AD 2008-04-04
final rule
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-400 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-401 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Bombardier Inc. | DHC-8-402 | Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
unsafe condition on an aviation product.
Affected Aircraft
Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8591-8593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E8-2626]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0183; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-146-AD;
Amendment 39-15376; AD 2008-04-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
There has been a reported case of failure of a bracket (P/N
85217732-108) of the over-centering spring assembly inside the
translating door of the forward baggage compartment. * * * Failure
of the bracket caused the eyebolt at the bottom of the spring
assembly to become loose, resulted in damage of the support beam
during normal door handle movement. Damage of the support beam,
which is dormant, in combination with failure of a doorstop attached
to any remaining undamaged support beam will degrade the structural
integrity of the door, resulting in possible depressurization or
loss of the door.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 20, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of March 20,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pong K. Lee, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7324; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 13, 2007
(72 FR 63827). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for
the specified products. The MCAI states:
There has been a reported case of failure of a bracket (P/N
85217732-108) of the over-centering spring assembly inside the
translating door of the forward baggage compartment. This condition
can exist on other translating doors on the aircraft. Investigation
concluded that an insufficient gap between the bottom eyebolt and
the barrel of the spring assembly caused an increase of tension load
on the bracket and resulted in subsequent failure of the bracket.
Failure of the bracket caused the eyebolt at the bottom of the
spring assembly to become loose, resulted in damage of the support
beam during normal door handle movement. Damage of the support beam,
which is dormant, in combination with failure of a doorstop attached
to any remaining undamaged support beam will degrade the structural
integrity of the door, resulting in possible depressurization or
loss of the door.
Corrective actions include a one-time inspection for damage of the
spring support bracket and support beam of the forward baggage door,
aft service door, and aft passenger door; repetitive inspections for
integrity (corrosion, damage, cracking, and looseness or misalignment)
of the doorstops of support beams found to be within damage limits;
repair of support beams, or replacement of damaged brackets, support
beams, or doorstops, as applicable; and removal of certain washers and
nuts. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the
AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 29 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 5 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $11,600, or $400 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
[[Page 8592]]
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-04-04 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment
39-15376. Docket No. FAA-2007-0183; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
146-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective March
20, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model DHC-8-400, DHC-8-401,
and DHC-8-402 airplanes; certificated in any category; having serial
numbers 4001 and 4003 through 4102.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52:
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
There has been a reported case of failure of a bracket (P/N
85217732-108) of the over-centering spring assembly inside the
translating door of the forward baggage compartment. This condition
can exist on other translating doors on the aircraft. Investigation
concluded that an insufficient gap between the bottom eyebolt and
the barrel of the spring assembly caused an increase of tension load
on the bracket and resulted in subsequent failure of the bracket.
Failure of the bracket caused the eyebolt at the bottom of the
spring assembly to become loose, resulted in damage of the support
beam during normal door handle movement. Damage of the support beam,
which is dormant, in combination with failure of a doorstop attached
to any remaining undamaged support beam will degrade the structural
integrity of the door, resulting in possible depressurization or
loss of the door.
Corrective actions include a one-time inspection for damage of the
spring support bracket and support beam of the forward baggage door,
aft service door, and aft passenger door; repetitive inspections for
integrity (corrosion, damage, cracking, and looseness or
misalignment) of the doorstops of support beams found to be within
damage limits; repair of support beams, or replacement of damaged
brackets, support beams, or doorstops, as applicable; and removal of
certain washers and nuts.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 1,000 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, perform a one-time inspection for damage of the spring support
bracket and support beams of the forward baggage door, aft service
door, and aft passenger door, as applicable, in accordance with
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-52-51, Revision A, dated September 8,
2006. Replace any damaged bracket, support beam, or doorstop in
accordance with the service bulletin, prior to further flight.
(i) If any support beam is damaged at only one spring location
and the damage is within the limits defined in Bombardier Repair
Drawing RD 8/4-52-202, Issue 1, dated December 2, 2005, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(i)(A) and (f)(1)(i)(B) of
this AD.
(A) Inspect each doorstop of the affected door for integrity in
accordance with the service bulletin prior to further flight, and
repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 400
flight hours, until the support beam is repaired as specified in
paragraph (f)(1)(i)(B) of this AD or replaced in accordance with the
service bulletin. If the doorstop does not meet integrity standards
during any inspection required by this paragraph, before further
flight, repair or replace the doorstop with a new or serviceable
doorstop in accordance with the repair drawing.
(B) Within 5,000 flight hours after accomplishing the inspection
described in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, repair the support beam in
accordance with the repair drawing or replace in accordance with the
service bulletin. Doing the repair or replacement terminates the
inspections required by paragraph (f)(1)(i)(A) of this AD.
(ii) If any support beam is damaged at one or two spring
locations and any damage exceeds the limits defined in Bombardier
Repair Drawing RD 8/4-52-202, Issue 1, dated December 2, 2005, prior
to further flight, replace the damaged support beam with a new
support beam in accordance with the service bulletin.
(iii) If any support beam is damaged at two spring locations and
the damage is within the limits defined in Bombardier Repair Drawing
RD 8/4-52-202, Issue 1, dated December 2, 2005, prior to further
flight, repair the support beam in accordance with the repair
drawing.
(2) Within 1,000 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, remove the nuts and washers at the bottom of the over-centering
spring assemblies of the forward baggage door, aft service door, and
aft passenger door by incorporating Modsum 4-155296, in accordance
with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-52-51, Revision A, dated
September 8, 2006.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Pong K. Lee, Aerospace
Engineer, New York ACO, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7324; fax (516) 794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the
AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in
the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the
[[Page 8593]]
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2007-05,
effective April 24, 2007; Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-52-51,
Revision A, dated September 8, 2006, including MHI Service Bulletin
8-MHI0084, Revision C, dated September 6, 2006; and Bombardier
Repair Drawing RD 8/4-52-202, Issue 1, dated December 2, 2005, for
related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-52-51, Revision
A, dated September 8, 2006; and Bombardier Repair Drawing RD 8/4-52-
202, Issue 1, dated December 2, 2005; as applicable; to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 7, 2008.
Kevin Hull,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-2626 Filed 2-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.