AD 2006-16-11
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-700 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-700 and 737-800 Series Airplanes |
| aircraft | The Boeing Company | 737-800 Series | Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-700 and 737-800 Series Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracks discovered during a full-scale fatigue test conducted by the manufacturer, which could result in more extensive fatigue cracking and lead to possible loss of cabin pressure.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for cracking of the backup intercostals located above the cutout for the forward airstair door. If any crack is found, do related investigative and corrective actions before further flight. If no crack is found, do other specified corrective actions as per Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1236, Revision 1.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 4,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, or before the accumulation of 24,000 total flight cycles, whichever comes later.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Boeing Model 737-700 and 737-800 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1236, Revision 1, dated November 10, 2005.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737-700 and 737-800 series airplanes. This AD requires performing a one-time high frequency eddy current inspection for cracking of the backup intercostals located above the cutout for the forward airstair door; doing related investigative and corrective actions if any crack is found; and doing other specified corrective actions if no crack is found. This AD results from a report of fatigue cracks discovered during a full-scale fatigue test conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking, which could result in more extensive fatigue cracking and lead to possible loss of cabin pressure.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45367-45368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: E6-12825]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-24698; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-026-AD;
Amendment 39-14711; AD 2006-16-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-700 and 737-800 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-700 and 737-800 series airplanes. This AD
requires performing a one-time high frequency eddy current inspection
for cracking of the backup intercostals located above the cutout for
the forward airstair door; doing related investigative and corrective
actions if any crack is found; and doing other specified corrective
actions if no crack is found. This AD results from a report of fatigue
cracks discovered during a full-scale fatigue test conducted by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct such
cracking, which could result in more extensive fatigue cracking and
lead to possible loss of cabin pressure.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 13, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of September 13,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for service information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6430; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain Boeing Model
737-700 and 737-800 series airplanes. That NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on May 9, 2006 (71 FR 26873). That NPRM proposed to
require performing a one-time high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection for cracking of the backup intercostals located above the
cutout for the forward airstair door; doing related investigative and
corrective actions if any crack is found; and doing other specified
corrective actions if no crack is found.
Comment
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the single comment received.
The commenter, Boeing, supports the NPRM.
Clarification to NPRM
The first reference to Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-53-1236, Revision 1, dated November 10, 2005, in paragraph (f) of
the NPRM was unintentionally omitted, and has been added to that
paragraph of this AD.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comment received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously.
We have determined that this change will neither increase the economic
burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 146 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD will affect about 54 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The required HFEC inspection will take about 2 work hours per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $8,640, or
$160 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 45368]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2006-16-11 Boeing: Amendment 39-14711. Docket No. FAA-2006-24698;
Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-026-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective September 13, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-700 and 737-800 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1236, Revision 1, dated
November 10, 2005.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of fatigue cracks discovered
during a full-scale fatigue test conducted by the manufacturer. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking, which could
result in more extensive fatigue cracking and lead to possible loss
of cabin pressure.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection of Backup Intercostals
(f) Before the accumulation of 24,000 total flight cycles, or
within 4,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever comes later: Perform a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection for cracking of the backup intercostals located above the
cutout for the forward airstair door, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-53-1236, Revision 1, dated November 10, 2005; and,
before further flight, do related investigative actions and
applicable corrective actions if any crack is found, and other
specified corrective actions if no crack is found. Related
investigative actions, applicable corrective actions, and other
specified corrective actions must be done in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-53-1236, Revision 1, dated November 10, 2005; except
where the service bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions, repair all cracks using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD.
Actions Accomplished Using Original Issue of Service Bulletin
(g) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1236, dated July 11,
2002, are considered acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
53-1236, Revision 1, dated November 10, 2005, to perform the actions
that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124-2207, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet
at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html</a>.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 31, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-12825 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.