AD 2007-14-06
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| aircraft | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-100 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| aircraft | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-101 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| aircraft | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-200 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| aircraft | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-201 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| aircraft | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-212 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| appliance | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| appliance | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-100 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| appliance | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-101 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| appliance | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-200 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| appliance | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-201 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
| appliance | Aerotechnic Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH | Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH | Dornier 228-212 | Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances |
Unsafe Condition
The absence of isolation diodes in the Heading and Attitude Valid lines can prevent the valid flag from appearing even if a gyro fault exists, leading to erroneous navigation information.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Install isolation diodes into the signal lines to the TPU67A to prevent reverse feed of the valid lines.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after August 16, 2007.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II systems installed on DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH Models Dornier 228-100, Dornier 228-101, Dornier 228-200, Dornier 228-201, and Dornier 228-212 airplanes with Supplemental Type Certificate No. SA1310 installed prior to January 31, 2005.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 133 (Thursday, July 12, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38000-38002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E7-13249]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-27680 Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-026-AD;
Amendment 39-15128; AD 2007-14-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs-u. Service GmbH
Model Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II Systems Appliances
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
It was detected by the STC holder that in earlier installations
of the ACASII system there were no isolation diodes installed in the
Heading and Attitude Valid lines. The absence of an isolation diode
in the valid lines can prevent the valid flag to come up even if a
gyro fault exists. The problem has only been detected for Heading
Valid lines but could equally affect the Attitude Valid lines.
With installation of the ACASII, the heading and attitude valid
lines have to be connected to the TPU67A. On valid state, the
signals are +28VDC. On invalid, the signals are open. This condition
of direct connection (without an isolation diode installed) of the
valid lines to the TPU67A, if not corrected, could cause the TPU67A
to feed current into the open stated valid lines. This prevents the
flag to appear even if the gyro is invalid, providing the flight
crew with erroneous navigation information.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 16, 2007.
On August 16, 2007, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department
[[Page 38001]]
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 26, 2007 (72
FR 20780). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
It was detected by the STC holder that in earlier installations
of the ACASII system there were no isolation diodes installed in the
Heading and Attitude Valid lines. The absence of an isolation diode
in the valid lines can prevent the valid flag to come up even if a
gyro fault exists. The problem has only been detected for Heading
Valid lines but could equally affect the Attitude Valid lines.
With installation of the ACASII, the heading and attitude valid
lines have to be connected to the TPU67A. On valid state, the
signals are +28VDC. On invalid, the signals are open. This condition
of direct connection (without an isolation diode installed) of the
valid lines to the TPU67A, if not corrected, could cause the TPU67A
to feed current into the open stated valid lines. This prevents the
flag to appear even if the gyro is invalid, providing the flight
crew with erroneous navigation information.
For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the installation of isolation diodes into the signal lines
to the TPU67A to prevent reverse feed of the valid lines.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA is not aware of any airplanes on the U.S. Registry that
have the affected equipment installed. All airplanes with this
equipment included in the applicability of this rule currently are
operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign registry; therefore, they
are not directly affected by this AD action at this time. However, the
FAA considers this rule necessary to ensure that the unsafe condition
is addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes are
imported and placed on the U.S. Registry.
Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S.
Registry, accomplishment of the required action will take approximately
8 work-hours at an average labor rate of $80 per work-hour. Required
parts will cost about $50 per product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for these costs. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may incur
costs higher than estimated here.
Based on these figures, the total cost impact of this AD will be
$690 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2007-14-06 AEROTECHNIC Vertiebs -u. Service GmbH: Amendment 39-
15128; Docket No. FAA-2007-27680; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-
026-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
16, 2007.
[[Page 38002]]
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Honeywell CAS67A ACAS II systems that are
installed on, but not limited to, DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH Models
Dornier 228-100, Dornier 228-101, Dornier 228-200, Dornier 228-201,
and Dornier 228-212 airplanes that:
(1) Had Supplemental Type Certificate No. SA1310 installed prior
to January 31, 2005; and
(2) are certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 34:
Navigation.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
It was detected by the STC holder that in earlier installations
of the ACASII system there were no isolation diodes installed in the
Heading and Attitude Valid lines. The absence of an isolation diode
in the valid lines can prevent the valid flag to come up even if a
gyro fault exists. The problem has only been detected for Heading
Valid lines but could equally affect the Attitude Valid lines.
With installation of the ACASII, the heading and attitude valid
lines have to be connected to the TPU67A. On valid state, the
signals are +28VDC. On invalid, the signals are open. This condition
of direct connection (without an isolation diode installed) of the
valid lines to the TPU67A, if not corrected, could cause the TPU67A
to feed current into the open stated valid lines. This prevents the
flag to appear even if the gyro is invalid, providing the flight
crew with erroneous navigation information.
For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the installation of isolation diodes into the signal lines
to the TPU67A to prevent reverse feed of the valid lines.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, within the next 100 hours time-in-
service (TIS) after August 16, 2007 (the effective date of this AD),
modify the Honeywell CAS67A ACASII System Installation following
Aerotechnic Vertiebs -u. Service GmbH Service Bulletin No. DO228-
119780-0104, Revision 2, dated December 21, 2006.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Staff, FAA, ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2007-0059, dated March 5, 2007, and Aerotechnic Vertiebs -u. Service
GmbH Service Bulletin No. DO228-119780-0104, Revision 2, dated
December 21, 2006, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Aerotechnic Vertiebs -u. Service GmbH Service
Bulletin No. DO228-119780-0104 Revision 2, dated December 21, 2006,
to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
AEROTECHNIC Vertriebs-und Service GmbH, Baden Airpark, Montreal
Avenue D425, 77836 Rheinmuenster; telephone: +49 7229 66 2400;
facsimile: +49 7229 66 2409.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 29, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7-13249 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.