AD 2006-12-09
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | BAE | 146 146-RJ | Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Frame corrosion and cracking were later found during scheduled maintenance in the two forward fuselage frames 15 and 18, despite previous inspections revealing no damage.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Inspect frames 15, 18, 41, and 43 using high-frequency eddy current and detailed methods for signs of corrosion, including cracks, blistering, or flaking paint. Perform applicable related investigative/corrective actions if any discrepancy is found before further flight.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within the compliance times specified in the service bulletin (ISB.53-182).
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
All BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -300A series airplanes; and Model Avro 146-RJ70A, 146-RJ85A, and 146-RJ100A airplanes, certificated in any category.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD), which applies to certain BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ airplanes. That AD currently requires one-time inspections of the inner webs and flanges at frames 15, 18, 41, and 43 for evidence of corrosion or cracking; and corrective actions if necessary. This new AD instead requires new repetitive inspections and expands the area to be inspected. This new AD also expands the applicability and provides an optional action that would extend the repetitive inspection interval. This AD results from a report indicating that in some cases the inspections required by the existing AD revealed no damage, yet frame corrosion and cracking were later found during scheduled maintenance in the two forward fuselage frames 15 and 18. We are issuing this AD to prevent reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 112 (Monday, June 12, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33602-33604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 06-5206]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-23284; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-163-AD;
Amendment 39-14634; AD 2006-12-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), which applies to certain BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ airplanes. That AD currently requires one-time
inspections of the inner webs and flanges at frames 15, 18, 41, and 43
for evidence of corrosion or cracking; and corrective actions if
necessary. This new AD instead requires new repetitive inspections and
expands the area to be inspected. This new AD also expands the
applicability and provides an optional action that would extend the
repetitive inspection interval. This AD results from a report
indicating that in some cases the inspections required by the existing
AD revealed no damage, yet frame corrosion and cracking were later
found during scheduled maintenance in the two forward fuselage frames
15 and 18. We are issuing this AD to prevent reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July 17, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of July 17,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
Contact British Aerospace Regional Aircraft American Support, 13850
Mclearen Road, Herndon, Virginia 20171, for service information
identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a> or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD 2004-01-07, amendment
39-13421 (69 FR 869, January 7, 2004). The existing AD applies to
certain BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ
airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December
13, 2005 (70 FR 73665). That NPRM proposed to continue to require
inspections of certain inner webs and flanges for signs of corrosion
(including cracks, blistering, or flaking paint), and corrective action
if necessary. That NPRM also proposed to add repetitive inspections,
expand the area to be inspected, expand the applicability, and provide
an optional action that would extend the proposed repetitive inspection
interval.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comment that has been
received on the NPRM.
Request To Require Revised Service Information
Air Wisconsin requests that we delay issuing the final rule until
the manufacturer revises Inspection Service Bulletin (ISB) ISB.53-182,
dated March 16, 2005 (cited in the NPRM). The commenter reports that
BAE plans to revise the ISB to extend the inspection area after recent
inspection data revealed evidence of corrosion cracking on some frame
outer flanges. The commenter states that delaying issuance of the final
rule would allow time to determine whether the revised ISB better
addresses the identified unsafe condition. The commenter adds that it
just makes more sense in regards to cost effectiveness and
airworthiness safety for operators to perform the most thorough and up-
to-date inspection on their airplanes.
We acknowledge the commenter's concern, but we do not agree to
delay the issuance of the final rule. Release of a revised service
bulletin is not imminent. To delay this action would be inappropriate
because we have determined that an unsafe condition exists. However, we
may consider further rulemaking in the future to expand the inspection
area if warranted. In light of the identified unsafe condition,
however, we consider it appropriate to proceed with this final rule as
proposed.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comment that has been submitted, and determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this AD.
[[Page 33603]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Average Cost per U.S.-
Action Work hours labor rate Parts cost airplane registered Fleet cost
per hour airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HFEC inspection, per 5 $65 None............ $325 55 $17,875
inspection cycle.
Detailed inspection, per 3 65 None............ 195 55 10,725
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
removing amendment 39-13421 (69 FR 869, January 7, 2004) and by adding
the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2006-12-09 BAE Systems (Operations) Limited (Formerly British
Aerospace Regional Aircraft): Amendment 39-14634. Docket No. FAA-
2005-23284; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-163-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective July 17, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2004-01-07.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Model BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -300A series airplanes; and Model
Avro 146-RJ70A, 146-RJ85A, and 146-RJ100A airplanes; certificated in
any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating that in some cases
the inspections required by AD 2004-01-07 revealed no damage, yet
frame corrosion and cracking were later found during scheduled
maintenance in the two forward fuselage frames 15 and 18. We are
issuing this AD to prevent reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections
(f) Use high-frequency eddy current and detailed methods to
inspect for signs of corrosion (including cracks, blistering, or
flaking paint) of frames 15, 18, 41, and 43, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-182, dated March 16, 2005.
Inspect at the applicable time specified in 1.D. ``Compliance'' of
the service bulletin. Application of corrosion-preventive treatment,
in accordance with the service bulletin, extends the repetitive
inspection interval, as specified in Table 2 in 1.D. ``Compliance''
of the service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Corrective Action
(g) If any discrepancy is found during any inspection required
by paragraph (f) of this AD: Before further flight, perform
applicable related investigative/corrective actions in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53-182, dated March 16,
2005, except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
(h) If the service bulletin referenced in this AD specifies to
contact the manufacturer for appropriate action, before further
flight, repair per a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the Civil
Aviation Authority (or its delegated agent).
(i) Although the service bulletin referenced in this AD
specifies to submit information to the manufacturer, this AD does
not include such a requirement.
(j) Where the service bulletin specifies a compliance time after
the issuance of the service bulletin, this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD. And where the service bulletin specifies a compliance time
``since date of construction'' of the airplane, this AD requires
compliance since the date of issuance of the original standard
airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the original
export certificate of airworthiness.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
[[Page 33604]]
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(l) British airworthiness directive G-2005-0019, dated July 6,
2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53-182, dated March 16, 2005, to perform the
actions that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this document in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact British Aerospace Regional
Aircraft American Support, 13850 Mclearen Road, Herndon, Virginia
20171, for a copy of this service information. You may review copies
at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at <a href="http://dms.dot.gov">http://dms.dot.gov</a>; or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/">http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/</a>
code--of--federal--regulations/ ibr--locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31, 2006.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 06-5206 Filed 6-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 4, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.