AD 2008-13-11
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-6-1 | Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC- 6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300 Airplanes |
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-6-100 | Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC- 6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300 Airplanes |
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-6-200 | Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC- 6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300 Airplanes |
| aircraft | Viking Air Limited | DHC-6-300 | Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC- 6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Service experience indicates that as aircraft become older, they are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Develop a schedule for doing the initial and repeat corrosion tasks (CTs) within 90 days after August 5, 2008. Initially, perform all seven basic CTs defined in the DHC-6 Twin Otter Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual, Revision 3, along with temporary revisions listed in Table 1 of this AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 90 days after August 5, 2008
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC-6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300 airplanes, serial numbers 001 through 844, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 1, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37355-37358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E8-13848]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0367 Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-089-AD;
Amendment 39-15574; AD 2008-13-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC-
6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Service experience indicates that as aircraft become older, they
are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion.
Additionally, the FAA has reviewed the service experience and finds
this action to be necessary based upon that service experience. We are
issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 5, 2008.
On August 5, 2008, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Beckwith, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, New York Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone: (516) 228-7302; fax: (516) 568-
2716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 31, 2008 (73
FR 16779). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Service experience indicates that as aircraft become older, they
are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion. Transport
Canada, in conjunction with other airworthiness authorities, has
committed itself to ensuring that additional maintenance programs
for older aircraft are developed and implemented to minimize and
control corrosive deterioration that could jeopardize airworthiness.
Bombardier Inc., as manufacturer of the DHC-6 aircraft, has
developed a Corrosion Prevention and Control Program which
identifies specific areas that must be inspected to ensure the
structural integrity of the DHC-6 fleet.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comment received.
The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) states that:
AOPA opposes broad-based fleet-wide airworthiness directives to
address corrosion related issues such as this one. Instead AOPA
supports a more focused approach that takes aircraft maintenance and
usage into account; instead of an AD based solely on age.
In general, the FAA agrees that broad-based fleet-wide ADs are not
always appropriate. However, in this case, the FAA has determined an AD
should be issued because an unsafe condition exists in the product and
the condition is likely to exist or develop in other products of the
same type design.
The FAA is issuing this AD for two reasons, both of which are
stated in the NPRM. First, service experience indicates that as
aircraft become older, they are more likely to exhibit indications of
corrosion. Second, we have performed a review of the relevant service
experience, including a review of the Corrosion Prevention and Control
Program inspection reports that were made by operators to the
manufacturer. This service experience supports the issuance of an AD.
The FAA agrees in principle that based upon maintenance history,
type of usage, etc., some operators may be in the position to address
this unsafe condition using alternative methods to those proposed in
the NPRM. However, it is not possible for the FAA to know all
operators' specific conditions and write a different AD for each
operator. Operators are encouraged to provide supporting evidence
regarding their maintenance and operations in support of an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) when appropriate and should follow the
procedures in 14 CFR 39.19 and this AD for requesting an AMOC.
We are not changing the final rule AD action based on this comment.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to assure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect 162 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will
take about 40 work-hours per product to comply with basic requirements
of this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $518,400 or $3,200 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
[[Page 37356]]
General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the
Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-13-11 Viking Air Limited: Amendment 39-15574; Docket No. FAA-
2008-0367; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-089-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
5, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Models DHC-6-1, DHC-6-100, DHC-6-200, and
DHC-6-300 airplanes, serial numbers (SNs) 001 through 844,
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 51:
Structures.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Service experience indicates that as aircraft become older, they
are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion. Transport
Canada, in conjunction with other airworthiness authorities, has
committed itself to ensuring that additional maintenance programs
for older aircraft are developed and implemented to minimize and
control corrosive deterioration that could jeopardize airworthiness.
Bombardier Inc., as manufacturer of the DHC-6 aircraft, has
developed a Corrosion Prevention and Control Program which
identifies specific areas that must be inspected to ensure the
structural integrity of the DHC-6 fleet.
Additionally, the FAA has reviewed the service experience of the
Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC-6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-
300 airplanes and finds this action to be necessary based upon that
service experience. The MCAI requires that you do the corrosion
tasks (CTs) required by the corrosion prevention and control
program.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Within the next 90 days after August 5, 2008 (the effective
date of this AD), develop a schedule for doing the initial and
repeat CTs required in paragraph (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD.
(2) Initially, do all of the seven basic CTs defined at
paragraph 3.0 of Part 3 of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300)
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3,
released and dated January 15, 2007 (individual pages dated as
specified in the List of Effective Pages on pages 7 through 12 of
the document); and the temporary revisions listed in Table 1--Viking
Temporary Revisions, of this AD:
Table 1.--Viking Temporary Revisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temporary revision number and date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Viking Temporary Revision, C57-10-18 (TR 2-2), dated December 19,
2007.
(ii) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1 (TR 3-2), dated
December 19, 2007.
