AD 2007-03-08
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Pilatus | Various | Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., PC-6 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | Aviat | Various | Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., PC-6 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Exfoliation corrosion in the fittings installed exterior to the bottom skin of the wing skin.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect the fittings for exfoliation corrosion. Replace any affected fittings as necessary.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., PC-6 Series Airplanes.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as the discovery of exfoliation corrosion in the fittings of some PC-6 airplanes. These fittings are installed exterior to the bottom skin of the wing skin. If not corrected, undetected corrosion in this area could lead to failure of the fitting and subsequent loss of control of the airplane. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 21 (Thursday, February 1, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4635-4637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E7-1494]
[[Page 4635]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-25929 Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-54-AD;
Amendment 39-14919; AD 2007-03-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., PC-6 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as the
discovery of exfoliation corrosion in the fittings of some PC-6
airplanes. These fittings are installed exterior to the bottom skin of
the wing skin. If not corrected, undetected corrosion in this area
could lead to failure of the fitting and subsequent loss of control of
the airplane. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 8, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of March 8,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust Street, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new process for streamlining the issuance
of ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined process will allow us to adopt
MCAI safety requirements in a more efficient manner and will reduce
safety risks to the public. This process continues to follow all FAA AD
issuance processes to meet legal, economic, Administrative Procedure
Act, and Federal Register requirements. We also continue to meet our
technical decision-making responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated products.
This AD references the MCAI and related service information that we
considered in forming the engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The AD contains text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain language principles.
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 3, 2006 (71
FR 64653). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections of the
wing strut fitting and the replacement of corroded wing strut fittings
with new retrofit wing strut fittings.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Comment Issue: Summary
Clay Lacy asks if there is a planned hourly minimum or just
calendar time for the compliance. He notes that he has a PC-6 that was
built by Fairchild in 1967, has only 1,600 hours total time, and has
always been hangared. Mr. Lacy added, ``We have never detected any
corrosion at any location.''
We are relying on the Federal Office for Civil Aviation (FOCA),
which is the state of design authority, and the manufacturer's
(Pilatus) determination that calendar time compliance for this type of
corrosion inspection is appropriate. The FOCA AD requires a one-time
inspection, and the corresponding service bulletin (SB) states the
required repetitive inspection will be included in Chapter 5 of the
Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM). Both initial and repetitive
compliance times are specified in calendar time. We do not have
information for this issue to correlate between Time-In-Service (TIS)
and calendar time.
Comment Issue: What Prompted AD
Clay Lacy states if possible he would like more information that
prompted this proposed AD.
Further information on what prompted this proposed AD may be found
in the Docket Management System (DMS). This action was initiated as a
result of FOCA AD HB-2006-400. We have checked the DMS and this
document is electronically available.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the AD, and take precedence over
the actions copied from the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 49 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take 27 work-hours per product
to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $2,500 per wing per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these parts.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$350,840 or $7,160 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation
[[Page 4636]]
is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2007-03-08 Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., PC-6 Series Airplanes: Amendment
39-14919; Docket No. FAA-2006-25929; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-
54-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective March 8,
2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Models PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-H2, PC-6/350,
PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2,
PC-6/B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/C1-H2
airplanes; manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 101 through 949, MSN
951, and MSN 2001 through 2092; that are certificated in any
category. These airplanes are also identified as Fairchild Republic
Company PC-6 airplanes, Fairchild Industries PC-6 airplanes,
Fairchild Heli Porter PC-6 airplanes, or Fairchild-Hiller
Corporation PC-6 airplanes.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states that exfoliation corrosion in the fittings of some PC-6
airplanes was found. These fittings are installed exterior to the
bottom skin of the wing skin. If not corrected, undetected corrosion
in this area could lead to failure of the fitting and subsequent
loss of control of the airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD and
repetitively thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12 months,
perform an inspection required by paragraph 3.B.(2) of PILATUS PC-6
Service Bulletin (SB) No. 57-003, dated June 13, 2006, of the
fittings Part Number (P/N) 6102.0041.00, P/N 111.35.06.055 or P/N
111.35.06.056 for signs of corrosion. Repair of minor surface
corrosion is permitted according to the Repair and Overhaul Manual
(ROM) (Report No. 1391), Chap. 2 and 4. Corrosion outside these
limits is not permitted.
(2) If during any of the inspections required by paragraph
(e)(1) of this AD, any minor surface corrosion is found, prior to
further flight, remove the minor surface corrosion (Ref. ROM. Chap.
2 and 4).
(3) If during any of the inspections required by paragraph
(e)(1) of this AD, any corrosion out of limits is found (Ref. ROM,
Chap. 2 and 4), prior to further flight, replace the fittings in
accordance with paragraph 4 of PILATUS PC-6 SB No. 57-003, dated
June 13, 2006, with new (retrofit) fittings P/N 111.35.06.185 and/or
P/N 111.35.06.186.
(4) Replacement of the fittings with new (improved) fittings P/N
111.35.06.185 (left hand side) and/or 111.35.06.186 (right hand
side) terminates the repetitive inspection for that side.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
(1) The FAA AD is requiring repetitive inspections, not just a
one-time inspection as required in the MCAI.
(2) The Service Bulletin specifies ``subsequent inspections for
corrosion will be included in Chapter 5 of the Aircraft Maintenance
Manual (AMM).'' The only way we (FAA) can mandate these repetitive
inspections is through an AD.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(f) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Staff, FAA, ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et.seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(g) Refer to FOCA AD HB-2006-400, effective date September 28,
2006, which references Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. SB No. 57-003, dated
June 13, 2006, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use PILATUS PC-6 Service Bulletin (SB) No. 57-003,
dated June 13, 2006, to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans,
Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 63 19; fax: +41 41 619 6224.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
[[Page 4637]]
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 24, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7-1494 Filed 1-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.