AD 2009-08-08R1
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| engine | Turbomeca S.A. | Arriel 1B | Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines |
| engine | Turbomeca S.A. | Arriel 1D | Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines |
| engine | Turbomeca S.A. | Arriel 1D1 | Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines |
| engine | Turbomeca S.A. | Arriel 2B | Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines |
| engine | Turbomeca S.A. | Arriel 2B1 | Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines |
Unsafe Condition
Geometric non-conformances on blade fir tree roots of Power Turbine (PT) wheels may reduce fatigue resistance below authorized limits, potentially causing blade release and uncommanded in-flight shutdown.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Determine if Module M04 (PT) is listed in MSB A292 72 0827 (Arriel 1) or A292 72 2833 (Arriel 2). Establish cyclic use limit of PT blades to 5,000 flight cycles. Remove Module M04, PT wheel assembly, or PT blades if flight cycles reach or exceed 5,000 before next flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Prior to next flight for affected engines reaching 5,000 flight cycles. All other actions must be completed by compliance with this AD effective May 7, 2010.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 engines with Module M04 listed in MSB A292 72 0827 (Arriel 1) or A292 72 2833 (Arriel 2).
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
PT Blades
Applicability Source Text
Show captured applicability text from the source AD
AD Final Rules - 2009-08-08R1.pdf Copy URL Document Versions Feedback DetailsAttachments/Public Comments AD Number: 2009-08-08R1 Document Type: AD Final Rules Docket Number: FAA-2009-0302 Subject Heading: Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines Subject: PT Blades Status: Current Citation: Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63) Citation Publish Date: 04/02/2010 Effective Date: 05/07/2010 Make: Turbomeca S.A. Model: Arriel 1B | Arriel 1D | Arriel 1D1 | Arriel 2B | Arriel 2B1 Product Type: Engine Product Subtype: Affected AD: Superseded AD: 2009-08-08 Affected By: Superseded By: Service/Office: Office of Primary Responsibility: CFR Part Reference: Part 39 Comments: Automatic Zoom Actual Size Page Fit Page Width 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 200% 300% 400% 125% of 7 1 [Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 16664-16666] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr02ap10-10] –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2009-0302; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-09-AD; Amendment 39-16245; AD 2009-08-08R1] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– SUMMARY: We are revising an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: During production of Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 Power Turbine (PT) wheels, geometric non-conformances on blade fir tree roots have been detected by Turboméca. Potentially non-conforming PT blades have been traced as having been installed on Module M04 (PT) listed in Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) A292 72 0827 for Arriel 1 engines and A292 72 2833 for Arriel 2 engines. The geometric non-conformities of the blades may potentially lead to a reduction in the fatigue resistance of PT blades to a lower level than their authorized in service use limit. This reduction of fatigue resistance can potentially result in blade release, which could cause an uncommanded in-flight shutdown. We are issuing this AD to prevent release of PT blades, which could result in an uncommanded in- flight shutdown and emergency autorotation landing. DATES: This AD becomes effective May 7, 2010. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 7, 2010. ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. 2 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: kevin.dickert@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7117, fax (781) 238- 7199. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 23, 2009 (74 FR 68194). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: Since issuance of initial version of AD 2009-0112 additional information is available: –The list of Modules M04 concerned by the restriction of the cycle use limit of these PT blades has been updated again: The serial numbers of Modules M04 which have been retrofitted are crossed out. However, no new affected Modules M04 have been identified. See figure 1 of the referenced Turboméca MSB. –Additional testing and analysis had been carried out by Turboméca which allows increasing the cyclic use limit of these PT blades to 5 000 flight cycles. Therefore this AD revises AD 2009-0112 and requires establishing the cyclic use limit of these PT blades to 5 000 flight cycles. For PT blades having reached a number of flight cycles superior or equal to 5 000, removal of Module M04, or PT wheel assembly, or PT blades is required prior to next flight. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public. Conclusion We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed. Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take precedence over the actions copied from the MCAI. Costs of Compliance Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will affect about 10 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 8 work-hours per product to comply with this AD.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
AD Final Rules - 2009-08-08R1.pdf Copy URL Document Versions Feedback DetailsAttachments/Public Comments AD Number: 2009-08-08R1 Document Type: AD Final Rules Docket Number: FAA-2009-0302 Subject Heading: Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines Subject: PT Blades Status: Current Citation: Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63) Citation Publish Date: 04/02/2010 Effective Date: 05/07/2010 Make: Turbomeca S.A. Model: Arriel 1B | Arriel 1D | Arriel 1D1 | Arriel 2B | Arriel 2B1 Product Type: Engine Product Subtype: Affected AD: Superseded AD: 2009-08-08 Affected By: Superseded By: Service/Office: Office of Primary Responsibility: CFR Part Reference: Part 39 Comments: Automatic Zoom Actual Size Page Fit Page Width 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 200% 300% 400% 125% of 7 1 [Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 16664-16666] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr02ap10-10] –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2009-0302; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-09-AD; Amendment 39-16245; AD 2009-08-08R1] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca ARRIEL 1B, 1D, 1D1, 2B, and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– SUMMARY: We are revising an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: During production of Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 Power Turbine (PT) wheels, geometric non-conformances on blade fir tree roots have been detected by Turboméca. Potentially non-conforming PT blades have been traced as having been installed on Module M04 (PT) listed in Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) A292 72 0827 for Arriel 1 engines and A292 72 2833 for Arriel 2 engines. The geometric non-conformities of the blades may potentially lead to a reduction in the fatigue resistance of PT blades to a lower level than their authorized in service use limit. This reduction of fatigue resistance can potentially result in blade release, which could cause an uncommanded in-flight shutdown. We are issuing this AD to prevent release of PT blades, which could result in an uncommanded in- flight shutdown and emergency autorotation landing. DATES: This AD becomes effective May 7, 2010. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 7, 2010. ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. 2 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: kevin.dickert@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7117, fax (781) 238- 7199. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 23, 2009 (74 FR 68194). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: Since issuance of initial version of AD 2009-0112 additional information is available: –The list of Modules M04 concerned by the restriction of the cycle use limit of these PT blades has been updated again: The serial numbers of Modules M04 which have been retrofitted are crossed out. However, no new affected Modules M04 have been identified. See figure 1 of the referenced Turboméca MSB. –Additional testing and analysis had been carried out by Turboméca which allows increasing the cyclic use limit of these PT blades to 5 000 flight cycles. Therefore this AD revises AD 2009-0112 and requires establishing the cyclic use limit of these PT blades to 5 000 flight cycles. For PT blades having reached a number of flight cycles superior or equal to 5 000, removal of Module M04, or PT wheel assembly, or PT blades is required prior to next flight. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public. Conclusion We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed. Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take precedence over the actions copied from the MCAI. Costs of Compliance Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will affect about 10 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 8 work-hours per product to comply with this AD.
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 8, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.