(iii) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1 (TR 3-3), dated
December 19, 2007.
(iv) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1, (TR 3-4), dated
December 19, 2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determine corrosion level following the definitions contained in the
introduction section of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300)
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3,
released and dated January 15, 2007 (individual pages dated as
specified in the List of Effective Pages on pages 7 through 12 of
the document). The initial accomplishment deadlines are specified in
Table 2--Initial Accomplishment Deadline, of this AD:
Table 2.--Initial Accomplishment Deadline
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial accomplishment deadline for
Applicable airplane serial numbers all airplanes in applicable S/N
range
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 001 through 199............... 15 months after August 5, 2008 (the
effective date of this AD).
(ii) 200 through 439.............. 27 months after August 5, 2008 (the
effective date of this AD).
(iii) 440 through 659............. 51 months after August 5, 2008 (the
effective date of this AD).
(iv) 660 through 844.............. 63 months after August 5, 2008 (the
effective date of this AD).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 37357]]
(3) After the initial completion of each CT, repeat each CT at
the repeat interval (R) specified in the manual. Determine corrosion
level following the definitions contained in the introduction
section of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300) Corrosion
Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, released and
dated January 15, 2007 (individual pages dated as specified in the
List of Effective Pages on pages 7 through 12 of the document).
(4) If any corrosion is found during any action required by this
AD, before further flight, address corrosion following paragraph 4.0
of Part 3 of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300) Corrosion
Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated January
15, 2007. All repairs are to be done following a method approved by
the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office or Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (or its delegated agent).
(5) Within 21 days after the finding of Level 3 corrosion,
submit a plan to the FAA to identify a schedule for accomplishing
the applicable CTs on the remainder of the airplanes in the
operator's fleet that are subject to this AD or data substantiating
that the Level 3 corrosion that was found is an isolated case. The
FAA may impose a schedule other than proposed in the plan upon
finding that a change to the schedule is needed to assure that any
other Level 3 corrosion is detected in a timely manner. For the
purposes of this paragraph, the FAA is defined as the cognizant
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) for operators that are
assigned a PMI (e.g., part 121, 125, and 135 operators) and the
cognizant flight standards district office for other operators
(e.g., part 91 operators).
(6) If any Level 3 corrosion is found while doing any action
required by this AD, within 21 days after the finding of Level 3
corrosion, report the finding on the form in Figure 1 of this AD and
send it to Viking Air Limited, VP Engineering, 9574 Hampden Road,
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 5V5.
(7) Incorporation of the initial and repeat CTs into your FAA-
approved maintenance program constitutes terminating action for this
AD. If this AD is terminated in this way, then the maintenance
program must be in accordance with this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Richard Beckwith,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone: (516) 228-7302; fax: (516)
568-2716. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate PMI in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PMI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
AD 2008-13-11
INSPECTION REPORT
(REPORT ONLY IF YOU FIND LEVEL 3 CORROSION)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Operator: 2. Telephone:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Airplane Model Number: 4. Airplane Serial Number:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Airplane Tail Number: 6. Date of Inspection:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Corrosion Task:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Description & Specific Location of Findings:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Additional Comments of Owner/Operator:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send to:
Viking Air Limited
VP Engineering
9574 Hampden Road
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
V8L 5V5
Telephone: 250.656.7227
Fax: 250.656.9702
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 1.
[[Page 37358]]
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada AD No. CF-94-12R1, dated
April 13, 1999; Transport Canada AD No. CF-99-11, dated May 28,
1999; DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300) Corrosion Prevention and
Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated January 15, 2007; and
the temporary revisions listed in Table 1--Viking Temporary
Revisions, of this AD, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information specified in Table 3--
Material Incorporated by Reference, of this AD to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Viking Air Limited, VP Engineering, 9574 Hampden Road, Sidney,
British Columbia, Canada V8L 5V5; Telephone: 250.656.7227; Fax:
250.656.9702.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Table 3.--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin No. Pages Revision Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/ 1 through 304.......... Revision 3............. Released and dated
300) Corrosion Prevention and January 15, 2007
Control Manual PSM 1-6-5. (individual pages
dated as specified in
the List of Effective
Pages on pages 7
through 12 of the
document).
(ii) Viking Temporary Revision, C57- 1 through 3............ Temporary Revision No.: December 19, 2007.
10-18 (TR 2-2). 2-2.
(iii) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 1 through 2............ Temporary Revision No.: December 19, 2007.
3, Supplement 1 (TR 3-2). 3-2.
(iv) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 1 through 2............ Temporary Revision No.: December 19, 2007.
3, Supplement 1 (TR 3-3). 3-3.
(v) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 1 through 2............ Temporary Revision No.: December 19, 2007.
3, Supplement 1, (TR 3-4). 3-4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 12, 2008.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-13848 Filed 6-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.