AD 2007-11-03
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Aviat | Various | Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH Model 228 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Cracks were found on the centre section of fuselage frame 19. Fuselage frame 19 supports the rear side of the main landing gear (MLG). This condition, if not corrected, could cause collapse of frame 19, leading to subsequent collapse of a MLG.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Visually inspect the affected fuselage frame 19 using the instructions in Dornier 228 RUAG Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-266. If any crack is found, contact RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH for FAA-approved repair instructions and incorporate the repair on the airplane before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Dornier 228-100, Dornier 228-101, Dornier 228-200, Dornier 228-201, Dornier 228-202, and Dornier 228-212 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28591-28592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E7-9600]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-27295 Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-013-AD;
Amendment 39-15060; AD 2007-11-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH Model 228 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During a maintenance inspection, cracks were found on the centre
section of fuselage frame 19. The investigation on the root cause is
still in progress. Fuselage frame 19 supports the rear side of the
main landing gear (MLG). This condition, if not corrected, could
cause collapse of frame 19, leading to subsequent collapse of a MLG.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June 26, 2007.
On June 26, 2007, the Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new process for streamlining the issuance
of ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined process will allow us to adopt
MCAI safety requirements in a more efficient manner and will reduce
safety risks to the public. This process continues to follow all FAA AD
issuance processes to meet legal, economic, Administrative Procedure
Act, and Federal Register requirements. We also continue to meet our
technical decision-making responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated products.
This AD references the MCAI and related service information that we
considered in forming the engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The AD contains text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain language principles.
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 16, 2007 (72
FR 12574). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states that:
During a maintenance inspection, cracks were found on the centre
section of fuselage frame 19. The investigation on the root cause is
still in progress. Fuselage frame 19 supports the rear side of the
main landing gear (MLG). This condition, if not corrected, could
cause collapse of frame 19, leading to subsequent collapse of a MLG.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that may exist or
develop on other aircraft of this type design, this Airworthiness
Directive (AD) requires a visual inspection of the affected fuselage
frame and, if discrepancies are found, reporting the results to the
TC holder. This is considered to be an interim action.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 19 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is
$80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $9,120 or $480 per product.
In addition, this AD may require follow-on actions. Because each
follow-on action is based on the damage found on the affected airplane,
we have no way of determining the cost of those follow-on actions or
the number of products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
[[Page 28592]]
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2007-11-03 Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH: Amendment 39-15060; Docket No.
FAA-2007-27295; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-013-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 26,
2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dornier 228-100, Dornier 228-101, Dornier
228-200, Dornier 228-201, Dornier 228-202, and Dornier 228-212
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During a maintenance inspection, cracks were found on the centre
section of fuselage frame 19. The investigation on the root cause is
still in progress. Fuselage frame 19 supports the rear side of the
main landing gear (MLG). This condition, if not corrected, could
cause collapse of frame 19, leading to subsequent collapse of a MLG.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that may exist or
develop on other aircraft of this type design, this Airworthiness
Directive (AD) requires a visual inspection of the affected fuselage
frame and, if discrepancies are found, reporting the results to the
TC holder. This is considered to be an interim action.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) For all airplanes, within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after the effective date of this AD, visually inspect the affected
fuselage frame 19 using the instructions in Dornier 228 RUAG Alert
Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-266, dated December 1, 2006.
(2) If any crack is found during the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, contact RUAG
Aerospace Services GmbH, Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. Box
1253, 82231 Wessling, Germany; telephone: +49-(0)8153-30-2280; fax:
+49-(0)8153-30-3030; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee8d9b9d9a81838b9c9d9b9e9e819c9ac08a819c80878b9cdcdcd6ae9c9b8f89c08d8183"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6c5d3d5d2c9cbc3d4d5d3d6d6c9d4d288c2c9d4c8cfc3d494949ee6d4d3c7c188c5c9cb">[email protected]</span></a> for
FAA-approved repair instructions and incorporate the repair on the
airplane.
Note 1: This is considered interim action. The State of Design
and DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH are looking at a possible repetitive
inspection program and/or modification program to address this
condition for the long-term. In the meantime, the FAA recommends
that you incorporate the above inspection into your regular
maintenance program.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
(1) The MCAI requires different compliance times for airplanes
operated in different conditions. The FAA is not able to enforce
compliance times based on airplane operations since there is no way
of determining the amount of operations in different conditions. To
ensure the unsafe condition is addressed adequately and timely, we
are requiring the inspection for all airplanes at 25 hours TIS.
(2) The MCAI allows flight with known cracks provided they do
not exceed a certain limit. FAA policy does not allow flight with
cracks in primary structure. Since the fuselage is considered
primary structure, we are mandating repair before further flight
after any crack is found.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Staff, FAA, ATTN: Karl Schletzabaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No: 2007-
0028, dated February 5, 2007; and Dornier 228 RUAG Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB-228-266, dated December 1, 2006, for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Dornier 228 RUAG Alert Service Bulletin No.
ASB-228-266, dated December 1, 2006, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact RUAG
Aerospace Services GmbH, Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. Box
1253, D-82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; telephone: 49
8153 302280.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 11, 2007.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-9600 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.