand (LH) inner
flap and nacelle. The damage had been caused by a broken fork of the
inner flap outboard drive shaft. This resulted in asymmetric flap
extension and interference between the flap and the nacelle. A
metallurgical investigation showed that the fork end failed in a
fatigue mode. Most probably the failure was caused by the ``cyclic
load'' as a result of regularly reaching the mechanical end stop
position.
A review of the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) `end stop
clearances check' for aeroplane in post-SBF50-27-030 configuration,
revealed that this inspection procedure, to determine and correct
the clearance between the end stop and the flap drive nut, may need
some improvement, which is now being considered. Further
investigation showed that this type of failure has occurred
previously on other Fokker 50 aeroplanes, but only those modified in
accordance with SBF50-27-030. A review of the experience with pre-
mod SBF50-27-030 aeroplane indicated that no failures have been
reported.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to further cases of
asymmetric flap extension, possibly resulting in loss of control of
the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires a one-
time inspection of the clearance between the flap mechanical drive
nut and the up and down stop and a non-destructive inspection of
certain components, if abutments marks are present or when the up
and/or down stop touches the drive nut after a full up or down
selection in the hydraulic mode.
Based on the above described failure scenario, the differences
in the design properties and the positive experience, aeroplanes in
pre-SBF50-27-030 configuration are not affected by this AD.
Corrective actions include readjusting the up-stop position if
clearance between the flap mechanical drive nut and the up-and-down-
stop is incorrect, and if any cracks are found during the non-
destructive inspection, replacing the part with a serviceable part. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Fokker has issued Service Bulletin SBF50-27-043, dated November 17,
2008. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
[[Page 38911]]
FAA's Determination and Requirements of this AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
There are no products of this type currently registered in the
United States. However, this rule is necessary to ensure that the
described unsafe condition is addressed if any of these products are
placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a note within the AD.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
Since there are currently no domestic operators of this product,
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
unnecessary.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0691; Directorate
Identifier 2009-NM-061-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-16-05 Fokker Services B.V.: Amendment 39-15988. Docket No. FAA-
2009-0691; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-061-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
20, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Fokker Model F.27 Mark 050 airplanes,
certificated in any category, all serial numbers, if in a post
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF50-27-030 configuration.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During the walk around check on a Fokker 50 (F27 Mark 050)
aeroplane, extensive damage was found on the left hand (LH) inner
flap and nacelle. The damage had been caused by a broken fork of the
inner flap outboard drive shaft. This resulted in asymmetric flap
extension and interference between the flap and the nacelle. A
metallurgical investigation showed that the fork end failed in a
fatigue mode. Most probably the failure was caused by the ``cyclic
load'' as a result of regularly reaching the mechanical end stop
position.
A review of the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) `end stop
clearances check' for aeroplane in post-SBF50-27-030 configuration,
revealed that this inspection procedure, to determine and correct
the clearance between the end stop and the flap drive nut, may need
some improvement, which is now being considered. Further
investigation showed that this type of failure has occurred
previously on other Fokker 50 aeroplanes, but only those modified in
accordance with SBF50-27-030. A review of the experience with pre-
mod SBF50-27-030 aeroplane indicated that no failures have been
reported.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to further cases of
asymmetric flap extension, possibly resulting in loss of control of
the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires a one-
time inspection of the clearance between the flap mechanical drive
nut and the up and down stop and a non destructive inspection of
certain components, if abutments marks are present or when the up
and/or down stop touches the drive nut
[[Page 38912]]
after a full up or down selection in the hydraulic mode.
Based on the above described failure scenario, the differences
in the design properties and the positive experience, aeroplanes in
pre-SBF50-27-030 configuration are not affected by this AD.
Corrective actions include readjusting the up-stop position if
clearance between the flap mechanical drive nut and the up-and-down-
stop is incorrect, and if any cracks are found during the non-
destructive inspection, replacing the part with a serviceable part.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the clearance between the flap mechanical drive nut and the
up-and-down-stop, and before further flight, do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin SBF50-27-043, dated November
17, 2008.
(2) If, during accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, abutments marks are found, or when the
up-and-down-stop touches the drive nut after a full up or down
selection in the hydraulic mode, before further flight, do a non-
destructive inspection for cracking, in accordance with Fokker
Service Bulletin SBF50-27-043, dated November 17, 2008. If any
cracking is found, before further flight, replace the part with a
serviceable part.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2009-
0047, dated March 2, 2009; Fokker Service Bulletin SBF50-27-043,
dated November 17, 2008; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Fokker Service Bulletin SBF50-27-043, dated
November 17, 2008, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Fokker Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150
AE Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)252-627-350; fax
+31 (0)252-627-211; e-mail
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfcbdadcd7d1d6dcded3ccdacdc9d6dcdacc91d9d0d4d4dacdccdacdc9d6dcdaccffcccbd0cdd491dcd0d2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="770312141f191e14161b041205011e1412045911181c1c1205041205011e14120437040318051c5914181a">[email protected]</span></a>; Internet <a href="http://www.myfokkerfleet.com">http://www.myfokkerfleet.com</a>.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 24, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-18417 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.